Back to Authors

Tamimi, Rulla M.

https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2306-8668

Mayo Clinic

Weill Cornell Medicine

Citations 78

Ovarian function suppression, symptom burden, and quality of life in young women with breast cancer: A prospective study.
Rosenberg, Shoshana M. , Ruddy, Kathryn J. , Gelber, Shari , Schapira, Lidia , Come, Steven E. , Meyer, Meghan E., Tamimi, Rulla M. , Borges, Virginia F. , Winer, Eric P. , Partridge, Ann H.

Journal of Clinical Oncology | March 8, 2019 | Volume: 33 | Issue: 15_suppl | Pages: 515-515

10.1200/jco.2015.33.15_suppl.515 Get It

BRCA1/BRCA2 (BRCA) testing in young women with breast cancer: Patterns, motivations, and implications for treatment decisions.
Rosenberg, Shoshana M. , Ruddy, Kathryn J. , Gelber, Shari , Schapira, Lidia , Come, Steven E. , Larsen, Bryce G., Tamimi, Rulla M. , Borges, Virginia F. , Garber, Judy E. , Partridge, Ann H.

Journal of Clinical Oncology | January 3, 2019 | Volume: 32 | Issue: 15_suppl | Pages: 6548-6548

10.1200/jco.2014.32.15_suppl.6548 Get It

Pregnancy after breast cancer: Results from a prospective cohort study.
Poorvu, Philip D. , Gelber, Shari , Rosenberg, Shoshana M. , Ruddy, Kathryn J. , Peppercorn, Jeffrey , Schapira, Lidia , Come, Steven E. , Tamimi, Rulla M. , Borges, Virginia F. , Partridge, Ann H.

Journal of Clinical Oncology | September 6, 2018 | Volume: 35 | Issue: 15_suppl | Pages: 10065-10065

10.1200/jco.2017.35.15_suppl.10065 Get It

10065 Background: Prospective data regarding fertility and pregnancy after breast cancer are limited. Many young survivors are interested future fertility, but pregnancy rates among women attempting and not attempting pregnancy have not been studied prospectively. Methods: As part of a multicenter cohort study, women diagnosed age ≤40 with stage 0-3 breast cancer are surveyed at baseline then annually regarding fertility interest, attempts, and pregnancies. Chi-square tests were used to compare proportions attempting and achieving pregnancy. Results: At least once in the 5 years (yrs) after Dx, 334/959 (35%) women reported interest in future biologic children. The percent interested was stable in the first 3 yrs then declined: 256 (27%, baseline), 244 (27%, 1 year), 209 (25%, 2 yrs), 176 (25%, 3 yrs), 106 (18%, 4 yrs), and 72 (16%, 5 yrs). Pregnancy was attempted by 104/334 (31%) of women who reported interest and 4/625 (1%) who did not. Pregnancy occurred in 118 women (12%), including 76/108 (70%) who attempted and 42/851 (5%) who did not. Attempts and achieving pregnancy were associated with younger age, partnered status, and not having children prior to Dx (table). Lower stage was associated with attempting pregnancy and ER negative disease with achieving pregnancy. Conclusions: A substantial number of young women become pregnant in the 5 years after a breast cancer diagnosis. Given that over 1/3 of pregnancies were among women who did not report attempting, additional attention to contraception counseling should be considered. Further evaluation of assisted reproductive technology use, pregnancy and disease outcomes in this cohort, and the POSITIVE Trial (NCT02308085) will shed light on the feasibility and safety of pregnancy after breast cancer. [Table: see text]
Endocrine therapy non-persistence in young women with early-stage breast cancer.
Rosenberg, Shoshana M. , Gelber, Shari , Ruddy, Kathryn J. , Wasserman, Johanna, Schapira, Lidia , Come, Steven E. , Meyer, Meghan E., Tamimi, Rulla M. , Borges, Virginia F. , Partridge, Ann H.

