Agashe, Shruti

Objective To evaluate whether local field potential (LFP) spectral profiles can serve as a candidate “spectral fingerprint” for physiological confirmation of centromedian-parafascicular (CM–Pf) targeting during thalamic deep brain stimulation (DBS) for drug resistant epilepsy (DRE). Methods This is a retrospective study of 10 patients (20 leads) who underwent CM-DBS implantation for DRE at a single tertiary center. Postoperative CT and preoperative MRI were co-registered, normalized to the Montreal Neurological Institute (MNI) space, and reconstructed using Lead-DBS software to anatomically localize contacts. BrainSense™ Survey recordings were obtained at least 3 weeks post-implant during routine programming. LFP frequency content was analyzed, and prominent peaks were identified and classified into canonical frequency bands (theta, alpha, beta). These spectral profiles were then mapped to MRI-based anatomical localizations, and statistical tests were applied to assess associations between peak patterns, contact localizations and thalamic subregions. Results Contacts were distributed as follows: 50 in the CM, 16 in the Parafascicular (Pf), 15 in the Centrolateral, 8 in the Mediodorsal, and 7 in the Ventrolateral (VL) nuclei. Of the 10 representative spectral localizations confined to the CM/CM-Pf region, 8 (80%) displayed a distinct dual-peak spectral profile with peaks in the theta/low alpha (5.5–9 Hz) and high beta (20–30 Hz) bands (mean frequencies: 7.63 Hz and 21.02 Hz, Fisher’s exact test, p < 0.001). Single-peak profiles showed no significant association with specific nuclei ( p = 0.871). Contacts overlapping other thalamic nuclei more frequently exhibited narrow 10–15 Hz peaks ( p = 0.005) or triple-peak profiles ( p = 0.02), suggesting mixed structural contributions. Conclusion A dual- band candidate spectral pattern consisting of theta/low alpha and high beta peaks was associated with the CM-Pf region in this cohort. This finding provides early evidence supporting the feasibility of incorporating passive LFP recordings as a physiologic marker of target engagement. Future work to prospectively compare bipolar survey-based localization with monopolar recording strategies could enable development of a state-based, physiologically informed spectral atlas to refine CM-Pf targeting in thalamic neuromodulation for DRE.

Abstract Despite the growing interest in network-guided neuromodulation for epilepsy, uncertainty about the safety and long-term efficacy of thalamocortical stimulation persists. Our evaluation focused on the use of a four-lead open-loop implantable pulse generator for thalamocortical network neuromodulation. We retrospectively reviewed seven patients with diverse seizure networks—poorly localized, regional, or multifocal—undergoing thalamocortical neuromodulation. Employing a four-lead system, electrodes targeted both thalamic and cortical seizure network nodes. We assessed seizure severity, life satisfaction and sleep quality on a 10-point scale, and seizure frequency was assessed via telephone interviews and chart review. Outcomes were assessed by the Wilcoxon sign-rank test at the 0.05 significance level. Seven patients with a median age at implant of 22 years (range 14–42 years) had a median disabling seizure reduction of 93% (range 50–100%, P = 0.0156), with 100% responder rate (≥50% reduction in seizure frequency) after a median of 17 months post-implantation (range 13–60). The median improvement in seizure severity was 3.5 out of 10 points (P = 0.0312), life satisfaction 4.5 points (P = 0.0312) and quality of sleep 3 points (P = 0.062). No perioperative complications occurred. Transient seizure exacerbations (n = 2) and stimulation-related sensory/motor side-effects (n = 2) quickly resolved with parameter adjustments. One patient required surgical revision due to delayed infection. Six patients had permanent electrode placement refined by intracranial EEG trial stimulation; five patients had >90% reduction in seizure frequency during trial stimulation. Thalamocortical network neuromodulation using a four-lead open-loop system is safe and associated with significant improvements in seizure control and patient quality of life. Trial stimulation during intracranial EEG shows promise for enhancing seizure network engagement and parameter optimization but requires further study. Prospective controlled trials are needed to further characterize and validate the efficacy and side-effect profile of thalamocortical network neuromodulation for epilepsy.

AbstractPresence of focal to bilateral tonic–clonic seizures (FBTCS) in focal epilepsy is associated with increased morbidity and mortality. Risk factors for FBTCS are poorly understood, and little is known regarding FBTCS recurrence after treatment initiation. This study aimed to investigate factors related to FBTCS in newly diagnosed focal epilepsy and their recurrence after starting antiseizure medications (ASMs) in the Human Epilepsy Project (HEP) cohort. HEP was an international, prospective cohort study that enrolled people with newly diagnosed focal epilepsy within 4 months of treatment initiation and followed them for up to 6 years. Baseline characteristics, treatment choices, and seizure outcomes were collected. Descriptive and inferential statistical analysis was conducted to assess the differences between study participants who had FBTCS and those who never experienced FBTCS. A total of 443 participants were included in this analysis; 77% (n = 342) had FBTCS at some point prior to or within the study period. In participants with FBTCS, regardless of initial seizure type, diagnosis was mostly made after FBTCS (335/342, 98%). After treatment initiation, FBTCS did not recur in 57% (n = 194/342) of cases. A higher number of total pretreatment seizures (median = 16 vs. 11, p = .048, Mann–Whitney U‐test), predominantly focal aware seizures (FAS) or focal impaired awareness seizures (FIAS; median = 15 vs. 10, p = .049, Mann Whitney U‐test), was associated with no recurrence in FBTCS after treatment initiation. Of 108 participants without FBTCS prior to treatment, only seven (6%) developed FBTCS after treatment initiation. There was no significant difference in choice of initial ASM class (levetiracetam vs. sodium channel blockers) between participants who experienced FBTCS and those who did not. This study highlights the significance of FBTCS among individuals with newly diagnosed focal epilepsy. The majority of participants who experienced FBTCS were diagnosed with epilepsy after experiencing their first FBTCS despite preceding FAS/FIAS. The more frequent FAS/FIAS in participants whose FBTCS resolved may be a characteristic of their epilepsy.

