Goldsweig, Andrew M.

Introduction and importance: While vaping has increased significantly among young individuals, the effects of vape aerosol constituents on cardiac electrophysiological dynamics remain unknown. Case presentation: A 22-year-old female with a history of energy vaping presented with cardiac arrest. Found to have no pulse, CPR was started and an initial rhythm of ventricular tachycardia was obtained. Shock was administered with a follow-up rhythm of ventricular fibrillation. She was emergently defibrillated and entered atrial fibrillation with rapid ventricular response. Toxicology and troponins were all negative. Left heart catheterization and cardiac MRI were unremarkable. She was discharged with an external defibrillation vest and a tentative plan for outpatient electrophysiology study in the setting of negative work-up for cardiopulmonary arrest. Clinical discussion: Vaping-induced sudden cardiac arrest may be attributed to a reduction in cardiac repolarization reserve. Exposure to vegetable glycerin and propylene glycol, substances present in nearly all vape products, have been found to incite arrhythmias and disrupt cardiac conduction in animals. Acrolein, an aldehyde byproduct of glycerin, has also been found to induce arrhythmias due to autonomic dysfunction. Increased intracellular calcium concentration and free radical damage, which occur as a result of inhaling particulate matter generated from e-cigarettes, further propagates the risk of arrhythmia. Conclusion: The effects of inhaling vape aerosols remain not fully understood. While there is a perceived notion that nicotine-free aerosols may be harmless, that remains unclear. Further studies are needed to evaluate proarrhythmogenic effects and autonomic dysfunction from the various chemical substances present in vape aerosols.

Abstract Aims Data on safety outcomes of left atrial appendage occlusion (LAAO) in elderly patients are limited. This study aimed to compare the outcomes of LAAO between octogenarians (age 80–89) and nonagenarians (age ≥90) vs. younger patients (age ≤79). Methods and results We conducted a retrospective cohort study using the National Inpatient Sample database to identify patients hospitalized for LAAO from 2016 to 2020 and to compare in-hospital safety outcomes in octogenarians and nonagenarians vs. younger patients. The primary outcome was a composite of in-hospital all-cause mortality or stroke. Secondary outcomes included procedural complications, length of stay (LOS), and total costs. Outcomes were determined using logistic regression models. Among 84 140 patients hospitalized for LAAO, 32.9% were octogenarians, 2.8% were nonagenarians, and 64.3% were ≤79 years of age. Over the study period, the volume of LAAO increased in all age groups (all Ptrend < 0.01). After adjustment for clinical and demographic factors, octogenarians and nonagenarians had similar odds of in-hospital all-cause mortality or stroke [adjusted odds ratio (aOR) 1.41, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.93–2.13 for octogenarians; aOR 1.69, 95% CI 0.67–3.92 for nonagenarians], cardiac tamponade, acute kidney injury, major bleeding, and blood transfusion, in addition to similar LOS and total costs compared with younger patients (all P > 0.05). However, octogenarians and nonagenarians had higher odds of vascular complications compared with younger patients (aOR 1.47, 95% CI 1.08–1.99 for octogenarians; aOR 1.60, 95% CI 1.18–2.97 for nonagenarians). Conclusion Octogenarians and nonagenarians undergoing LAAO have a similar safety profile compared with clinically similar younger patients except for higher odds of vascular complications.

BACKGROUND: Following regulatory approval, medical devices may be used “off-label.” Patent foramen ovale (PFO) closure is indicated to reduce recurrent stroke but has been proposed for other indications, including migraine, transient ischemic attack, and diving decompression illness. We sought to evaluate PFO closure rates and indications relative to the timing of regulatory approval and publication of key randomized trials. METHODS: We performed a retrospective cohort study using the OptumLabs Data Warehouse of US commercial insurance enrollees from 2006 to 2019. We quantified PFO closure among individuals with ≥2 years of preprocedure coverage to establish indications, classified hierarchically as stroke/systemic embolism, migraine, transient ischemia attack, or other. RESULTS: We identified 5315 patients undergoing PFO closure (51.8% female, 29.2%≥60 years old), which increased from 4.75 per 100 000 person-years in 2006 to 6.60 per 100 000 person-years in 2019. Patients aged ≥60 years accounted for 29.2% of closures. Procedure volumes corresponded weakly with supportive clinical publications and device approval. Among patients with PFO closure, 58.6% underwent closure for stroke/systemic embolism, 10.2% for transient ischemia attack, 8.8% for migraine, and 22.4% for other indications; 17.6% of patients had atrial fibrillation at baseline; and 11.9% developed atrial fibrillation postprocedure. Those aged ≥60 years and male were less likely to undergo closure for migraine than stroke/systemic embolism. CONCLUSIONS: From 2006 to 2019, PFO closure use was consistently low and corresponded weakly with clinical trial publications and regulatory status. Nearly half of patients underwent PFO closure for indications unapproved by the Food and Drug Administration. Regulators and payers should coordinate mechanisms to promote utilization for approved indications to ensure patient safety and should facilitate clinical trials for other possible indications.

