Wasson, Megan

Abstract Surgery continues to be a mainstay of treatment for patients with symptomatic fibroids. Hysterectomy is an option for those desiring definitive treatment and myomectomy is preferred for those that have not yet completed childbearing or wish to retain their uterus. While open laparotomy remains a viable approach to both hysterectomy and myomectomy, minimally invasive techniques for the surgical management of symptomatic fibroids are preferred options for many due to improved patient outcomes. These include hysteroscopic myomectomy, laparoscopic and robotically assisted myomectomy, and vaginal, laparoscopic, and robotically assisted hysterectomy. Patients have a faster recovery and less postoperative pain compared to a laparotomic approach. More recently, uterine‐sparing outpatient modalities such as ultrasound‐guided radiofrequency ablation and high‐intensity focused ultrasound have emerged as promising alternatives for selected patients. Benefits include clinically significant reduction in fibroid size and menstrual bleeding with small or no abdominal incisions and an expedited convalescence. This article reviews preoperative evaluation and imaging for fibroids, as well as the techniques, approach, indications, patient selection, procedural management, and surgical and fertility outcomes for each surgical and procedural management of uterine fibroids.

Abstract Uterine fibroids (leiomyomas) and adenomyosis are among the most common benign gynecological conditions affecting women of reproductive age. These disorders are frequently associated with abnormal uterine bleeding, pelvic pain, pressure symptoms on adjacent pelvic organs, and potential infertility. The incidence of fibroids increases as women enter their third and fourth decades of life. In parallel, recent trends in delayed childbearing have further emphasized the need for fertility‐preserving treatment options. Notably, fibroids have a higher prevalence in African‐American women, highlighting a significant disparity in health needs compared to white women. Historically, hysterectomy and myomectomy were considered definitive treatments. However, these procedures carry inherent surgical risks, longer recovery periods, and, in the case of hysterectomy, a complete loss of reproductive potential. Consequently, there is increasing demand for uterus‐sparing, minimally invasive alternatives that provide effective symptom control with lower morbidity and preservation of fertility. Among the evolving treatment options, three image‐guided, minimally invasive therapies have gained particular attention: Uterine Artery Embolization (UAE), Radiofrequency Ablation (RFA), and High‐Intensity Focused Ultrasound (HIFU). Uterine Artery Embolization (UAE), also known as uterine fibroid embolization (UFE), is a well‐established endovascular procedure in which embolic agents are introduced via catheterization of the uterine arteries, inducing ischemia and infarction of fibroids. Performed under conscious sedation or regional anesthesia, UAE has demonstrated significant reductions in fibroid volume and symptom relief in over 80% of appropriately selected patients. All image‐guided techniques are especially beneficial for women who desire uterine preservation, have contraindications to surgery, or wish to avoid major operative interventions. In comparison with UAE, Radiofrequency Ablation (RFA) uses targeted thermal energy to induce coagulative necrosis within fibroid tissue. This approach can be delivered via laparoscopic, transcervical, or transvaginal routes, depending on the platform. The Sonata® System integrates intrauterine ultrasound guidance with energy delivery, enabling precise fibroid targeting with minimal myometrial damage. RFA is associated with shorter recovery and less intraoperative blood loss, though it is more suitable for smaller or fewer fibroids and may be less ideal for extensive disease. Together, these advancements reflect a paradigm shift in fibroid management—driven by demographic trends, racial disparities, patient preferences, and technological innovations—toward evidence‐based, uterus‐preserving therapies tailored to individual patient needs. This article discusses details of each technique including the procedure, benefits and complications and also the impact on particular situations such as pregnancy. Some key points common to each technique are also mentioned.

Abstract Endometriosis is defined as the presence of endometrial-like glands and stroma outside of the uterus. There are three types of endometriotic lesions: superficial or peritoneal endometriosis, ovarian endometrioma, and deep infiltrating disease. Endometriosis not only occurs in the pelvis but also can be found in extrapelvic sites such as the gastrointestinal tract, upper abdominal viscera, genitourinary tract, abdominal wall, diaphragm, and thoracic cavity. After thorough history and physical examination is performed, imaging, such as ultrasound or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), should be obtained if there is high suspicion for deep-infiltrating endometriosis to better assess visceral involvement. Endometriosis can be suspected based on symptoms, physical examination findings, and imaging. However, a definitive diagnosis requires histopathologic confirmation. Treatment options include expectant, medical, and surgical management. Endometriosis is largely a quality-of-life issue, and treatment should be tailored accordingly with empiric medical therapy frequently utilized. Medical management focuses on symptom improvement. Surgical management with excision of endometriosis is preferred over ablation or fulguration of endometriotic lesions. In the case of deep or extrapelvic endometriosis, treatment with a multidisciplinary team with experience in the treatment of advanced-stage endometriosis is essential to minimizing morbidity and increasing long-term success.

History A 30-year-old female patient with a history of infertility and no pregnancy presented to the gynecologic endometriosis clinic for follow-up 1 month after oocyte retrieval, to be evaluated for pelvic optimization before potential embryo transfer, with worsening dysmenorrhea, dyspareunia, and overall pelvic pain. Eleven years prior, the patient had undergone left ovarian cystectomy for treatment of endometrioma, as well as excision of deep infiltrating endometriosis. The oocyte retrieval procedure, where more than 30 eggs were retrieved, was complicated by ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome and intraperitoneal bleeding, which necessitated admission to the intensive care unit (ICU) for 3 days. Following discharge from the ICU, the patient experienced occasional on-and-off pressure of the urinary bladder and persistent aching pelvic pain. At the 1-month follow-up appointment, the patient’s vital signs were assessed (blood pressure, 142/94 mm Hg; pulse rate, 95 per minute; temperature, 96.8 °F [36 °C]). Routine blood investigations, including white blood cell count, were within normal limits. Physical examination showed the abdomen was soft but there was mild pelvic tenderness. The serum β–human chorionic gonadotropin test result was negative for pregnancy, and urinalysis testing showed no leukocyte esterase or nitrites. MRI of the pelvis was performed to evaluate the worsening pain.

