Mendoza, Maria A.

Abstract Background Hematopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT) recipients are susceptible to infections with respiratory viruses resulting in higher morbidity and mortality. Parainfluenza virus (PIV) infection in the setting of leukopenia is associated with higher risk of lower respiratory tract infection and mortality. Intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG) has been used as adjunctive treatment in viral respiratory infections, although data guiding its use is limited.Table 1:Patient CharacteristicsTable 2:Clinical Outcomes Methods We conducted a retrospective cohort study of adult HSCT recipients diagnosed with PIV infection at our institution from January 2014 to September 2024. Diagnosis of PIV infection was made via BioFire® Respiratory Panel multiplex polymerase chain reaction (PCR) or viral culture from nasopharyngeal or bronchoalveolar lavage. Data on clinical characteristics and outcomes were collected and reviewed.Table 3:Clinical Outcomes for Patients with IgG <767 mg/dL Results A total of 110 HSCT recipients were diagnosed with PIV infection by PCR or viral culture within the study period. Patient characteristics and clinical outcomes are summarized in Tables 1 and 2. PIV type 3 was the most common, followed by PIV type 4 and type 1. Eighteen patients (16.36%) had co-infections with another virus. A total of 16 patients received IVIG at time of PIV infection. The mean cumulative IVIG dose was 28.75 grams. Patients who received IVIG were more likely to have been hospitalized due to symptoms related to the viral infection (p=0.03) and had a lower immunoglobulin G level (p< 0.001). Overall, there was no significant difference in rates of mechanical ventilation (12.5% vs 7.45%, p=0.616), development of secondary fungal or bacterial infection (12.5% vs 12.7%, p=1), or 90-day mortality (18.75% vs 6.38%, p=0.123) among patients treated with or without IVIG, respectively. Similarly, in a subset analysis of patients with IgG level < 767 mg/dL, there were no significant difference in outcomes for patients treated with or without IVIG (Table 3). Conclusion There were no significant differences in clinical outcomes, including rates of mechanical ventilation, secondary infections, or 90-day mortality, between HSCT patients who received IVIG and those who did not for PIV infection. Larger studies are needed to gain insight into efficacy of IVIG as adjunctive treatment in PIV infections in this population. Disclosures All Authors: No reported disclosures

Abstract Background Invasive mold infections (IMI) lead to significant morbidity and mortality in patients with hematologic malignancies. We provide patients deemed at higher risk mold active prophylaxis but still observe breakthrough IMIs. The purpose of this study was to evaluate risk factors associated with these breakthrough infections. Methods We conducted a retrospective cohort study of adult hematologic patients at 3 tertiary care medical centers from November 19, 2011 - August 6, 2021. Only IMI cases defined as proven or probable per EORTC/MSG criteria were included. Patients with IMIs who received a minimum of 7 days of mold active prophylaxis were classified as breakthrough infection. We performed logistical regression analysis to identify risk factors associated with breakthrough IMI. Results Majority of cases were probable IMIs, with 16 (28.6%) and 25 (15.7%) proven cases amongst breakthrough and non-breakthrough IMIs, respectively. Many variables indicative of weakened host immune system, including neutropenia and hypogammaglobulinemia, were associated with breakthrough IMIs, albeit not statistically significant (Table 1). Multivariate analysis revealed history of AML (OR 4.20, 95% CI 2.03-8.88; p < 0.001) and receipt of HCT (OR 3.37, 95% CI 1.46-8.11; p = 0.003) to be independent host risk factors for breakthrough IMI. Of all the pathogens, Fusarium (OR 4.38, 95% CI 1.56-12.56; p = 0.005) and Mucorales (OR 5.59, 95% CI 2.11-15.61; p < 0.001) were significantly likely to lead to breakthrough IMIs. 26 (47.3%) of the breakthrough IMIs were on appropriately dosed prophylaxis at the time of infection, with only 9 (16.4%) found to be subtherapeutic (Table 2). Overall, mortality was slightly higher amongst the breakthrough IMIs (51.8% vs 45.9%) but not significantly different (Figure 1). Conclusion In our cohort of probable/proven IMIs, we did not observe any significant difference in mortality between patients with breakthrough IMIs and those not on mold active prophylaxis. Even with appropriate prophylactic dosing, breakthrough infections occurred, irrespective of agent. Our study demonstrates that host risk factors and the causative pathogen are clinically more pertinent than the prophylaxis regimen in breakthrough IMIs. Disclosures Paschalis Vergidis, MD, MSc, AbbVie: Advisor/Consultant|Ansun Biopharma: Grant/Research Support|Cidara Therapeutics: Grant/Research Support|F2G: Grant/Research Support|Scynexis: Advisor/Consultant|Scynexis: Grant/Research Support

