Abstract Disclosure: M. Kakakhel: None. S. Cheema: None. S. Fatima: None. R. Noor: None. H. Javaid: None. P.K. Singh: None. H. Jawad: None. R. Haider: None. A. Qadeer: None. M. Khawar: None. T. Ashraf: None. F. Naveed: None. H. Ahmad: None. F. Ahmed: None. R. Kirchoff: None. Introduction: The health of a nation is often a reflection of the equity within its systems. Yet, when we examine the United States, one of the most developed nations globally, a concerning picture emerges in the realm of public health significant racial and ethnic disparities in disease outcomes. Among these, endocrine- related mortality, which includes conditions like diabetes, thyroid disorders, and hormonal imbalances, stands as a silent yet significant contributor to health inequities. Using data from the CDC WONDER database, this study seeks to explore these trends in depth, not just to identify the gaps but to shed light on the lived experiences of marginalized communities who bear the brunt of these inequities to pave the way for more equitable healthcare interventions. Methods: This descriptive study analyzes Racial and Ethnic Disparities in Endocrine-Related Mortality in the United States from 1999-2022, utilizing data from CDC Wonder database. We searched the Center for Disease Control database from 1999 to 2022 for mortality statistics with an underlying cause of death. The age-adjusted mortality rate (AAMR) was calculated per 1,000,000 deaths. We evaluated the AAMR using demographic variables such as race/ethnicity, geographic density, gender, age (25 or above), place of death, and the US Census Region. Temporal trends were assessed using Joinpoint regression software. Mortality rates by age, demographics, and place of death were examined. Statistical analysis calculated endocrine-related mortality rates and trends, with findings deemed significant at P < 0. 05. Results: Between the years 1999 to 2022, 837203 deaths were recorded to be caused by endocrine-related disorders. An overall rising mortality trend from 1999-2022 among all races and ethnicities is noted, except in Asian or Pacific Islander, Black or African American, and Hispanic patients, which shows a rise till 2020 followed by fall in age-adjusted mortality rates (AAMR) in 2022. A significant dip in mortality rate was seen in 2017 in all racial and ethnic groups. American Indian or Alaska Natives showed highest AAMR (181.87, 95% CI 178.06-185.69) followed by Black or African Americans (149.78, 95% CI 148.9-150.64), Hispanic or Latinos (112.33, 95% CI 111.59-113.07), Whites (94.31, 95% CI 66.6-68.25), Asian or Pacific Islanders (67.45, 95% CI 66.6-68.25). American Indians or Alaska Natives exhibit the steepest rise over time (APC -0.32 TO 8.85) from 1999-2022. Conclusions: Mortality due to endocrine-related disorders has dramatically increased over time. Significant disparities have been noted among different races and ethnic groups, with the highest rate among Americans and the lowest among Asians. This underscores the need for targeted interventions for specific racial groups to reduce the mortality burden of endocrine-related diseases. Presentation: Sunday, July 13, 2025
Comparative efficacy of PARP inhibitors in BRCA mutated HER2-negative breast cancer: A systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
e13162 Background: BRCA1/2 mutations impair homologous recombination repair, forcing cancer cells to rely on alternative DNA repair pathways, such as those mediated by poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP). PARP inhibitors (PARPis), like iniparib, olaparib, talazoparib, niraparib, and veliparib, exploit this dependency, inducing lethality in cells of BRCA-mutated, HER2-negative breast cancers (BRCAm, HER2-BC). Only 2 PARPis, talazoparib and olaparib, are FDA-approved for BRCAm, HER2-BC. However, the treatment with the highest efficacy remains unclear. We conducted a network meta-analysis (NMA) of randomised controlled trials (RCTs) to compare the efficacy of PARPis in treating BRCAm, HER2-BC. Methods: We systematically searched PubMed, Cochrane CENTRAL, SCOPUS, and ClinicalTrials.gov (up to December 2024) for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) following PRISMA-NMA guidelines. Primary outcome was overall survival(OS), with hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Secondary outcome was