Gidal, Barry

Abstract Objectives Dravet syndrome (DS) is a drug‐resistant developmental and epileptic encephalopathy, often requiring three or more antiseizure medications (ASMs). Consequently, the therapeutic landscape is highly complex, combining DS‐specific agents (stiripentol, STP; cannabidiol, CBD; fenfluramine, FFA), non‐specific ASMs, and non‐pharmacologic options such as dietary therapy or neuromodulation. In addition, recognition of patients' changing needs across the lifespan, together with the essential contribution of caregiver education to effective treatment oversight—including awareness of potential drug–drug interactions and adverse events—emphasizes the value of an integrated and forward‐looking approach. A consensus initiative was developed to guide clinicians in the management of patients with DS, with a particular focus on STP‐containing regimens. Methods Based on a literature review and clinical vignette discussions, a nominal group of five international DS experts developed 38 statements across six themes: (i) general principles, (ii) guiding physicians to empower families, (iii) STP as add‐on to specific and non‐specific Dravet ASMs, (iv) FFA in regimens containing STP, (v) CBD in regimens containing STP, and (vi) patient follow‐up during treatment initiation. Statements were scored on a 9‐point Likert scale (1 = strongly disagree, 9 = strongly agree) first by the nominal group and then by an international panel of 59 DS clinicians. Consensus was defined as ≥75% rating ≥7 and/or a median ≥8. Results Thirty‐four of the 38 statements (89%) reached consensus among both the nominal group and the international panel; one did not reach consensus in either, and three reached consensus only among the nominal group. Both panels agreed on the importance of involving families in treatment decisions and follow‐up, as well as on key aspects of polytherapy management, including ASM initiation, treatment adjustments, and adverse event management. Significance This international consensus integrates evidence and clinical expertise to establish shared principles that address a long‐standing gap in the polytherapeutic management of Dravet syndrome. Plain Language Summary Dravet syndrome is a rare and severe form of epilepsy that begins in early childhood, with seizures that often persist throughout life. Because the disease is highly drug resistant, most patients are treated with polytherapy, making clinical management complex for clinicians. This consensus brings together published evidence and expert experience to provide practical guidance on the management of polytherapy in Dravet syndrome, supporting clinicians in optimizing patient care.

AbstractPresence of focal to bilateral tonic–clonic seizures (FBTCS) in focal epilepsy is associated with increased morbidity and mortality. Risk factors for FBTCS are poorly understood, and little is known regarding FBTCS recurrence after treatment initiation. This study aimed to investigate factors related to FBTCS in newly diagnosed focal epilepsy and their recurrence after starting antiseizure medications (ASMs) in the Human Epilepsy Project (HEP) cohort. HEP was an international, prospective cohort study that enrolled people with newly diagnosed focal epilepsy within 4 months of treatment initiation and followed them for up to 6 years. Baseline characteristics, treatment choices, and seizure outcomes were collected. Descriptive and inferential statistical analysis was conducted to assess the differences between study participants who had FBTCS and those who never experienced FBTCS. A total of 443 participants were included in this analysis; 77% (n = 342) had FBTCS at some point prior to or within the study period. In participants with FBTCS, regardless of initial seizure type, diagnosis was mostly made after FBTCS (335/342, 98%). After treatment initiation, FBTCS did not recur in 57% (n = 194/342) of cases. A higher number of total pretreatment seizures (median = 16 vs. 11, p = .048, Mann–Whitney U‐test), predominantly focal aware seizures (FAS) or focal impaired awareness seizures (FIAS; median = 15 vs. 10, p = .049, Mann Whitney U‐test), was associated with no recurrence in FBTCS after treatment initiation. Of 108 participants without FBTCS prior to treatment, only seven (6%) developed FBTCS after treatment initiation. There was no significant difference in choice of initial ASM class (levetiracetam vs. sodium channel blockers) between participants who experienced FBTCS and those who did not. This study highlights the significance of FBTCS among individuals with newly diagnosed focal epilepsy. The majority of participants who experienced FBTCS were diagnosed with epilepsy after experiencing their first FBTCS despite preceding FAS/FIAS. The more frequent FAS/FIAS in participants whose FBTCS resolved may be a characteristic of their epilepsy.

AbstractObjectiveThis study was undertaken to ascertain the natural history and patterns of antiseizure medication (ASM) use in newly diagnosed focal epilepsy patients who were initially started on monotherapy.MethodsThe data were derived from the Human Epilepsy Project. Differences between the durations of the most commonly first prescribed ASM monotherapies were assessed using a Cox proportional hazards model. Subjects were classified into three groups: monotherapy, sequential monotherapy, and polytherapy.ResultsA total of 443 patients were included in the analysis, with a median age of 32 years (interquartile range [IQR] = 20–44) and median follow‐up time of 3.2 years (IQR = 2.4–4.2); 161 (36.3%) patients remained on monotherapy with their initially prescribed ASM at the time of their last follow‐up. The mean (SEM) and median (IQR) duration that patients stayed on monotherapy with their initial ASM was 2.1 (2.0–2.2) and 1.9 (.3–3.5) years, respectively. The most commonly prescribed initial ASM was levetiracetam (254, 57.3%), followed by lamotrigine (77, 17.4%), oxcarbazepine (38, 8.6%), and carbamazepine (24, 5.4%). Among those who did not remain on the initial monotherapy, 167 (59.2%) transitioned to another ASM as monotherapy (sequential monotherapy) and 115 (40.8%) ended up on polytherapy. Patients remained significantly longer on lamotrigine (mean = 2.8 years, median = 3.1 years) compared to levetiracetam (mean = 2.0 years, median = 1.5 years) as a first prescribed medication (hazard ratio = 1.5, 95% confidence interval = 1.0–2.2). As the study progressed, the proportion of patients on lamotrigine, carbamazepine, and oxcarbazepine as well as other sodium channel agents increased from a little more than one third (154, 34.8%) of patients to more than two thirds (303, 68.4%) of patients.SignificanceSlightly more than one third of focal epilepsy patients remain on monotherapy with their first prescribed ASM. Approximately three in five patients transition to monotherapy with another ASM, whereas approximately two in five end up on polytherapy. Patients remain on lamotrigine for a longer duration compared to levetiracetam when it is prescribed as the initial monotherapy.