Cleary, James M.

Abstract Purpose: Mutant IDH1 (mIDH1) defines a therapeutically targetable subtype of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC), with the mIDH1 inhibitor ivosidenib approved for advanced disease. A subset of patients experiences prolonged disease stabilization; however, the molecular basis for eventual progression remains poorly defined. Experimental Design: We performed molecular profiling of matched baseline and postprogression circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) samples from patients with mIDH1 ICC enrolled in the ClarIDHy phase III trial. Functional studies were conducted to characterize candidate resistance mechanisms. Results: Longitudinal ctDNA analysis of 18 patients treated with ivosidenib for >6 months revealed emergent genomic alterations in multiple cases. Acquired mutations in mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) pathway genes (KRAS, NRAS, MAP2K1, NF1) were identified in five cases, with instances of concurrent alterations and/or high variant allele fractions (VAF). Additional candidate resistance events included a secondary IDH1 mutation and a hotspot IDH2 mutation, detected at low VAF in the same patient. Functional studies showed that these IDH mutations conferred sustained 2-hydroxyglutarate production and ivosidenib resistance, whereas MAPK activation blunted gene expression induced by ivosidenib plus IFNγ, a key therapeutic output of mIDH1 inhibition. In parallel, baseline ctDNA profiling of 81 patients revealed that ARID1A mutations and elevated mIDH1 VAF were associated with reduced clinical benefit. Conclusions: MAPK pathway alterations represent a recurrent mechanism of resistance to mIDH1 inhibition in ICC, whereas emergent IDH1/IDH2 mutations appear infrequent. Functional data suggest that MAPK-mediated resistance may involve impaired IFN signaling. These results support MAPK-directed combination strategies and highlight the utility of ctDNA profiling to identify predictive and resistance biomarkers in mIDH1-driven ICC.

Abstract Background: Ivosidenib (IVO) is a first-in-class oral inhibitor of the IDH1 mutant (mIDH) enzyme. In the ClarIDHy phase 3 study of previously treated patients with mIDH cholangiocarcinoma (CCA), IVO treatment led to improved progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) vs placebo (median PFS: 2.7 vs. 1.4 months and OS 10.3 vs. 5.1 months, when adjusted for the 70% crossover rate; HR, 0.49 [95% CI, 0.34-0.70]; 1-sided P<0.001. Here, we studied the dynamics of mutations emerging after 6 months of IVO treatment using ctDNA analyses. Methods: Prior to enrollment, all subjects in ClarIDHy had IDH1 R132 mutations confirmed by a central NGS panel utilizing tumor biopsy tissue. Since post-progression tissue samples were unavailable, discovery of emerging mutations was limited to plasma ctDNA assessments. To explore molecular changes associated with acquired resistance, an analysis was performed on 18 subjects treated with IVO for ≥6 months (4 partial response; 12 stable disease, 2 NA) using matched baseline and end of treatment (EOT) samples (PGDx elioTM plasma complete, 521 gene panel). A subset of the oncogenic alterations identified were selected for confirmation by ddPCR analysis in ctDNA samples collected longitudinally. Longitudinal plasma 2HG levels were also evaluated. Results: This analysis identified several EOT mutations not present at baseline. The most common mutations were in the MAPK pathway, including activating KRAS, NRAS, and MAP2K1 mutations and loss-of-function NF1 mutations (6/18 patients, 33%). In 2/6 patients, multiple MAPK pathway mutations were detected. There was a range of variant allele frequencies (VAFs) of RAS alterations, including some that had comparable levels to the truncal mIDH, suggesting that MAPK activation may have made a major contribution to the burden of resistant disease. ddPCR analyses from longitudinal plasma samples from selected cases confirmed these findings. In addition, 2 patients had mutations affecting transcription/epigenetics (WT1 and KMT2C). Finally, only 1 patient had acquired mutations in IDH genes (IDH2-R172K and IDH1-G131V). The WT1, KMT2C, and IDH variants had a low VAF. Accordingly, EOT plasma 2HG levels were reduced vs pre-treatment levels in the patient with secondary mIDH, indicating a limited role in the overall emergence of resistance. Conclusion: Analyses of paired baseline/EOT samples suggest that multiple acquired mutations could contribute to IVO resistance, with oncogenic MAPK pathway alterations being the most common. Consistent with previous clinical studies conducted in AML, IDH1 second site mutations and isotype switching to IDH2, rarely emerge during IVO treatment. The lack of detectable mutations in the majority of patients could reflect the sensitivity of the NGS assay or a role for non-genetic mechanisms of resistance. Citation Format: Hatice Duygu Saatcioglu, Haley Ellis, Jinkai Wan, Sam Lubner, Milind Javle, Ghassan K. Abou-Alfa, James M. Cleary, Robin Kate Kelley, Mitesh J. Borad, Teresa Macarulla, Do Youn Oh, Camelia Gliser, Susan Pandya, Sung Chloe, Nabeel Bardeesy, Adriana Tron. Circulating tumor DNA analysis demonstrates newly emerging alterations in previously treated IDH1 mutated cholangiocarcinoma patients enrolled in the ClarIDHy study [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2025; Part 1 (Regular Abstracts); 2025 Apr 25-30; Chicago, IL. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2025;85(8_Suppl_1):Abstract nr 4648.