Abstract There are limited treatment options for individuals with drug‐resistant idiopathic generalized epilepsy (IGE). Small, limited case series suggest that centromedian thalamus deep brain stimulation (CM‐DBS) may be an effective treatment option. The optimal CM‐DBS target for IGE is underexamined. Here, we present a retrospective analysis of CM‐DBS targeting and efficacy for five patients with drug‐resistant IGE. Volume of tissue activated (VTA) overlap with CM nucleus was performed using an open‐source toolbox. Median follow‐up time was 13 months. Median convulsive seizure frequency reduction was 66%. One patient had only absence seizures, with >99% reduction in absence seizure frequency. Four patients had electrode contacts positioned within the CM nucleus target, all of whom had >50% reduction in primary semiology seizure, with 85% median seizure reduction ( p = .004, paired‐sample t test). Volumetric “sweet‐spot” mapping revealed that best outcomes were correlated with stimulation of the middle ventral CM nucleus. Connectivity strength between the sweet‐spot region and central peri‐Rolandic cortex was increased significantly relative to other cortical regions ( p = 8.6 × 10 −4 , Mann–Whitney U test). Our findings indicate that CM‐DBS can be an effective treatment for patients with IGE, highlight the importance of accurate targeting and targeting analysis, and within the context of prior work, suggest that ideal CM‐DBS targets may be syndrome specific.

AbstractObjectiveThis study was undertaken to ascertain the natural history and patterns of antiseizure medication (ASM) use in newly diagnosed focal epilepsy patients who were initially started on monotherapy.MethodsThe data were derived from the Human Epilepsy Project. Differences between the durations of the most commonly first prescribed ASM monotherapies were assessed using a Cox proportional hazards model. Subjects were classified into three groups: monotherapy, sequential monotherapy, and polytherapy.ResultsA total of 443 patients were included in the analysis, with a median age of 32 years (interquartile range [IQR] = 20–44) and median follow‐up time of 3.2 years (IQR = 2.4–4.2); 161 (36.3%) patients remained on monotherapy with their initially prescribed ASM at the time of their last follow‐up. The mean (SEM) and median (IQR) duration that patients stayed on monotherapy with their initial ASM was 2.1 (2.0–2.2) and 1.9 (.3–3.5) years, respectively. The most commonly prescribed initial ASM was levetiracetam (254, 57.3%), followed by lamotrigine (77, 17.4%), oxcarbazepine (38, 8.6%), and carbamazepine (24, 5.4%). Among those who did not remain on the initial monotherapy, 167 (59.2%) transitioned to another ASM as monotherapy (sequential monotherapy) and 115 (40.8%) ended up on polytherapy. Patients remained significantly longer on lamotrigine (mean = 2.8 years, median = 3.1 years) compared to levetiracetam (mean = 2.0 years, median = 1.5 years) as a first prescribed medication (hazard ratio = 1.5, 95% confidence interval = 1.0–2.2). As the study progressed, the proportion of patients on lamotrigine, carbamazepine, and oxcarbazepine as well as other sodium channel agents increased from a little more than one third (154, 34.8%) of patients to more than two thirds (303, 68.4%) of patients.SignificanceSlightly more than one third of focal epilepsy patients remain on monotherapy with their first prescribed ASM. Approximately three in five patients transition to monotherapy with another ASM, whereas approximately two in five end up on polytherapy. Patients remain on lamotrigine for a longer duration compared to levetiracetam when it is prescribed as the initial monotherapy.

Purpose: Temporal encephaloceles are a cause of drug-resistant temporal lobe epilepsy; however, their relationship with epileptogenesis is unclear, and optimal surgical resection is uncertain. EEG source localization (ESL) may guide surgical decision-making. Methods: We reviewed patients at Mayo Clinic Rochester with drug-resistant temporal lobe epilepsy and temporal encephaloceles, who underwent limited resection and had 1-year outcomes. EEG source localization was performed using standard density scalp EEG of ictal and interictal activity. Distance from dipole and standardized low-resolution brain electromagnetic tomography (sLORETA) solutions to the encephalocele were measured. Concordance of ESL with encephalocele and surgical resection was compared with 1-year surgical outcomes. Results: Seventeen patients met criteria. The mean distances from ESL results to encephalocele center for dipole and sLORETA analyses were 23 mm (SD 9) and 22 mm (SD 11), respectively. Ten patients (55.6%) had Engel I outcomes at 1 year. Dipole-encephalocele distance and sLORETA-encephalocele distance were significantly longer in patients with Engel I outcome and patients whose encephalocele was contained by sLORETA had worse outcome as well; however, multiple logistic regression analysis found that only containment of encephalocele by the sLORETA current density was significant (P < 0.05), odds ratio 0.12 (95% confidence interval [0.021, 0.71]). Conclusions: EEG source localization of scalp EEG localizes near encephaloceles, however, typically not in the encephalocele itself; this may be due to scalp EEG sampling propagated activity or alternatively that the seizure onset zone extends beyond the herniated cortex. Surprisingly, we observed increased ESL to encephalocele distances in patients with excellent surgical outcomes. Larger cohort studies including intracranial EEG data are needed to further explore this finding.