Abstract Background RSV is a common respiratory infection that causes significant morbidity in SOTR. However, risk factors for complications such as hypoxic respiratory failure, mechanical ventilation, and secondary infections have not been well described. Methods This retrospective, international, multicenter cohort study is actively recruiting SOTR hospitalized with RSV. Here, we analyzed data from Mayo Clinic (Rochester, Florida, Arizona), Miami Transplant Institute, Cleveland Clinic, and Royal Melbourne Hospital between 2016 and 2019. Secondary infection was defined as culture positive infection within 90 days of RSV diagnosis. Whenever appropriate, logistic and Cox regression analysis were conducted to identify risk factors. Survival functions were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method.Figure 1:Forest plots of multivariable logistic regression models for risk factors for A) hypoxia, B) secondary infections, C) mechanical ventilation. Note: all variables included are the ones statistically significant on univariate analysis. Abbreviations: CI, confidence interval; OR, Odds ratio; LRTI: lower respiratory tract infection. Results 233 SOTRs (58.8% male; median, 61 years), including 77 (49.1%) kidney, 23 (9.9%) liver, 79 (33.9%) lung, and 38 (16.3%) heart transplants (Table). Hypoxic respiratory failure, mechanical ventilation, and secondary infection were seen in 98 (42.1%), 23 (9.9%), and 58 (24.9%) patients, respectively. After multivariate analysis, age >60 years, symptoms and imaging evidence of lower respiratory tract infection (LRTI) were associated with oxygen requirement (Figure 1A); similar results were observed in an analysis of the lung transplant cohort only. Risk factors on multivariate analysis for secondary infection include a history of rejection within six months and mechanical ventilation (Figure 1B). Risk factors for mechanical ventilation included age >60 years and LRTI on imaging (Figure 1C) after multivariate analysis. Seventeen (7.3%) patients died within 90 days of diagnosis. Cox univariate analysis identified age >60 years and LRTI on imaging, secondary infections, mechanical ventilation and hypoxia on admission were associated with higher mortality (Figure 2 and 3).Figure 2:Forest plot with Cox proportional hazards models. Note: only univariate results shown, multivariate not done due to low number of events. Conclusion This multicenter study of SOTR hospitalized with RSV identified older age ( >60 years old) as a risk factor for hypoxic respiratory failure, mechanical ventilation and death. Mechanical ventilation and a history if rejection within six months of RSV were associated with increased risk of secondary infections, identifying them as high-risk that needs close surveillance for this complication.Figure 3:Effects of A) Age older than 60 years old and B) mechanical ventilation on 90 day probability of survival after RSV infection Disclosures Michelle Yong, MBBS, FRACP, MPH, PhD, MSD: Grant/Research Support|MSD: Honoraria|Takeda: Advisor/Consultant Yoichiro Natori, MD, Eurofin/Viracor: Honoraria|Nobel Pharma: Advisor/Consultant

AbstractIntroductionCytomegalovirus (CMV) reactivation is one of the most common complications after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT). Letermovir is approved for CMV prophylaxis among high‐risk recipients. However, delayed‐onset post‐prophylaxis clinically significant CMV infection (csCMVi) has been observed, suggesting the potential for extending letermovir prophylaxis beyond the first one hundred days post‐HSCT.MethodsRetrospective multicenter cohort study of allogeneic HSCT patients from August 2018 to March 2023. The primary aim of this study was to identify the risk factors at day 100 associated with delayed onset csCMVi, in patients who received letermovir prophylaxis up to day 100. Competing risk analysis was used to evaluate incidence with specific risk factors, using Gray's Test comparing groups for each event.ResultsAmong 166 eligible allogeneic HSCT recipients, the most common primary hematological diagnosis was acute myelogenous leukemia (AML) (42.2%). Twenty‐six (15.7%) developed a breakthrough csCMVi. Delayed‐onset csCMVi occurred in 23.5%, at a median time of 133 days after SCT. On multivariate analysis, having a matched unrelated donor (odds ratio [OR] 2.46) and a CMV donor negative/recipient positive status (OR 3.47) were associated with delayed onset csCMVi. In contrast, AML had a lower odd of having delayed‐onset csCMVi (OR 0.23).ConclusionsHaving a matched unrelated donor, a CMV donor negative/recipient positive status, and a non‐AML underlying disease were associated with delayed onset csCMVi. Prospective studies are needed to evaluate whether extended letermovir prophylaxis is beneficial for these patients. image

