Thakkar, Samarthkumar

ABSTRACT Background Obesity is an important risk factor associated with atrial fibrillation (AF). The impact of glucagon‐like peptide‐1 receptor agonists (GLP‐1 RAs) on recurrent AF among patients undergoing catheter ablation is not well described. Objective This study aimed to evaluate the effect of GLP‐1 RA on the recurrence of AF among obese patients after catheter ablation. Methods Utilizing the TriNetX research network, we identified patients aged over 18 with obesity (BMI ≥ 30) who underwent AF ablation from January 1, 2015, to December 1, 2022, using Current Procedural Terminology codes. Patients were categorized based on their baseline GLP‐1 RA use. Through propensity‐score matching, each cohort comprised 1558 patients. The primary outcome encompassed a composite of cardioversion, initiation of new antiarrhythmic drug (AAD) therapy, or redo AF ablation. Additional outcomes during the 12‐month follow‐up included AF readmission, heart failure readmissions, readmissions due to ischemic stroke, and mortality, with a separate analysis done for patients with BMI > 40. Results GLP‐1 RA use in patients with obesity undergoing AF ablation was linked to a significantly reduced risk of cardioversion, new AAD therapy, and the need for redo AF ablation (hazard ratio [HR] 0.72 [0.65–0.80]; p < 0.001). At 12 months, individuals on GLP‐1 agonists exhibited a lower likelihood of mortality (HR 0.61 [0.40–0.93]; p < 0.001). Although all other secondary outcomes were lower in the GLP‐1 RA group, there was no significant difference in ischemic stroke between the groups. These results were consistent among patients with BMI > 40, although apart from ischemic stroke, there was no difference in mortality between the two groups. Conclusion The utilization of GLP‐1 RA in individuals with obesity is linked to a decreased likelihood of arrhythmia recurrence following AF ablation, leading to a reduced requirement for cardioversion, AAD therapy, or redo AF ablation.

Introduction: Advances in cardiac implanted electronic devices (CIED) have significantly improved outcomes for patients with heart failure. However, there is a bereft of recent real- world data on the relative effectiveness of cardiac resynchronization therapy with pacing and defibrillator (CRT-D) and continuous resynchronization therapy with pacing (CRT-P) in patients with nonischemic cardiomyopathy (NICM). We hypothesized that the addition of defibrillation therapy in patients with NICM would offer no significant benefit. Methods: We searched the National Readmissions Database (NRD) from 2016-2020 to identify hospitalizations with NICM using appropriate ICD-10 diagnosis and procedure codes. The cohort was further divided into groups with NICM and CRT-D implantation and NICM with CRTP implantation. Results and Discussion: Our final cohort included 8,801 hospitalizations with NICM and CRT-D implantation and 3,399 hospitalizations with NICM and CRT-P implantation. Propensity matching was performed using comorbidities through multivariate logistic regression. Two thousand nine hundred seventeen hospitalizations were included in each of the two groups, CRT-D and CRT-P. Analysis of the propensity-matched cohorts at 180 days revealed a trend toward lower heart failure readmission, all-cause readmission, and all-cause mortality rates in the group with CRTP implantation. However, there was no difference noted in the 180-day hazard ratios of HF readmission [1.08 (0.98-1.19); p = 0.1], all-cause readmission [1.04 (0.87-1.12); p = 0.23], and all-cause mortality [0.83 (0.58-1.19); p = 0.32]. Conclusion: It was found that NICM patients with CRT-D have a trend towards higher HF readmissions, all-cause readmission, and all-cause mortality compared to those with CRT-P, but no significant difference was noted in hazard ratios. The findings of our study raise further questions about the need for defibrillator therapy in patients with NICM and merit further studies to better select candidates for each of these therapies.

Introduction: Obesity is associated with a higher burden of atrial fibrillation (AF) and related complications. Hypothesis: Bariatric surgery in patients with AF is associated with a reduction in mortality and long-term complications at 1 year. Methods: Patients with AF who underwent bariatric surgery were identified by analyzing the nationwide readmission database and incorporating the validated ICD-10 CM codes from October 2015 to December 2019. We performed the propensity score matching to adjust the confounders and cox proportional hazard regression to generate hazard ratios. Moreover, we generated Kaplan Meier curves for time-to-event analysis. The primary endpoint was all-cause mortality at 1 year, whereas secondary endpoints were ischemic stroke, major bleeding, and AF readmission at 1 year. Results: Out of 892488 obese patients with AF, 18766 underwent bariatric surgery. After propensity score matching, 18764 patients were identified in each group. At 1-year, patients undergoing bariatric surgery had a significant reduction in mortality (2.18% vs. 2.73%, HR: 0.91, 95% CI: 0.85-0.96, p=0.001). Additionally, risk of ischemic stroke was also reduced (1.98% vs. 2.29%, HR: 0.91, 95% CI: 0.86-0.97, p=0.01), whereas no difference was noted in AF readmissions (4.02% vs. 3.34%, HR: 0.97, 95% CI: 0.92-1.04, p=0.49) and risk of major bleeding was increased (5.74% vs. 3.42%, HR: 1.17, 95% CI: 1.10-1.25, p<0.0001) at 1 year in AF patients with bariatric surgery. (Figure 1) Conclusions: Bariatric surgery in patients with AF was associated with a reduction in 1-year mortality and ischemic stroke. However, the risk of major bleeding was noted to be increased and no difference was noted in AF readmission at 1 year.