Background: Clinical outcomes of catheter-based thrombectomy (CBT) compared with surgical embolectomy (SE) in patients with massive pulmonary embolism (mPE) have not been previously examined. Methods: We conducted a retrospective cohort study using the 2016-2020 National Inpatient Sample database to compare the outcomes of CBT versus SE in patients with mPE. Outcomes of interest included risk-adjusted in-hospital mortality, major bleeding, stroke, acute kidney injury (AKI), hospital length of stay (LOS), and total cost. Results: The total cohort included 5,845 patients with mPE, of which 5,490 (93.9%) underwent CBT and 215 (3.7%) underwent SE. After risk-adjustment, CBT had similar odds of in-hospital mortality (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 1.49, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.60-3.66, p=0.37) and stroke (aOR 1.49, 95% CI 0.30-7.38, p=0.62), lower odds of major bleeding (aOR 0.28, 95% CI 0.13-0.63, p<0.01), and higher odds of AKI (aOR 2.40, 95% CI 1.11-5.17, p=0.02) compared with SE. CBT had a similar LOS (p=0.58) and total cost (p=0.23) compared with SE. Between 2016 and 2020, there was a temporal increase in the performance of CBT in patients with mPE (p trend <0.01). Conclusions: In patients with massive PE, CBT was associated with similar in-hospital mortality, stroke, LOS, and total cost, lower major bleeding, and higher AKI compared with SE. Randomized controlled trials are indicated to confirm our findings.

Background: Transcatheter pulmonary valve implantation (TPVI) is an effective non-surgical treatment method for patients with right ventricle outflow tract dysfunction. The Medtronic Melody and the Edwards Sapien are the two valves approved for use in TPVI. Since TPVI patients are typically younger, even a modest annual incidence of infective endocarditis (IE) is significant. Several previous studies have shown a growing risk of IE after TPVI. There is uncertainty regarding the overall incidence of IE and differences in the risk of IE between the valves. Methods: A systematic search was conducted in the MEDLINE, EMBASE, PubMed, and Cochrane databases from inception to 1 January 2023 using the search terms ‘pulmonary valve implantation’, ‘TPVI’, or ‘PPVI’. The primary outcome was the pooled incidence of IE following TPVI in Melody and Sapien valves and the difference in incidence between Sapien and Melody valves. Fixed effect and random effect models were used depending on the valve. Meta-regression with random effects was conducted to test the difference in the incidence of IE between the two valves. Results: A total of 22 studies (including 10 Melody valve studies, 8 Sapien valve studies, and 4 studies that included both valves (572 patients that used the Sapien valve and 1395 patients that used the Melody valve)) were used for the final analysis. Zero IE incidence following TPVI was reported by eight studies (66.7%) that utilized Sapien valves compared to two studies (14.3%) that utilized Melody valves. The pooled incidence of IE following TPVI with Sapien valves was 2.1% (95% CI: 0.9% to 5.13%) compared to 8.5% (95% CI: 4.8% to 15.2%) following TPVI with Melody valves. Results of meta-regression indicated that the Sapien valve had a 79.6% (95% CI: 24.2% to 94.4%, p = 0.019; R2 = 34.4) lower risk of IE incidence compared to the Melody valve. Conclusions: The risk of IE following TPVI differs significantly. A prudent valve choice in favor of Sapien valves to lower the risk of post-TPVI endocarditis may be beneficial.