ABSTRACT Rhodococcus equi is an opportunistic pathogen known to cause pulmonary and extrapulmonary disease among immunocompromised patients. Treatment is frequently challenging due to intrinsic resistance to multiple antibiotic classes. While non- equi Rhodococcus spp. are prevalent, their clinical significance is poorly defined. There is also limited data on antibiotic susceptibility testing (AST) of Rhodococcus infection in humans. We conducted a single-center, retrospective cohort study evaluating clinical characteristics, microbiologic profile, and AST of Rhodococcus infections between June 2012 and 2022 at our tertiary academic medical center. Identification of Rhodococcus spp. was performed by Sanger 16S rRNA gene sequencing and/or matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization-time of flight mass spectrometry, and AST was performed by agar dilution. Three hundred twenty-two isolates of Rhodococcus spp. were identified from blood (50%), pulmonary (26%), and bone/joint (12%) sources. R. equi/hoagii, R. corynebacterioides , and R. erythropolis were the most frequently isolated species, with 19% of isolates identified only to genus level. One hundred ninety-nine isolates evaluated for AST demonstrated high-level resistance to amoxicillin/clavulanate, cephalosporins, and aminoglycosides. More than 95% susceptibility to imipenem, vancomycin, linezolid, rifampin, and clarithromycin was observed. Non- equi species showed a significantly more favorable AST profile relative to R. equi . Clinically significant Rhodococcus infection was rare with 10 cases diagnosed (majority due to R. equi ) and managed. The majority of patients received 2- or 3-drug combination therapy for 2–6 months, with favorable clinical response. Significant differences in AST were observed between R. equi and non- equi species. Despite high antimicrobial resistance to several antibiotic classes, imipenem and vancomycin remain appropriate empiric treatment options for R. equi . Future research evaluating mechanisms underlying antimicrobial resistance is warranted.

Abstract Background Letermovir (LTMV) is approved for CMV prophylaxis during the first 100 days after HSCT. Thereafter, CMV reactivation (CMVr) may still occur. This study aims to evaluate the incidence and risk factors for any CMVr and clinically significant CMV infection (csCMVi) in patients who received LTMV prophylaxis. Methods Retrospective multicenter cohort study of HSCT patients who received 100 days of LTMV prophylaxis from 08/2018 to 09/2022. Categorical and continuous variables were compared with Fisher’s exact and Kruskal-Wallis test respectively. Logistic regression was used to identify risk factors. Results Of 115 HSCT patients, 28 had CMVr after LTMV prophylaxis (Table 1), including 21 with csCMVi (Table 2). Of note, 29 (25.2%) patients had breakthrough CMV during LTMV prophylaxis. Among 28 cases of post-LTMV CMVr, DNAemia occurred with a median of 38.5 (31.3 – 47) days after stopping LTMV. The median absolute lymphocyte count (ALC) at diagnosis was 1.29 (0.41 – 2.04) x109cells/L. Median peak CMV DNAemia at was 482 (100.5 – 2600) IU/mL, with a duration of 29 (20- 35) days; none had end organ disease. All were receiving immunosuppression for graft-versus-host disease treatment (n=18) or prophylaxis (n=10). Risk factors for CMVr and csCMVi are listed in Table 3. For CMVr, univariate analysis showed that CMV D-/R+ status is associated with increased risk, while having CMV D+ donors or acute myeloid leukemia (AML) had lower risk. Multivariable analysis showed D-/R+ status and breakthrough viremia while on LTMV were associated with increased risk. csCMVi in 21 patients were treated with valganciclovir (n=15) or IV ganciclovir (n=6) for a median duration of 37 (25.5 – 50) days. Univariate analysis showed that acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) and reduced intensity conditioning were associated with increased risk, while AML had lower risk of csCMVi. On multivariable analysis, ALL, and D-/R+ had higher risk while AML had lower risk. Demographics and clinical characteristics of allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell recipients with or without late clinically significant CMV infection Conclusion One in four allogeneic HSCT patients who received LTMV developed post-prophylaxis CMVr within 100 to 200 days post-transplant. CMV D-/R+ status had a higher risk for CMVr and csCMVi after LTMV discontinuation. Patients with AML had a lower risk for CMVr and csCMVi. Disclosures Raymund R. Razonable, MD, Allovir: Endpoint Adjudication Committee|American Society of Transplantation: Board Member|Gilead: Grant/Research Support|Novartis: DSMB|Regeneron: Grant/Research Support|Roche: Grant/Research Support

