Samadder, N. Jewel

Background/Objectives: Multi-cancer detection (MCD) tests have emerged as a promising tool to redefine the landscape of early cancer detection. Implementation of this novel technology will likely fall to primary care clinicians (PCC). The purpose of this study is to characterize and explore differences in PCCs perceptions and preferences towards MCD testing. Methods: Between March and May of 2023, this cross-sectional survey was administered to 281 PCCs, including physicians and advanced care providers practicing within an integrated healthcare system spanning five states. The survey collected data on self-reported characteristics, perceptions of MCD testing, and preferences for learning about MCD testing. Analysis was limited to those with no prior experience with MCD testing (N = 181, response rate 22.8%). Descriptive statistics summarized key variables and chi-square tests assessed differences in perceptions and preferences by key characteristics. Results: Most PCCs were interested in MCD testing (66.3%), but limited knowledge/awareness of MCD testing and confidence to manage patients with a positive test were observed, along with concerns around cost (76.7%) and misuse/poor implementation. The primary preferences for learning about MCD testing were online courses or classroom instruction (64.5%). Significant differences in perceptions and preferences for learning were observed by location, degree, and years in practice. Conclusions: PCCs in our study held positive views towards MCD testing, but gaps and variation in knowledge and confidence towards MCD testing and concerns around the cost and misuse/poor implementation were observed. While efforts to train and educate all PCCs on MCD testing is a critical first step, more research is needed to understand how best to support implementation tailored to individual and system-level needs and characteristics.

Patients with familial adenomatous polyposis (FAP) are at increased risk of developing cancer, with the most common sites being colorectal, duodenal/ampullary and thyroid. In the last decade, an alarming increase in gastric cancer has been reported in the Western FAP population. These cancers are often diagnosed at an advanced stage with poor prognosis, even in patients undergoing regular upper endoscopic surveillance. Most gastric cancers in Western patients with FAP occur in the proximal stomach, where a carpeting of fundic gland polyposis hampers visualization of gastric cancer and its precursor lesions during endoscopic surveillance. Although fundic gland polyps are the most prevalent proximal polyp, several different dysplastic lesions can be found in the stomachs of patients with FAP. including fundic gland polyps with dysplasia, foveolar-type adenomas, pyloric gland adenomas, and intestinal-type adenomas. Although adenomas are the most likely precursors to gastric cancer, the exact lesions responsible for gastric cancer in FAP are not yet fully understood. This review focuses on gastric polyposis and the characteristics of gastric cancer in Western patients with FAP, including risk factors, lesion detection, surveillance and management of gastric polyposis, and areas for future research.

Sarcomas are rare heterogenous mesenchymal tumors with over seventy-five different subtypes, with varying biology and outcomes, with no clear inciting factor in the vast majority. To determine the prevalence of pathogenic germline variants (PGV) in patients with sarcomas, we undertook a prospective multi-site study of germline sequencing using an 84-gene next-generation sequencing panel among patients receiving care at the four Mayo Clinic Cancer Centers. Of 115 patients with bone and soft tissue sarcoma, the median age was 60 years, 49.6% were female, 82.6% were White. The anatomical location of the primary tumor included extremities (34.8%), retroperitoneum (19.1%), trunk (13.0%), and head and neck (7.8%). Family history of cancer was present in 62.6% of the study population. Ten patients (8.7%) had a pathogenic/likely pathogenic variant (PGV). Of these, three had stage IV sarcoma, and seven had earlier-stage sarcoma (stages I–III). Among the 55 (48.7%) patients who had variant of uncertain significance (VUS), 41.1% (22/55) had stage IV sarcoma and 58.9% (33/55) had earlier-stage disease. Of the ten patients with PGV, high-to-moderate penetrance gene abnormalities were identified in eight patients (80%) involving TP53 (3), BRCA1 (1), SDHA (1), ATM (2), and NBN (1) genes. The vast majority of the PGVs (70%) would not have been detected using the current guidelines. Because of the paucity of sarcomas and lack of effective treatment options for advanced disease, germline testing in sarcomas represents a potentially impactful strategy to assess therapeutic options and for assessment of familial risk.

