Bhaimia, Eric

AbstractIntroductionCytomegalovirus (CMV) reactivation is one of the most common complications after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT). Letermovir is approved for CMV prophylaxis among high‐risk recipients. However, delayed‐onset post‐prophylaxis clinically significant CMV infection (csCMVi) has been observed, suggesting the potential for extending letermovir prophylaxis beyond the first one hundred days post‐HSCT.MethodsRetrospective multicenter cohort study of allogeneic HSCT patients from August 2018 to March 2023. The primary aim of this study was to identify the risk factors at day 100 associated with delayed onset csCMVi, in patients who received letermovir prophylaxis up to day 100. Competing risk analysis was used to evaluate incidence with specific risk factors, using Gray's Test comparing groups for each event.ResultsAmong 166 eligible allogeneic HSCT recipients, the most common primary hematological diagnosis was acute myelogenous leukemia (AML) (42.2%). Twenty‐six (15.7%) developed a breakthrough csCMVi. Delayed‐onset csCMVi occurred in 23.5%, at a median time of 133 days after SCT. On multivariate analysis, having a matched unrelated donor (odds ratio [OR] 2.46) and a CMV donor negative/recipient positive status (OR 3.47) were associated with delayed onset csCMVi. In contrast, AML had a lower odd of having delayed‐onset csCMVi (OR 0.23).ConclusionsHaving a matched unrelated donor, a CMV donor negative/recipient positive status, and a non‐AML underlying disease were associated with delayed onset csCMVi. Prospective studies are needed to evaluate whether extended letermovir prophylaxis is beneficial for these patients. image

AbstractIntroductionCytomegalovirus (CMV) causes significant morbidity in solid organ transplant recipients (SOTR). Measuring cell‐mediated immunity (CMI) may inform the risk of CMV infection after antiviral prophylaxis and predict relapse after CMV treatment.MethodsWe serially assessed CMV CMI using the QuantiFERON‐CMV assay (QF‐CMV; Qiagen, Germantown, MD) in two cohorts of SOTRs: during valganciclovir prophylaxis and during treatment of CMV viremia. Results of CMI were correlated with post‐prophylaxis CMV infection and post‐treatment relapse, respectively.ResultsOnly one (4.2%) of 24 CMV D+/R‐ patients demonstrated positive QF‐CMV by the end of valganciclovir prophylaxis. Four (16.6%) patients developed post‐prophylaxis CMV infection; all four had undetectable QF‐CMV at end of prophylaxis. Among 20 patients treated for CMV infection, 18 (90%) developed QF‐CMV levels >.2 IU/mL by end of antiviral treatment and none developed CMV relapse. In contrast, the single patient who relapsed after completing treatment had a CMV CMI <.2 IU/ml (p = .0036).ConclusionSince CMV D+/R‐ SOTRs are unlikely to develop adequate CMV CMI while receiving valganciclovir prophylaxis, the utility of CMV CMI monitoring for risk stratification during time of prophylaxis had limited value. Conversely, CMV CMI testing may be a useful marker of the risk of CMV relapse after antiviral treatment.

Abstract Background Eculizumab, an inhibitor of terminal complement activation, has been utilized in pre-transplant desensitization, treatment of antibody-mediated rejection and thrombotic microangiopathy in solid organ transplant recipients (SOTR). Eculizumab is associated with meningococcal disease, leading to guidelines for vaccination against serogroups ACWY (menACWY) and B (menB) at least 2 weeks prior to eculizumab therapy. In persons requiring emergent use of eculizumab, prophylaxis for at least 2 weeks is recommended. SOTRs respond suboptimally to vaccination, raising consideration for pre-transplant vaccination and prolonged prophylaxis in those undergoing eculizumab therapy. We sought to describe meningococcal vaccination and prophylaxis practices among SOTRs receiving eculizumab. Methods We performed a retrospective chart review of meningococcal vaccination, including number and timing pre- or post-transplant, along with prophylaxis prescribing and duration in SOTRs receiving eculizumab across 3 distinct Mayo Clinic Enterprise sites (Rochester, Arizona, and Florida). Results 200 SOTRs receiving at least one dose of eculizumab between 1/1/2008 and 9/16/2021 were reviewed. Eculizumab indications included antibody mediated rejection (38%), desensitization (26%), and thrombotic microangiopathy (19%). 83% (166/200) of SOTRs received eculizumab for an unanticipated post-transplant complication. Vaccination rates were 82% (164/200) and 35.5% (71/200) for menACWY dose 1 and 2, respectively, and 54% (108/200) and 28.5% (57/200) for menB dose 1 and 2, respectively. The majority received their first vaccination post-transplant: menACWY 66.5% (133/200) and menB 2.5% (185/200). Among those without vaccination pre-eculizumab, 22.3% (41/184) were not prescribed prophylaxis. The median duration of prophylaxis was 62 (range 4-2651) days. Conclusion Most SOTRs underwent meningococcal vaccinations near the time of eculizumab administration post-transplant for an unanticipated complication. One-fifth of those meeting criteria were not provided meningococcal prophylaxis. These findings may support pre-transplant administration of meningococcal vaccinations and heightened awareness for meningococcal prophylaxis in SOTRs receiving eculizumab. Disclosures All Authors: No reported disclosures.

