Risch, Harvey A.

Abstract Background: Comorbidities can affect survival of ovarian cancer patients by influencing treatment efficacy. However, little evidence exists on the association between individual concurrent comorbidities and prognosis in ovarian cancer patients. Methods: Among patients diagnosed with invasive ovarian carcinoma who participated in 23 studies included in the Ovarian Cancer Association Consortium, we explored associations between histories of endometriosis; asthma; depression; osteoporosis; and autoimmune, gallbladder, kidney, liver, and neurological diseases and overall and progression-free survival. Using Cox proportional hazards regression models adjusted for age at diagnosis, stage of disease, histology, and study site, we estimated pooled HRs and 95% confidence intervals to assess associations between each comorbidity and ovarian cancer outcomes. Results: None of the comorbidities were associated with ovarian cancer outcome in the overall sample nor in strata defined by histologic subtype, weight status, age at diagnosis, or stage of disease (local/regional vs. advanced). Conclusions: Histories of endometriosis; asthma; depression; osteoporosis; and autoimmune, gallbladder, kidney, liver, or neurologic diseases were not associated with ovarian cancer overall or progression-free survival. Impact: These previously diagnosed chronic diseases do not appear to affect ovarian cancer prognosis. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; 26(9); 1470–3. ©2017 AACR.

Abstract Introduction: Obesity and diabetes are two major modifiable risk factors for pancreatic cancer. Genetic variation affecting the risk of obesity- and diabetes-related pancreatic cancer have yet to be comprehensively investigated at the genome-wide level. Aims: To identify novel gene-environment interactions (GxE) of obesity/diabetes on pancreatic cancer risk. Methods: We conducted a multi-stage genome-wide gene-diabetes and gene-obesity interaction study using GWAS data of 7095 cases and 10710 controls from Pancreatic Cancer Consortium (PanScan I, PanScan II and PanScan III) and Pancreatic Cancer Case Control Consortium (PanC4). About 870,000 SNPs, having MAF ≥ 0.005 and having been genotyped in at least one study, were analyzed. Missing genotypes were imputed using IMPUTE2 and the Haplotype Reference Consortium (HRC) reference panel. Case-control (CC) and case-only (CO) methods were used for SNP-level GxE analysis. Fixed-, random- and joint-effect models built in “rareGE” R package were used for gene-based GxE analysis. About 20,000 genes that have at least one SNP genotyped were included in the analysis. Age, gender and principal components accounting for subpopulation structure were adjusted in both SNP-level and gene-level analyses. Obesity was defined as body mass index ≥30 mg/m2. Diabetics with <3-year duration were excluded for gene-diabetes interaction analysis. The PanScan I, II, III and PanC4 datasets were analyzed separately followed by meta-analysis of the summary statistics. Fixed-effect and Fisher’s p-value based meta-analysis was applied for SNP-level and gene-level GxE analysis, respectively. Results: No genome-wide significant (P<5 x 10-8 ) interaction at the SNP level was detected in any of the PanScan or PanC4 datasets or in the meta-analysis. A significant interaction of diabetes and FAM63A (family with sequence similarity 63 member A) gene (P<2.5 x 10-6) was observed in the meta-analysis (PFixed= 3.4 x 10-5, PRandom= 1.9 x 10-6, PJoint= 6.8 x 10-7) . This interaction showed nominal significance in all individual dataset analyses. The corresponding P values for this interaction were 4.2 x 10-2, 3.8 x 10-2 and 6.8 x 10-2 in PanScan I, 2.8 x 10-2, 3.9 x 10-2 and 6.5 x 10-2 9.1 x 10-3, 2.2 x 10-4 and 8.8 x 10-6 in PanScan III, and 3.1 x 10-3, 3.4 x 10-3 and 8.8 x 10-3 in PanC4, respectively. Conclusions: In the largest genome-wide GxE analysis for pancreatic cancer to date, we identified a significant diabetes interacting gene in pancreatic cancer, which was consistently replicated in 4 individual GWAS studies. This observation identifies FAM63A as a candidate for future functional studies to understand its role in pancreatic cancer etiology. Further increasing the sample size may unveil additional genetic loci that contribute to the susceptibility to pancreatic cancer via G x E. Citation Format: Hongwei Tang, Lai Jiang, Laufey T. Amundadottir, Harvey A. Risch, Rachael S. Stolzenberg-Solomon, Alison P. Klein, Brian M. Wolpin, Gloria Petersen, Nilanjan Chatterjee, Donghui Li, Peter Kraft, Peng Wei. Genomewide gene-diabetes and gene-obesity interaction scan in 7095 cases and 10710 controls from Pancreatic Cancer Cohort Consortium and Pancreatic Cancer Case Control Consortium [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2017; 2017 Apr 1-5; Washington, DC. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2017;77(13 Suppl):Abstract nr 1295. doi:10.1158/1538-7445.AM2017-1295