AbstractEndometriosis is a complex gynecologic disorder characterized primarily by symptoms of pelvic pain, infertility, and altered quality of life. National and international guidelines highlight the diagnostic difficulties and lack of conclusive diagnostic tools for endometriosis. Furthermore, guidelines are becoming questionable at an increasingly rapid rate as new diagnostic techniques emerge. This work aims to provide a knowledge synthesis of the relevance of various diagnostic tools and to assess areas of improvement of conventional algorithms. MEDLINE and Cochrane Library databases were searched from January 2021 to December 2023 using relevant key words. Articles evaluating the diagnostic relevance and performance of various tools were included and independently reviewed by the authors for eligibility. Included studies were assessed using the GRADE and QUADAS‐2 tools. Of the 4204 retrieved articles, 26 were included. While anamnesis and clinical examination do contribute to diagnostic accuracy, their level of evidence and impact on the diagnostic process remains limited. Although imaging techniques are recommended to investigate endometriosis, ultrasonography remains highly operator dependent. Magnetic resonance imaging appears to exhibit higher sensitivities than ultrasound. However, concerns persist with regards to the terminology, anatomical definition of lesions, and accuracies of both ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging. Recently, several biological markers have been studied and cumulative evidence supports the contribution of noncoding RNAs to the diagnosis of endometriosis. Marginal improvements have been suggested for anamnesis, clinical examination, and imaging examinations. Conversely, some biomarkers, including the saliva microRNA signature for endometriosis, have emerged as diagnostic tools which inspire reflection on the revision of conventional diagnostic algorithms.

Abstract Purpose The U.S. population is rapidly aging. The supply of surgeons needed to meet this demand should be evaluated. This study evaluated the trends in supply of Medicare surgeons by specialty and by U.S. state and region. Method All surgeons associated with a National Provider Identifier for cardiothoracic surgery, colorectal surgery, general surgery, gynecologic oncology, hand surgery, neurosurgery, obstetrics-gynecology, ophthalmology, oral and maxillofacial surgery, orthopedic surgery, otolaryngology, plastic and reconstructive surgery, surgical oncology, urology, and vascular surgery from 2013 to 2019 on the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services website were included. The absolute number of physicians was adjusted per 100,000 Medicare beneficiaries. Annual change was calculated by linear regression model, and the compound annual growth rate (CAGR) was calculated per specialty. Results The absolute number of physicians per 100,000 beneficiaries increased in 6 of 15 specialties during the study period. Vascular surgery had the largest annual increase (+0.23; CAGR, +2.75%), and obstetrics-gynecology had the largest annual decrease (−1.08; CAGR, −1.44%). Surgical oncology showed the largest positive CAGR (+4.20%). Oral and maxillofacial surgery had the largest negative CAGR (−2.86%). The Northeast was above the national average in supply for each specialty. The Midwest had the most specialties with positive CAGRs. The South did not meet the national average for physicians in any specialty. Conclusions This analysis of 15 surgical specialties provides important context to predicted physician shortages to the Medicare population. The study found geographic variation by region across specialty, which has important implications for health care planning from the level of undergraduate medical education to provision of hospital resources. Overall, the supply of surgeons across all specialties may not be sufficient to meet the demand of the rapidly aging U.S. population. Future study is needed to evaluate why surgeons are leaving the Medicare program.

History A 30-year-old female patient with a history of infertility and no pregnancy presented to the gynecologic endometriosis clinic for follow-up 1 month after oocyte retrieval, to be evaluated for pelvic optimization before potential embryo transfer, with worsening dysmenorrhea, dyspareunia, and overall pelvic pain. Eleven years prior, the patient had undergone left ovarian cystectomy for treatment of endometrioma, as well as excision of deep infiltrative endometriosis. The oocyte retrieval procedure, where more than 30 eggs were retrieved, was complicated by ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome and intraperitoneal bleeding, which necessitated admission to the intensive care unit (ICU) for 3 days. Following discharge from the ICU, the patient experienced occasional on-and-off pressure of the urinary bladder and persistent aching pelvic pain. At the 1-month follow-up appointment, the patient’s vital signs were assessed (blood pressure, 142/94 mm Hg; pulse rate, 95 per minute; temperature, 96.8 °F [36 °C]). Routine blood investigations, including white blood cell count, were within normal limits. Physical examination showed the abdomen was soft but there was mild pelvic tenderness. The serum β–human chorionic gonadotropin test result was negative for pregnancy, and urinalysis testing showed no leukocyte esterase or nitrites. MRI of the pelvis ( Figs 1 – 3 ) was performed to evaluate the worsening pain.

AbstractFertility preservation is a growing field in reproductive medicine that may raise ethical questions. Preservation of fertility must be discussed with the patient if gonadotoxic treatment is required, whether in the case of benign or malignant pathology, or in the management of transgender identity. As a result, surgery or chemotherapy that has fewer adverse impacts on fertility should be proposed if this does not alter the prognosis of the disease. If the risk of infertility persists, then fertility cryopreservation should be proposed for children and adults of reproductive age. Sperm, oocytes, and gonadal tissue can be cryopreserved for many years. FIGO wishes to emphasize the importance of fertility preservation in the medical and surgical management of patients, and the importance of a specialized, multidisciplinary approach.