Murray, David

ABSTRACT Background Platelet factor 4‐polyanion enzyme‐linked immunosorbent assays (ELISAs) are considered highly sensitive for diagnosing heparin‐induced thrombocytopenia (HIT), such that current practice guidelines recommend use of ELISA‐negative results to exclude HIT. Once HIT is ruled out, alternative, non‐heparin‐based anticoagulant treatments are ceased, and heparin reintroduction frequently occurs. Methods Antigen‐based and PF4‐dependent functional testing were used to study PF4/polyvinylsulfonate ELISA‐negative platelet‐activating antibodies in HIT‐suspected patients. Results Three patients with clinical presentations consistent with HIT tested negative in an ELISA using PF4‐polyvinylsulfonate (PF4/PVS), an antigenic target very commonly used for HIT antibody screening. All three patients demonstrated PF4‐dependent platelet activation in functional testing that was sensitive to blockade of platelet FcγRIIa receptors and inhibited by high concentrations of heparin, consistent with pathogenic HIT antibodies. Functional testing‐based screening of 500 ELISA‐negative patients identified three additional patients whose sera activated platelets in a PF4‐ and FcγRIIa‐dependent manner and had clinical histories consistent with HIT. Five of the six ELISA‐negative HIT patients were re‐exposed to heparin, which precipitated a decrease in platelet counts in all re‐exposed patients, and one patient developed a new thrombus. Conclusions Recognition of ELISA‐negative HIT is critical to avoid harm due to the cessation of alternative anticoagulation therapy and re‐exposure of these patients to heparin.

Summary This nutshell review discusses the pathophysiology, diagnostic features, treatment strategies and avenues for future research in a recently identified thrombotic entity, monoclonal gammopathy of thrombotic significance (MGTS). MGTS is an anti‐platelet factor 4 (PF4) antibody‐mediated disorder distinct from heparin‐induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) and vaccine‐induced thrombotic thrombocytopenia (VITT), as it involves the production of persistent, monoclonal anti‐PF4 antibodies. Several subtypes of MGTS, including ‘HIT‐like’, ‘VITT‐like’ and ‘non‐HIT/VITT‐like’, exhibit unique serological profiles that can complicate diagnosis. Recognition of ‘HIT‐like’ MGTS is critical to avoid heparin exposure in these patients, which can result in adverse effects like those seen in heparin‐exposed HIT patients. ‘Non‐HIT/VITT‐like’ MGTS antibodies have only been detected in PF4‐enhanced functional testing; therefore, we recommend using these platelet‐based tests as the front‐line assay for detecting MGTS antibodies. Mass profiling using mass spectrometry is critical for the ‘fingerprinting’ of monoclonal antibodies to establish a diagnosis of MGTS. Treatments used in HIT and VITT, such as non‐heparin anticoagulants and intravenous immunoglobulin G, are typically insufficient for managing MGTS. Emerging MGTS therapies, such as plasma cell‐directed drugs and Bruton tyrosine kinase inhibitors, are discussed. The review concludes with an emphasis on areas of future research in MGTS.

