Baum, Christian L.

Abstract Objective To evaluate the clinical value of breast MRI in radiation-associated angiosarcoma of the breast (RAASB) for assessing disease extent at diagnosis and after neoadjuvant therapy compared with clinical examination and surgical pathology. Methods This IRB-approved retrospective study included 25 patients with breast MRIs between1995 and 2020. MRI estimated disease extent was compared to clinical exam and surgical pathology. MRI findings were evaluated for additional disease and impact on clinical management. Agreement between MRI and clinical assessment of disease was evaluated using Cohen’s kappa statistic. Results Baseline MRI demonstrated moderate agreement with clinical disease extent (Cohen’s κ = 0.44; 95% CI, 0.14-0.75). Thirteen of 24 (54%) of MRIs reflected clinical exam, 4/24 (17%) MRIs underestimated disease, and 5/24 (21%) MRIs overestimated disease. Baseline MRI changed surgical management in 4/24 (17%). In 8 patients who proceeded directly to surgery, MRI reflected pathology in 6/8 (75%). In 10 patients with post-neoadjuvant MRI, 4/10 (40%) pathology and MRI extent were similar, 5/10 (50%) MRI overestimated disease, and 1/10 (10%) MRI underestimated disease. Conclusion MRI has clinical value in assessing RAASB with the potential for significantly altering surgical management. In this small cohort, post-neoadjuvant MRI demonstrated limited additional clinical value. Larger studies are needed to define the optimal role and timing of post-neoadjuvant MRI. Advances in knowledge Baseline MRI detected additional disease not identified on initial clinical exam in 5/24 (21%) and changed surgical management in 4/24 (17%). Although baseline MRI demonstrated moderate agreement with clinical examination, post-neoadjuvant MRI frequently overestimated residual disease when compared with final pathology.

ImportanceCutaneous squamous cell carcinoma (CSCC) is the second most common malignant disease in the US. Although it typically carries a good prognosis, a subset of CSCCs are highly aggressive, carrying regional and distant metastatic potential. Due to its high incidence, this aggressive subset is responsible for considerable mortality, with an overall annual mortality estimated to equal or even surpass melanoma. Despite this morbidity, CSCC is excluded from national cancer registries, making it difficult to study its epidemiology and outcomes. Therefore, the bulk of the CSCC literature is composed of single-center and multi-institutional retrospective cohort analyses. Given variations in reporting measures and analyses in these studies, interpretability between studies and the ability to pool results are limited.ObjectiveTo define standardized reporting measures for retrospective CSCC studies.FindingsAn expert panel was convened to determine standardized guidelines for recording and analyzing retrospective CSCC data. A total of 13 dermatologists and dermatologic surgeons with more than 5 years of posttraining experience and considerable experience with performing CSCC outcomes research were recruited to the panel. Consensus recommendations were achieved for CSCC retrospective study reporting measures, definitions, and analyses.Conclusions and RelevanceThe recommendations in this report present the potential to standardize future CSCC retrospective studies. With such standardization, future work may have greater interstudy interpretability and allow for pooled analyses.

AbstractBackgroundPrevious literature on cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma (cSCC) suggests that the incidence, rate of metastasis, and tumour severity of cSCC are higher in immunosuppressed patients than in immunocompetent patients. However, current literature lacks an extensive comparison of cSCC clinical characteristics and outcomes in immunosuppressed patients.ObjectivesWe compared cSCC tumour characteristics and disease‐related outcomes to help guide the clinical management of immunosuppressed patients.MethodsWe conducted a retrospective review of histopathologic and clinical data from 935 cSCC cases (19.5% immunosuppressed) from the Mayo Clinic.ResultsImmunosuppression was associated with younger age (69.3 vs. 74.8 years old, p < 0.0001), male gender (78.6% vs. 67.2%, p = 0.003), and higher grade cSCC tumour characterized by moderate or poor differentiation (25.7% vs. 15.8%, p = 0.009; 9.2% vs. 7.2%, p = 0.009, respectively). No significant differences were found in other tumour characteristics, including clinical tumour dimension, Brigham and Women's Hospital tumour staging or cumulative risk of metastasis and recurrence. Immunosuppressed patients had an increased risk of disease‐specific death on univariate analysis (hazard ratio [HR] [95% confidence interval, CI] 2.05 [1.13–3.74], p = 0.0128). Overall survival in the immunosuppressed population was worse (adjusted HR [95% CI] 1.83 [1.42–2.35], p < 0.001) and, notably, solid organ transplant recipients had the lowest overall survival when stratifying immunosuppressed patients by immunosuppression type (HR [95% CI] 1.62 [1.17–2.24], p < 0.0001).ConclusionsIn our study, immunosuppression status was predictive of poor differentiation of tumours and a reduction in overall and cSCC‐specific survival. Current staging systems for cSCC do not include immunosuppression as a risk factor and incorporating immune status may be beneficial for accurate risk stratification.