Purpose: Studies on outcomes related to endovascular treatment (EVT) in advanced stages of chronic kidney disease (CKD) and end-stage renal disease (ESRD) among hospitalizations with acute limb ischemia (ALI) are limited. Methods: The Nationwide Inpatient Sample was quarried from October 2015 to December 2017 to identify the hospitalizations with ALI and undergoing EVT. The study population was subdivided into 3 groups based on their CKD stages: group 1 (No CKD, stage I, stage II), group 2 (CKD stage III, stage IV), and group 3 (CKD stage V and ESRD). The primary outcome was all-cause in-hospital mortality. Results: A total of 51 995 hospitalizations with ALI undergoing EVT were identified. The in-hospital mortality was significantly higher in group 2 (OR = 1.17; 95% CI 1.04 – 1.32, p=0.009) and group 3 (OR = 3.18; 95% CI 2.74–3.69, p<0.0001) compared with group 1. Odds of minor amputation, vascular complication, atherectomy, and blood transfusion were higher among groups 2 and 3 compared with group 1. Group 2 had higher odds of access site hemorrhage compared with groups 1 and 3, whereas group 3 had higher odds of major amputation, postprocedural infection, and postoperative hemorrhage compared with groups 1 and 2. Besides, groups 2 and 3 had lower odds of discharge to home compared with group 1. Finally, the length of hospital stay and cost of care was significantly higher with the advancing CKD stages. Conclusion: Advanced CKD stages and ESRD are associated with higher mortality, worse in-hospital outcomes and higher resource utilization among ALI hospitalizations undergoing EVT. Clinical Impact Current guidelines are not clear for the optimum first line treatment of acute limb ischemia, especially in patients with advanced kidney disease as compared to normal/mild kidney disease patients. We found that advanced kidney disease is a significant risk factor for worse in-hospital morbidity and mortality. Furthermore, patients with acute limb ischemia and advanced kidney disease is associated with significantly higher resource utilization as compared to patients with normal/mild kidney disease. This study suggests shared decision making between treating physician and patients when considering endovascular therapy for the treatment of acute limb ischemia in patients with advanced kidney disease.

Abstract Introduction Sarcoidosis is a multisystem disorder characterized by an autoimmune response to an unidentified antigen in genetically susceptible persons. Despite clinically detectable cardiac manifestations of sarcoidosis occurring in approximately 5% of patients, recent studies have revealed cardiac involvement to be at 25% in patients with the disease, highlighting the fact that cardiac involvement in sarcoidosis is much more common than was once thought to be. Purpose With cardiac involvement in sarcoidosis being increasingly recognized due to the availability of advanced cardiac imaging, large scale data regarding in-hospital mortality and clinical outcomes of patients admitted with cardiac sarcoidosis (CS) is lacking. Our study aimed to fill this knowledge gap by analyzing demographics and in-hospital outcomes of a large cohort of patients admitted with CS across the United States (US). Methods We analyzed data from the national inpatient sample (NIS) database between October 2015 to December 2018 to identify patients who had been admitted with primary and secondary diagnoses of CS. The NIS is an administrative database sponsored by the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality consisting of data from 46 participating states, representing more than 95% of the US population and providing nationwide estimates of over 35 million hospitalizations annually. The NIS uses de-identified hospital discharges as samples and hence no additional ethical committee approval was required. International Classification of Diseases, 10th Revision, Clinical Modification (ICD-10-CM) code D86.85 was used to identify hospitalizations with CS in patients aged 18 years or older. SAS 9.4 (SAS Institute, Inc, Cary, NC) was used for statistical analyses. Results A total of 4275 patients were included in the analysis. A higher proportion of patients with CS were females (62.43% vs. 37.57%). Hypertension was the most common comorbidity (43.99%), followed by hyperlipidemia (39.21%) and chronic kidney disease (26.95%). All-cause in-hospital mortality was 2.57%. Atrial fibrillation (AF) was the most common arrhythmia (28.12%), followed by ventricular tachycardia (VT) (22.52%). About 16% of CS patients underwent implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) implantation during hospital stay. About 42% of patients had concurrent heart failure, out of whom 33.84% had heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF). Mean length of hospital stay was 5 days (3–8 days), and the mean cost of hospitalization was $14,177 ($7,121–35,993). Conclusion Given the low prevalence of CS, most of the available studies have been retrospective in nature, based on small sample sizes. Despite being retrospective and cross-sectional, our study has the advantage of being based on a nationally representative sample population, providing key formation on the demographics and in-hospital outcomes of patients with CS. Funding Acknowledgement Type of funding sources: None.

