Back to Authors

Desnoyers, Rodwige J.

Mayo Clinic

Atrium Health Wake Forest Baptist

Citations 2

Regorafenib dose optimization study (ReDOS): Randomized phase II trial to evaluate dosing strategies for regorafenib in refractory metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC)–An ACCRU Network study.
Anderson, Daniel M. , Ahn, Daniel H. , Ciombor, Kristen K. , Jacobs, Nisha L. , Desnoyers, Rodwige J., Cleary, James M. , Meyers, Jeffrey P., Chiorean, E. Gabriela , Sloan, Jeffrey A., McCune, Jeannine S. , Lenz, Heinz Josef, Bekaii‐Saab, Tanios , Ou, Fang‐Shu , Boland, Patrick M. , Pedersen, Katrina S. , Barzi, Afsaneh , Lacouture, Mario E. , Grothey, Axel

Journal of Clinical Oncology | January 2, 2019 | Volume: 36 | Issue: 4_suppl | Pages: 611-611

10.1200/jco.2018.36.4_suppl.611 Get It

611 Background: Regorafenib is an oral multikinase inhibitor with survival benefit in refractory mCRC patients (pts). Toxicities such as Palmar-plantar erythrodysesthesia syndrome (PPES), fatigue and hypertension (HTN) have limited its use. Despite absence of supportive data, various dosing or interval scheduling have been implemented into clinical practice. Methods: A randomized phase II study of regorafenib dose-escalation (Arm A: 80 mg/day, weekly dose escalation if no significant drug-related toxicities, up to 160 mg/day) vs. standard dose (Arm B: 160 mg/day) in pts with mCRC for 21 days of a 28-day cycle. Pts were randomized 1:1:1:1 to arms A1 and B1 (Pre-emptive Clobetasol for PPES); A2 and B2 (Reactive Clobetasol). The primary endpoint was the proportion of patients who completed 2 cycles of treatment and initiated the 3rd in Arm A (Pooled A1 + A2) vs. Arm B (Pooled B1 + B2). Superiority for Arm A was to be declared if the one-sided p-value calculated using Fisher’s exact method was less than 0.2. Results: From June 2015 to June 2017, 123 pts were randomized with 116 (A = 54, B = 62) evaluable for the primary endpoint. Demographic data were well balanced with overall median age of 61yrs (range: 29-81), M/F (61/39%) and ECOG PS 0/1 (37/63%) and KRAS MT/WT/UNK (47/44/9%).The study met its primary endpoint with 43% of pts on Arm A initiating the 3rd vs. only 25% of pts Arm B [one-sided p-value 0.028]. Median Overall Survival (OS) was improved in Arm A vs. Arm B (9.0 mos vs. 5.9 mos; p = 0.094). Median Progression Free Survival (PFS) was 2.5 mos for Arm A vs. 2.0 mos for Arm B (p=0.553). Overall rates of grade 3/4 toxicity were more favorable for Arm A vs. Arm B (% PPES 15 vs. 16, HTN 7 vs. 15 and fatigue 13 vs. 18, respectively). Multiple QOL parameters were improved in A vs. B primarily at week 2 of the first cycle. Conclusion: A strategy with weekly dose escalation of regorafenib from 80 mg to 160 mg/day was found to be superior to a starting dose of 160 mg/day. These results establish a new standard for optimizing regorafenib dosing. Further data on outcomes of preemptive vs. reactive clobetasol strategies are undergoing analysis and will be presented later. Clinical trial information: NCT02368886.
Regorafenib dose optimization study (ReDOS): A phase II randomized study of lower starting dose regorafenib compared to standard dose regorafenib in patients with refractory metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC).
Ciombor, Kristen K. , Farhat, Mohamed, Kirshner, Jeffrey J., Knost, James A., Anderson, Daniel M. , Soori, Gamini S. , Wender, Donald B., Desnoyers, Rodwige J., Bekaii‐Saab, Tanios , Ou, Fang‐Shu , Boland, Patrick M. , Sargent, Daniel J. , Grothey, Axel

Journal of Clinical Oncology | September 6, 2018 | Volume: 34 | Issue: 15_suppl | Pages: TPS3630-TPS3630

10.1200/jco.2016.34.15_suppl.tps3630 Get It