Akpala, Christeebella O.

Follicular occlusion disorders (FOD) represent a tetrad of chronic, recurrent inflammatory conditions united by a common pathophysiologic mechanism: follicular hyperkeratosis leading to occlusion, rupture, and subsequent abscess or sinus tract formation. First conceptualized as a triad in the 1950s and later expanded to a tetrad in the 1970s, this grouping includes hidradenitis suppurativa (HS), acne conglobata (AC), dissecting cellulitis of the scalp (DCS), and pilonidal sinus (PS). Despite their shared pathogenesis, each condition carries distinct clinical features, epidemiological profiles, and management considerations. This article aims to provide a comprehensive review of FOD, with a primary emphasis on HS (the most prevalent of the disorders). Hidradenitis suppurativa is a debilitating disease affecting ∼1% of the global population, predominantly in females, and the diagnosis is often delayed by 7 or more years. Multiple genes are linked to FOD patients with a positive familial history in 35% to 40%, along with lifestyle factors (smoking, alcohol consumption, and obesity). Key inflammatory mediators, including TNF-α, IL-1β, and IL-17, drive the chronic tissue destruction characteristic of FOD, frequently resulting in scarring, lymphedema, and significant psychosocial impairment. Wound care is critical and often underemphasized in disease management. This article outlines evidence-informed wound care strategies for both nonsurgical and postsurgical presentations, including dressing selection, exudate and odor management, pain and itch control, infection management, and the emerging role of intravenous ertapenem as rescue therapy. An interprofessional approach, integrating dermatology, surgery, wound care nursing, and psychosocial support, is emphasized throughout as essential to improving patient outcomes and quality of life. GENERAL PURPOSE: To increase clinicians’ understanding of follicular occlusion disorders including the associated risk factors, clinical manifestations, and evidence-based approaches for management. TARGET AUDIENCE: This continuing education activity is intended for physicians, physician assistants, nurse practitioners, and registered nurses with an interest in skin and wound care. LEARNING OBJECTIVES/OUTCOMES: After participating in this educational activity, the participant will: Assess clinical characteristics of each follicular occlusion disorder Evaluate the basic disease mechanisms for follicular occlusion disorders Describe principal disease burdens that require wound care attention Identify the unique wound care strategies and follicular occlusion disorder challenges JOURNAL/aswca/04.03/00129334-202610000-00004/figure1/v/2026-09-18T181327Z/r/image-jpeg

Abstract Background Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have transformed cancer treatment by targeting immune checkpoints such as PD‐1, PDL‐1, and CTLA‐4, but concerns about severe immune‐related adverse events persist. The scarcity of literature on dermatologic implications, especially severe reactions such as Stevens‐Johnson syndrome (SJS) and toxic epidermal necrolysis (TEN), highlights the urgent need for investigation. Objective Our systematic review aims to address the gap in relevant literature by extensively examining the epidemiologic risk factors and management of SJS/TEN‐like illnesses in ICI‐treated patients to provide insights for risk assessment and clinical care. Method s We identified 158 case reports that detailed the incidence of SJS/TEN in patients being treated with ICIs, examining demographic patterns, type of malignancy, clinical characteristics, and treatments linked to onset. We assessed mortality rates, risk elements, and the effectiveness of interventions to help guide clinical care. Results Analysis of 158 case reports revealed that SJS/TEN in ICI users is typically seen on average at the age of 63 and is more common in males. PD1 inhibitors such as nivolumab and pembrolizumab are often associated with various mucocutaneous patterns and significant risks with ICI use, especially TEN, which is linked to high morbidity and mortality rates. Limitations Our study notes limitations due to the inclusion of case reports or case series, such as potential publication and reporting biases, leading to skewed findings. Additionally, because of the heterogeneous reporting standards, the retrospective nature limits phenotypic precision, control for confounding variables, and data completeness. Conclusion Our study provides valuable insights into the epidemiology, clinical features, management strategies, and outcomes of ICI‐induced SJS/TEN, underscoring the importance of vigilant monitoring and personalized risk assessment in oncology practice. Continued research efforts are essential to optimize patient outcomes and enhance the safety profile of ICIs in cancer therapy.

AbstractBackgroundThere is a dearth of studies investigating the efficacy of hydroxychloroquine in the treatment of either anogenital lichen sclerosus or extragenital lichen sclerosus, a condition that, if left untreated, could lead to a greater degree of scarring and malignant transformation.ObjectiveThis study aims to analyze the demographic characteristics, clinicopathological features, treatment response, and outcomes of patients diagnosed with either anogenital or extragenital lichen sclerosus who received hydroxychloroquine therapy.MethodsA retrospective analysis was conducted involving 70 patients diagnosed with lichen sclerosus who underwent treatment with hydroxychloroquine at our institution between 2018 and 2023.ResultsAmong the cohort, 67 patients were female, and 3 were male. Extragenital lichen sclerosus was diagnosed in 23 patients, with 16 exhibiting concomitant morphea overlap. Itching was the predominant clinical presentation (67%). A notable proportion of patients (36%) had a connective tissue disorder, prompting hydroxychloroquine therapy. Among the 30 patients treated solely for lichen sclerosus, 21 demonstrated response and 9 had no response. From a broader comparison of response to hydroxychloroquine, the overall anogenital response rate was 84.6% as opposed to 50% in extragenital lichen sclerosus. The median time to initial response was 4 months. Adverse effects, predominantly mild, were observed in 10 (14.3%) patients.LimitationThis study is constrained by its retrospective nature and reliance on data from a single center, resulting in a limited sample size.ConclusionHydroxychloroquine demonstrates promise as a therapeutic option for anogenital lichen sclerosus because of its favorable response rates and low incidence of adverse effects. However, further investigations, including larger‐scale or prospective studies, are imperative to ascertain its definitive efficacy.