Abstract Background: Atrial fibrillation (AF) is relatively less frequent in younger patients (age<50). Recently, studies have suggested that early restoration of sinus rhythm may lead to improved outcomes compared with rate control. Methods: We included all hospitalized patients between 18 and 50 years with a diagnosis of AF from the Nationwide Readmission Database 2016-2017 from the Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project. Demographic and comorbidity data were collected and analyzed. Outcomes assessed included one-year AF readmission rates, all-cause readmission, ischemic stroke, and all-cause mortality. Subgroup analyses were performed for all demographic and comorbidity variables.Results: Overall, 52,598 patients (medium age 44, interquartile range 38-48, female 25.7%) were included in the study, including 2,146 (4.0%) who underwent catheter ablation for AF. Patients who underwent catheter ablation had a significantly lower rate of readmission for AF or any cause at one year (adjusted hazard ratios (HR) of 0.52 [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.43-0.63] and HR of 0.81 [95% CI: 0.72 - 0.89], respectively). There was no difference in 1-year readmission for stroke or all-cause mortality between the two groups. Subgroup analyses showed a consistent reduction in the risk of AF readmission among major demographic and comorbidity subgroups.Conclusion: Catheter ablation in young patients with AF was associated with a reduction in 1-year AF related and all-cause readmissions. These data merit further prospective investigation for validation.

Background: Different arrhythmias have been reported in patients with COVID-19 due to the complication of the disease, and medications used in the management of COVID-19. Remdesivir was approved by FDA for the management of COVID-19 patients in October 2020. There are several case reports suggesting remdesivir causing bradyarrhythmia in COVID-19 patients. Objective: To increase the knowledge and awareness among healthcare professions (HCPs) about the risk of arrhythmias associated with the use of remdesivir. Methods: We used the FDA Adverse Events Reporting System (FAERS) database to find bradyarrhythmia as a reported adverse event (AE) due to remdesivir until October,2021. Total 6,504 events were reported, out of which 5,996 (92.2%) were reported by HCPs. These AEs were included and further analyzed. Results: Out of 5,996 AEs reported with remdesivir, total 537 (9.0%) events were bradyarrhythmia. There were 74 (1.27%) events reported for atrial fibrillation, and 24 (0.04%) for ventricular tachycardia attributed to the use of remdesivir. Reported events of bradyarrhythmia were further divided and analyzed into men vs women, and different age groups of years 18-64, 65-85, &gt;85. Total events of bradyarrhythmia among men (238, 6.5%) vs women (141, 6.4%) were not significantly different. Among all the age groups, more events were reported in younger women in the age group of 18-64 (12.3%) vs 65-85 (7.9%) vs &gt;85 (6.9%). Conclusion: Multiple studies have shown COVID-19 associated tachyarrhythmias, likely secondary to the myocardial damage due to hypoxia. Few studies have also suggested bradyarrhythmias in these patients. Our analysis of the FAERS database also showed many reported AEs of bradyarrhythmia attributed to the use of remdesivir. Postulated mechanisms include; medication side effects, damage to the SA node as a complication of the COVID-19 disease process, and electrolyte imbalance due to the renal failure. Close surveillance of these patients with early diagnosis can lead to prompt discontinuation of the medication, which can further decrease the mortality related to bradyarrhythmias. Further studies are required to identify the at-risk population and to better understand the risk of bradyarrhythmia associated with remdesivir.