7577 Background: Prior research has consistently shown that patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) have an ~2-fold increased risk of developing melanoma compared to controls. MBL is a common condition affecting 8-10 million adults over the age of 40 years in the United States and is a precursor to CLL. Little is known about the association between MBL and melanoma. Herein, we evaluated the risk of incident melanoma in a large cohort of individuals screened for MBL. Methods: Participants from the Mayo Clinic Biobank who had no prior history of hematologic malignancy, were 40 years or older, were residents of counties surrounding Mayo Clinic, and who provided blood samples between 7/2009 and 4/2022 were included in the study. Peripheral blood mononuclear cells were screened for MBL using highly sensitive eight-color flow cytometry. Individuals with MBL were classified as CLL-like MBL (CD5+, CD20dim) or atypical MBL (CD5+, CD20+) based on immunophenotypes, and also classified as low-count MBL (LCMBL) or high-count MBL (HCMBL) based on whether the percent clonal B-cell count was < 85% or ≥85%, respectively. Diagnosis of melanoma was ascertained using ICD codes and review of the electronic health records. All individuals were followed from date of sample upon which MBL screening was performed to the earliest of incident melanoma, loss to follow-up, withdrawal from the study, or September 30, 2022. We used Cox regression to estimate hazard ratios (HR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI), adjusting for age, sex, and history of melanoma in previous 5 years. Results: A total of 7,334 participants were screened for MBL, of which 1,151 (16%) individuals had MBL. Among those with MBL, 1,107 (96.2%) had CLL-like MBL and 1098 (95.4%) had LC MBL. The median age at entry into the MBL screening cohort was 67 years (range 40-101) and 37% were male; individuals with MBL were older (median age 72 vs 65 years) and male (49% vs 35%). After a median follow-up of 2.9 years (range 0-13.2), 121 of the 7,334 (1.6%) participants developed incident melanoma after the date of MBL screening. The 10-year cumulative incidence of melanoma among individuals with MBL was 7.8% (95% CI 4.5-13.5%) compared to 3.4% (2.7-4.4%) in those who screened negative for MBL. After adjusting for age, sex, and history of prior melanoma, we found a 1.81-fold increased risk of incident melanoma (95% CI 1.19-2.76) among individuals with MBL. The increased risk of melanoma persisted when the analysis was restricted to individuals with LCMBL (HR = 1.84; 95% CI 1.21-2.82). Conclusions: In the largest MBL screening cohort to date, we found that LCMBL, a common condition, was associated with an 84% elevated risk of melanoma, similar to the ~2-fold increased risk observed in patients with CLL. These data, together with our prior findings of a heightened risk of serious infections and lymphoid malignancies, suggest that individuals with LCMBL are at increased risk for adverse health outcomes.

Abstract Purpose: To evaluate the impact of trimodality treatment versus monotherapy or dual therapy for radiation-associated angiosarcoma of the breast (RAASB) after prior breast cancer treatment. Experimental Design: With Institutional Review Board approval, we identified patients diagnosed with RAASB and abstracted data on disease presentation, treatment, and oncologic outcomes. Trimodality therapy included (i) taxane induction, (ii) concurrent taxane/radiation, and then (iii) surgical resection with wide margins. Results: A total of 38 patients (median age 69 years) met inclusion criteria. Sixteen received trimodality therapy and 22 monotherapy/dual therapy. Skin involvement and disease extent were similar in both groups. All trimodality patients required reconstructive procedures for wound closure/coverage, compared with 48% of monotherapy/dual therapy patients (P &lt; 0.001). Twelve of 16 (75%) patients receiving trimodality therapy had a pathologic complete response (pCR). With median follow-up of 5.6 years, none had local recurrence, 1 patient (6%) had distant recurrence, and no patients died. Among 22 patients in the monotherapy/dual therapy group, 10 (45%) had local recurrence, 8 (36%) had distant recurrence, and 7 (32%) died of disease. Trimodality therapy demonstrated significantly better 5-year recurrence-free survival [RFS; 93.8% vs. 42.9%; P = 0.004; HR, 7.6 (95% confidence interval, CI: 1.3–44.2)]. Combining all patients with RAASB regardless of treatment, local recurrence was associated with subsequent distant recurrence (HR, 9.0; P = 0.002); distant recurrence developed in 3 of 28 (11%) patients without local recurrence compared with 6 of 10 (60%) with local recurrence. The trimodality group had more surgical complications that required reoperation or prolonged healing. Conclusions: Trimodality therapy for RAASB was more toxic but is promising, with a high rate of pCR, durable local control, and improved RFS.

AbstractBackgroundMerkel cell carcinoma (MCC) is a rare, aggressive cutaneous malignancy that usually occurs in the head/neck or extremities. However, there are reports of MCC developing in the lymph nodes or parotid gland without evidence of a primary cutaneous lesion.MethodsWe reviewed 415 patients with biopsy‐proven MCC. Patients with MCC of unknown primary (n = 37, 9%, MCCUP) made up the study cohort. The primary endpoints of the study were rate of recurrence, disease‐free survival, and overall survival.ResultsPatients with MCCUP presented with tumors in lymph nodes (n = 34) or parotid gland (n = 3). Nodal disease was most commonly detected in the inguinal/external iliac (n = 15) or axillary (n = 14) regions. The mean age at diagnosis was 70 years and 24% were female. Patients presented with distant metastases in 24.3% of cases. Patients with stage IIIA disease treated with regional lymph node dissection (RLND) had a lower risk of disease recurrence (hazard ratio 0.26, p = 0.046). Recurrence‐free survival was 59.3% at 5 years. Disease‐specific survival was 63.3% at 5 years.ConclusionPatients with MCCUP have a high risk of recurrence and mortality. The optimal treatment for MCCUP has yet to be elucidated, although therapeutic RLND appears beneficial for these patients.