Journal of Clinical Oncology | September 6, 2018 | Volume: 35 | Issue: 15_suppl | Pages: 531-531

10.1200/jco.2017.35.15_suppl.531 Get It

531 Background: The greatest age disparity in early stage breast cancer (BC) outcomes is in young women with hormone receptor positive (HR+) BC. While differences in biology may play a role, understanding the role of non-persistence (early discontinuation) with endocrine therapy (ET) is critical given the demonstrated efficacy of ET in this population. Methods: As part of a prospective cohort that enrolled women with BC diagnosed (dx) at age ≤40 between 2006-2016, we identified women with HR+, Stage I-III BC. Socio-demographic and treatment information, fertility concerns and confidence with the ET treatment decision were assessed by survey within 1 yr of dx. Medical record review was used to ascertain stage and HR status. Women who initiated ET but did not report taking tamoxifen or an aromatase inhibitor at 3 yrs post-diagnosis (or last follow-up if <3 yrs) were classified as non-persistent. Chi-square tests were used to compare categorical variables between persisters and non-persisters and stepwise multivariable regression to evaluate predictors of non-persistence. Results: In 538 women who initiated ET, median age at dx was 36; 10% were non-persistent. Discontinuation of ET was more likely in those who were less confident with their ET decision compared to those who were more confident (25/179, 14% vs 18/263, 7%, p=0.01). A greater proportion of women concerned about fertility discontinued vs. women not concerned (29/213,14% vs 25/319, 8%, p=0.03), and fertility concerns were associated with non-persistence in multi-variable analyses (OR: 1.85, 95% CI 1.05-3.26, p=0.03). Age at dx, race, education, employment, financial comfort, marital status, parity, stage, chemotherapy and local therapy were not associated with non-persistence. Conclusions: A significant minority of women with HR+ BC discontinued ET within 3 yrs. The association between fertility concerns expressed soon after dx and non-persistence underscores a need to address psychosocial issues that can impact treatment decisions in young women. Strategies to reduce decisional conflict and increasing confidence with the choice to take ET, may influence persistence. Future work will evaluate the contribution of other factors (eg symptom burden) to non-persistence.
Non-adherence behaviors among young women on adjuvant endocrine therapy for breast cancer.
Wassermann, Johanna , Gelber, Shari , Rosenberg, Shoshana M. , Ruddy, Kathryn J. , Schapira, Lidia , Come, Steven E. , Tamimi, Rulla M. , Borges, Virginia F. , Partridge, Ann H.

Journal of Clinical Oncology | September 6, 2018 | Volume: 35 | Issue: 15_suppl | Pages: 526-526

10.1200/jco.2017.35.15_suppl.526 Get It

526 Background: Young age at diagnosis (dx) is a predictor of worse prognosis in patients (pts) with luminal breast cancer (BC). Poorer adherence to endocrine therapy (ET) among younger women may contribute to this disparity. Aim: To assess non-adherent behaviors and associated factors among young women with stage 1-3 hormone receptor (HR)+ BC taking ET. Methods: This study is a part of a multi-center, prospective cohort of pts with dx of BC at or under age 40. On a survey 30 months after dx, among pts reporting taking ET, adherence was measured using a 3-item Likert-type scale (Do you ever forget to take your ET? If you feel worse when you take your ET, do you stop taking it? Did you take your ET exactly as directed by your doctor?). Pts reporting any non-adherent behavior during the last 3 months were classified as non-adherers. Variables with a p-value <0.20 were included in a multivariate logistic model. Results: Among361 pts eligible for this analysis, 174 (48%) reported some non-adherent behaviors in the last 3 months; 56 (16%) moderate or greater non-adherent behaviors. None of the studied variables was associated with non-adherent behaviors (table). Conclusions: Non-adherent behaviors to ET are present in almost half of the young women with HR+ BC. Further analyses of explanatory factors and impact of non-adherence are required to understand and potentially improve this problem. [Table: see text]
Selection for Oncotype Dx testing among young women with early-stage ER+/HER2- breast cancer.
Poorvu, Philip D. , Gelber, Shari , Rosenberg, Shoshana M. , Ruddy, Kathryn J. , Peppercorn, Jeffrey , Schapira, Lidia , Come, Steven E. , Collins, Laura C. , Tamimi, Rulla M. , Borges, Virginia F. , Warner, Ellen , Partridge, Ann H.