Abstract Introduction In 2018, our institution implemented a MALDI-TOF mass spectrometry (MS) method (Mass-Fix) to detect myeloma associated M-proteins in blood. Currently, the lab has performed more than 500K tests by Mass-Fix. While Mass-Fix has been found to be more sensitive and specific than IFE, an ESI-Q-TOF (High Resolution Mass-Fix) method has demonstrated the potential to detect M-proteins at significantly lower levels. Blood minimal residual disease (MRD) detection in lieu of bone marrow (BM) is desirable since blood is easier and less expensive to obtain and analyze. This feature can allow for more frequent MRD monitoring for myeloma patients. Methods 66 residual blood samples from myeloma patients with varying M-protein varying isotypes were diluted into healthy blood to estimate the limit of detection of HR-Mass-Fix method. 179 Rochester Mayo Clinic patients who had a clinically ordered BM MRD assessment by next generation flow (NGF) cytometry (2 x 10-6), a blood sample available within 7 days of the BM biopsy, and a pre-treatment measured M-protein mass by Mass-Fix were utilized to assess the concordance of the BM and blood MRD status. Results The average limit of detection (LOD) of the HR-Mass-Fix was found to be significantly lower than Mass-Fix (0.0003 g/dL and 0.01 g/dL, respectively). The treated patient cohort utilized for comparison consisted of 145 myeloma, 21 AL amyloid, 4 LPL lymphoma and 9 other PCDs. Comparing the Mass-Fix and HR-Mass-Fix results, 100% of blood positive MRD results by Mass-Fix were positive by HR-Mass-Fix. HR-Mass-Fix detected residual M-proteins (mass within +/- 1 Da of pre-treatment) in 29 samples (40%) that were negative by Mass-Fix. Thus, HR-Mass-Fix increased the overall blood MRD positivity rate from 57% by Mass-Fix to 78%. The BM NGF MRD positivity was lower at 54%. The overall agreement of blood and BM by Mass-Fix was 71% (kappa 0.4) which decreased to 0.63 (kappa 0.3) with HR-Mass-Fix. Most of the disagreements were HR-Mass-Fix Blood (+)/BM NGF (-). Blood M-protein MRD appeared to be affected by M-protein half-lives. To determine this, the M-protein isotype distribution of Blood/BM MRD status was compared the M-protein isotype distribution of the overall cohort. The half-lives are as follows: IgG 23 days, IgA 6 days, IgM 5 days and FLC 0.25 days. When both blood and BM were positive, the isotype distribution was not significantly different than the overall cohort. For blood(+)/BM(-) patients, IgG (with the longest half-life) were significantly overrepresented compared to the overall cohort (74% vs 51%) . For blood(-)/BM(+) cases, there were no IgG M-proteins, and the majority were FLC patients. These results suggest that patients with shorter half-life M-proteins (non-IgG) are more likely to be Blood MRD(-) than patients with longer half-life M-proteins. M-protein rate changes over time will likely be needed to resolve the M-protein half- life affect. Conclusions HR-Mass-Fix can significantly increase the detection of M-proteins in comparison to our current Mass-Fix method. Ig recycling was found to be a likely reason for the disagreement between BM and blood. Therefore, a negative blood MRD status by HR-Mass-Fix is most likely to be the most significant in predicting patient outcomes.

Abstract Introduction Matrix assisted laser desorption ionization time of flight mass spectrometry (MALDI-TOF MS, mass fix) represents a sensitive and specific alternative to electrophoresis and immunofixation for quantifying monoclonal antibodies in patients with multiple myeloma (MM). Here we report real world data utilizing mass fix and compare its test characteristics to a gold standard of minimal residual disease (MRD) quantification utilizing next generation sequencing (NGS). Results All patients who had obtained mass fix and MRD testing by NGS as part of routine clinical care at Mayo Clinic Arizona were screened for this study. In total, 343 pairs of mass fix and NGS testing within 50 days of each other representing 269 unique patients with secretory multiple myeloma were included. Cases of IgD myeloma and those secreting only free light chains were excluded. The threshold of MRD negativity was set at <1x10-6(less than one malignant cell in one million) and was assessed utilizing the clonoSEQ NGS assay. The median age of our cohort is 67, it is 44% female, and primarily Caucasian (88%) with a median follow-up of 7.3 months from testing date. FISH testing was performed in 96% of patients and at least one high risk cytogenetic abnormality (t(4;14), t(14;16), del(17p)) was found in 23% of patients. The t(11;14) translocation was found in 18%, +1q in 26%, and amp(1q) in 6% of evaluated patients. Notably, patients at all stages of treatment or disease status were included in our study. Induction treatment for newly diagnosed MM (NDMM, 133 patients) was mostly daratumumab-containing quadruplet (63%) or triplet drug regimens (36%). Autologous stem cell transplant (ASCT) was performed in 79% of NDMM and 80% of relapsed refractory MM patients (RRMM, 138 patients). Of the RRMM patients, 94% were triple class exposed and 41% were penta-exposed. Overall agreement between NGS and mass fix results was 65% (Kappa statistic: 0.31, 95% CI: 0.22 – 0.41). Most discordant cases were instances of mass fix negativity and NGS positivity (n = 89, 26% of all testing