Hemida, Mohamed Fawzi

Background: We conducted an updated meta-analysis of the routine use of cerebral embolic protection (CEP) devices in Transcathter Aortic Valve Replacement (TAVR). This analysis follows the recent BHF PROTECTED TAVI trial which is the largest randomized controlled trial to date. Methods: Electronic databases were searched through April 2025 for eligible randomized controlled trials (RCTs). The primary outcome was overall incidence of stroke, disabling stroke and non-disabling stroke all reported at 2-5 days and 30 days were primary outcomes for our analyses. Results: 8 RCTs with a total of 11,692 patients were included. No statistically significant difference was found between CEP group and the control group in overall stroke incidence at 2-5 days and 30 days as the following (RR=0.95, 95%CI: [0.75,1.19], p=0.64) and (RR=0.93, 95%CI: [0.57,1.53], p=0.79). Similarly, the pooled analysis revealed no statistically significant difference between the two groups in terms of disabling stroke at 2-5 days (RR=0.70, 95%CI: [0.41,1.18], p=0.18), and at 30 days (RR=1.18, 95%CI: [0.36,3.87], p=0.78). CEP group and control group didn’t show statistically significant difference in non- disabling stroke at 2-5 days and 30 days as the results showed: (RR=1.17, 95%CI: [0.84,1.63], p=0.36) and (RR=0.86, 95%CI: [0.49,1.51], P=0.61) respectively. Conclusion: Our meta-analysis found no statistically significant evidence that cerebral embolic protection (CEP) devices reduce the incidence of stroke—disabling or non-disabling in the 2-5 days following TAVR or after 30 days. Major bleeding, major vascular complication and AKI showed no statistically significant results indicating a neutral safety profile.

Background: Obicetrapib is a next-generation cholesteryl ester transfer protein (CETP) inhibitor. It has emerged as a promising agent for improving lipid parameters and potentially reducing risk of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD). Methods: A systematic search of databases, including PubMed, Scopus, Embase, Web of Science, Clinical Trials, and Cochrane Library, was conducted to identify relevant randomized controlled trials (RCTs). Outcomes included the assessment of LDL-C reduction, changes in ApoB, non-HDL-C, HDL-C, triglycerides, Lp(a), MACE, as well as the safety and tolerability profile of Obicetrapib in patients with dyslipidemia or ASCVD. Standardized mean differences (SMD) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) were pooled using random-effects. Results: Seven RCTs encompassing 3483 patients were included. Obicetrapib significantly improved lipid parameters. It reduced LDL-C (MSD: –35.43; 95% CI: –40.14 to –30.17; I2 = 93.26%), non-HDL-C (MSD: –36.42; 95% CI: –42.77 to –30.07; I2 = 99.06%), ApoB (MSD: –23.38; 95% CI: –30.68 to –16.08; I2 = 88.56%), and Lp(a) (MSD: –23.95; 95% CI: –35.26 to –12.63; I2 = 77.14%). Obicetrapib also led to a reduction in TG levels (MSD: –0.12; 95% CI: –0.19 to –0.05; I2 = 0.00%). In contrast, favorable increases were observed in HDL-C (MSD: 77.35; 95% CI: 64.56 to 90.13; I2 = 95.82%) and ApoA1 (MSD: 63.93; 95% CI: 53.65 to 74.21; I2 = 81.89%). Despite high heterogeneity, these results support Obicetrapib’s effectiveness in improving atherogenic lipid markers. Obicetrapib demonstrated a safety profile comparable to placebo. The overall risk of any adverse event was slightly reduced in the Obicetrapib group compared to placebo, but the 95% CI included 1, (RR: 0.96; 95% CI: 0.76 to 1.21; I2 = 66.3%; p = 0.01). Specific adverse events such as diarrhea (OR: 1.56; 95% CI: 0.34 to 7.11; I2 = 5.16%; p = 0.57), headache (OR: 1.17; 95% CI: 0.74 to 1.84; I2 = 0.00%; p = 0.50), and back pain (RR: 0.36; 95% CI: 0.11 to 1.16; I2 = 18.3%; p = 0.26) were also not significantly different between groups. Overall, Obicetrapib appears well-tolerated without increased adverse events. Conclusion: Obicetrapib significantly improved lipid parameters, notably reducing LDL-C, non-HDL-C, ApoB, Lp(a), and triglycerides, while increasing HDL-C and ApoA1, with a favorable and comparable safety profile.

