Imanirad, Iman

663 Background: GI malignancies continue to be a major cause of cancer related deaths, despite advances in therapy options. In pancreatic cancer, the presence of homologous recombination mutations (HRM) has been shown to confer increased sensitivity to platinum chemotherapy. However, the role of HRM mutations in other GI cancers remains to be determined. The focus of this study is to evaluate the prognostic nature of core and noncore HRM in nonpancreatic GI cancers. Additionally, we aim to understand the predictive nature of these mutations related to platinum exposure. Methods: This was a retrospective review of patients at Moffitt Cancer Center with a primary stage IV nonpancreatic GI cancer treated with platinum therapy. All patients had next generation sequencing and were in the Clinical Genomics Action Committee database between 1/1/2013 and 11/1/2020. All patients had either a core HRM (BRCA1, BRCA2, PALB2) or noncore HRM (such as ATM, ATR, BARD1, BRIP1, FANCA, NBN, and RAD51). Patients were grouped into core HRM vs. noncore HRM. Response was stratified between responders (complete response and partial response) vs. non responders (stable disease and progressive disease), based on RECIST criteria. Progression free survival and overall survival were estimated using Kaplan-Meier method, and the log-rank test was used to assess the difference in progression free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) by HRM status and type of platinum therapy used. Results: There were 72 patients included in the study: the majority of patients were male (65.3%) and Caucasian (87.5%). Twenty-one (29.2%) patients had a core HRM and 51 (70.8%) had a noncore HRM. There was no significant difference in response rate between patients with core HRM and patients with noncore HRM for evaluable patients (n = 66): 20.0% of patients with core HRM vs. 21.7% of patients with noncore HRM demonstrated a response to platinum therapy (p = 0.41). An improved OS was noted for patients with core HRM vs. those with noncore HRM at 68.9 vs. 24.3 months (p = 0.019). An improved PFS was also seen in patients with core HRM at 10.4 months vs. 6.3 months with noncore HRM (p = 0.027). There was no difference in PFS based on type of platinum therapy used (oxaliplatin vs. carboplatin vs. cisplatin), while an improved OS was noted for patients treated with oxaliplatin vs. carboplatin vs. cisplatin at 43.1 vs. 28.2 vs. 16.0 months (p = 0.011). Conclusions: Our study demonstrated that in stage IV nonpancreatic GI malignancies treated with platinum therapy, patients with core HRM had a greater OS and PFS compared to those with noncore HRM, suggesting a potential prognostic and predictive role of these mutations. Further studies are needed to confirm our findings.

174 Background: Colorectal cancer (CRC), while one of the most common cancer diagnoses, can behave heterogeneously based on molecular characteristics. A subset of patients (pts) with CRC are characterized with mismatch repair deficiency (MMR-d), these pts exhibit encouraging responses to immunotherapy. The predictive nature of various factors, such as BRAF status, age, and MMR-D protein loss type, have been investigated in pts with MMR-d CRC. However, the prognostic role of these factors has not been well established. The purpose of this study was to identify characteristics that influence survival in MMR-d mCRC. Methods: This study evaluated pts with MMR-d mCRC in the Flatiron database. Overall survival (OS) was determined from date of diagnosis of stage IV disease to date of death and stratified based on age greater than or less than 50 years, BRAF mutation status, RAS mutation status, and type of MMR gene loss. For statistical analysis, the Chi-Square test was implemented to determine the prognostic significance of clinical and molecular features. Univariate and multivariate analyses were determined through the Cox regression model. Results: There were 1,101 pts in the study. The majority of pts were older than 50 (79.7%), Caucasian (75%), and had ECOG 0-1 (83.4%). Among the 803 pts with known BRAF status, 44.3% (n=356) had BRAF V600E mutation and 55.7% (n=447) were BRAF wildtype. Pts with BRAF V600E mutation had OS of 18.9 months vs. 33.2 months for pts with wild type BRAF (HR 1.52, 95% CI: 1.25-1.86, p<0.001). Pts older than 50 had a lower median OS vs. those who were ≤50 at 21.4 months vs. 38.7 months (HR 1.66, 95% CI: 1.33-2.07, p<0.001). When comparing MSH2/MSH6 mutations to MLH1/PMS2, a trend towards improved OS was seen with median survival of 35.2 months vs. 22.7 months, respectively (HR 0.79, 95% CI: 0.61-1.02, p=0.067). On multivariate analysis, BRAF mutation and older age continued to be associated with differences in survival, while KRAS mutation and specific MMR gene loss did not. Conclusions: BRAF V600E mutation and age greater than 50 are associated with decreased survival for pts with MMR-D mCRC. KRAS mutations and specific MMR alterations are not associated with differences in survival.

TPS4149 Background: Patients with advanced gastric cancer experience a 5 year survival rate <10% even with multimodality therapy representing a clear unmet need for improved treatment. In advanced gastric and gastroesophageal junction (GEJ) adenocarcinoma, ramucirumab (a monoclonal antibody against VEGFR2) has demonstrated clinical activity and has been approved as second line therapy in combination with paclitaxel with a response rate of 28% and absolute overall survival benefit of 8 weeks when compared to placebo. However, there are many patients that cannot tolerate paclitaxel due to prior exposure to oxaliplatin causing neuropathy. Therefore, novel combinations with ramucirumab, is highly desirable. TAS-102 is an oral cytotoxic agent with two active components; trifluridine (TFD) which inhibits tumor cell growth by being incorporated into DNA during DNA synthesis and tipiracil (TPI) which inhibits the metabolism of TFD, thereby prolonging its ability to exert effect. TPI also inhibits platelet derived endothelial cell growth factor which plays a key role with VEGF in tumor angiogenesis. The combination of a cytotoxic agent with an antiangiogenic agent has demonstrated a significant anticancer activity in multiple cancers. In a recent Phase III study, TAS-102 significantly prolonged overall survival as compared to best supportive care in patients with GEJ and gastric cancers that had received at least 2 prior lines of treatment. We hypothesize that a combination of TAS-102 and ramucirumab might increase efficacy without causing unmanageable toxicity. Methods: This is a single institutional phase II single arm two-stage design trial using the combination of TAS-102 and ramucirumab in advanced, refractory gastric or GEJ adenocarcinoma. Eligible patients include those with histologically confirmed gastric or GEJ adenocarcinoma that have received at least 1 prior line of treatment with performance status 0 or 1 and preserved organ function. Ramucirumab will be administered 8mg/kg every 2 weeks and TAS-102 at doses of 35 mg/m2 twice daily. Each cycle length will be 28 days. The primary endpoint is 6 month OS and secondary endpoints are safety, objective response rate and PFS. Fifteen patients will be enrolled in the first stage. If ≥ 7 of the 15 are alive at 6 months, an additional 10 patients will be enrolled in the second phase. Enrollment is currently ongoing. Clinical trial information: NCT03686488.