pairs). Only 7% of cases (n= 30) represented mass fix positivity with NGS negativity. Mass fix was able to define therapeutic monoclonal antibody by its unique mass spectrometric profile in 38 of the total test pairs that otherwise would have been considered disease associated. Of the 30 patients testing mass fix positive and NGS negative, 25 (83%) represent post-treatment evaluations. Thus, ongoing mass fix positivity represents monoclonal protein washout kinetics. All of these cases are noted to have declining mass fix levels at last follow up and 40% had undetectable monoclonal protein. The discordant mass fix negative and NGS positive cases were evenly distributed across NDMM and RRMM representing 32% and 20% of test pairs in each group, respectively. Amongst these 89 total test pairs, the median abundance of malignant clone by NGS was 10 cells per million (range 0.06 to 297,895). This is in contrast to 136 concordantly positive test pairs where the median was 2960 cells per million (range 0.353 to 1,017,360). The median monoclonal protein identified (in those with a quantifiable M-spike) was 0.30 g/dL. Receiver operating characteristic curves using NGS as gold standard found the optimal mass fix threshold to be 0.010g/dL (specificity 95%, sensitivity 51%) for NDMM patients and 0.046g/dL (specificity 84%, sensitivity 55%) in RRMM patients. Conclusions Development of a MRD assay based on peripheral blood sampling could greatly improve the ease and speed of obtaining these assessments. Our experience highlights both the great potential and need to identify appropriate clinical contexts for optimal use of mass fix MRD assessment. A significant limitation of our data is that low level monoclonal proteins without a previous reference above a threshold of 20mg/dL are not reported as positive and may account for a significant fraction of discordant cases reported here. All clonoSEQ NGS samples are referenced to a positive control greatly increasing specificity. The currently reported dataset is biased against mass fix as not all test pairs reported are known to have a positive reference. Further delineation of these cases is forthcoming. Previous reports have also noted that mass fix test characteristics can improve with time from treatment which will be assessed with future follow-up.

Abstract Background Monoclonal antibody therapies (t-mabs) are known to interfere in serum immunofixation, as they show up as a discrete band. Until recently, most of the t-mabs were IgG kappa monoclonal immunoglobulins, and laboratories were familiar with the clue of a cathodal migrating IgG kappa in a patient sample, suggesting this could be daratumumab or another t-mab in the report. However, with the advent of novel antibody-based medications, identification via traditional laboratory methods has grown more complex. Teclistamab-cqyv is an IgG4 lambda T-cell engager bispecific antibody targeting B-cell maturation antigen (BCMA) and CD3 on T cells, used in relapsed and refractory multiple myeloma. The goal of this study was to determine if teclistamab could be detected on serum immunofixation and mass-fix. Methods Residual waste serum samples with no monoclonal protein via mass-fix (a MALDI-TOF based assay used in place of serum immunofixation) and variable polyclonal background were used to spike teclistamab (n=3). Briefly, one sample had total IgG < 500 mg/dL measured by nephelometry on a Siemens BNII (431 mg/dL, hypo gamma), a second sample had IgG within reference intervals (779 mg/dL, normal gamma) and the third sample had IgG > 1600 mg/dL (1950 mg/dL, polyclonal hypergamma). Each sample was divided into 3 aliquots and spiked with teclistamab (Tecvayli, Johnson &Johnson) obtained from the pharmacy, at final concentrations of 10, 20, and 40 mg/dL in the serum samples. The nine artificial samples were subjected to immunofixation electrophoresis (Sebia) and a new monoclonal protein study using mass-fix, a laboratory developed test. Results In the serum immunofixation experiments, a single discrete IgG lambda band was visible in the hypogamma and normal gamma samples (Table 1) when teclistamab was present at 20 mg/dL or 40 mg/dL. No bands were observed for the 10 mg/dL spike in hypos or normals. No teclistamab was detected at any concentration in the hypergamma sample. When mass-fix was performed, monoclonal protein spikes consistent with the expected mass of the two unique lambda light chains associated with teclistamab (22624Da and 22636Da) were identified in the hypo and normal gamma samples at the 3 concentrations tested: 10, 20, and 40 mg/dL. No mass-fix spikes were seen above the polyclonal spectra in the hypergamma samples. Conclusion The polyclonal background of immunoglobulins in a serum specimen plays a significant role in the identification of any monoclonal protein. Teclistamab is a new IgG lambda t-mab with potential to show up as an interference in both immunofixation and mass-fix, depending on the amount of polyclonal IgG present. Without positive identification, teclistamab presence could complicate interpretation of a patient’s response to treatment. This proof-of-concept study shows that mass-fix can detect smaller concentrations of teclistamab than immunofixation, therefore would be more prone to identifying this t-mab than labs employing the gel-based immunofixation method.

