Sargent, Daniel J.

TPS3630 Background: In metastatic colorectal cancer with deficient DNA mismatch repair (MMR), anti-PD-1 antibody monotherapy produced high tumor response rates and extended progression-free survival compared to lack of benefit for proficient MMR tumors (Le, M, et al, NEJM 2016). We propose a phase III randomized trial to determine if the addition of the anti-PD-L1 antibody, atezolizumab (Genentech™), to adjuvant FOLFOX can improve patient disease-free survival (DFS) vs FOLFOX alone in patients with stage III colon cancers with dMMR or microsatellite instability (MSI). By blocking the PD-1/PD-L1 interaction, atezolizumab may activate T cells, thereby, restoring their ability to detect and attack tumor cells. Limited data suggest that FOLFOX may increase intratumoral cytotoxic CD8+ T cells that may serve as ‘immune priming.’ Methods: Patients with curatively resected stage III colon carcinomas with evidence of dMMR or MSI will be randomized to modified FOLFOX6 for 6 months (12 cycles) alone or combined with atezolizumab (840 mg IV q2 wk) continued as monotherapy for an additional 6 months (total duration of 12 months). Patients will be stratified by T, N stage and tumor sidedness. Local testing for MSI or MMR proteins is allowed. Atezolizumab must begin by/with cycle 2. The targeted accrual goal of 700 patients provides 90% power to detect an effect size expressed as hazard ratio of 0.6 for the primary endpoint DFS at two-sided alpha of 0.05. Interim analyses are planned at 50% and 75% of events. Secondary endpoints include overall survival, treatment tolerability, and quality of life. This study will be conducted by the Alliance for Clinical Trials in Oncology. The protocol has been approved by NCI CTEP and is expected to be activated in mid 2017. Clinical trial information: NCT02912559.

3582 Background: The prognostic importance of the incidence, severity, type and duration of AEs pts experience during chemotherapy varies between tumor types, and the available evidence across the board is often conflicting. Here we investigated the impact of the overall severity of AEs among pts with mCRC receiving first-line oxaliplatin (Oxa)- and/or irinotecan(Iri)-based regimens. Methods: The overall severity of AE data (i.e., max grade (G) of all AEs) were available on 3,971 pts (median age 61; 60% male, 47% ECOG PS 1+; 57% 2+ metastatic sites) enrolled onto 6 1st-line randomized trials. Around 46%, 45%, and 9% of pts had received Oxa-, Iri-, and Oxa+Iri-based regimens, respectively. Pts receiving biologic agents were excluded. Stratified multivariate Cox models were used to assess the associations with overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS); adjusted hazard ratios (HRadj) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) are reported. Results: Pts who only received Oxa-based treatment reported the lowest rate of G3+ AEs (p < .0001) compared to pts treated with Iri- or Oxa+Iri-based regimens. Older age, female gender, and PS 1 or 2+ were associated with higher grade AEs (all p < .0001). Considering AEs experienced within 6w after randomization, 10% and 61% of pts experienced G4+ and G2-3 AEs, respectively. G3+ AEs were associated with a shorter OS for both pts receiving Oxa- (HRadj= 1.2, 95% CI, 1.1-1.3, padj < .0001) and Iri-based regimens (HRadj= 1.4, 95% CI, 1.2-1.5, padj < .0001). For the entire treatment course, 19% and 72% of pts experienced G4+ and G2-3 AEs, respectively. For Oxa-based regimens, pts with G3+ AEs had a longer OS (HRadj= 0.86, 95% CI, 0.78-0.94, padj = .0016), whereas G3+ AEs were associated with a shorter OS (HRadj= 1.2, 95% CI, 1.1-1.4, padj = .0004) for pts treated with Iri-based regimens. Similar patterns were seen for PFS. Conclusions: Pts who reported higher grade AEs during initial treatment (≤6w) have significantly worse outcome than those who do not. Further analyses with treatment exposure/detailed dose-AE profile and its impact on survival are warranted.

3579 Background: Tumor infiltrating lymphocytes (TIL) indicate a host immune response that may influence survival. Immunoscore was developed using CD3+ and CD8+density and location in primary CC pts with pooled stages, varying treatment and follow-up. We determined if individual immune markers and/or Immunoscore are prognostic in resected stage III CC pts (N=600). Methods: CD3+ and CD8+ T-cell or CD20+ B lymphocyte density in central tumor (CT) and invasive margin (IM) was evaluated by immunostaining and quantified by image analysis. Immunoscore was calculated on a scale of I0 to I4 with high densities of CD3+ and CD8+in both CT and IM scored as I4; low densities scored as I0. Associations with disease-free survival (DFS) were evaluated by multivariable Cox regression adjusting for covariates. Results: Data for CD3+, CD8+ and CD20+ were generated (N=595). Higher density of CD3+ CT, CD3+ IM and CD8+ IM were associated with longer DFS adjusting for covariates (Table). CD3+ IM had the strongest association with DFS, and was stronger in left-sided (HRadj.=0.81, 95% CI, 0.70-0.94, padj.= 0.0049) vs right-sided (HRadj.=0.93, 95% CI, 0.85-1.0 padj.=0.52) tumors (pinteraction=0.039). Higher density of CD3+ IM was associated with older age (p=0.034), T1/2 (p<.0001), N1 (p=0.017), right-sided (p=0.013), high TILs (p=0.0008), and deficient MMR (p=0.0003). Using a prior Immunoscore risk stratification, higher scores were associated with better DFS (HR.=0.62, CI, 0.44-0.87, p=0.006) (Table). Conclusions: Densities of CD3+ and CD8+, especially at IM, are individually prognostic in FOLFOX-treated pts. Association of CD3+IM with prognosis differed by primary CC site. Immunoscore was strongly prognostic, and this result provides validation in a clinical trial cohort. [Table: see text]