4079 Background: HER2 mutations are infrequent genomic events in biliary tract cancers (BTCs) and are associated with poor overall survival (OS) in patients with metastatic disease. HER2 overexpression is associated with an increased risk of disease recurrence in patients with resected BTC. There is limited data on targeting HER2 in BTC harboring activating somatic HER2 mutations. Neratinib, an irreversible, pan-HER, oral tyrosine kinase inhibitor, interferes with constitutive receptor kinase activation and has demonstrated activity in several HER2-mutant solid tumors. Methods: SUMMIT is an open-label, single-arm, multi-cohort, phase 2, ‘basket’ trial of neratinib in patients with solid tumors harboring oncogenic HER2 somatic mutations. The primary objective of the BTC cohort was to estimate objective response rate (ORR). Secondary objectives were clinical benefit rate (CBR), progression-free survival (PFS), OS, response duration, safety, and tolerability. Retrospective central confirmation of locally reported HER2 mutation (next-generation sequencing on archival or fresh tumor tissue using MSK-IMPACT or in cfDNA extracted from plasma by MSK-ACCESS) and association with outcome was an exploratory endpoint. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT01953926). Results: 25 treatment-refractory patients with metastatic BTC were enrolled (11 cholangiocarcinoma, 10 gallbladder, 4 ampullary cancers). ORR was 16% (95% CI 4.5–36.1%) and CBR was 28% (95% CI 12.1–49.4%). Median PFS and OS were 2.8 (95% CI 1.1–3.7) and 5.4 (95% CI 3.7–11.7) months, respectively. Median PFS for the gallbladder, cholangiocarcinoma and ampulla cohorts was 3.7 (95% CI 0.8–6.4), 1.4 (95% CI 0.5–9.1), and 1.1 (95% CI 1.1–3.8) months, respectively. Corresponding median OS values in these cohorts were 9.8 (95% CI 2.4–NE), 5.4 (95% CI 0.8–16.2), and 5.0 (95% CI 3.7–10.2) months, respectively. Central mutation confirmation was feasible for 23 of 25 patients; 22 were concordant with enrolment assays. The most common HER2 mutations were S310F (n = 11; 48%) and V777L (n = 4; 17%). Exploratory analyses suggested worse outcomes for HER2-mutant tumors with co-occurring oncogenic TP53 and CDKN2A alterations. Loss of amplified HER2 S310F and acquisition of multiple previously undetected oncogenic co-mutations were identified at progression in one of four responders. Diarrhea (56% any grade) was the most common toxicity. Conclusions: Neratinib is tolerable with modest antitumor activity in patients with BTC harboring HER2 mutations. Although the primary endpoint was met, future studies should evaluate rational combinations to augment and/or prolong responses. Clinical trial information: NCT01953926.

Abstract HER2 mutations are infrequent genomic events in biliary tract cancers (BTCs). Neratinib, an irreversible, pan-HER, oral tyrosine kinase inhibitor, interferes with constitutive receptor kinase activation and has activity in HER2-mutant tumours. SUMMIT is an open-label, single-arm, multi-cohort, phase 2, ‘basket’ trial of neratinib in patients with solid tumours harbouring oncogenic HER2 somatic mutations (NCT01953926). The primary objective of the BTC cohort was objective response rate (ORR). Among 25 treatment-refractory patients (11 cholangiocarcinoma, 10 gallbladder, 4 ampullary cancers), the ORR was 16%. The most common HER2 mutations were S310F (n = 11; 48%) and V777L (n = 4; 17%). Outcomes appeared worse for ampullary tumours or those with co-occurring oncogenic TP53 and CDKN2A alterations. Loss of amplified HER2 S310F and acquisition of multiple previously undetected oncogenic co-mutations were identified at progression in one responder. Neratinib demonstrated anti-tumour activity in patients with refractory BTC harbouring HER2 mutations. Future studies of rational combinations are warranted.

