Mullen, John T.

11550 Background: RPS often have local recurrence (LR) after surgery. Preoperative radiation (RT) to 50.4 Gy can reduce LR risk but is not uniformly effective, especially after (+) margin resections. Therefore, we conducted a multi-institutional, prospective Phase II study to assess efficacy and tolerability of preop IMPT with selective dose escalation to 63 GyRBE to the posterior RPS margin (clinical target volume [CTV] 2) at high risk for (+) margins to further reduce the risk of LR. This dose was tolerable in a prior phase I study (DeLaney T et al, 2017, PMID:28740917). Methods: Primary RPS patients (pts) >18 years received preop IMPT, 50.4 GyRBE in 28 fractions (fx) of 1.8 GyRBE to CTV1 (tumor plus adjacent tissue at risk of subclinical disease) with SIB to CTV2 to 63.0 GyRBE in 28 fx of 2.25 GyRBE. Pts with high-grade tumors could get chemotherapy(CTX) prior to IMPT. To avoid treatment delay, 11 fx of IMRT x-rays could be substituted for IMPT. Pts had restaging and surgery 4-8 weeks after IMPT. Primary study endpoint was local tumor control. Secondary endpoints included clinical and pathologic response, surgical margin status, and disease-free and overall survival. Results: We accrued 60 pts from January 2016 to February 2021. Histology: 35 liposarcoma(LPS) (19 dediff and 16 well diff), 22 leiomyosarcoma(LMS), and 3 undifferentiated pleomorphic sarcoma. IMPT was delivered per protocol in all pts. 51 pts have had surgery, 5 are awaiting surgery, and 4 had no surgery due to metastases(DM) on preop imaging. 22 pts had (+) margins. 2 pts had > 75% necrosis. With 23-month median (range 1-52 months) follow-up after start of RT, there were two LRs. A dediff LPS pt had a well diff LPS LR 26 months postop, resected, and is disease-free. A renal vein/IVC LMS pt treated with CTX and IMPT had LR and DM 4 months postop and died from disease. Surgical Clavien-Dindo morbidity scores: 0(21), 1(9), 2(8), 3a (4), 3b(4), 4a(2), 4(b)1, 5(2); the periop deaths were from sepsis(pneumonia) and duodenal ulcer. The grade 3-4 periop morbidity included abscess(3), treated by catheter(2) or operative(1) drainage, prolonged hospital stays (2 pts with IVC LMS), small bowel obstruction (1), and late sigmoid colon anastomotic failure (1). Readmissions for lymphopenia(1), pneumoperitoneum (1), and volume overload (1). One late neuropathy was seen in a Type II diabetic pt with transient postop weakness after femoral nerve dissection who later had significant lower extremity weakness 3.75 years postop. Study was amended to reduce IMPT dose in diabetic pts. Conclusions: Preoperative IMPT with selective dose escalation to 63 GyRBE to the high risk posterior RPS margin is feasible. Early local control results with this approach appear promising. Some peri-operative morbidity was noted but appears to be in the expected range for RPS resections. Clinical trial information: NCT01659203.

Background In this series from the Transatlantic Australasian Retroperitoneal Sarcoma Working Group (TARPSWG), the authors examined longitudinal outcomes of patients with a second recurrence of retroperitoneal sarcoma (RPS) after complete resection of a first local recurrence (LR). Methods Data from patients undergoing resection of a first LR from January 2002 to December 2011were collected from 22 sarcoma centers. The primary outcome was overall survival (OS) after second recurrence. Results Second recurrences occurred in 400 of 567 patients (70.5%) after an R0/R1 resection of a first locally recurrent RPS. Patterns of disease recurrence were LR in 323 patients (80.75%), distant metastases (DM) in 55 patients (13.75%), and both LR and DM in 22 patients (5.5%). The main subtype among the LR group was liposarcoma (77%), whereas DM mainly were leiomyosarcomas (43.6%). In patients with a second LR only, a total of 200 patients underwent re‐resection (61.9%). The 5‐year OS rate varied significantly based on the pattern of failure ( P < .001): 45.6% for the LR group, 25.5% for the DM group, and 0% for the group with LR and DM. The only factors found to be associated with improved OS on multivariable analysis were both time between second surgery and the development of the second recurrence (32 months vs 8 months: hazard ratio, 0.44 [ P < .001]) and surgery for second recurrence (yes vs no: hazard ratio, 3.25 [ P < .001]). The 5‐year OS rate for patients undergoing surgery for a second LR was 59% versus 18% in the patients not deemed suitable for surgical resection. Conclusions Survival rates after second recurrence of RPS varied based on patterns of disease recurrence and treatment. Durable disease‐free survivors were identified after surgery for second LR in patients selected for this intervention.

Abstract Purpose: The role of surgery for first relapse locally recurrent retroperitoneal sarcoma (RPS-LR1) is uncertain. We report outcomes of the largest RPS-LR1 series and propose a new prognostic nomogram. Experimental Design: Patients with consecutive RPS-LR1 without distant metastases who underwent resection at 22 centers (2002–2011) were included. Endpoints were disease-free and overall survival (DFS, OS) and crude-cumulative-incidence (CCI) of local/distant recurrence from second surgery. Nomograms predicting DFS and OS from second surgery were developed and validated (calibration plots); discrimination was assessed (Harrell C index). Results: Of 684 patients identified, full prognostic variable data were available for 602. Initial surgery for primary RPS was performed at our institutions in 188 patients (31%) and elsewhere in 414 (69%). At a median follow-up of 119 months [Interquartile range (IQR), 80–169] from initial surgery and 75 months (IQR 50–105) from second surgery, 6-year DFS and OS were 19.2% [95% confidence interval (CI), 16.0–23.0%] and 54.1% (95% CI, 49.8–58.8%), respectively. Recurrence patterns and survival probability were histology-specific, with liposarcoma subtypes having the highest 6-year CCI of second local recurrence (LR, 60.2%–70.9%) and leiomyosarcoma (LMS) having higher 6-year CCI of distant metastasis (DM, 36.3%). Nomograms included age at second surgery, multifocality, grade, completeness of second surgery, histology, chemotherapy/radiotherapy at first surgery, and number of organs resected at first surgery. OS and DFS nomograms showed good calibration and discriminative ability (C index 0.70 and 0.67, respectively). Conclusions: We developed nomograms to predict DFS and OS for patients undergoing RPS-LR1 resection. Nomograms provide individualized, disease-relevant estimations of survival for RPS-LR1 patients and assist in clinical decisions.