Allred, JB

Abstract Background: The live attenuated non-pathogenic Edmonston MV vaccine strain has advantages as an oncolytic platform given its tumor specificity, potent bystander effect, and ability to be engineered and retargeted. MV-NIS expresses the human thyroidal sodium-iodide symporter (NIS) and is selectively oncolytic, entering tumor cells through CD46 (overexpressed on many cancers, including breast cancer of all subtypes) and Nectin-4. NIS expression in MV-NIS infected cells permits noninvasive monitoring of virus spread by SPECT-CT imaging of Tc-99m pertechnetate or I-123 uptake. Methods: NCT01846091 is a standard 3+3 phase I trial of a single IT administration of MV-NIS in pts with recurrent/metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (SCCHN) or metastatic breast cancer (MBC). Primary objectives are (a) safety and tolerability and (b) maximally tolerated single dose. The secondary clinical objective is to preliminarily assess antitumor efficacy at and away from the MV injection site. Key eligibility criteria were: absence of standard therapy with life prolonging intent; at least one lesion >1 cm amenable to percutaneous injection; and no impending visceral crisis. MV-NIS was administered on D1 with mandatory SPECT-CT at baseline (BL) and on D3&D8; repeat SPECT-CT on D15&D21 if the prior result was positive; mandatory tumor biopsies on D3&D21; optional tumor biopsies on D8&D15; assessments for viremia and viral shedding at BL and on D3,D8,D15,D21; and standard imaging for restaging at BL,D21,W6,W12. Results: Accrual completed with 12 evaluable pts (6 SCCHN and 6 MBC) at 3 dose levels (108, 3x108, 109 TCID50). The MBC group included 5 HR+/HER2- pts and 1 pt with mixed HR+/HER2- and HR+/HER2+ disease. 5 pts had evidence of disease progression prior to study participation. No dose limiting toxicities were observed among the MBC pts; AEs possibly related to MV-NIS in this group were gr2 fatigue, gr1 flu-like illness, gr2 lymphopenia (all n=1). No SCCHN responses were observed. Best response for the MBC pts was: stable disease (SD) >6 wks, n=4; clinical response, n=1; progression, n=1. One MBC pt with SD for 12 wks had positive SPECT/CT imaging at and away from the injection site on D3&D8 and was the only pt seronegative for measles IgG antibodies prior to MV-NIS exposure. The MBC pt who responded after initial MV-NIS exposure was the only pt with low viral RNA in blood (D3); she received additional doses at W9&W13 without toxicity through an expanded access protocol exemption and had disease progression by W19. No viral shedding was detected from mouth rinse or urine in any pt. MV was detected in tumor samples from all pts treated at the highest dose level. Additional blood and tissue analyses are in progress. Conclusion: These results demonstrate the safety of IT MV-NIS administration, provide early evidence of biologic activity in MBC, and support the possibility of viral replication in tumors remote from the IT injection site. A MV strain encoding the immunomodulatory neutrophil activating protein transgene has been constructed (MV-s-NAP) with preclinical evidence of improved antitumor activity and immunogenicity. The phase I MV-s-NAP trial will start recruitment in Fall 2018. Citation Format: Liu MC, Peng K-W, Federspiel MJ, Russell SJ, Brunton BA, Zhou Y, Packiriswamy N, Hubbard JM, Loprinzi CL, Peethambaram PP, Ruddy KJ, Allred JB, Galanis E, Okuno SH. Phase I trial of intratumoral (IT) administration of a NIS-expressing derivative manufactured from a genetically engineered strain of measles virus (MV) [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2018 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2018 Dec 4-8; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2019;79(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P6-21-03.

