Quillen, Jaxon

ABSTRACTPurposeThis study aimed to assess whether kidney stone burden and risk factors at the time of kidney donor evaluation were associated with a symptomatic stone event post‐donor evaluation.MethodsWe identified adults evaluated at Mayo Clinic (two sites) (2000–2011) for living kidney donation and had either a personal history or radiological evidence of kidney stone disease. We analyzed demographics, stone risk factors, stone number/size, and the committee's donation decision and reasons. A follow‐up survey (2022–2023) assessed post‐evaluation symptomatic kidney stones and related morbidity.ResultsAmong 412 potential donors with kidney stone disease, 258 donated, 75 did not donate due to kidney stones, and 79 did not donate for other reasons. Multivariable analysis showed that candidates not donating due to stones had higher body mass index (BMI), prior symptomatic kidney stones, multiple stones on imaging, bilateral kidney stones, and diameter of largest stone ≥3 mm. Of 147 who completed the survey, 26 (18%) had a symptomatic kidney stone post‐donor evaluation. Younger age (p = 0.031) and multiple stones on imaging (p = 0.02) were significant predictors of post‐evaluation symptomatic stones regardless of donation status (p = 0.41).ConclusionsStone burden on imaging and prior symptomatic stone events were associated with not donating. Younger age and stone burden on imaging were the primary risk factors for a symptomatic kidney stone event after donor evaluation.

Abstract The study of prehabilitation and rehabilitation ([p]rehabilitation) to alleviate the sequelae of bladder cancer and its treatment has generated numerous opportunities to improve the quality of life of bladder cancer survivors. The authors conducted a scoping review of randomized clinical trials (RCTs) to identify knowledge gaps in and research directions for (p)rehabilitative support for those affected by bladder cancer. The authors systematically searched six databases and synthesized key findings from RCTs conducted from January 1, 2004, through March 15, 2022, that enrolled participants with bladder cancer, survivors, or caregivers in outpatient (p)rehabilitative programs (e.g., exercise, nutrition, or psychological support). Outcomes were characterized according to eight prespecified, clinically relevant categories. The search retrieved 10,968 records, 27 of which met the inclusion criteria, and 24 described unique RCTs with 2471 enrolled participants. Of 24 interventions, 17 (71%) yielded statistically significant results for the outcome of interest. Only one RCT included a cost‐effectiveness analysis, and only two characterized the efficacy of interventions for caregivers. Of 11 RCTs involving psychological support, eight yielded statistically significant results, as did nine of 11 RCTs with physical exercise interventions, three of four RCTs with educational interventions, three of four RCTs with nutritional support interventions, one of two RCTs with pharmacologic medications, and zero of one RCT with physical therapy. The most promising interventions for inclusion in multimodal, personalized (p)rehabilitation programs included exercise, stress management training, cognitive training, smoking and alcohol cessation counseling, immunonutrition, stoma education, and penile rehabilitation. Further studies of the cost effectiveness and efficacy for caregivers of such interventions are needed. Plain Language Summary In a scoping review of all randomized clinical trials involving prehabilitative or rehabilitative diet, exercise, and psychological support interventions for patients with bladder cancer, survivors, and their caregivers, 17 of 24 (71%) interventions yielded statistically significant improvements in the outcome of interest. Clinicians should consider implementing such interventions for those affected by bladder cancer.

Background: Cardiovascular disease remains the most common cause of death among kidney transplant recipients, with hypertension being one of the most prevalent risk factors. Understanding the current prevalence of hypertension in this population is critical to help shape post-transplant care policies and guidelines and ensure proper management of CVD risk. Methods: We included all kidney transplant recipients who received their transplant between 2019 and 2023 at our center and who completed 24-hour ABPM at 12 months post-transplant. We reported data in mean (SD) unless noted otherwise. BP was categorized per AHA guidelines. This study was deemed exempt by the IRB. Results: A total of 940 patients were included in this study. Detailed results are seen in Figure 1 and Table 1. Notable to mention that 60% of the patients had blood pressure > 130/80 mmHg at 12 months post kidney transplant, with the majority being stage 1. Patients with more severe hypertension tended to be older, had lower eGFR, and had more comorbidities. They also had lower diastolic blood pressure than stage 1 HTN patients, consistent with older age. Night-time BP was significantly higher among stage 2 HTN patients. Conclusion: Hypertension remains a prevalent condition post-kidney transplant despite the majority of patients having satisfactory kidney allograft function. Ongoing BP monitoring and assessment of out-of-office BP post-kidney transplantation is critical to ensure control of this important cardiovascular risk factor. 24-hour ABPM has several advantages in this group, including accurate measurement of out-of-office BP and detection of nocturnal hypertension, an independent risk factor for cardiovascular events. Additional studies are needed to describe the hypertension subphenotypes (e.g., sustained vs. masked) and to identify predictors of severe uncontrolled hypertension in this patient population.