Background: Resistant hypertension (RH), defined as uncontrolled blood pressure (BP) despite ≥3 antihypertensive agents at maximally tolerated doses, remains a significant therapeutic challenge. Device-based renal denervation (RDN), using either radiofrequency (RF) or ultrasound (US) ablation, has shown promise in reducing BP. While both methods have demonstrated efficacy versus sham controls in randomized controlled trials (RCTs), direct comparisons remain limited. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate the efficacy and safety of RF- and US-based RDN in patients with resistant hypertension. Methods: Following PRISMA guidelines, we searched PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science through April 2025 for RCTs comparing RDN versus sham in RH. Eligible trials reported systolic or diastolic BP outcomes via ambulatory, office, or home measurements. Pooled mean differences (MD) and risk ratios (RR) were calculated using a random-effects model. Subgroup analyses were conducted by RDN modality and follow-up duration. Results: Seventeen RCTs met inclusion criteria. RDN significantly reduced ambulatory systolic BP (MD: −3.14 mmHg; 95% CI: −5.30 to −0.98; p=0.004) and diastolic BP (MD: −1.40 mmHg; 95% CI: −2.45 to −0.35; p=0.009) compared to sham. RF-based RDN showed consistent statistically significant reductions in both SBP and DBP across ambulatory and in-office measurements. In contrast, US-based RDN demonstrated variable efficacy, with only daytime DBP showing a marginal benefit (MD: −1.32 mmHg; p=0.04). Safety outcomes, including mortality, acute kidney injury, hypertensive crisis, and hypotension, were similar between groups. Conclusion: RDN offers a significant BP-lowering effect in resistant hypertension, with RF-based RDN yielding more consistent benefits across diverse measurement settings. US-based RDN showed limited but promising effects. Both techniques demonstrated acceptable safety profiles. Further head-to-head trials are needed to confirm long-term comparative effectiveness.

Introduction: Chronic total occlusion (CTO) is commonly encountered in patients with coronary artery disease and is associated with adverse outcomes, including increased short- and long-term mortality. While percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) has shown potential clinical benefits in CTO patients, its comparative effectiveness against optimal medical therapy (OMT) remains debated. This meta-analysis aims to evaluate the impact of CTO-PCI versus OMT on key cardiovascular outcomes. Methods: We conducted a comprehensive search of Pubmed, Scopus, Web of science and Cochrane. We assessed outcomes including all-cause mortality, cardiac death, myocardial reinfarction, major adverse cardiac events (MACE), stroke, and repeat revascularization. Pooled risk ratios (RRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated using a random-effects model. Statistical significance was defined as p<0.05. Results: 25 studies with a total of 22102 patients were included. Compared to OMT alone, CTO-PCI was associated with a significant reduction in the overall all-cause mortality (RR: 0.66; 95% CI: 0.53–0.82; p=0.0002), cardiovascular mortality (RR: 0.65; 95% CI: 0.52–0.82; p=0.0003) and MACE (RR: 0.84; 95% CI: 0.71–0.98; p=0.03). No statistically significant differences were observed between CTO-PCI and OMT in rates of Stroke (RR: 1.01; 95% CI: 0.68–1.50; p=0.96), Subsequent PCI/CABG (revascularization) (RR: 1.01; 95% CI: 0.78–1.29; p=0.97) or Heart Failure Hospitalization (RR: 0.77; 95% CI: 0.37–1.59; p=0.48) Conclusion: This is the largest and most updated systematic review meta analysis for CTO-PCI vs OMT. Our findings show that CTO-PCI is associated with significantly lower all-cause and cardiovascular mortality compared to OMT. However, no significant differences were observed between the two strategies in the incidence of stroke, need for subsequent revascularization (PCI/CABG), or heart failure hospitalization.