Introduction: Valve-in-valve transcatheter mitral valve replacement (ViV-TMVR) and redo surgical mitral valve replacement (redo-SMVR) are two treatment strategies for patients with bioprosthetic mitral valve dysfunction. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to compare the outcomes of ViV-TMVR versus redo-SMVR. Methods: We searched PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane, and Google Scholar for studies comparing outcomes of ViV-TMVR versus redo-SMVR in degenerated bioprosthetic mitral valves. We used a random effects model to calculate risk ratios (RRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Outcomes included in-hospital, 30-day, 1-year, and 2-year mortality, stroke, bleeding and vascular complications, acute kidney injury (AKI), arrhythmias, and hospital length of stay (LOS). Results: Six observational studies with a total of 1,339 subjects were included. Median follow-up was 2 years. Compared to redo-SMVR, ViV-TMVR was associated with significantly lower in-hospital (RR 0.42; 95% CI 0.25-0.70; p=0.001) and 30-day mortality (RR 0.49; 95% CI 0.24-0.98; p=0.04) but similar 1-year (RR 0.97; 95% CI 0.64-1.47; p=0.89) and 2-year mortality (RR 1.14; 95% CI 0.71-1.81; p=0.59). Stroke, bleeding, AKI, and arrhythmias were less frequent and hospital LOS was shorter with ViV-TMVR, however vascular complications were similar between both strategies. Conclusion: In patients with degenerated bioprosthetic mitral valves, ViV-TMVR is associated with better outcomes compared to redo-SMVR including lower in-hospital and 30-day mortality, lower complication rates, and shorter hospital LOS. Given these findings and the ongoing advances in transcatheter therapeutics, ViV-TMVR may be preferred over redo-SMVR, particularly in individuals at intermediate-to-high surgical risk.

Abstract Background ST elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) has traditionally been a relative contraindication for the utilization of rotational atherectomy (RA). However, in severely calcified lesions, RA may be necessary to facilitate stent delivery. Case summary Three patients who present with STEMI are found to have severely calcified lesions on intravascular ultrasound. Equipment was unable to pass the lesions in all three cases. Rotational atherectomy was therefore performed to allow for stent passage. All three cases had achieved successful revascularization with no intraoperative or post-operative complications. The patients remained angina-free the rest of their hospitalization and at the 4 month follow-up. Discussion Rotational atherectomy for calcific plaque modification during STEMI when equipment will not pass is a feasible and safe therapeutic option.

Background Racial and ethnic disparities in outcomes exist following many cardiac procedures. Transcatheter mitral valve replacement (TMVR) has grown as an alternative to mitral valve surgery for patients at high surgical risk. The outcomes of TMVR by race and ethnicity are unknown. We aimed to evaluate racial and ethnic disparities in the outcomes of TMVR. Methods and Results We analyzed the National Inpatient Sample database from 2016 to 2020 to identify hospitalizations for TMVR. Racial and ethnic disparities in TMVR outcomes were determined using logistic regression models. Between 2016 and 2020, 5005 hospitalizations for TMVR were identified, composed of 3840 (76.7%) White race, 505 (10.1%) Black race, 315 (6.3%) Hispanic ethnicity, and 345 (6.9%) from other races (Asian, Pacific Islander, American Indian or Alaska Native, Other). Compared with other racial and ethnic groups, Black patients were significantly younger and more likely to be women (both P <0.01). There were no significant differences between White, Black, and Hispanic patients in in‐hospital mortality (5.2% versus 5.0% versus <3.5%; P =0.89) and procedural complications, including heart block ( P =0.91), permanent pacemaker ( P =0.49), prosthetic valve dysfunction ( P =0.45), stroke ( P =0.37), acute kidney injury ( P =0.32), major bleeding ( P =0.23), and blood transfusion ( P =0.92), even after adjustment for baseline characteristics. Adjusted vascular complications were higher in Black compared with White patients ( P =0.03). Trend analysis revealed a significant increase in TMVR in all racial and ethnic groups from 2016 to 2020 ( P trend <0.05). Conclusions Between 2016 and 2020, Black and Hispanic patients undergoing TMVR had similar in‐hospital outcomes compared with White patients, except for higher vascular complications in Black patients. Further comparative studies of TMVR in clinically similar White patients and other racial and ethnic groups are warranted to confirm our findings.

AbstractThe Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions (SCAI) Think Tank is a collaborative venture that brings together interventional cardiologists, administrative partners, and select members of the cardiovascular industry community annually for high‐level field‐wide discussions. The 2021 Think Tank was organized into four parallel sessions reflective of the field of interventional cardiology: (a) coronary intervention, (b) endovascular medicine, (c) structural heart disease, and (d) congenital heart disease. Each session was moderated by a senior content expert and co‐moderated by a member of SCAI's Emerging Leader Mentorship program. This document presents the proceedings to the wider cardiovascular community in order to enhance participation in this discussion, create additional dialog from a broader base, and thereby aid SCAI, the industry community and external stakeholders in developing specific action items to move these areas forward.