Breitkopf, Carmen Radecki

Genetic research generates results with implications for relatives. Recommendations addressing relatives’ access to a participant’s genetic research findings include eliciting participant preferences about access and choosing a representative to make decisions about access upon participant incapacity/death. Representatives are likely to be blood relatives or spouse/partners (who may share genetically related children). This raises the question of whether relatives hold similar attitudes about access or divergent attitudes that may yield conflict. We surveyed pancreatic cancer biobank participants (probands) and relatives in a family registry (blood relatives and spouse/partners of probands); 1,903 (>55%) surveys were returned. Results revealed few attitudinal differences between the groups. A slightly higher proportion of blood relatives agreed with statements reflecting proband privacy. In conclusion, probands’ decisions on access are likely to be accepted by relatives; in choosing a representative, probands may not face major differences in attitudes about privacy/sharing between a blood relative and a spouse/partner.

AbstractObjectiveThis study employs the concept of relational autonomy to understand how relational encounters with family members (FMs) and care providers may shape decisions around ovarian cancer patients’ clinical trial (CT) participation. The study also offers unique insights into howFMs view patients’ decision making.MethodsIn‐depth interviews were conducted with 33 patients with ovarian cancer who had been offered aCTand 39FMs. Data were inductively analysed using a thematic approach and deductively informed by constructs derived from the theory of relational autonomy (RA).ResultsPatients’ relationships, experiences and social status were significant resources that shaped their decisions. Patients did not give equal weight to all relationships and created boundaries around whom to include in decision making. Doctors’ recommendations and perceived enthusiasm were described as influential inCTdecisions. Both patients with ovarian cancer and theirFMs maintained that patients have the “final say,” indicating an individualistic autonomy. However, maintaining the “final say” in the decision‐making process is constitutive of patients’ relationships, emphasizing a relational approach to autonomy.FMs support patients’ autonomy and they do so particularly when they believe the patient is capable of making the right choices.ConclusionsAlthough ethical principles underlying informed consent forCTparticipation emphasize individual autonomy, greater attention to relational autonomy is warranted for a more comprehensive understanding ofCTdecision making.

The objective of this study is to understand the resolution of discordance between adolescent–parent dyads about participation in research. Adolescent (14-17 years) and parent dyads were recruited from NYC pediatric clinics to assess attitudes toward research participation. A subset of dyads participated in videotaped discussions about participation in a hypothetical study. Videos from dyads that held strongly discordant opinions about participation ( n = 30) were content-coded and analyzed using a thematic framework approach. Strategies used to resolve discordance included asserting authority, granting autonomy, or recognizing inaccurate assumptions using a variety of communication behaviors. Missed opportunities to enroll initially discordant dyads may be avoided by allowing time for adolescents and parents to elicit information, clarify a situation, or convince the other.

Abstract Addressing underrepresentation of minorities and women as research participants has largely focused on clinical trials, while little is known about attitudes and knowledge regarding other types of biomedical research, e.g., epidemiologic and genetic studies. These types of studies are essential for advances in cancer research, including development of targeted therapies for women and minorities. As part of an academic/community partnership between Mayo Clinic and The Links, Incorporated, a national volunteer service organization of professional African American women, this study sought to: (1) examine attitudes regarding participation in research involving access to the medical record, genetic studies/biobanking, and clinical trials; and (2) develop and evaluate a novel, targeted online educational program addressing these 3 types of biomedical research. Initial qualitative inquiry via 3 focus groups (n=34) found that most women associated health-related research with clinical trials; few women were familiar with other study types. Women expressed more concerns about how information is collected, used, and shared by investigators than with personal mistreatment in research regardless of study type (genetic research (GEN), chart review (CR), clinical trial (CT)) or the kind of information (social, health, genetic) collected. The importance of investigator transparency regarding the significance of the disease in African Americans, research funding source, the investigator’s agenda, and commitment to the population being studied was emphasized. Qualitative results informed development of the educational program. A total of 244 Links members completed the program (77% response rate) and answered pre- and post-assessments of intentions, attitudes and knowledge. The percent of women indicating that they “definitely” or “probably” intend to participate in research increased from 9.4% to 19.5% and 27.1% to 49.8%, respectively, after program completion. Agreement with the statement “research in the U.S. is ethical” increased from 52.9% to 74.4%. Factual knowledge related to each of the 3 study types also increased. Prior to completing the program many women reported “little or no understanding” of the 3 types of studies (66% GEN, 62.9% CR, 40.7% CT) whereas after program completion, these numbers decreased to 24.9%, 18.4%, and 15.5%, respectively. While few women rated their opinion of the study types as “very positive” prior to beginning the program (14.3% GEN, 15.0% CR, 28.6% CT), upon completion these proportions increased and equalized (42.8% GEN, 43.0% CR, 42.5% CT). Two-month follow-up will evaluate longer-term impact including knowledge dissemination, visiting clinicaltrials.gov, and enrolling in ResearchMatch. An online education-to-action program targeting professional African American women improved knowledge, perceptions of research ethics, and intent to participate in biomedical research. Citation Format: Carmen Radecki Breitkopf, Karen P. Williams, Jennifer L. Ridgeway, Alice L. Strong Simmons, Monica W. Parker, Michele Y. Halyard, Sharonne N. Hayes. Linking education to action: A program to increase research participation among African American women [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2017; 2017 Apr 1-5; Washington, DC. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2017;77(13 Suppl):Abstract nr 4233. doi:10.1158/1538-7445.AM2017-4233

