Felder, Seth

ImportanceImmune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have been approved for treatment of microsatellite instable (MSI-H) metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC), but factors associated with receipt and efficacy of ICIs in routine clinical practice remain largely unknown.ObjectiveTo identify factors associated with receipt of ICIs and associated survival outcomes among patients with mCRC in routine clinical practice.Design, Setting, and ParticipantsThis population-based cohort study used deidentified data from a nationwide electronic health record–derived database to include 18 932 patients diagnosed with mCRC between January 2013 and June 2019. Population-based patients were diagnosed with de novo mCRC and had at least 2 documented clinical visits on or after the date of diagnosis. The study analyses were performed between September 2020 and April 2021.ExposurePatients received ICI therapy and/or chemotherapy as part of a systemic treatment for mCRC.Main Outcomes and MeasuresThe outcomes were receipt of ICI therapy, overall survival (OS), and time to treatment discontinuation (TTD).ResultsIn this cohort study of 18 932 patients diagnosed with mCRC (10 537 [55.7%] male; 546 [2.9%] Asian, 2005 [10.6%] Black or African American, 1674 [8.8%] Hispanic, 12 338 [65.2%] White, 4043 [21.4%] unknown race or ethnicity; median [IQR] age at metastatic diagnosis, 64.6 [55.0-73.3] years), patients with MSI-H tumors had a significantly higher probability of receiving ICIs than those with microsatellite stable (MSS) tumors (odds ratio [OR], 22.66 [95% CI, 17.30-29.73]; P < .001), whereas patients initially diagnosed with synchronous mCRC had significantly lower odds of receiving ICIs than patients with metachronous mCRC (OR, 0.57 [95% CI, 0.45-0.73]; P < .001). Patients with MSI-H tumors who received ICIs as first line of therapy had significantly longer OS than those receiving chemotherapy only (HR, 0.37 [95% CI, 0.25-0.56]; P < .001). Among patients with MSS tumors, ICI-based therapy was associated with significantly longer OS for patients with high albumin level (vs low: HR, 0.28 [95% CI, 0.18-0.45]; P < .001) and antibiotic use (vs nonuse: HR, 0.43 [95% CI, 0.27-0.67]; P < .001), but a significantly shorter OS for patients with synchronous mCRC (vs metachronous: HR, 1.90 [95% CI, 1.24-2.89]; P = .003). In addition, 29 out of 235 patients with MSS tumors (12.3%) experienced durable responses on ICI-based therapy. Similar patterns of associations with TTD were observed.Conclusions and RelevanceIn this cohort study of patients with mCRC, clinical characteristics were associated with different survival outcomes in patients treated with ICI-based therapy, with important clinical implications for patients with MSS tumors who are generally unresponsive to immunotherapy.

Multigene panel testing has allowed for the detection of a growing number of inherited pathogenic/likely pathogenic variants in people at high risk of cancer, including endometrial cancer (EC). Hereditary syndromes associated with EC include Lynch syndrome, PTEN hamartoma tumor syndrome, and Peutz-Jeghers syndrome. This manuscript provides the latest recommendations from the NCCN Guidelines for Genetic/Familial High-Risk Assessment: Colorectal, Endometrial, and Gastric on the screening and management of EC in patients at high risk for these syndromes, as well as the advantages and limitations of multigene panel testing. This manuscript also describes recent updates to these guidelines regarding de-implementation of colon cancer screening in individuals with CHEK2 pathogenic/likely pathogenic variants, based on the most up-to-date evidence regarding the association between CHEK2 pathogenic/likely pathogenic variants and colon cancer risk.

663 Background: GI malignancies continue to be a major cause of cancer related deaths, despite advances in therapy options. In pancreatic cancer, the presence of homologous recombination mutations (HRM) has been shown to confer increased sensitivity to platinum chemotherapy. However, the role of HRM mutations in other GI cancers remains to be determined. The focus of this study is to evaluate the prognostic nature of core and noncore HRM in nonpancreatic GI cancers. Additionally, we aim to understand the predictive nature of these mutations related to platinum exposure. Methods: This was a retrospective review of patients at Moffitt Cancer Center with a primary stage IV nonpancreatic GI cancer treated with platinum therapy. All patients had next generation sequencing and were in the Clinical Genomics Action Committee database between 1/1/2013 and 11/1/2020. All patients had either a core HRM (BRCA1, BRCA2, PALB2) or noncore HRM (such as ATM, ATR, BARD1, BRIP1, FANCA, NBN, and RAD51). Patients were grouped into core HRM vs. noncore HRM. Response was stratified between responders (complete response and partial response) vs. non responders (stable disease and progressive disease), based on RECIST criteria. Progression free survival and overall survival were estimated using Kaplan-Meier method, and the log-rank test was used to assess the difference in progression free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) by HRM status and type of platinum therapy used. Results: There were 72 patients included in the study: the majority of patients were male (65.3%) and Caucasian (87.5%). Twenty-one (29.2%) patients had a core HRM and 51 (70.8%) had a noncore HRM. There was no significant difference in response rate between patients with core HRM and patients with noncore HRM for evaluable patients (n = 66): 20.0% of patients with core HRM vs. 21.7% of patients with noncore HRM demonstrated a response to platinum therapy (p = 0.41). An improved OS was noted for patients with core HRM vs. those with noncore HRM at 68.9 vs. 24.3 months (p = 0.019). An improved PFS was also seen in patients with core HRM at 10.4 months vs. 6.3 months with noncore HRM (p = 0.027). There was no difference in PFS based on type of platinum therapy used (oxaliplatin vs. carboplatin vs. cisplatin), while an improved OS was noted for patients treated with oxaliplatin vs. carboplatin vs. cisplatin at 43.1 vs. 28.2 vs. 16.0 months (p = 0.011). Conclusions: Our study demonstrated that in stage IV nonpancreatic GI malignancies treated with platinum therapy, patients with core HRM had a greater OS and PFS compared to those with noncore HRM, suggesting a potential prognostic and predictive role of these mutations. Further studies are needed to confirm our findings.