Abstract Background: Many cancers share specific genetic risk factors, including both rare high-penetrance mutations and common SNPs identified through genome-wide association studies (GWAS). However, little is known about the overall shared heritability across cancers. Quantifying the extent to which two distinct cancers share genetic origin will give insights to shared biological mechanisms underlying cancer and inform design for future genetic association studies. Methods: In this study, we estimated the pair-wise genetic correlation between six cancer types (breast, colorectal, lung, ovarian, pancreatic, and prostate) using cancer-specific GWAS summary statistics data based on 66,958 case and 70,665 control subjects of European ancestry. We also estimated genetic correlations between cancers and 14 noncancer diseases and traits. Results: After adjusting for 15 pair-wise genetic correlation tests between cancers, we found significant (P < 0.003) genetic correlations between pancreatic and colorectal cancer (rg = 0.55, P = 0.003), lung and colorectal cancer (rg = 0.31, P = 0.001). We also found suggestive genetic correlations between lung and breast cancer (rg = 0.27, P = 0.009), and colorectal and breast cancer (rg = 0.22, P = 0.01). In contrast, we found no evidence that prostate cancer shared an appreciable proportion of heritability with other cancers. After adjusting for 84 tests studying genetic correlations between cancer types and other traits (Bonferroni-corrected P value: 0.0006), only the genetic correlation between lung cancer and smoking remained significant (rg = 0.41, P = 1.03 × 10−6). We also observed nominally significant genetic correlations between body mass index and all cancers except ovarian cancer. Conclusions: Our results highlight novel genetic correlations and lend support to previous observational studies that have observed links between cancers and risk factors. Impact: This study demonstrates modest genetic correlations between cancers; in particular, breast, colorectal, and lung cancer share some degree of genetic basis. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; 26(9); 1427–35. ©2017 AACR.

Objective Oesophageal adenocarcinoma (OA) incidence has risen sharply in Western countries over recent decades. Local and systemic inflammation is considered an important contributor to OA pathogenesis. Established risk factors for OA and its precursor, Barrett's oesophagus (BE), include symptomatic reflux, obesity and smoking. The role of inherited genetic susceptibility remains an area of active investigation. Here, we explore whether germline variation related to inflammatory processes influences susceptibility to BE/OA. Design We used data from a genomewide association study of 2515 OA cases, 3295 BE cases and 3207 controls. Our analysis included 7863 single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in 449 genes assigned to five pathways: cyclooxygenase (COX), cytokine signalling, oxidative stress, human leucocyte antigen and nuclear factor-κB. A principal components-based analytic framework was employed to evaluate pathway-level and gene-level associations with disease risk. Results We identified a significant signal for the COX pathway in relation to BE risk (p=0.0059, false discovery rate q=0.03), and in gene-level analyses found an association with microsomal glutathione-S-transferase 1 (MGST1); (p=0.0005, q=0.005). Assessment of 36 MGST1 SNPs identified 14 variants associated with elevated BE risk (q<0.05). Four of these were subsequently confirmed (p<5.5×10−5) in a meta-analysis encompassing an independent set of 1851 BE cases and 3496 controls, and are known strong expression quantitative trait loci for MGST1. Three such variants were associated with similar elevations in OA risk. Conclusions This study provides the most comprehensive evaluation of inflammation-related germline variation in relation to risk of BE/OA and suggests that variants in MGST1 influence disease susceptibility.

Telomeres cap chromosome ends, protecting them from degradation, double‐strand breaks, and end‐to‐end fusions. Telomeres are maintained by telomerase, a reverse transcriptase encoded by TERT, and an RNA template encoded by TERC. Loci in the TERT and adjoining CLPTM1L region are associated with risk of multiple cancers. We therefore investigated associations between variants in 22 telomere structure and maintenance gene regions and colorectal, breast, prostate, ovarian, and lung cancer risk. We performed subset‐based meta‐analyses of 204,993 directly‐measured and imputed SNPs among 61,851 cancer cases and 74,457 controls of European descent. Independent associations for SNP minor alleles were identified using sequential conditional analysis (with gene‐level p value cutoffs ≤3.08 × 10−5). Of the thirteen independent SNPs observed to be associated with cancer risk, novel findings were observed for seven loci. Across the DCLRE1B region, rs974494 and rs12144215 were inversely associated with prostate and lung cancers, and colorectal, breast, and prostate cancers, respectively. Across the TERC region, rs75316749 was positively associated with colorectal, breast, ovarian, and lung cancers. Across the DCLRE1B region, rs974404 and rs12144215 were inversely associated with prostate and lung cancers, and colorectal, breast, and prostate cancers, respectively. Near POT1, rs116895242 was inversely associated with colorectal, ovarian, and lung cancers, and RTEL1 rs34978822 was inversely associated with prostate and lung cancers. The complex association patterns in telomere‐related genes across cancer types may provide insight into mechanisms through which telomere dysfunction in different tissues influences cancer risk.