Ahuja, Nita

Abstract Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is a devastating cancer with an increasing incidence and extremely dismal prognosis. Discovery and mechanistic understanding of the genetic and epigenetic drivers of PDAC is therefore of critical importance. Here, we uncover serine protease inhibitor Kazal type 1 (SPINK1) as a putative determinant of clinical progression and demonstrate that it can have a non-canonical function as a regulator of epigenomic states of PDAC cells and associated extensive changes in gene expression. We show that SPINK1 expression, which varies in PDAC, is associated with key aggressive phenotypic cancer states and is correlated with the expression of stemness markers both in vitro and in patient samples. Mechanistically, our results strongly suggest that SPINK1 acts through a new signaling axis, by interacting with COL18A1 in the Golgi apparatus, promoting endostatin release and eventually inducing extensive histone H3 modifications. These results reveal a new function of SPINK1 in PDAC and suggest a potential therapeutic route to combat PDAC aggressiveness by targeting the SPINK1-COL18A1-endostatin signaling.

Background In this series from the Transatlantic Australasian Retroperitoneal Sarcoma Working Group (TARPSWG), the authors examined longitudinal outcomes of patients with a second recurrence of retroperitoneal sarcoma (RPS) after complete resection of a first local recurrence (LR). Methods Data from patients undergoing resection of a first LR from January 2002 to December 2011were collected from 22 sarcoma centers. The primary outcome was overall survival (OS) after second recurrence. Results Second recurrences occurred in 400 of 567 patients (70.5%) after an R0/R1 resection of a first locally recurrent RPS. Patterns of disease recurrence were LR in 323 patients (80.75%), distant metastases (DM) in 55 patients (13.75%), and both LR and DM in 22 patients (5.5%). The main subtype among the LR group was liposarcoma (77%), whereas DM mainly were leiomyosarcomas (43.6%). In patients with a second LR only, a total of 200 patients underwent re‐resection (61.9%). The 5‐year OS rate varied significantly based on the pattern of failure ( P < .001): 45.6% for the LR group, 25.5% for the DM group, and 0% for the group with LR and DM. The only factors found to be associated with improved OS on multivariable analysis were both time between second surgery and the development of the second recurrence (32 months vs 8 months: hazard ratio, 0.44 [ P < .001]) and surgery for second recurrence (yes vs no: hazard ratio, 3.25 [ P < .001]). The 5‐year OS rate for patients undergoing surgery for a second LR was 59% versus 18% in the patients not deemed suitable for surgical resection. Conclusions Survival rates after second recurrence of RPS varied based on patterns of disease recurrence and treatment. Durable disease‐free survivors were identified after surgery for second LR in patients selected for this intervention.

Abstract Background: Epigenetic alterations in the genome, including abnormal DNA methylation and histone hypoacetylation, initiate and promote cancerous changes via several mechanisms, including inactivation of tumor suppressor genes. Preclinical investigations in breast cancer suggest that use of epigenetic modifiers results in re-expression of aberrantly silenced genes and proteins that represent important therapeutic targets (e.g. estrogen receptor alpha, ER). Combination therapy with a DNA methyltransferase inhibitor (DNMTI) and a histone deacetylase inhibitor (HDACI) has yielded superior ER reexpression and greater restoration of tamoxifen responsiveness than with HDACI alone. We hypothesize that clinically tolerable doses of the DNMTI 5-azacitidine (5-AZA) and the HDACI entinostat may not only effect changes in DNA methylation and gene expression, but also yield objective disease responses in women with advanced breast cancer. Trial design: This multicenter phase II study (NCT01349959) is enrolling patients with advanced human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-negative breast cancer with triple negative (ER/progesterone receptor [PR]/HER2−negative, Cohort A) or hormone-resistant (Cohort B) disease. Patients will receive 5-AZA 40 mg/m2 subcutaneously days 1–5 and 8–10 and entinostat 7 mg orally days 3 and 10 every 28 days. Because of the potential for re-expression of the ER with epigenetic agents, patients will be offered continuation of 5-AZA and entinostat at progression with the addition of hormonal therapy (investigator discretion). Mandatory tumor biopsies will be performed at baseline and after 8 weeks of therapy to evaluate correlative biomarkers. Eligibility Criteria: Eligible patients must be ≥ 18 years, have measurable locally advanced/metastatic triple-negative (at least one prior chemotherapy received adjuvant/metastatic setting) or hormone-resistant (must have received two prior hormonal agents and one prior chemotherapy) disease, adequate organ function and ECOG PS ≤ 2. Specific Aims: 1. Objective response rate (ORR) by RECIST 1.1 criteria. 2. Safety and tolerability 3. Progression-free survival, overall survival and clinical benefit rate. 4. Safety and toxicity data, feasibility and response rate where hormonal therapy is added to the combination under investigation at the time of progressive disease. 5. Pharmacokinetics, cytidine deaminase, changes from baseline of candidate gene methylation and expression in circulating deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) and malignant tissue. Statistical Methods: Using a two-stage three-outcome design to assess the efficacy of the combination, a maximum of 30 patients (requiring 27 evaluable) will be accrued to each cohort unless undue toxicity is encountered for a maximum sample size of 60 patients. The study design tests the null hypothesis that the ORR is at most 5% against the alternative hypothesis that it is at least 20% with a type I error of 4% and power of 90%. Present and Targeted Accrual: This study has just opened to patient enrollment. We anticipate a rapid accrual of 60 patients within 1 year.br](Funding from Stand Up to Cancer and CTEP). Citation Information: Cancer Res 2011;71(24 Suppl):Abstract nr OT3-01-06.