174 Background: Colorectal cancer (CRC), while one of the most common cancer diagnoses, can behave heterogeneously based on molecular characteristics. A subset of patients (pts) with CRC are characterized with mismatch repair deficiency (MMR-d), these pts exhibit encouraging responses to immunotherapy. The predictive nature of various factors, such as BRAF status, age, and MMR-D protein loss type, have been investigated in pts with MMR-d CRC. However, the prognostic role of these factors has not been well established. The purpose of this study was to identify characteristics that influence survival in MMR-d mCRC. Methods: This study evaluated pts with MMR-d mCRC in the Flatiron database. Overall survival (OS) was determined from date of diagnosis of stage IV disease to date of death and stratified based on age greater than or less than 50 years, BRAF mutation status, RAS mutation status, and type of MMR gene loss. For statistical analysis, the Chi-Square test was implemented to determine the prognostic significance of clinical and molecular features. Univariate and multivariate analyses were determined through the Cox regression model. Results: There were 1,101 pts in the study. The majority of pts were older than 50 (79.7%), Caucasian (75%), and had ECOG 0-1 (83.4%). Among the 803 pts with known BRAF status, 44.3% (n=356) had BRAF V600E mutation and 55.7% (n=447) were BRAF wildtype. Pts with BRAF V600E mutation had OS of 18.9 months vs. 33.2 months for pts with wild type BRAF (HR 1.52, 95% CI: 1.25-1.86, p<0.001). Pts older than 50 had a lower median OS vs. those who were ≤50 at 21.4 months vs. 38.7 months (HR 1.66, 95% CI: 1.33-2.07, p<0.001). When comparing MSH2/MSH6 mutations to MLH1/PMS2, a trend towards improved OS was seen with median survival of 35.2 months vs. 22.7 months, respectively (HR 0.79, 95% CI: 0.61-1.02, p=0.067). On multivariate analysis, BRAF mutation and older age continued to be associated with differences in survival, while KRAS mutation and specific MMR gene loss did not. Conclusions: BRAF V600E mutation and age greater than 50 are associated with decreased survival for pts with MMR-D mCRC. KRAS mutations and specific MMR alterations are not associated with differences in survival.

86 Background: Race and sex disparities exist for receipt of adjuvant chemotherapy (AC) for stage III colon cancer. However, most studies have not used an intersectional approach, which assesses the cumulative effects of different identities (e.g., Black women) instead of treating each as distinct, independent variables. Using this approach, we assessed the summative impact of these identities on receipt of AC for stage III colon cancer. Methods: The National Cancer Database was queried from 2004 to 2015 for patients who underwent surgery for stage III colon cancer and were healthy enough for AC. Receipt of AC was assessed chi-squared and multivariable logistic regression analyses. Results: 92,696 patients were identified. White patients had higher rates of care at community cancer centers. Black patients had higher rates of treatment at academic cancer programs (p < 0.001). Overall 83.5% received AC. Black males and females had higher rates of AC (86.5% and 86.2%, respectively) compared to White males and females (85.3% and 80.5%), respectively (p < 0.001). In adjusted analysis, Black males had the lowest odds of AC (OR 0.73), followed by Black females (OR 0.89) and White females (OR 0.91). When evaluated by age < 65 years and adjusting for potential confounders, Black men remained the least likely group to receive AC (OR 0.70). Black females had similar odds of receipt of AC (OR 0.99) and White females had increased odds (OR 1.22) relative to White males. Conclusions: Despite higher rates of treatment at academic centers, Black males and females had lower odds of receipt of AC after adjusting for confounders. Younger Black males persisted with the lowest odds of AC, although younger Black females had odds similar to younger White males. Additional research is necessary to identify drivers of these disparities and interventions to ameliorate them. [Table: see text]