3554 Background: There is considerable variability in the outcomes between second line (SL) trials in mCRC. The aim of this analysis is to compare the outcomes of patients (pts) with mCRC treated either on SAFL, with protocol defined SL treatment, or DSLT. Methods: Individual pt data was available on pts with mCRC enrolled in 1 of 10 trials (7 DSLT, 3 SAFL) in the ARCAD database. Regimens included FOLFIRI, FOLFOX, and irinotecan (IRI), since pts did not receive biologic agents in SL on SAFL. For pts on a SAFL, PFS and OS were defined as time from initiation of SL treatment to second progression (SP)/death and death, respectively. Descriptive statistics and multivariable Cox models were used to assess differences in PFS and OS. Results: 5,076 pts were included; 63% were male; median age was 62. See Table for treatment details. Pts treated on SAFL had shorter OS (0.7-1.5 months (mos>) shorter) and PFS (0.6-2.6 mos shorter), compared to those treated on DSLT. These findings were statistically significant and differences in OS did not attenuate after adjustment for age, gender, and prior treatment. PFS differences in FOLFOX became insignificant after multivariable adjustment. Conclusions: There are modest differences in both PFS and OS between pts with mCRC treated on SAFL and those on DSLT, suggesting differences in these pt populations. Caution is needed when applying these data to pts, as we were unable to control for potential confounders (ECOG PS, number and sites of metastases) at initiation of SL in SAFL, which may impact outcomes. [Table: see text]

3535 Background: CRC is known to be a heterogeneous disease. This study quantifies within pt heterogeneity in early lesion change rate (LCR) in the era of targeted agents compared to chemo alone and its potential impact on survival. Methods: Pts with 2-10 lesions measured at baseline were included. For each lesion, the early LCR was defined as the change in size (shrinking or growing) from baseline to 12 weeks on treatment. Within pt heterogeneity in early LCR among lesions was estimated by standard deviation (STD). A larger value of STD indicates larger variation of LCR per pt. Stratified multivariate Cox models were used to assess the associations between LCR STD with overall survival (OS). Adjusted hazard ratios (HRadj) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) are reported. Results: Data were available on 9,092 mCRC pts (median age 61; 60% male, 55% ECOG PS 0; 61% 2+ metastatic sites) enrolled in 16 1st-line randomized trials, with 44%, 42%, and 10% of pts received chemo alone, + a VEGF inhibitor (VEGFi) or an EGFR inhibitor (EGFRi), respectively. LCR heterogeneity is the highest among pts received EGFRi but lowest among pts received VEGFi (Table). Overall, higher heterogeneity is associated with worst OS (HRadj1.22, 95% CI (1.16, 1.27)). The effect is most pronounced in pts received VEGFi (interaction p=0.0012). Conclusions: There was heterogeneity observed in lesion size changes within pts. Its magnitude varies across treatment approaches, and was associated with poor survival. This preliminary result reveals the great potentials to define novel response endpoint and refine treatment decision-making by incorporating heterogeneities in lesion changes. [Table: see text]

3516 Background: Epidemiological data suggest a protective effect of vitamin D on CC risk. However, association of serum vitamin D level with clinical outcome in pts with surgically resected CC remains unknown. We analyzed total circulating 25-hydroxyvitamin D [25(OH)D)] with clinical outcome in pts with resected stage III CC treated with FOLFOX +/- cetuximab in a phase III trial. Methods: Association of pre-treatment level of plasma 25(OH)D with disease-free survival (DFS) and time-to-recurrence (TTR) was analyzed with 25(OH)D as a continuous variable by a relative risk model with splines and as a binary variable (vitamin D deficient [<30 ng/mL]) using multivariable Cox regression. Results: Overall, 49% (291/600) of pts were vitamin D deficient. Prevalence of vitamin D deficiency was significantly higher in women vs men (52% vs. 48%, p=0.030) and in blacks vs whites (74% vs. 45%, p=0.0003). The continuous 25(OH)D level and pt sex were associated by the interaction test (pinteraction=0.044). There were no statistically significant associations with DFS/TTR for either continuous 25(OH)D level (DFS, p=0.22; TTR, p=0.26) nor for vitamin D deficiency (DFS, adjusted hazard ratio [HRadj]=1.01, 95% CI, 0.74-1.38; padj=0.94; TTR, HRadj=1.00; CI, 0.72-1.38; padj=0.99. A comparison of the highest vs lowest tertile showed a significant association between the highest 25(OH)D level and better outcomes in men (DFS, HRadj.=0.18, CI, 0.04-0.76, padj=0.020; TTR, HRadj.=0.12, CI, 0.02-0.64, padj=0.014), but not in women (DFS, pinteraction=0.039; TTR, pinteraction=0.033). Conclusions: Nearly one-half of pts in the clinical trial cohort were vitamin D deficient with lowest 25(OH)D levels found in women and blacks. While vitamin D deficiency was not associated with adverse outcome, high levels of vitamin D in men, but not women, were associated with longer survival. Support: U10CA180821, U10CA180882, U10CA180820, U10CA180863, U10CA180888, U10CA077202, CCSRI 021039. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT00079274.