Abstract Background We evaluated the time to progression (TTP) and survival outcomes of second-line therapy for metastatic colorectal cancer among adults aged 70 years and older compared with younger adults following progression on first-line clinical trials. Methods Associations between clinical and disease characteristics, time to initial progression, and rate of receipt of second-line therapy were evaluated. TTP and overall survival (OS) were compared between older and younger adults in first- and second-line trials by Cox regression, adjusting for age, sex, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status, number of metastatic sites and presence of metastasis in the lung, liver, or peritoneum. All statistical tests were 2-sided. Results Older adults comprised 16.4% of patients on first-line trials (870 total older adults aged >70 years; 4419 total younger adults aged ≤70 years, on first-line trials). Older adults and those with Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status >0 were less likely to receive second-line therapy than younger adults. Odds of receiving second-line therapy decreased by 11% for each additional decade of life in multivariable analysis (odds ratio = 1.11, 95% confidence interval = 1.02 to 1.21, P = .01). Older and younger adults enrolled in second-line trials experienced similar median TTP and median OS (median TTP = 5.1 vs 5.2 months, respectively; median OS = 11.6 vs 12.4 months, respectively). Conclusions Older adults were less likely to receive second-line therapy for metastatic colorectal cancer, though we did not observe a statistical difference in survival outcomes vs younger adults following second-line therapy. Further study should examine factors affecting decisions to treat older adults with second-line therapy. Inclusion of geriatric assessment may provide better criteria regarding the risks and benefits of second-line therapy.

4069 Background: CCA is a rare cancer for which there are limited effective therapies. IDH1 mutations occur in ̃20% of intrahepatic CCAs, resulting in production of the oncometabolite D-2-hydroxyglutarate, which promotes oncogenesis. IVO (AG-120) is a first-in-class, oral, small-molecule inhibitor of mutant IDH1 (mIDH1). ClarIDHy aimed to demonstrate the efficacy of IVO vs PBO in pts with unresectable or metastatic m IDH1 CCA. The primary endpoint was met with significant improvement in progression-free survival (PFS) by independent radiology center (IRC) with IVO vs PBO (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.37, p < 0.0001). Objective response rate (ORR) and stable disease for IVO were 2.4% (3 partial responses) and 50.8% (n = 63) vs 0% and 27.9% (n = 17) for PBO. IVO pts experienced significantly less decline in physical and emotional functioning domains of quality of life at cycle 2 day 1 vs PBO pts (nominal p < 0.05). Methods: Pts with m IDH1 CCA were randomized 2:1 to IVO (500 mg PO QD) or matched PBO and stratified by prior systemic therapies (1 or 2). Key eligibility: unresectable or metastatic m IDH1 CCA based on central testing; ECOG PS 0–1; measurable disease (RECIST v1.1). Crossover from PBO to IVO was permitted at radiographic progression. Primary endpoint: PFS by IRC. Secondary endpoints included overall survival (OS; by intent-to-treat), ORR, PFS (by investigator), safety, and quality of life. The planned crossover-adjusted OS was derived using the rank-preserving structural failure time (RPSFT) model. Results: As of 31 May 2020, ̃780 pts were prescreened for an IDH1 mutation and 187 were randomized to IVO (n = 126) or PBO (n = 61); 13 remain on IVO. Median age 62 y; M/F 68/119; 91% intrahepatic CCA; 93% metastatic disease; 47% had 2 prior therapies. 70% of PBO pts crossed over to IVO. OS data were mature, with 79% OS events in IVO arm and 82% in PBO. Median OS (mOS) was 10.3 months for IVO and 7.5 months for PBO (HR = 0.79; 95% CI 0.56–1.12; one-sided p = 0.093). The RPSFT-adjusted mOS was 5.1 months for PBO (HR = 0.49; 95% CI 0.34–0.70; p < 0.0001). Common all-grade treatment emergent adverse events (TEAEs, ≥ 15%) in the IVO arm: nausea 41%, diarrhea 35%, fatigue 31%, cough 25%, abdominal pain 24%, decreased appetite 24%, ascites 23%, vomiting 23%, anemia 18%, and constipation 15%. Grade ≥ 3 TEAEs were reported in 50% of IVO pts vs 37% of PBO pts, with grade ≥ 3 treatment-related AEs in 7% of IVO pts vs 0% in PBO. 7% of IVO pts experienced an AE leading to treatment discontinuation vs 9% of PBO pts. There were no treatment-related deaths. Conclusions: IVO was well tolerated and resulted in a favorable OS trend vs PBO despite a high rate of crossover. These data – coupled with statistical improvement in PFS, supportive quality of life data, and favorable safety profile – demonstrate the clinical benefit of IVO in advanced m IDH1 CCA. Clinical trial information: NCT02989857.