Abstract Background: Human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccination rates in the United States remain low and lag behind other recommended adolescent vaccines. Studies evaluating the association of geographic and area-level characteristics with HPV vaccination rates provide a valuable resource for public health planning. Method: We used the Rochester Epidemiology Project data linkage system to ascertain HPV vaccination rates between 2010 and 2015 in a 7-county region of southern Minnesota. Geocoded individual patient data were spatially linked to socioeconomic data from the American Community Survey at the census block group level. Bayesian hierarchical logistic regression was used to model incident vaccination rates, adjusting for individual- and area-level sociodemographic characteristics, and geolocation. Geolocation was modeled as an approximated Gaussian field using a Stochastic Partial Differential Equations approach. All models were estimated using Integrated Nested Laplace Approximations. Results: In adjusted models, increasing age and female sex were associated with increased HPV vaccination. Lower socioeconomic status was associated with decreased rates of initiation [adjusted odds ratio (AOR); 95% confidence interval = 0.90 (0.86–0.95)], completion of the second dose [AOR = 0.88 (0.83–0.93)], and completion of the third dose [AOR = 0.85 (0.80–0.92)]. Geographic spatial analysis demonstrated increased odds of vaccination for the eastern region and in the greater Rochester metropolitan area, showing significant spatial variation not explained by individual level characteristics and ACS block group-level data. Conclusions: HPV vaccination rates varied geographically and by individual and geographically indexed sociodemographic characteristics. Impact: Identifying geographic regions with low HPV vaccination rates can help target clinical and community efforts to improve vaccination rates. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; 26(4); 533–40. ©2017 AACR. See all the articles in this CEBP Focus section, “Geospatial Approaches to Cancer Control and Population Sciences.”

AbstractHuman papillomavirus (HPV) vaccines offer primary prevention of cervical cancer and protection against other HPV‐associated cancers. HPV vaccine coverage in the United States (U.S.) remains low, particularly among older adolescents/young adults, and the uninsured. We assessed awareness and knowledge of HPV disease, HPV‐related cancers, and HPV vaccines among working, uninsured adults. Data from the 2014 Health Information National Trends Survey (HINTS 4, Cycle 4) were used as a benchmark. Patients were surveyed in late 2014 at the Volunteers in Medicine free clinic in Duval County, Florida. Surveys contained validated measures of HPV disease and vaccine knowledge; HPV‐related cancer knowledge was also assessed. Two‐hundred and ninety‐six surveys were analyzable with an 84% participation rate. Half (50.3%) of participants had heard of HPV, and 32.1% had heard of the HPV vaccine; in HINTS, these estimates were 63.6% and 62.7%, respectively (both P < 0.0001). In adjusted models, high HPV disease knowledge was associated with white race and increased education; high vaccine knowledge was associated with white race, increased education, and female sex. Recognition of HPV as a causative agent was 43.9% for cervical, 9.1% for anal, and 11.1% for throat cancers. For all HPV‐associated cancers, participants had lower knowledge/recognition relative to HINTS. The uninsured, socioeconomically disadvantaged adults we surveyed were unaware of a ubiquitous virus that can cause cancer and the existence of a vaccine to protect against it. These findings point to settings and populations in which initiatives to promote HPV vaccination as a cancer prevention tool remain critical.

Background/aims: Some of the most promising avenues of cancer clinical investigation center on immunotherapeutic approaches. These approaches have provided notable gains in cancer therapeutics with recent Food and Drug Administration approvals of agents of this class in several types of cancers, although gains for ovarian cancer lag behind. This study examined perceptions of therapeutic trials including immunotherapy and virotherapy among ovarian cancer patients and their family members. Methods: A total of 72 semi-structured qualitative interviews were conducted with 33 patients and 39 family members at two National Cancer Institute–designated comprehensive cancer centers. Eligible patients were diagnosed with epithelial ovarian, primary peritoneal, or fallopian tube carcinoma and had experience with clinical trial conversations; family members were nominated by patients and interviewed separately. Applied thematic analysis was used to understand and interpret the data. Results: More participants were aware of vaccine trials than virus trials, although more than half had heard of at least one of them. Initial reactions to vaccine trials were generally favorable. For many, childhood experience with vaccines lent a familiar frame of reference. Virus trials elicited more negative initial reactions, including the use of adjectives such as “scary” and “dreadful.” Viruses seemed contagious or difficult to control. Increased receptivity to these trials occurred in the context of limited therapeutic options and cancer recurrence. Most participants, including those not immediately drawn to these types of trials, indicated openness to learning more. Conclusion: Although vaccine and viral trials are both immunologically based therapeutic approaches, patients who are offered these trials may perceive their potential benefit and safety quite differently. There is a need to consider terminology, solicit and address “gut reactions,” and provide information that enables patients and their family members to better understand the science behind these trials.