Journal of Clinical Oncology | September 5, 2018 | Volume: 36 | Issue: 15_suppl | Pages: 533-533

10.1200/jco.2018.36.15_suppl.533 Get It

Abstract 224: Evidence for a shared genetic basis between breast cancer and mammographic density phenotypes
Chen, Hongjie , Douglas, Julie A. , Gordon, William, Thompson, Deborah J. , Fasching, Peter A. , Maskarenic, Gertraud, Lindströem, Sara, Couch, Fergus J. , Hall, Per N , Hopper, John L. , Pollán, Marina , Stone, Jennifer , Tamimi, Rulla M.

Cancer Research | August 17, 2018 | Volume: 78 | Issue: 13_Supplement | Pages: 224-224

10.1158/1538-7445.am2018-224 Get It

Abstract Background: Radiologically dense area (DA) on a mammogram represents the stromal and epithelial tissue in the breast, while non-dense area (NDA) represents adipose tissue. Quantitative measurements of DA, NDA as well as the proportion of dense area in the breast (percent density, PD) adjusted for age and body mass index (BMI) have all been associated with breast cancer (BC) risk. Previous genome-wide association studies (GWAS) have identified genetic loci that show association with both mammographic density (MD) phenotypes and BC, but little is known about the genome-wide and local genetic correlation between MD phenotypes and BC. Methods: We estimated the genome-wide and local genetic correlation between MD phenotypes adjusted for age and BMI and BC, leveraging GWAS summary statistics for MD phenotypes based on 12,866 women (MODE consortium) and for BC based on 122,977 cases and 105,974 controls (BCAC consortium). We also conducted partitioned heritability analysis to identify specific functional annotations that contribute to MD heritability. Results: We observed a negative genetic correlation between DA and NDA (-0.62, p=0.002). Both DA and PD showed positive genetic correlations with overall BC (DA: rg=0.24, p=0.004; PD: rg=0.27, p=0.0001), estrogen receptor-positive (ER+) BC (DA: rg=0.23, p=0.005; PD: rg=0.23, p=0.001), and ER- BC (DA: rg=0.26, p=0.01; PD: rg=0.32, p=0.0006). In contrast, NDA showed a nonsignificant negative genetic correlation with BC (rg=-0.11, p=0.21). Local genetic correlation analyses between MD phenotypes and BC reflected known findings including positive correlation at 10q21 region between both PD and DA and BC (both p&lt;5x10-7), negative correlation at 22q13.1 between DA and BC (p=4.6x10-6), and positive correlation at 8p11.23 between NDA and BC (p=2.8x10-6). Two known BC regions that have not previously been associated with MD showed suggestive genetic correlations between BC and DA: 1q21.2 (negative genetic correlation, p=1.3x10-4) and 12q21.31 (positive genetic correlation, p=6.7x10-4). In exploratory analyses estimating the genome-wide genetic correlation between MD and hormone-related phenotypes in UK Biobank (n=337,199), we observed nominally significant positive genetic correlations between PD and benign mammary dysplasia (rg=0.45, p=0.01), NDA and endometriosis (rg=0.45, p=0.02), and negative genetic correlation between NDA and menstrual cycle length (rg=-0.30, p=0.05). We identified multiple functional annotations that contribute to MD heritability including histone mark H3K27ac that marks active enhancers (~2,5-fold enrichment in heritability for both DA and NDA) and DNAsel Hypersensitive Sites (DHS, 9.1-fold enrichment in heritability for DA). Conclusion: Our results provide evidence of shared genetic basis between mammographic density and breast cancer. Citation Format: Hongjie Chen, Julie Douglas, William Gordon, Deborah Thompson, Fergus Couch, Peter Fasching, Per Hall, John Hopper, Gertraud Maskarenic, Marina Pollan, Jennifer Stone, Rulla Tamimi, Sara Lindstroem. Evidence for a shared genetic basis between breast cancer and mammographic density phenotypes [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2018; 2018 Apr 14-18; Chicago, IL. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2018;78(13 Suppl):Abstract nr 224.
Abstract 2593: Association of mammographic density measures and breast cancer ‘intrinsic’ molecular subtypes
Visscher, Daniel W., Shepherd, John, Chen, Yunn‐Yi , Beck, Andrew H. , Vachon, Celine M. , Norman, Aaron D. , Tamimi, Rulla M. , Scott, Christopher G. , Bertrand, Kimberly A. , Jensen, Matthew R. , Couch, Fergus J. , Fan, Bo, Pankratz, V. Shane , Kerlikowske, Karla , Vachon, Celine M.