Abstract Background Hand-foot skin reaction (HFSR) is the most common regorafenib-induced adverse event and is in need of effective prevention and palliation. Materials and Methods The Regorafenib Dose Optimization Study (ReDOS), a four-arm, previously published trial with a 1:1:1:1 randomization scheme, was analyzed in a manner in keeping with the original protocol to assess whether clobetasol 0.05% cream (a corticosteroid) applied to the palms and soles twice per day for 8 weeks was more effective when prescribed preemptively (before the development of HFSR) versus reactively (after the development of HFSR). Patients were assessed during the first two cycles of regorafenib. Results Sixty-one patients received preemptive clobetasol, and 55 received reactive clobetasol. Groups were balanced on demographics. Over the first two cycles, no evidence of HFSR occurred in 30% with preemptive clobetasol versus 13% with reactive clobetasol (p = .03). During the first cycle, 54% and 45% of patients had no HFSR with preemptive and reactive clobetasol, respectively (p = .35). During the second cycle, 33% and 15% had no HFSR with preemptive and reactive clobetasol, respectively (p = .02). During the second cycle, rates of grade 1, 2, and 3 HFSR were 30%, 8%, and 3%, respectively, with preemptive clobetasol and 43%, 18%, and 7%, respectively, with reactive clobetasol (p = .12). Patient-reported outcomes showed HFSR compromised nearly all activities of daily living with worse quality of life in patients who received reactive versus preemptive clobetasol. No clobetasol-induced adverse events were reported. Conclusion Preemptive clobetasol might lessen regorafenib-induced hand-foot reactions compared with reactive therapy. Further confirmatory studies are needed in a larger patient cohort. Implications for Practice Regorafenib causes hand-foot skin reactions. Preemptive clobetasol, a high-potency topical corticosteroid, appears to lessen the severity of this adverse event. Although further study is needed, the favorable adverse event profile of this intervention might prompt clinicians to discuss this option with their patients.

TPS350 Background: Mutations in isocitrate dehydrogenase 1 (mIDH1) are found in approximately 20-30% of patients with intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (CCA), and less commonly in glioma, chondrosarcoma, and other gastrointestinal malignancies. Despite documented clinical activity of mIDH1 inhibition in solid tumors, there are no approved targeted therapies for this patient population. LY3410738 is a potent, selective, and covalent inhibitor of mIDH1 R132. LY3410738 is differentiated from prior mIDH1 inhibitors by 1) its unique covalent binding mode, 2) its increased potency, and 3) its unique binding site outside of the dimer interface, which enables activity in the setting of known common second-site IDH1 mutations. Methods: This is an open-label, multicenter, global phase 1 study with oral LY3410738 currently enrolling patients with advanced CCA and other solid tumor types (NCT04521686). A dose escalation cohort will be followed with 4 exploratory expansion cohorts. The primary objective for dose escalation is determination of the maximum tolerated dose (MTD)/recommended phase 2 dose (RP2D). The primary objective for dose expansion is to assess the preliminary anti-tumor activity by ORR of LY3410738 when administered alone or in combination with cisplatin plus gemcitabine. Secondary objectives include evaluating safety and tolerability, pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, progression free survival, and overall survival. Key inclusion criteria include any solid tumor with the presence of mIDH1 R132, ECOG performance status ≤1, and adequate organ function. Any prior treatment including an IDH1 inhibitor is allowed in the dose escalation cohort. Exclusion criteria include presence of active central nervous system metastases, leptomeningeal disease, and active or uncontrolled infection. CCA patients must not have had locoregional therapy within 4 weeks prior to the initial study dose, history of hepatic encephalopathy or refractory ascites, ongoing cholangitis, or mixed hepatocellular-CCA histology. Dose escalation will follow a 3+3 design and will allow patient back-fill to dose levels previously cleared for safety. Each cycle will be 28 days (4 weeks). Once the RP2D is determined, LY3410738 will be evaluated as monotherapy in expansion cohorts 1-3, and in combination with cisplatin plus gemcitabine in expansion cohort 4. Cohort 1 will enroll CCA patients with measurable disease who have received prior chemotherapy. Cohort 2 will enroll patients with advanced solid tumors except CCA who have measurable disease and received standard therapies. Cohort 3 will enroll patients with advanced solid tumors who have non-measurable disease and received standard therapies. Cohort 4 will enroll CCA patients with measurable disease who are treatment naïve for advanced disease. Clinical trial information: NCT04521686.