Abstract Background The diagnosis of monoclonal gammopathies relies on the detection of monoclonal immunoglobulins (M-proteins) in serum or urine. Mass-Fix utilizes matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization time-of-flight (MALDI-TOF) mass spectrometry (MS) to detect and quantify M-proteins. This method employs immunoaffinity enrichment using antibodies against heavy chains (HC) and light chains (LC), followed by MS analysis to determine M-protein isotypes. Mass-Fix has also revealed novel M-protein characteristics, including LC glycosylation and fragmentation, facilitated by measuring the mass of LC. LC glycosylation is as an independent risk factor for disease progression of monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance (MGUS), while light chain fragments have been postulated as the origin of amyloid light chain (AL) plaques. Since Mass-Fix enriches intact immunoglobulins before dissociating LCs, it potentially enhances fragment detection. However, the precise nature and clinical significance of these fragments remain to be fully elucidated. Methods Mass-Fix serum results from Mayo Clinic patients tested from September 10, 2018, to October 1, 2024, were reviewed for the presence of M-protein and LC fragments. The frequency and the isotype of fragment LC fragments was determined in the M-protein positive cohort (n=15410). Patients diagnosed with either MGUS (n=6996), AL amyloidosis (n=315), or both (n=32) who had positive M-protein results on Mass-Fix, either prior to or within one month after the diagnosis, were included for a retrospective clinical association study of LC fragments and disease. To validate that these fragments were not artifacts of MS analysis, PAGE gel analysis and Western blots were performed using clinical residual serum from 9 patients: 2 IgG/kappa and 3 IgG/lambda patients with detectable LC fragments and 2 IgG/kappa and 2 IgG/lambda patients without fragments. Samples were purified using antibodies against gamma heavy chains and reduced with TCEP prior to gel electrophoresis and Western blot. Results Of the 15410 patients with monoclonal proteins detected by Mass-Fix, 2896 (18.7%) had detectable LC fragments; kappa fragments in 1533 and lambda fragments in 1363. Most often, the fragments were observed in pairs, with combined molecular weight typically equaled that of the full-length monoclonal LC present in the same sample. LC fragments were observed more frequently among patients diagnosed with AL amyloidosis (118/347=34%) compared to those without the diagnosis (685/6996=10%), with an odds ratio of 4.75 (95% CI, 3.75-6.01). PAGE with Coomassie blue staining revealed bands with sizes representing LC fragments in the five M-protein samples with detectable LC fragments on Mass-Fix, while no such bands observed in those without LC fragments. Western blot using anti-kappa or anti-lambda antibodies confirmed the identity of the bands with higher molecular weight as a fragment of LC in each of the IgG/kappa and IgG/lambda samples. Conclusion Mass-Fix is able to discriminate LC fragments from intact LC based on their sizes. The detection of LC fragments with Western blot without ionization suggests a biological origin rather than analytical artifacts from MS. The clinical association study suggests that LC fragments may have utility in increasing the suspicion of AL amyloidosis in M-protein positive patients with LC fragments, potentially facilitating earlier intervention and improving patient outcomes.