Abstract Background Organ transplant recipients are at increased risk of potentially life-threatening opportunistic infections, including Pneumocystis jirovecii pneumonia (PJP). Given the use of effective prophylaxis, PJP has become less common, especially during the first-year post-transplant. Recent data has shown that the risk of infection has shifted within the first 2 years after discontinuing prophylaxis. We aimed to determine risk factors for late posttransplant PJP using a national database. Methods Using the United States Renal Data System database, we performed a retrospective case-control study of patients who underwent kidney transplant from 1998 through 2019. To evaluate risk factors for late PJP, we performed logistic regression analysis by comparing characteristics between infected patients and their matched uninfected controls. Results We identified 407 cases with PJP and matched to 1628 controls (1:4). 60 (14.7%) of the cases occurred within one year post transplant and 347 (85.3%) patients were diagnosed after one year of transplant. In the late period, the median time between transplant and PJP diagnosis was 68.7 (IQR 28 -134.2) months. Seventy cases (20.1%) occurred between 12 and 24 months. In multivariate analysis (table 1), risk factors for late infection included a higher Elixhauser Comorbidity Index (ECI), history of cytomegalovirus disease, older donor age, use of antilymphocyte agents, history of re-transplant and a longer time of hemodialysis prior to transplant. Of note, in the early period, we found that having a living donor was protective. Multivariate analysis of risk factors for late Pneumocystis jirovecii pneumonia Conclusion Our findings highlight the importance of a timely transplant to mitigate the risk of post-transplant PJP in the late post-transplant period where prophylaxis is not routinely used. These results also raise the consideration of PJP prophylaxis in the late period in patients diagnosed with CMV disease, history of re transplant and recent use of antilymphocyte agents. Disclosures Paschalis Vergidis, MD, MSc, AbbVie: Advisor/Consultant|Ansun: Grant/Research Support|Cidara: Grant/Research Support|Scynexis: Grant/Research Support

Abstract Background Rhodococcus spp. are a zoonotic, Gram-positive coccobacilli that cause pulmonary and disseminated disease in immunocompromised patients. Rhodococcus infection is associated with high morbidity and mortality and treatment can be challenging due to intrinsic resistance to several antibiotics. There is limited data on antibiotic susceptibility patterns and clinical characteristics of infection in humans. Methods We retrospectively evaluated the microbiology and antibiotic susceptibility testing (AST) of Rhodococcus isolates submitted to our medical reference laboratory between June 2012 and 2022. Identification (ID) was performed by Sanger 16S rRNA gene sequencing or MALDI-TOF mass spectrometry. AST was performed by microbroth dilution. We also reviewed the clinical characteristics, management, and outcomes of patients managed at our local academic medical center. Results Over a 10-year period, 322 isolates of Rhodococcus spp. were identified from blood (50%), pulmonary (26%), and bone/joint (12%) sources. R equi/hoagii and R corynebacteriodes were the most frequently isolated species, with 19% of isolates only identified to genus level (Figure 1). 199 isolates were evaluated for AST, with high rates of resistance to cephalosporins and aminoglycosides. Optimal antibiotics based on AST included imipenem, vancomycin, linezolid, clarithromycin, and TMP-SMX. Discordance in susceptibility was noted between ciprofloxacin (62%) and moxifloxacin (94%) (Table 1). Ten clinical cases of Rhodococcus infection were identified. Eight patients were immunocompromised with 6 having pulmonary and 3 with extra-pulmonary disease. Significant variability in choice and duration of therapy was noted, but all patients had positive treatment response with minimal complications (Table 2). Conclusion This study demonstrates high rates of resistance among Rhodococcus isolates with need for accurate ID and AST to guide effective treatment of infection among immunocompromised patients. Disclosures Nancy Wengenack, PhD, Mayo Clinic Laboratories: Employee

Abstract Background Left ventricular assist devices (LVAD) have an associated infection rate of 13%–80% postimplant. An optimal strategy for surgical infection prophylaxis (SIP) at the time of implantation has not been well defined. We aimed to evaluate the different LVAD implantation antibiotic prophylaxis regimens as well as the incidence of LVAD infection at our institution. Methods We performed a single-center, retrospective study of patients who underwent LVAD implantation between February 2007 and June 2019. The primary outcome was the incidence of LVAD infection (LVADI), within 3 months and 1 year of placement, between patients who received expanded or narrow-spectrum regimens for SIP. We assessed outcomes using Kaplan-Meier, time-to-first event. We used a noninferiority analysis, which was established if the narrow-spectrum event rate was no more than 5% greater than the expanded-spectrum event rate. Results We included 399 patients, 305 (76.4%) patients received narrow-spectrum SIP, whereas the remaining 94 (23.6%) patients received the expanded-spectrum regimen. Statistical noninferiority of the narrow spectrum to the multiple drug regimen was demonstrated at both time points, and statistical superiority of the narrow-spectrum group across 12-month follow up was further evident (P = .037). Conclusions We report evidence supporting noninferiority, or even superiority, of the narrow-spectrum over expanded-spectrum antimicrobial prophylaxis strategy with respect to LVADI. These findings support data-driven antimicrobial prophylaxis strategies.