Background Patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) are at increased risk of ischemic cerebrovascular events despite anticoagulants (AC). We aim to evaluate whether changing AC or adding antiplatelet therapy to anticoagulants (AP + AC) in patients with AF presenting with acute ischemic stroke (AIS) or transient ischemic attack (TIA) despite AC, decreases the risk of recurrent AIS/TIA compared to patients continued on same AC regimen. Methods Patients with AF on AC presenting with AIS or TIA at our center between 2011- 2021 were included. Data on Demographics, index event, antithrombotic therapy before and after index event, recurrent AIS/TIA, or major bleeding events (MBE) were extracted. Cox proportional hazards models were used to compare outcomes between AC unchange vs AC change, and AP + AC vs AC only groups. Results One hundred eighty-five patients were included (mean age 78.3 years; 62% males, median follow-up 9 months (IQR 1-34)). Seventeen patients (9%) had AC change, 100 (54%) received AP + AC, 39 (21%) had recurrent AIS/TIA, and 27 (15%) had MBE following index event. No difference was observed between AC unchange vs AC change and AP + AC vs AC only groups regarding recurrent AIS/TIA (HR 1.72 [.65-4.57], P = .27 and HR 1.02 [.53- 1.98], P = .95, respectively) or MBE (HR .85 [.19-3.67], P = .83 and HR 1.49 [.67-3.33)], P = .33, respectively). Fourteen vascular neurologists treated this cohort and 9(64%) implemented AC changes. Conclusion In this single center retrospective study of 185 patients with AF and AIS/TIA despite AC, changing AC or adding AP agents did not decrease the risk of ischemic cerebrovascular events.

Introduction: Postoperative pain management and postoperative nausea and vomiting are a persistent challenge for both health care providers and patients. Acupuncture is an effective and safe modality for the management of pain and nausea, and has the potential to play a key role in postoperative pain management. This study explores the utility and feasibility of acupuncture in the immediate postoperative setting. Methods: In a retrospective case–control study, 22 patients who underwent elective surgeries and received acupuncture in the post-anesthesia care unit (PACU) were compared with 88 case controls. Indications for acupuncture therapy included persistent pain, nausea, or anxiety. Patient satisfaction and symptom improvement after acupuncture were assessed. PACU nurses and patients were queried on their perspectives on using this therapy. Demographic data, perioperative opioid consumption, pain score in the PACU, incidence of postoperative nausea, PACU length of stay, and unintended hospital admission were assessed. The groups with/without acupuncture were compared using Wilcoxon rank sum test or Fisher's exact test as appropriate. Results: A total of 78.9% of patients receiving acupuncture felt improvement in their symptoms. 94.7% of recovery nurses who cared for patients who received acupuncture felt that it was helpful and 78.9% did not believe it was disruptive. Patients who opted for acupuncture had a statistically significant higher overall median (interquartile range) pain score in the PACU (7.0 [5.2, 9.5] vs. 5.0 [3.0, 7.0], p = 0.009) and higher postoperative opioid consumption (22.5 [9.8, 44.8] vs. 15.0 [0.0, 30.0], p = 0. 03). There was no difference between total perioperative opioid consumption between groups ( p = 0.94). Conclusions: Most patients who received acupuncture therapy in the PACU were satisfied with their therapy and would recommend it to future patients undergoing surgery. Most recovery nurses felt it was helpful, was not disruptive, and would like to see it utilized in the PACU.