Abstract Background The Freelite serum free light chain (FLC) assay has been widely used for detecting and monitoring monoclonal gammopathies. Reference intervals (RIs) established by Katzmann et al. in 2002 have served as the standard values for interpreting kappa/lambda FLC ratios. However, multiple reports suggested an assay drift and clinical laboratories started to move towards locally established RIs given the challenge in verifying original RIs. The assay drift over time increased kappa concentration measurements and was attributed to an interaction between the kappa FLC calibrator and serum proteins, including alpha-1-antitrypsin. A stabilized calibrator was developed to improve consistency of results with original RI. The objective of this study was to assess whether the new updated kappa calibrator would warrant a RI update. Methods Healthy adult donors’ serum samples were selected from the institution quality unit. Exclusion criteria included autoimmune diseases, cancers and renal disease. FLC measurements were obtained on the Optilite by turbidimetry using routine reagents for kappa (old lot); the new lot of reformulated kappa calibrator, and a single measurement for lambda FLC. FLC ratios were calculated with the old lot and new lot. All samples were tested by MASS-FIX to confirm absence of a monoclonal protein. Bootstrap resampling (10,000 replicates) estimated standard errors, with statistical significance defined as p < 0.05. Clinical significance was assessed per CLSI EP28-A3 guidelines. A RI was considered for partitioning by sex if the mean difference between males and females exceeded 25% of the RI width or if >4% of either sex had values beyond RI limits. Similar tests were applied to age groups (<60 and =60 years). Results 465 donors (48.2% male, 51.8% female) aged 30-89 years were used. Sixteen donors with incidental monoclonal proteins identified by MASS-FIX were excluded, for a final n=449. No clinically significant relationships of results were found with sex or age. The updated kappa calibrator resulted in a measurable shift down in FLC values with the new lot of reagents. The kappa FLC concentration and corresponding FLC ratio decreased by a median -12.1%, see table 1 for absolute values When reviewing Optilite results of the new lot, 98/449 samples were outside the kappa concentration original RI (21%). Lambda concentration RI was shifted up on Optilite when compared to original RI but passes verification (1.6% of samples, acceptance criteria < or =10%). 19 samples (4.2%) were outside the original RI for the FLC ratio of 0.26 to 1.65 (all >1.65), which was originally established as a 100% diagnostic range. The calibrator reformulation, while decreasing test results by >10%, was not sufficient to verify the original RI for kappa and still left a few cases outside the original diagnostic range for the FLC ratio. Conclusion This study assessed the impact of the stabilized calibrator on RIs for the Optilite Freelite assay. These findings suggest revisiting existing RIs to ensure continued accuracy in clinical interpretation and should be further evaluated with additional lots of reagents for robustness.

Abstract Introduction Multiple myeloma (MM) is characterized by the abnormal proliferation of plasma cells, resulting in the overproduction of distinctive monoclonal proteins (M-protein). Suspected MM necessitates screening for M-protein through a combination of serum protein electrophoresis, serum immunofixation (SIFE), and serum free light chain (SFLC) determination. An M-protein appears as a relatively restricted band on agarose gel, where migration in ɑ-2 is rare. Methods A 55-year-old man with pulmonary tuberculosis presented with severe lower back pain. On examination, he appeared chronically ill, with conjunctival pallor. X-rays revealed vertebral compression fractures. The full blood count confirmed anemia; however, serum calcium and creatinine levels did not meet myeloma-defining event criteria. Results The serum protein electrophoresis revealed hypogammaglobulinemia, with the SIFE demonstrating unusual unrestricted κ staining in the ɑ-2 region. A markedly elevated κ SFLC and κ:λ ratio were found. Bone marrow examination demonstrated approximately 90% plasmacytosis. Urine immunofixation revealed a small, restricted κ band disproportionate to the κ SFLC. Notably, matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry identified only polyclonal κ SFLC. Discussion Given the absence of a discernible M-protein on SIFE, a small κ restriction on urine immunofixation, and a polyclonal increase in κ SFLCs, the patient’s condition is being managed as an oligosecretory MM.