Multigene panel testing has allowed for the detection of a growing number of inherited pathogenic/likely pathogenic variants in people at high risk of cancer, including endometrial cancer (EC). Hereditary syndromes associated with EC include Lynch syndrome, PTEN hamartoma tumor syndrome, and Peutz-Jeghers syndrome. This manuscript provides the latest recommendations from the NCCN Guidelines for Genetic/Familial High-Risk Assessment: Colorectal, Endometrial, and Gastric on the screening and management of EC in patients at high risk for these syndromes, as well as the advantages and limitations of multigene panel testing. This manuscript also describes recent updates to these guidelines regarding de-implementation of colon cancer screening in individuals with CHEK2 pathogenic/likely pathogenic variants, based on the most up-to-date evidence regarding the association between CHEK2 pathogenic/likely pathogenic variants and colon cancer risk.

Background/Objectives: Multi-gene, multi-cancer, hereditary cancer risk screenings may be useful in cancer prevention and treatment, not only for cancer patients but also for patients’ family members. If genetic cancer screening is to have the widest possible benefit, it must be extended into diverse cancer care settings that serve diverse patient communities, providing cancer patients and their relatives with individualized cancer risk evaluations. Little research, to date, has examined the impact of extending multigenic cancer screening into diverse settings. Without empirical data characterizing the support needs of cancer patients and their family members, we may not adequately satisfy the needs of all patients and risk exacerbating existing disparities in cancer care and outcomes. Methods: We examined patient perspectives on the sharing of genetic results with at-risk family members by surveying a racially diverse sample of cancer patients receiving a multi-gene, multi-cancer risk screen in a community hospital setting. Results: In a survey of 230 cancer patients, we found that intent to share results with family members was high but varied across family member types. More respondents planned to disclose results to at least one sister (82.5%) compared to at least one brother (73.1%). Over one-fourth of participants (27.4%) were either uncertain about sharing or intended to withhold their genomic screening results from at least one at-risk family member eligible for cascade testing. Participants were more likely to withhold their results from a sibling than from a child. Furthermore, intent to share across all family member types was lower if probands failed to identify at least one benefit to sharing. Conclusions: Understanding factors associated with decisions to share results with at-risk relatives in diverse patient populations can help clinicians support cascade genetic cancer screenings in diverse communities and settings.

PURPOSE The autosomal dominant cancer predisposition disorders hereditary breast and ovarian cancer (HBOC) and Lynch syndrome (LS) are genetic conditions for which early identification and intervention have a positive effect on the individual and public health. The goals of this study were to determine whether germline genetic screening using exome sequencing could be used to efficiently identify carriers of HBOC and LS. METHODS Participants were recruited from three geographically and racially diverse sites in the United States (Rochester, MN; Phoenix, AZ; Jacksonville, FL). Participants underwent Exome+ sequencing (Helix Inc, San Mateo, CA) and return of results for specific genetic findings: HBOC ( BRCA1 and BRCA1) and LS ( MLH1, MSH2, MSH6, PMS2, and EPCAM). Chart review was performed to collect demographics and personal and family cancer history. RESULTS To date, 44,306 participants have enrolled in Tapestry. Annotation and interpretation of all variants in genes for HBOC and LS resulted in the identification of 550 carriers (prevalence, 1.24%), which included 387 with HBOC (27.2% BRCA1, 42.8% BRCA2) and 163 with LS (12.3% MSH6, 8.8% PMS2, 4.5% MLH1, 3.8% MSH2, and 0.2% EPCAM). More than half of these participants (52.1%) were newly diagnosed carriers with HBOC and LS. In all, 39.2% of HBOC/LS carriers did not satisfy National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) criteria for genetic evaluation. NCCN criteria were less commonly met in underrepresented minority populations versus self-reported White race (51.5% v 37.5%, P = .028). CONCLUSION Our results emphasize the need for wider utilization of germline genetic sequencing for enhanced screening and detection of individuals who have LS and HBOC cancer predisposition syndromes.