Studies have shown that prosection and dissection facilitate similar academic outcomes and promote meaningful learning in anatomy laboratory courses. While dissection is the mainstay of many graduate level anatomy curricula, financial and other constraints have increased the use of prosection. This research evaluates student preference for studying different body regions and accomplishing learning outcomes related to content knowledge, teamwork, career preparation, humanistic learning, and wellness. First‐year medical students (n=51) who completed a hybrid prosection and dissection course completed a post‐course survey about their perceptions of the effectiveness of each lab learning modality. Response options included prosection, dissection, no preference (equally effective), and no preference (equally ineffective). A one‐way ANOVA was used to evaluate performance differences on course assessments between students in the hybrid course and students in past years who participated in a dissection based course. The response rate was 51%. Respondents preferred dissection for learning the back (62%), thorax (68%), abdomen (54%), shoulder, axilla, and arm (61.5%), and hip, thigh, and leg (46%). Prosection was favored for the pelvis (perineum 81%, cavity 69%), foot (58%), hand (46%), and head/neck (64%). Students favored dissection for gaining hands‐on skills relevant to surgical practice, appreciating anatomical variation, becoming more comfortable handling the human body, engaging in self‐directed learning, and fostering teamwork. Respondents felt prosection provided more time for independent study and wellness activities. Prosection and dissection were rated equally effective for developing a medical vocabulary, applying anatomical knowledge to clinical conditions, and gaining a 3D appreciation of the body. A hybrid prosection and dissection course was preferred by 73% of respondents, compared to 4% who ranked prosection alone as their preference; no students ranked dissection alone as their first choice. There were no statistically significant differences in academic performance related to teaching methods (F(3,195) = 2.65, p=0.34) between students in the hybrid course and students in previous dissection only courses. Students prefer prosection for learning more spatially complex and intricate regions requiring time‐consuming and skilled dissection. However, learners recognize distinct benefits of dissection for acquiring various technical and non‐technical skills. Hybrid courses should capitalize on the strengths of each method, aligning instructional methods with outcomes and incorporating learner preferences to achieve meaningful, lasting learning.

Abstract Context Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) is a multimodal protocol aimed to improve quality of postoperative recovery, minimize complications, and optimize overall self-regulation. Preoperative gabapentin decreases postoperative pain but can be associated with prolonged postoperative somnolence and respiratory depression risk. Although it is known that gabapentin affects the postoperative course, it is unclear if the timing of preoperative administration affects this finding. Objectives This study aims to assess the optimal preoperative timing for gabapentin administration in patients undergoing gynecologic surgery to minimize postoperative somnolence risk. Methods A retrospective cohort study evaluated patients who underwent major gynecologic surgery and received preoperative gabapentin. Patients were grouped based on timing from gabapentin administration to surgical incision (<4 h group vs. ≥4 h group). Preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative data were abstracted and compared. Univariate associations between the timing of gabapentin administration and the patient and surgical characteristics and outcomes were tested utilizing two-sample equal-variance t-tests, linear model ANOVA, or Fisher’s exact tests. Associations between the timing of gabapentin administration and the time until the Richmond Agitation Sedation Scale (RASS) score of 0 were modeled utilizing linear regression, adjusted for age, initial postoperative anesthesia care unit (PACU), RASS score, and postoperative narcotics. Results Each group contained 127 patients. Demographics were similar except for age (<4 h group mean=44.2 years; ≥4 h group mean=40.5 years; p=0.021), chronic pain (<4 h group=17.6%; ≥4 h group=43.3%; p<0.001), and surgical indication (<4 h group=pelvic pain [29.1%]; ≥4 h group=pelvic pain [51.2%]; p=0.007). The <4 h group had a similar postoperative narcotic administration (<4 h group mean morphine milligram equivalents [MME]=3.667; ≥4 h group mean MME=4.833; p=0.185). The minutes from surgical closure until the patient received a RASS score of 0 and initial PACU pain score (Visual Analogue Scale [VAS]) were similar. The initial PACU oxygen administration volume, hours from surgical closure until the patient transitioned to room air, and initial PACU respiratory rate were similar. The PACU duration, admission secondary to somnolence, and initial PACU Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) score showed no difference. Postoperative nausea/vomiting was decreased in the ≥4 h group (<4 h group=24.4%; ≥4 h group=13.4%; p-value=0.036), and urinary retention (<4 h group=14.2%; ≥4 h group=5.5%; p-value=0.033) was decreased in the ≥4 h group. Conclusions The timing of gabapentin administration less than or more than 4 h preoperatively in patients ≥18 years does not significantly affect postoperative somnolence or respiratory depression. Further, it does not have a significant effect on GCS scores or VAS scores.