Abstract Background: TNBC is characterized by unique molecular profiles, aggressive behavior, poor prognosis and lack of targeted therapies. Brostallicin is a novel synthetic compound from the class of DNA minor groove binding (MGB) anti-cancer agents, making it a logical agent to evaluate in the setting of TNBC. It retains activity in cancer cells resistant to alkylating agents, topoisomerase I inhibitors and is fully active against DNA-mismatch repair deficient tumor cells. Preclinical models using cell lines demonstrate that cells expressing relatively high glutathione/glutathione S-transferase (GSH/GST) levels are more susceptible to brostallicin's antitumor efficacy. Cisplatin administration increases expression of GSH/GST in tumor cells, thus leading to an increased anti-tumor efficacy of brostallicin. Methods: Phase II cooperative group study in pts with mTNBC (³18 years of age with measurable metastatic disease, ER/PR ≤1%; HER2 negative, who had received 0–4 prior chemotherapy regimens in the metastatic setting; with adequate hematologic, renal and hepatic functions; and no active CNS metastases; prior exposure to cisplatin allowed). Cisplatin on Day 1 followed by brostallicin on Day 2, repeated every 21 days. Aim: efficacy of brostallicin and proof of concept of its mechanism of action in mTNBC. Primary endpoint progression-free survival (PFS) at 3 months with 89% power (0.10 significance level) to detect an absolute difference of 20% (35% vs 55%), based on the median PFS of 60 days in pts with mTNBC from the N0234 trial of erlotinib and gemcitabine as 1st/2nd line. Secondary endpoints include ORR, duration of response (DOR), 6-month PFS, OS and AE profile. Tertiary endpoints include assessment of 1) GSH levels prior to the administration of cisplatin and of brostallicin; and 2) the prevalence of BCRA-1 mutation by IHC in primary or metastatic tumor. Results: Study closed on 3/28/12 and it accrued 48 pts (median f/u 2.3 mo; 0–15.3); 33 pts are off treatment and 15 pts remain on study; 38 pts evaluable for response, and 43 evaluable for AEs. 50% received therapy as 3rd to 5th line. Median number of cycles 2.5 (off-treatment: 2; on-treatment: 3, range 0–15). There are currently 5 confirmed responses (4 PR and 1 CR); DOR: 2.8–13.3 months. The 6-mo PFS is currently 19.2% (95% CI: 8.9%, 41.3%); the median TTP is 3.0 months (95% CI: 1.7 months, 4.2 months). Current data are premature to determine the primary endpoint (3-mo PFS) but we expect to report such data by November 2012. Current toxicity data: 69.7% G3/4 heme toxicity. Non-heme toxicity G3 (30.2%) and G4 (9.3)% (febrile neutropenia 21%; fatigue G3 14%); and no G5 non-heme AE. Conclusions: The current preliminary data of this trial show very encouraging activity of this regimen (brostallicin plus cisplatin) in mTNBC. Near 1/3 of pts are still currently receiving therapy, and we expect to provide primary and additional secondary endpoint data at SABCS 2012. Citation Information: Cancer Res 2012;72(24 Suppl):Abstract nr P1-12-06.

Abstract Background: Epigenetic alterations in the genome, including abnormal DNA methylation and histone hypoacetylation, initiate and promote cancerous changes via several mechanisms, including inactivation of tumor suppressor genes. Preclinical investigations in breast cancer suggest that use of epigenetic modifiers results in re-expression of aberrantly silenced genes and proteins that represent important therapeutic targets (e.g. estrogen receptor alpha, ER). Combination therapy with a DNA methyltransferase inhibitor (DNMTI) and a histone deacetylase inhibitor (HDACI) has yielded superior ER reexpression and greater restoration of tamoxifen responsiveness than with HDACI alone. We hypothesize that clinically tolerable doses of the DNMTI 5-azacitidine (5-AZA) and the HDACI entinostat may not only effect changes in DNA methylation and gene expression, but also yield objective disease responses in women with advanced breast cancer. Trial design: This multicenter phase II study (NCT01349959) is enrolling patients with advanced human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-negative breast cancer with triple negative (ER/progesterone receptor [PR]/HER2−negative, Cohort A) or hormone-resistant (Cohort B) disease. Patients will receive 5-AZA 40 mg/m2 subcutaneously days 1–5 and 8–10 and entinostat 7 mg orally days 3 and 10 every 28 days. Because of the potential for re-expression of the ER with epigenetic agents, patients will be offered continuation of 5-AZA and entinostat at progression with the addition of hormonal therapy (investigator discretion). Mandatory tumor biopsies will be performed at baseline and after 8 weeks of therapy to evaluate correlative biomarkers. Eligibility Criteria: Eligible patients must be ≥ 18 years, have measurable locally advanced/metastatic triple-negative (at least one prior chemotherapy received adjuvant/metastatic setting) or hormone-resistant (must have received two prior hormonal agents and one prior chemotherapy) disease, adequate organ function and ECOG PS ≤ 2. Specific Aims: 1. Objective response rate (ORR) by RECIST 1.1 criteria. 