Abstract Disclosure: M. Kakakhel: None. R. Haider: None. S. Cheema: None. S.M. Irshad: None. M.U. Hussain: None. A. Ullah: None. A.Z. Khan: None. F. Naveed: None. H. Jawad: None. F. Naveed: None. M.F. Hemida: None. A. Qadeer: None. M. Khawar: None. H. Ahmad: None. F. Ahmed: None. R.W. Kirchoff: None. R. Alcaraz: None. Background: Hypertension has been a significant cause of morbidity and mortality for ages. Coupled with endocrine disorders, it poses a greater risk of indisposition to the U.S population. This CDC wonder analysis explores the trends and patterns of these disorders, stratified by states and rural/urban. Methods: To attain this objective, this retrospective study has utilized data from the Center for Disease Control and Prevention's Wide-Ranging Online Data for Epidemiologic Research (CDC WONDER) database to assess endocrine disorder-related mortality rates in the pediatric population from 1999 to 2011. Average Annual Percentage Change (AAPC) and Annual Percent Change (APC) were used to evaluate trends and produce age-adjusted mortality rates (AAMRs) per 100,000 people. Data was stratified by year, sex, race/ethnicity, state-wise and geographical regions. Statistical significance and confidence intervals were used to assess the reliability of the observed trends. Results: Between 1999 and 2020, 2383332 deaths in the United States were attributed to endocrine-related mortality with underlying hypertension. The Overall AAMR initially rose steeply from 10.7 in 1999 to 24.9 in 2001 (APC: 34.3; 95% CI: 9.5 to 56.7), followed by a period of further steady increase in AAMR till 36.5 in 2018 (APC: 1.6; 95% CI: 0.6 to 2.1). This progressive increase in AAMR then sharply spiked from 2018 onwards, reaching 51.7 in 2020 (APC: 18.1*; 95% CI: 9.3 to 23.5). Notable discrepancies were observed in urbanization. Non-metropolitan areas showed a higher AAMR (35.5) than metropolitan (31.5). State-level analysis revealed substantial heterogeneity, including Mississippi as the state of the highest AAMR (58.6). Conclusion: The concerning rise of AAMR in non-metropolitan areas and Mississippi calls for more targeted health-care policies. These findings underscore the need for geographically tailored public health interventions to address disparities in endocrine disorder-related mortality in these groups. Presentation: Monday, July 14, 2025

Abstract Disclosure: M. Kakakhel: None. S. Cheema: None. R. Haider: None. F. Saleem: None. M.H. Alsaadi: None. H. Jawad: None. A.Z. Khan: None. A. Qadeer: None. M. Khawar: None. A. Ullah: None. M.F. Hemida: None. H. Ahmad: None. F. Ahmed: None. R. Alcaraz: None. Background: Globally, pediatric endocrine anomalies are a significant cause of early mortality. This study examines the discrepancies of paediatric endocrine abnormalities across various demographic and geographic groups in the United States, including gender, census region, race, age groups, and urbanization levels. Our objective was to identify disparities and trends to inform targeted interventions for the vulnerable demographics. Methods: Adhering to STROBES criteria, we extracted the mortality statistics due to endocrine disorders in the paediatric population from 1999-2020 from the Centre for Disease Control and Prevention-Wide Ranging Online Data for Epidemiologic research (CDC-WONDER). We calculated Age-Adjusted mortality rates (AAMRs) per 100,000 individuals. We calculated the Annual Percentage Change (APC) and Average Annual Percentage Change (AAPC) to assess trends stratified by age, gender, urbanization, race, census region, and states. Joinpoint regression model was used for analysis. Results: Between 1999 and 2020, 5161 deaths among children less than 1 year to 14 years of age in the United States were related to endocrine-related disorders. Most occurred due to thyroid disorders, diabetes mellitus, and other miscellaneous disorders related to glucose regulation and pancreatic internal secretion. The overall AAPC for endocrine-related mortality in the pediatric population increased from 1.4866 in 2008 to 2.4982 in 2020, with an AAPC of 0.1346 (95% CI: -3.1216 to -3.5003, p &gt; 0.000001). The male population had higher AAPCs than the female population (women: -0.9938; men: 0.7223). There were notable racial differences: The Hispanic or Latino population had the highest AAPC (0.15), followed by the Black population (-0.195) and then the White population with the lowest AAPC (-0.166). According to the age group stratification, the age group with the highest AAPC was the 5-14 age group (2.03) and the lowest the less than 1 year age group, with AAPC (-2.007). There was a significant decrease in deaths in the less than 1 year age group from 1999 to 2020 (p value &lt; 0.05) with APC (-2.0) (95% CI: -3.0191 to -0.9861) and for the 5-14 age group from 2010 to 2020 with APC (10.8861) (95% CI: 3.4843 to 18.8). Depending on the urban-rural categorization, metro areas had a higher AAPC (0.1508) compared to the non-metro areas with an AAPC (-0.4467). Conclusion: The overall decline in endocrine-related deaths in the pediatric population from 1999 to 2020 hails an improvement in efforts made to manage these disorders. However, the recent uptick in the Hispanic-Latino population emphasizes the necessity for targeted efforts to tackle these disparities and improve the health outcomes of affected communities as well as in children 1-4 years of age, depicting the increased vulnerability and need for added care in this age group. Presentation: Saturday, July 12, 2025