Abstract Background Cytomegalovirus (CMV) causes significant morbidity in solid organ transplant recipients (SOTR). As a lack of immunity predisposes to infection, a laboratory test that measures CMV-specific cell-mediated immunity (CMV CMI) may help guide antiviral prophylaxis, predict relapses and correlate with outcomes. We assessed CMV CMI in CMV D+/R- patients during valganciclovir primary prophylaxis and in CMV viremic SOTRs during antiviral treatment, and correlated the results with post-prophylaxis CMV infection and post-treatment relapse, respectively. Methods CMV CMI was assessed in two groups of SOTRs using the QuantiFERON© CMV interferon-gamma release assay (IGRA), with level &gt;0.2 IU/mL suggestive of immunity. The first group included CMV D+/R- SOTRs who underwent monthly CMV CMI testing during 6 months of valganciclovir prophylaxis. These patients were prospectively followed for CMV episodes for 1 year post transplant. The second group included SOTRs with CMV viremia or disease, who underwent CMV CMI testing at time of CMV diagnosis and at various time points during antiviral treatment. These patients were prospectively followed for CMV relapse for 1 year post-primary CMV episode. Standard definitions were used to define CMV infection and disease. Results In the primary prophylaxis cohort, 24 CMV mismatched (D+/R-) SOTRs were enrolled. Only 1 patient (4.2%) demonstrated a CMV CMI &gt;0.2 IU/mL by the end of prophylaxis; this patient did not develop CMV disease. Four (16.6%) patients developed post-prophylaxis CMV infection, none of which had CMV CMI &gt;0.2 IU/ml. In the post-treatment cohort, 20 CMV viremic SOTRs were enrolled, including 12 D+/R- (60%). Eighteen (90%) had CMV CMI levels &gt;0.2 IU/mL by end of treatment and none developed CMV relapse. In contrast, the single patient who relapsed after treatment had a CMV CMI response &lt; 0.2 IU/ml (p=0.05). Conclusion CMV D+/R- SOTRs are unlikely to develop CMV CMI during valganciclovir prophylaxis. Thus, the utility of CMV CMI for risk stratification of post-prophylaxis CMV infection in CMV D+/R- SOTRs is questionable. Conversely, CMV CMI testing may potentially be a useful marker of CMV relapse risk after treatment and guide the role of secondary antiviral prophylaxis. Disclosures Elitza Theel, PhD, D(ABMM), Euroimmun US: Advisor/Consultant|Oxford Immunotech: Advisor/Consultant|Roche Diagnostics: Advisor/Consultant|Serimmune Inc: Advisor/Consultant Raymund R. Razonable, MD, American Society of Transplantation: Board Member|gilead: Grant/Research Support|novartis: DSMB|regeneron: Grant/Research Support|Roche: Grant/Research Support.