2. Safety and tolerability 3. Progression-free survival, overall survival and clinical benefit rate. 4. Safety and toxicity data, feasibility and response rate where hormonal therapy is added to the combination under investigation at the time of progressive disease. 5. Pharmacokinetics, cytidine deaminase, changes from baseline of candidate gene methylation and expression in circulating deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) and malignant tissue. Statistical Methods: Using a two-stage three-outcome design to assess the efficacy of the combination, a maximum of 30 patients (requiring 27 evaluable) will be accrued to each cohort unless undue toxicity is encountered for a maximum sample size of 60 patients. The study design tests the null hypothesis that the ORR is at most 5% against the alternative hypothesis that it is at least 20% with a type I error of 4% and power of 90%. Present and Targeted Accrual: This study has just opened to patient enrollment. We anticipate a rapid accrual of 60 patients within 1 year.br](Funding from Stand Up to Cancer and CTEP). Citation Information: Cancer Res 2011;71(24 Suppl):Abstract nr OT3-01-06.

Abstract Abstract #5110 Background: It has been demonstrated that certain chemotherapeutic drugs such as taxanes increases cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2) levels. Upregulation of COX-2 may be a resistance mechanism of the tumor, or a method to modulate toxic effects of the agent. COX-2 is associated with less differentiated and more aggressive breast cancers, and the expression may be a prognostic indicator of disease. Studies defining the “true” impact of therapy on COX-2 activity are lacking. Hypothesis: Chemotherapy increases COX-2 function in patients with invasive breast cancer. This leads to increased PGE2, VEGF, and downregulation of immune responses. Objective: Patients with stage II or III breast cancer were enrolled in a phase II preoperative chemotherapy trial of docetaxel and carboplatin administered every two weeks (4 cycles). We evaluated circulating PGE2, VEGF, and immune cell phenotype at diagnosis and after chemotherapy. Results: Fifty seven patients were enrolled in the study and 32 were analyzed in the lab, most of them being infiltrating ductal carcinoma. Four had complete response, 20 had partial response, and 8 were non-responders. Due to low numbers of patients analyzed, statistical significance was not achieved in most instances. Nevertheless, intriguing data has been generated that warrants further investigation. VEGF/PGE2 versus clinical response to chemotherapy: 86% of the patients in whom VEGF levels decrease post chemotherapy were responders compared to 60% in which VEGF remained unchanged or increased slightly. Responders had decreased VEGF levels on average, while the non-responders increased. Interestingly, even with low sample size, if both VEGF and PGE2 levels increase post treatment the response rate to chemotherapy is significantly lower (55% versus 88% if both VEGF and PGE2 decrease post treatment, p=0.05). Thus, both VEGF and PGE2 are critical factors in determining response rate. Whether COX-2 activity is driving both factors or whether VEGF is independently regulated is yet to be determined. Clinical Response versus Dendritic cell (DCs) / T-cell data: Data revealed highly important trends that warrant future investigation. Patients with increased B7H4 (an immunosuppressive molecule expressed on tolerizing DCs) were non-responders while patients with decreased B7H4 were responders. In contrast, responders had increased levels of CD80 and CD86 (co-stimulatory molecules expressed on activating DCs). VEGF/PGE2 Change versus Dendritic/T-cell data: When VEGF increased post treatment, B7H4 and FoxP3 (T regulatory cells) increased, while CD80, CD86, and CD8 decreased. The association between VEGF and immune cells post chemotherapy treatment is the first indication that VEGF may regulate immune cell function possibly independent of COX-2 activity. These data suggest that anti-VEGF therapy (which may include COX-2 inhibitor) may not only augment responses to chemotherapy but may also augment immune responses post chemotherapy. Citation Information: Cancer Res 2009;69(2 Suppl):Abstract nr 5110.