Abstract Background: Human papillomavirus (HPV) is a causative agent in cervical cancer as well as anal, oropharyngeal, penile, and vaginal/vulvar cancers. Licensed, effective HPV vaccines have been available in the U.S. since mid-2006 for females and late 2011 for males and are recommended up to age 26. Despite this, in 2014, only 39.7% of U.S. girls and 21.6% of boys 13 to 17 years of age completed the three-dose vaccine series. ‘Lack of knowledge’ was a primary reason cited among parents for not vaccinating their children. HPV vaccination rates are lower still among 19-26 year olds, particularly among the uninsured. We assessed awareness and knowledge of HPV disease, HPV-related cancers, and HPV vaccines among working, uninsured adults and used 2014 data from the Health Information National Trends Survey (HINTS cycle 4) as a national benchmark against which to compare our data. Methods: Self-administered surveys were offered to patients attending appointments at the Volunteers in Medicine (VIM) clinic in Jacksonville, FL between September 10, 2014 and October 24, 2014. VIM provides free primary care for working individuals without insurance living and/or working in Duval County. Patients were eligible to participate if they were at least 18 years of age, not in acute distress, and had not completed a survey during pilot-testing. Surveys were available in English and Spanish and contained a validated HPV knowledge measure assessing disease knowledge and vaccine knowledge. Additionally, HPV-related cancer knowledge was assessed: 5 HPV-related (cervical, anal, throat, penile, vaginal/vulvar) and 4 not currently known to be HPV-related (lung, breast, prostate, skin). High knowledge was defined as having a knowledge score in the upper quartile of positive values. Odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were estimated using logistic regression to assess the association of demographic characteristics with having high knowledge of HPV, HPV vaccines, and HPV-related cancer. Additional models assessed individual cancers. During the study period 356 patients were eligible to participate; of these, 55 declined (84% participation rate). Of the 301 surveys, 5 surveys were excluded from analysis due to excessive missing data; a total of 296 surveys were analyzed. Results: 50.3% of participants (n=149) had heard of HPV, 37.2% (n=110) correctly indicated that HPV is sexually transmitted, and 32.1% (n=95) had heard of the HPV vaccine. In HINTS 4, these estimates were 63.6%, 44.0%, and 62.7%, respectively. In adjusted models, high HPV disease knowledge was associated with race (OR non-white = 0.39 (0.19, 0.78)) and education (OR &gt;high school = 2.34 (1.14, 4.84)) while high HPV vaccine knowledge was associated with race (OR non-white = 0.42 (0.21, 0.82)), education (OR &gt;high school = 5.04 (2.30, 11.06)), and sex (OR male = 0.34 (0.12, 0.94)). Of the HPV-related cancers, 43.9% answered correctly for cervical, 9.1% for anal, 11.1% for mouth/throat, 11.5% for penile, and 30.7% for vaginal/vulvar cancer. Males were less likely than females to know that HPV is a causative agent for cervical (OR=0.41 (0.22, 0.75)) and vaginal/vulvar cancers (OR=0.43 (0.22, 0.86)). Conclusion: Using estimates obtained in HINTS 4 as a benchmark, awareness and knowledge of HPV, HPV-related cancers, and HPV vaccines were low among working, uninsured adult patients. In addition to improving access to HPV vaccination (e.g. volunteer clinics), the findings demonstrate a need for strategies to educate medically underserved adults about HPV. Maximizing access to HPV vaccination, including catch-up vaccination for adults up to age 26 are consistent with the recommendations of the President's Cancer Panel, the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, the American College of Physicians, and the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices. Citation Format: Carmen Radecki Breitkopf, Lila Finney Rutten, Debra Jacobson, Patrick Wilson, Monica Albertie, Robert M. Jacobson, Gerardo Colon-Otero. Awareness and knowledge of HPV, HPV-related cancers, and HPV vaccines in a working, uninsured clinic population. [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the Eighth AACR Conference on The Science of Health Disparities in Racial/Ethnic Minorities and the Medically Underserved; Nov 13-16, 2015; Atlanta, GA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2016;25(3 Suppl):Abstract nr B91.