Cancer Research | July 26, 2016 | Volume: 76 | Issue: 14_Supplement | Pages: 2593-2593

10.1158/1538-7445.am2016-2593 Get It

Abstract Percent mammographic density (PMD) is a risk factor for estrogen receptor (ER)-positive and ER-negative invasive breast cancer (BC). Gene expression profiling has identified molecular signatures that classify invasive BC into distinct subtypes that vary in their clinical behavior, response to treatment and likely, etiology. Immunohistochemical (IHC) staining of tumor sections using antibody panels can be used to classify these ‘intrinsic’ molecular subtypes. We evaluated whether density measures [PMD, absolute dense area (DA) and non-dense area (NDA)], are associated equally with all ‘intrinsic’ molecular subtypes. Pooled analysis of six cohort or case-control studies included 3492 women with invasive BC and 10,148 without, who underwent screening mammography a median 4 years prior to diagnosis (for cases). PMD, DA, and NDA were assessed from digitized film-screen mammograms using a computer-assisted thresholding technique, and categorized as 0-10%, 11-25%, 26-50% and 51%+ (PMD) or into quartiles (DA and NDA). Receptor status was abstracted from pathology records and supplemented by IHC staining. We classified tumors as Luminal A (ER+ and/or PR+ and HER2- and grade 1 or 2), Luminal B (ER+ and/or PR+ and HER2+ or Luminal A and grade 3), HER2 expressing (HER2+/ER-/PR-) and triple negative (TN) (ER-/PR-/HER2-). For TN, we also differentiated basal-like tumors (positive for EGFR and/or CK 5/6) from unclassified (negative on both markers). We used polytomous logistic regression to calculate the odds ratio (OR) of each ‘intrinsic’ subtype of BC by categories of PMD, DA or NDA, adjusting for age, body mass index and study. We tested for statistical heterogeneity of associations by subtype. Of 3492 invasive BC cases, 2217 (63%) were classified as Luminal A, 747 (21%) as Luminal B, 159 (5%) as HER2 expressing, and 369 (11%) as TN. Of TN, 203 were evaluated for CK 5/6 and EGFR, with 167 (82%) classified as basal-like and 36 (18%) unclassified. PMD was associated with BC risk across all subtypes. For Luminal A, compared to women with 11-25% PMD (reference), women with 0-10% had a reduced risk of BC (OR = 0.63 [95% confidence interval: 0.55, 0.74]) while women with 26-50% had an OR = 1.5 [1.3, 1.7] and women with 51%+ had the highest risk, OR = 2.3 [2.0, 2.7]. Similar BC associations were seen across PMD categories when comparing the five subtypes (P-heterogeneity = 0.63). Similar trends were seen for DA and BC across the five subtypes (P-het = 0.25). NDA was inversely associated with BC across subtypes, and there was suggestion of a stronger inverse trend among HER2-expressing BC compared to other subtypes (P-het = 0.09). Our results suggest mammographic density measures are associated with all ‘intrinsic’ molecular subtypes. However, NDA may be more strongly inversely associated with HER2-expressing than other subtypes. Understanding the importance of density measures for BC subtypes has significance for subtype-specific risk models. Citation Format: Aaron D. Norman, Rulla M. Tamimi, Christopher G. Scott, Kimberly A. Bertrand, Matthew R. Jensen, Daniel W. Visscher, Fergus J. Couch, John Shepherd, Bo Fan, Yunn-Yi Chen, Lin Ma, Andrew Beck, Vernon S. Pankratz, Karla Kerlikowske, Celine M. Vachon. Association of mammographic density measures and breast cancer ‘intrinsic’ molecular subtypes. [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 107th Annual Meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research; 2016 Apr 16-20; New Orleans, LA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2016;76(14 Suppl):Abstract nr 2593.
Abstract IA22: Mammographic density: A risk factor for all breast cancers or only specific subtypes?
Vachon, Celine M. , Chen, Yunn‐Yi , Jensen, Matthew R. , Visscher, Daniel W., Shepherd, John, Fan, Bo , Wu, Fangfang , Beck, Andrew H. , Cummings, Steve, Vachon, Celine M. , Tamimi, Rulla M. , Scott, Christopher G. , Bertrand, Kimberly A. , Norman, Aaron D. , Couch, Fergus J. , Wu, Fang-Fang, Pankratz, V. Shane , Kerlikowske, Karla

Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention | May 20, 2016 | Volume: 25 | Issue: 3_Supplement | Pages: IA22-IA22

10.1158/1538-7755.disp15-ia22 Get It

Abstract Gene expression profiling has identified molecular subtypes that classify invasive breast cancers into distinct categories that vary in their clinical behavior and response to treatment. These subtypes highlight the many possible biologically and clinically distinct types of breast cancer. Immunohistochemical (IHC) staining of tumor sections using antibody panels has been used as a surrogate for the molecular subtypes identified through gene expression profiling, resulting in a set of intrinsic molecular subtypes. Given the heterogeneity within breast cancer, one might expect that different risk factors influence specific subtypes of breast cancer through various etiologic pathways. We evaluated whether percent mammographic density (MD), the proportion of fibroglandular or white tissue on a mammogram and one of the strongest and most consistent risk factors for breast cancer, is associated equally with all intrinsic molecular subtypes. Data were pooled from six cohort or case-control studies including 3389 women with invasive breast cancer and 9860 without, who underwent screening mammography. Percent MD was assessed from digitized film-screen mammograms (for cases, at a median 4 years prior to diagnosis) using a computer-assisted threshold technique, and categorized as 0-10%, 11-25%, 26-50% and 51%+. Receptor status was abstracted from clinical pathology records and supplemented by IHC staining of tumor sections or microarrays. With estrogen receptor (ER), progesterone receptor (PR) and human epidermal growth factor receptor (HER2) information, we classified tumors into the intrinsic molecular subtypes: Luminal A ( ER+ and/or PR+ and HER2- and grade 1 or 2), Luminal B (ER+ and/or PR+ and HER2+ or Luminal A and grade 3), HER2 expressing (HER2+/ER-/PR-) and triple negative (ER-/PR-/HER2-). For cancers found to be triple negative (TN), we also stained for epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) and cytokeratins (CK) 5/6 to differentiate basal-like tumors (positive for EGFR and/or CK 5/6) from the unclassifieds (negative on both EGFR and CK 5/6). We used polytomous logistic regression to calculate the odds (OR) of each of the intrinsic subtypes of breast cancer by categories of percent MD, adjusting for age, BMI and study. Contrasts were constructed and tested within the polytomous model framework to investigate differences in the strength of association of percent MD across subtypes. On average, cases were slightly older (56.4 years [SD=11.3]) than controls (55.8 [10.9]). Of the 3389 invasive breast cancer cases, 2146 (63%) were classified as Luminal A, 709 (21%) as Luminal B, 169 (5%) as HER-2 expressing, and 365(11%) as triple negative (TN). Of the TN tumors, 203 had tumor tissue available and were evaluated for CK 5/6 and EGFR, with 167 (82%) classified as basal-like and 36 (18%) as unclassified. Percent (%) MD was associated with breast cancer risk across all intrinsic subtypes. For Luminal