e16481 Background: Gastric cancer is a malignant disease characterized by the uncontrolled growth of cells in the stomach lining. It is a global health concern with regional variation in incidence and prevalence. This study investigates the regional incidence and prevalence of gastric cancer among adults aged 70 and older from 1990 to 2021, utilizing data from 26 global regions. Methods: Global Burden of Disease (GBD) data for 2021 were analyzed to assess regional incidence and prevalence of gastric cancer among adults aged ≥ 70. The Annual Average Percentage Change (AAPC) was calculated to evaluate trends from 1990 to 2021, with statistical significance determined using p-values. Results: In 2021, East Asia has the highest incidence (273403) followed by Middle SDI (189383) and High-middle SDI (176691). Highest Prevalence numbers were recorded for East Asia (398,000) followed by High SDI (337,000) and High-middle SDI (250,000). With regards to rates per 100,000, Oceania has the lowest incidence (257) as well as prevalence (252) followed by Central Sub-Saharan Africa (I:1142 , P: 1081) and Southern Sub-Saharan Africa (I:1295, P: 1227). The largest increase in AAPC of incidence was exhibited by Western Sub Saharan Africa (-0.24, CI: -0.27 to -0.23), Southern Sub Saharan Africa (-0.29, CI: 0.37 to -0.22), and South Asia (-0.306, CI: -0.422 to -0.158) regions, while South Asia (-0.087, CI: -0.1748 to 0.0308), East Asia (-0.0952, CI: 0.0284 to 0.1606), and Andean Latin America (-0.1696, CI: -0.3498 to -0.0381) showed largest increase in AAPC of prevalence. Western Europe region had the greatest decline in AAPC of incidence (-2.3995, CI: -2.4374 to -2.3691) followed by Central Europe (-2.2010, CI: -2.3007 to -2.1445) and Eastern Europe (-2.1554, CI: -2.212 to -2.0925 ) regions while Central Asia had the greatest decline in AAPC of prevalence (-1.9281, CI: -2.0109 to -1.8522) followed by High Income Asia Pacific (-1.8268, CI: -1.8926 to -1.7913) and Eastern Europe (-1.8103, CI: -1.8631 to -1.7623). All AAPC values were statistically significant (p < 0.000001). Conclusions: The East Asia region exhibited the highest incidence and prevalence, highlighting the vulnerability of these populations, while Central Sub-Saharan Africa bore the least burden. Notably, several regions, particularly in Asia, experienced substantial increases in both incidence and prevalence, emphasizing the need for targeted interventions. Conversely, some regions, such as Europe, showed encouraging declines in prevalence, suggesting that effective prevention and control strategies can be implemented. These findings underscore the importance of tailored approaches to address the evolving burden of Gastric Cancer.