Purpose of review Coronavirus disease-2019 (COVID-19) disproportionately causes severe outcomes in solid organ transplant recipients (SOTR). Antispike monoclonal antibodies have been authorized for therapy and prophylaxis for COVID-19. Here, we review the current state of antispike monoclonal antibodies and their role for SOTRs. Recent findings Bamlanivimab with or without etesevimab, casirivimab-imdevimab and sotrovimab have reduced the rates of hospitalization and severe disease in high-risk patients with mild-to-moderate COVID-19. Multiple retrospective studies have also demonstrated monoclonal antibodies are effective in SOTR populations. However, the evolution of resistant severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) variants of concerns has resulted in revocation of the authorization of bamlanivimab with or without etesevimab, and casirivimab-imdevimab as treatment and postexposure prophylaxis (PEP). Sotrovimab and bebtelovimab are currently authorized for treatment of the predominant circulating SARS-CoV-2 B.1.1.529 (Omicron), but not as pre or PEP. Tixagevimab–cilgavimab, a long-acting antibody combination preparation, is authorized for preexposure prophylaxis in high-risk immunocompromised populations, including SOTRs, who are less likely to mount an effective immune response following vaccination series and booster. Summary Antispike monoclonal antibodies are useful for the prevention and treatment of mild-to-moderate COVID-19 in SOTRs. However, their clinical use should be determined by the evolving epidemiology of SARS-CoV-2 variants in the community.

Abstract Background We reviewed the scientific literature to gain insight on the epidemiology and outcome of Strongyloides stercoralis infections after transplantation. Methods CINAHL, PUBMED, and OVID/MEDLINE were reviewed from inception through March 31, 2022 using key words Strongyloides and transplantation. Results Our review identified 108 episodes of Strongyloides infection among 91 solid organ transplant (SOT) and 15 hematopoietic cell transplant (HCT) recipients. Median time to infection was 10.8 (range, .14–417) and 8.8 (range, 0–208) weeks after SOT and HCT, respectively. Gastrointestinal symptoms were frequent (86/108 [79.6%]), while skin rash (22/108 [20.3%]) and fever (31/103 [30%]) were less common. Peripheral eosinophilia was observed in half of patients (41/77 [53.2%]). Bacteremia (31/59 [52.5%]) was frequently due to Gram‐negative organisms (24/31 [77.4%]). Abnormal chest radiologic findings were reported in half (56/108 [51.9%]). The majority had hyperinfection syndrome (97/108 [89.8%]) while disseminated strongyloidiasis was less common (11/108 [10.2%]). Thirty‐two cases were categorized as donor‐derived infection (DDI), with donors (23/24 [95.8%]) who had traveled to or lived in endemic areas. Median time to DDI was 8 weeks (range .5–34.3 weeks) after transplantation. Treatment consisted of ivermectin ( n = 26), a benzimidazole ( n = 27), or both drugs ( n = 28). There was high all‐cause mortality (48/107, 44.9%) and a high Strongyloides ‐attributable mortality (32/49, 65.3%). Conclusions Strongyloidiasis should be strongly considered among recipients with epidemiologic risk factors for infection, even in the absence of eosinophilia or rash. A policy that provides guidance on pro‐active screening is needed, to ensure preventive measures are provided to recipients at increased risk.

AbstractBackgroundSolid organ transplant (SOT) recipients are at increased risk for complications from SARS‐CoV‐2 infection. Little is known regarding clinical course and outcomes of breakthrough COVID‐19 in the fully vaccinated SOT population. We sought to describe our cohort of SOT recipients who developed symptomatic breakthrough COVID‐19 after full vaccination.MethodsWe conducted a retrospective review of SOT recipients diagnosed with COVID‐19 at least 14 days after completing SARS‐CoV‐2 vaccination. Patients were analyzed according to those presenting with mild‐to‐moderate and severe COVID‐19, respectively. We described presenting characteristics, COVID‐19 therapy, and analyzed outcomes including emergency department (ED) visits, hospitalization, and intensive care unit (ICU) admission.ResultsThirty‐five patients met inclusion criteria. These had a mean age of 60.8 years and kidney transplant was the most common SOT type. Five patients presented with severe COVID‐19 at diagnosis, all requiring hospitalization without ICU admission. From the 30 patients who presented with mild‐to‐moderate infection, 28 received casirivimab–imdevimab. Four of these 28 (14.3%) had an ED visit, with one requiring hospital admission (3.4%). No patients required ICU admission.ConclusionBreakthrough COVID‐19 may occur in SOT recipients after full vaccination, though they appear to have acceptable outcomes. Anti‐spike monoclonal antibody therapy for eligible SOT patients may have mitigated clinical progression and improved the outcomes. Further study with large cohorts is warranted.