Background: Sacubitril-valsartan is a combination of a neprilysin inhibitor and an angiotensin II receptor blocker respectively. Sacubitril-valsartan has become a standard of care in the treatment of patients with Congestive Heart Failure (CHF) with reduced EF. During its clinical trials and upon review of U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approval, sacubitril-valsartan exhibited a side effect profile including hyperkalemia, hypotension, renal dysfunction, and angioedema. Recently, sacubitril-valsartan was also approved for the treatment of CHF patients with preserved EF. Objective: In view of new indications and increased usage, it is important to establish the updated safety profile of sacubitril-valsartan in the general population since the PARADIGM-HF trial. Methods: We explored reported Adverse Events (AEs) of sacubitril-valsartan using the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System. A total of 57,958 AEs were reported until August 2021. Total of 16,658 (28.7%) AEs were reported by HCPs, which were further analyzed. AEs were analyzed in men (56.7%) vs women (25.3%), and also in 3 age groups of 18-64, 65-85, >85. Results: Out of 16,658 AEs, the most frequently reported AE was hypotension (17.2%). Other commonly reported AEs were renal dysfunction (14.3%), allergic reactions including angioedema (10.8%), GI distress (8.8%), tachyarrhythmias (5.8%), hyperkalemia (4.5%), and cough (3.0%). Out of 16,658 AEs, 11,631 (69%) were deemed serious and 4,422 (26.5%) resulted in hospitalization. Deaths were attributed to 3,909 serious AEs (23.5%). In the age group of 18-64, events of atrial fibrillation were less among women compared to men (1% vs 3%), while total events of ventricular tachycardia were noted more among men compared to women (2% vs 0.5%). Conclusion: Most of the reported AEs were consistent with the observed AEs from PARADIGM-HF except for tachyarrhythmia. There are few reports documenting arrhythmias followed by the use of sacubitril-valsartan, however, the clear mechanism is unknown. Despite the wide use of sacubitril-valsartan, there is currently limited data on the safety profile. In future with the increasing use, further randomized controlled trials (RCTs) are needed to better understand the safety profile of the medication.

Introduction: In the last two decades, risk factors, prevalence, and mortality due to coronary artery disease in young adults is on the rise. Hypothesis: Assess the prevalence, trends, and economic burden of ventricular tachycardia (VT) in young adults (18-44 years). Methods: The Nationwide Inpatient Sample was explored for hospitalizations with VT in patients (Age 19-44) between 2005-2018 and divided among 3 groups of the quadrennial period using validated ICD-9 and ICD-10 CM codes. The Pearson chi-square test and Student’s t-test were used for categorical and continuous variables, respectively. We assessed the temporal trends of mortality in VT as well as trends of VT stratified by age, sex, and race by the linear-by-linear association test (Figure 1). Results: Out of 5,156,326 patients were admitted with VT between 2005-2018, 309,636 were in young adults. Among them, 102,433 were admitted between 2005-2009 (mean age 36.1±6.99; 61% male, 58.5% white), 109,591 between 2010-2014 (mean age 35.5±7.16; 59% male, 54.2% white), and 97,495 between 2015-2018 (mean age 35.4±7.00; 60% male, 52.3% white) (p<0.0001). In the young adults with VT, all-cause mortality was 7.37% from 2005-2009, 7.85% from 2010-2014 (6.5% relative increase from 2005-2009), and 8.98% from 2015-2018 (relative increase of 14.4% from 2010-2014) (p<0.0001). Inflation adjusted cost increased over the years [$12,177 in 2005-2009; $13,249 in 2010-2014; $15,807 in 2015-2018; p<0.0001)]. Conclusions: The prevalence of VT in young individuals is rising. VT-related mortality and healthcare utilization costs are on the rise in the study period. VT burden and poor outcomes were notable for Black males. Further studies are required for targeted screening and preventative measures in young adults.

Introduction: Real-world data on the significance of adding a defibrillator to cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT-D) in patients with nonischemic cardiomyopathy (NICM) are limited. Hypothesis: CRT-D is associated with a lower risk of mortality and heart failure (HF) readmissions compared to CRT-P in NICM. Methods: We identified patients with NICM who underwent CRT-D and CRT without an ICD (CRT-P) by analyzing the nationwide readmission database from October 2015- December 2018 and using appropriate ICD-10 CM codes. Propensity score matching was performed to adjust for the confounders. Kaplan Meier curves were utilized for time to event analysis. Cox proportional hazard regression was used to generate hazard ratios. All-cause mortality at 6 months was the primary outcome whereas readmission due to HF and any other cause at 6 months were defined as secondary outcomes. Results: Post-PSM, 3054 patients with NICM underwent CRT-P, and 2863 patients underwent CRT-D placement. CRT-D did not show any benefit over CRT-P in reducing all-cause mortality at 6 months (2.92% vs. 2.79%, HR: 0.84, 95% CI: 0.61-1.16, p=0.29). Similarly, there was no difference in terms of readmissions due to other causes among both groups of patients (36.25% vs. 31.85%, HR: 0.98, 95% CI: 0.89-1.08, p=0.77). However, patients with CRT-P implantations had a lower risk of HF readmissions compared to the CRT-D group (10.05% vs. 14.25%, HR: 0.67, 95% CI: 0.58-0.79, p<0.0001). Conclusions: The addition of a defibrillator to CRT failed to show a survival benefit in patients with NICM. Moreover, HF readmissions were higher in CRT-D patients compared to CRT-P.