progression-free survival (PFS). Survival times were converted to HRs under the assumption of exponential distribution. Standard of care (SOC) was defined as taxane/anthracycline-based regimens with additional platinum-based chemotherapy. Physician's choice chemotherapy (PCT) included capecitabine, eribulin, gemcitabine, or vinorelbine. A frequentist approach with random-effects modeling was used to pool estimates, and P-scores ranked treatment efficacy. Heterogeneity and inconsistency were assessed using τ², I², and Q-statistics. Analyses were conducted in R version 4.4.1. Results: 8 studies including 4432 participants incorporating 8 pairwise comparisons and 7 treatments were analyzed for OS. Compared to SOC (reference), HRs of OS were significantly reduced with talazoparib+SOC (HR = 0.49, 95% CI: 0.32–0.74; P = 0.64), olaparib+SOC (HR = 0.46, 95% CI: 0.36–0.59; P = 0.69), niraparib+SOC (HR = 0.44, 95% CI: 0.26–0.76; P = 0.76), and veliparib+SOC (HR = 0.38, 95% CI: 0.29–0.48; P = 0.91). No heterogeneity or inconsistency was detected (τ² = 0; I² = 0; Q = 1.27, p = 0.53). For PFS, iniparib/gemcitabine, talazoparib, olaparib, and niraparib showed significant reduction in HR with increasing order of P-scores, in combination with SOC. Conclusions: Veliparib combined with SOC showed the highest OS improvement, while niraparib ranked highest for PFS, followed by talazoparib and olaparib. Further trials are needed to confirm these findings and refine treatment strategies for BRCAm, HER2-BC.
Regional trends in incidence and prevalence of gastric cancer among older adults (70+) from 1990 to 2021: A global burden of disease study.
e16481 Background: Gastric cancer is a malignant disease characterized by the uncontrolled growth of cells in the stomach lining. It is a global health concern with regional variation in incidence and prevalence. This study investigates the regional incidence and prevalence of gastric cancer among adults aged 70 and older from 1990 to 2021, utilizing data from 26 global regions. Methods: Global Burden of Disease (GBD) data for 2021 were analyzed to assess regional incidence and prevalence of gastric cancer among adults aged ≥ 70. The Annual Average Percentage Change (AAPC) was calculated to evaluate trends from 1990 to 2021, with statistical significance determined using p-values. Results: In 2021, East Asia has the highest incidence (273403) followed by Middle SDI (189383) and High-middle SDI (176691). Highest Prevalence numbers were recorded for East Asia (398,000) followed by High SDI (337,000) and High-middle SDI (250,000). With regards to rates per 100,000, Oceania has the lowest incidence (257) as well as prevalence (252) followed by Central Sub-Saharan Africa (I:1142 , P: 1081) and Southern Sub-Saharan Africa (I:1295, P: 1227). The largest increase in AAPC of incidence was exhibited by Western Sub Saharan Africa (-0.24, CI: -0.27 to -0.23), Southern Sub Saharan Africa (-0.29, CI: 0.37 to -0.22), and South Asia (-0.306, CI: -0.422 to -0.158) regions, while South Asia (-0.087, CI: -0.1748 to 0.0308), East Asia (-0.0952, CI: 0.0284 to 0.1606), and Andean Latin America (-0.1696, CI: -0.3498 to -0.0381) showed largest increase in AAPC of prevalence. Western Europe region had the greatest decline in AAPC of incidence (-2.3995, CI: -2.4374 to -2.3691) followed by Central Europe (-2.2010, CI: -2.3007 to -2.1445) and Eastern Europe (-2.1554, CI: -2.212 to -2.0925 ) regions while Central Asia had the greatest decline in AAPC of prevalence (-1.9281, CI: -2.0109 to -1.8522) followed by High Income Asia Pacific (-1.8268, CI: -1.8926 to -1.7913) and Eastern Europe (-1.8103, CI: -1.8631 to -1.7623). All AAPC values were statistically significant (p < 0.000001). Conclusions: The East Asia region exhibited the highest incidence and prevalence, highlighting the vulnerability of these populations, while Central Sub-Saharan Africa bore the least burden. Notably, several regions, particularly in Asia, experienced substantial increases in both incidence and prevalence, emphasizing the need for targeted interventions. Conversely, some regions, such as Europe, showed encouraging declines in prevalence, suggesting that effective prevention and control strategies can be implemented. These findings underscore the importance of tailored approaches to address the evolving burden of Gastric Cancer.