ABSTRACT A 70-year-old man presented to the clinic with a 6-month history of dysgeusia, followed by chronic, non-bloody diarrhea and 45 lb unintentional weight loss. Esophagogastroduodenoscopy discovered confluent nodularity in the gastric antrum and examined duodenum, but a normal esophagus. Colonoscopy uncovered patches of polypoid nodular mucosa throughout the entire colon. Biopsies of the nodular mucosa were consistent with hamartomatous polyps while biopsies of the intervening, normal-appearing mucosa demonstrated edema with crypt architectural distortion. Other hereditary polyposis syndromes were excluded with genetic testing, confirming a diagnosis of Cronkhite-Canada syndrome. Adalimumab therapy was initiated with clinical improvement after nonresponse to prednisone.

376 Background: Germline genetic testing (GGT) is becoming increasingly important in the management of genitourinary (GU) malignancies as novel targeted drug therapies emerge. Selection for genetic studies and testing has historically been highly selective and based on pathologic characteristics, family history, and age of diagnosis. The aim of our study was to investigate the prevalence of pathogenic variants (PGVs) in inherited cancer susceptibility genes utilizing a universal testing approach and to characterize the rate of PGVs that would have been missed based on current NCCN guidelines. Methods: A multisite single-institutional prospective study (INTERCEPT) offered GGT to all patients with new or active diagnoses of GU malignancies (bladder, prostate, and renal cancers) from April 1, 2018 to March 31, 2020 at Mayo Clinic Arizona, Mayo Clinic Florida and Mayo Clinic Rochester. Participants were offered GGT with a panel of >80 genes through Invitae Corp. Demographic, tumor characteristics and genetic results were evaluated. PGVs were classified as high-, intermediate-, or low- penetrance variants based on published literature. Respective NCCN GU GGT guidelines were used to determine if the PGVs discovered using our universal testing approach would have been missed with guideline-directed GGT. Results: A total of 3095 pan-cancer patients were enrolled in the study; 601 of which had a GU malignancy including: prostate cancer (358 patients), renal cancer (137), and bladder cancer (106). The mean age of enrollment was 66.8 years (SD 9.1), 89% were male, and 85.9% of patients were Non-Hispanic white. PGVs were identified in 82 of all GU patients (13.6%) and variants of undetermined significance (VUS) in 289 (48.1%) patients. PGV prevalence breakdown by cancer type was: 13.7% of prostate, 13.1% renal, and 14.2% bladder cancer patients. The proportion of high penetrance PGVs varied by malignancy type. Of all patients, 326 (54.2%) had advanced (stage III/IV) disease and 377 (64.4%) of these were metastatic upon initial evaluation. The majority of all PGVs identified were incremental, defined as PGVs that would not have been identified based on guideline-concordant GGT: 100% (15/15 patients) with bladder, 77.8% (14/18) with renal, and 57.1% (28/49) with prostate cancer. Conclusions: Universal GGT for prostate, renal and bladder cancer revealed that over 1 in 10 patients harbored potentially actionable PGVs, most of which would not have been identified with guidelines-based GGT. Utilization of GGT can impact our understanding of GU cancer pathogenesis, aid in familial cascade testing, and influence treatment decisions.

Abstract Background People with cancer experience high rates of venous thromboembolism (VTE). Risk of subsequent cancer is also increased in people experiencing their first VTE. The causal mechanisms underlying this association are not completely understood, and it is unknown whether VTE is itself a risk factor for cancer. Methods We used data from large genome-wide association study meta-analyses to perform bidirectional Mendelian randomization analyses to estimate causal associations between genetic liability to VTE and risk of 18 different cancers. Results We found no conclusive evidence that genetic liability to VTE was causally associated with an increased incidence of cancer, or vice versa. We observed an association between liability to VTE and pancreatic cancer risk [odds ratio for pancreatic cancer: 1.23 (95% confidence interval: 1.08–1.40) per log-odds increase in VTE risk, P = 0.002]. However, sensitivity analyses revealed this association was predominantly driven by a variant proxying non-O blood group, with inadequate evidence to suggest a causal relationship. Conclusions These findings do not support the hypothesis that genetic liability to VTE is a cause of cancer. Existing observational epidemiological associations between VTE and cancer are therefore more likely to be driven by pathophysiological changes which occur in the setting of active cancer and anti-cancer treatments. Further work is required to explore and synthesize evidence for these mechanisms.