A, compared to women with 11-25% MD (reference), women with 0-10% MD had a reduced risk of breast cancer (OR=0.64 [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.55, 0.74]) while women with 26-50% MD had an OR=1.5 (1.3,1.7) and women with 51%+ MD had the highest risk, OR=2.4 (2.0, 2.8). Similar associations were seen for Luminal B, HER2 expressing, and TN across percent MD categories. The small differences among the percent MD-breast cancer associations observed for the different subtypes were not statistically significant, either when comparing the four (Luminal A, Luminal B, HER-2 expressing and TN; p=0.61) or five categories of subtypes (Luminal A, Luminal B, HER-2 expressing, basal-like, unclassified; p=0.66). Our results suggest percent MD is a risk factor for all intrinsic molecular subtypes. Additional study is needed to examine whether these results hold for younger and older aged women. Understanding the importance of mammographic density measures for subtypes of breast cancer has significance for development of subtype-specific risk models. Citation Format: Celine Vachon, Rulla Tamimi, Yunn-Yi Chen, Christopher Scott, Kimberly Bertrand, Matthew Jensen, Daniel Visscher, Aaron Norman, Fergus Couch, John Shepherd, Bo Fan, Fang-Fang Wu, Lin Ma, Andrew Beck, Steve Cummings, V. Shane Pankratz, Karla Kerlikowske. Mammographic density: A risk factor for all breast cancers or only specific subtypes? [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the Eighth AACR Conference on The Science of Health Disparities in Racial/Ethnic Minorities and the Medically Underserved; Nov 13-16, 2015; Atlanta, GA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2016;25(3 Suppl):Abstract nr IA22.
Cross-Cancer Genome-Wide Analysis of Lung, Ovary, Breast, Prostate, and Colorectal Cancer Reveals Novel Pleiotropic Associations
Fehringer, Gordon , Kraft, Peter , Eeles, Rosalind A. , Chatterjee, Nilanjan , Schumacher, Fredrick R. , Schildkraut, Joellen M. , Lindström, Sara , Brennan, Paul , Bickeböller, Heike , Houlston, Richard S. , Landi, Maria Teresa , Caporaso, Neil E. , Risch, Angela , Olama, Ali Amin Al , Berndt, Sonja I. , Giovannucci, Edward L. , Grönberg, Henrik , Muir, Kenneth , Stampfer, Meir J. , Stevens, Victoria L. , Goode, Ellen L. , Reid, Brett M. , Brenner, Hermann , Chang‐Claude, Jenny , Kocarnik, Jonathan K., Slattery, Martha L. , Adank, Muriel A. , Ahsan, Habibul , Aittomäki, Kristiina, Baglietto, Laura , Blomquist, Carl, Canzian, Federico , Eliassen, A. Heather , Figueroa, Jonine D. , Flesch‐Janys, Dieter, Fletcher, Olivia , García‐Closas, Montserrat , Gaudet, Mia M. , Johnson, Nichola , Hazra, Aditi , Hein, Rebecca, Hofman, Albert , Irwanto, Astrid , Johansson, Mattias , Lichtner, Peter , Liu, Jianjun , Lund, Eiliv , Makalic, Enes , Meindl, Alfons , Müller‐Myhsok, Bertram , Muranen, Taru , Peeters, Petra H., Peto, Julian, Prentice, Ross L. , Sánchez, María‐José , Schmutzler, Rita K. , Southey, Melissa C. , Travis, Ruth C. , Turnbull, Clare , Uitterlinden, André G. , Wang, Zhaoming , Whittemore, Alice S. , Yang, Xiaohong R. , Zheng, Wei , Buchanan, Daniel D. , Casey, Graham , Conti, David V. , Edlund, Christopher K., Gallinger, Steven , Haile, Robert W. , Jenkins, Mark A. , Li, Li , Lindor, Noralene M., Schmit, Stephanie L. , Thibodeau, Stephen N. , Woods, Michael O. , Rafnar, Þórunn , Guðmundsson, Jūlı́us, Stacey, Simon , Stefánsson, Kāri , Sulem, Patrick , Chen, Y. Ann , Wei, Yongyue , Shen, Hongbing , Hu, Zhibin , Obeidat, Ma’en , Nickle, David C. , Timens, Wim , Freedman, Matthew L. , Seminara, Daniela, Gong, Jian , Peters, Ulrike , Gruber, Stephen B. , Sellers, Thomas A. , Easton, Douglas F. , Hunter, David J. , Haiman, Christopher A. , Henderson, Brian E., Hung, Rayjean J., Batra, Jyotsna , Hung, Rayjean J. , Pharoah, Paul D.P. , Kote‐Jarai, Zsofia , Ma, Jing , Wiklund, Fredrik E. , Willett, Walter C. , Permuth, Jennifer B. , Risch, Harvey A. , Bezieau, Stéphane , Chan, Andrew T. , Hudson, Thomas J , Newcomb, Polly A. , Schoen, Robert E. , White, Emily E. , Czene, Kamila , dos‐Santos‐Silva, Isabel , Hall, Per N , Hopper, John L. , Kaaks, Rudolf , Kibriya, Muhammad Ghulam , Meindl, Alfons , Nevanlinna, Heli , Rahman, Nazneen , Schmidt, Daniel F. , Tamimi, Rulla M. , Marchand, Loı̈c Le , Tyrer, Jonathan P. , Christiani, David C. , Shu, Xiao‐Ou , Shiraishi, Kouya , Takahashi, Atsushi , Bossé, Yohan , Li, Qiyuan , Chanock, Stephen Jacob , Amos, Christopher I. , Hung, Rayjean J., Buchanan, Daniel D , Houlston, Richard S , Eeles, Rosalind A , Southey, Melissa C , Jenkins, Mark A , Canzian, Federico , Hung, Rayjean J , Muir, Kenneth , Travis, Ruth C , Haile, Robert W , Wang, Zhaoming , Brenner, Hermann , Muranen, Taru A , García-Closas, Montserrat , Makalic, Enes , Kraft, Peter , Zheng, Wei , Figueroa, Jonine D , Eliassen, A Heather , Conti, David V , Batra, Jyotsna , Johansson, Mattias , Baglietto, Laura , Fletcher, Olivia , Sánchez, Maria-Jose , Risch, Angela , Bickeböller, Heike , Shen, Hongbing , Timens, Wim , Liu, Jing

Cancer Research | April 21, 2016 | Volume: 76 | Issue: 17 | Pages: 5103-5114

10.1158/0008-5472.can-15-2980 Get It

Abstract Identifying genetic variants with pleiotropic associations can uncover common pathways influencing multiple cancers. We took a two-stage approach to conduct genome-wide association studies for lung, ovary, breast, prostate, and colorectal cancer from the GAME-ON/GECCO Network (61,851 cases, 61,820 controls) to identify pleiotropic loci. Findings were replicated in independent association studies (55,789 cases, 330,490 controls). We identified a novel pleiotropic association at 1q22 involving breast and lung squamous cell carcinoma, with eQTL analysis showing an association with ADAM15/THBS3 gene expression in lung. We also identified a known breast cancer locus CASP8/ALS2CR12 associated with prostate cancer, a known cancer locus at CDKN2B-AS1 with different variants associated with lung adenocarcinoma and prostate cancer, and confirmed the associations of a breast BRCA2 locus with lung and serous ovarian cancer. This is the largest study to date examining pleiotropy across multiple cancer-associated loci, identifying common mechanisms of cancer development and progression. Cancer Res; 76(17); 5103–14. ©2016 AACR.