Ganatra, Sarju

Importance Glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1 RAs) are associated with increased risk of diabetic retinopathy (DR) and nonarteritic anterior ischemic optic neuropathy (NAION). The risk of sight-threatening complications associated with GLP-1 RAs is underexamined. Objective To investigate whether the use of GLP-1 RAs in patients with T2D is associated with the development of DR, NAION, or DR complications. Design, Setting, and Participants This retrospective cohort study of adults (aged ≥18 years) with T2D and a recent hemoglobin A 1c level of 6.5% or higher was conducted between January 1, 2015, and September 30, 2022, using the TriNetX database. The cohort was divided into 2 groups, adjusted for baseline characteristics through propensity score matching (PSM), based on whether the individuals received prescriptions for a GLP-1 RA. The statistical analysis was conducted on October 10, 2024. Exposures At least 2 prescriptions of a GLP-1 RA given 6 months apart. Main Outcomes and Measures Cox proportional hazard regression models were used to evaluate the primary outcome: association between GLP-1 RAs and the risk of incident DR, NAION, or sight-threatening complications over a 2-year follow-up period. Results After PSM, 185 066 individuals (mean [SD] age, 59.0 [12.5] years; 93 389 females [50.5%]) were prescribed GLP-1 receptor agonists. Use of GLP-1 RAs was associated with an increased incidence of DR (hazard ratio [HR], 1.07; 95% CI, 1.03-1.11), while no statistically significant difference was observed in the risk of NAION (HR, 1.26; 95% CI, 0.94-1.70). In a subgroup analysis of 32 695 patients with preexisting DR, GLP-1 RAs were not associated with progression to proliferative DR (HR, 1.06; 95% CI, 0.97-1.15) or diabetic macular edema (HR, 0.98; 95% CI, 0.95-1.01) but were associated with a lower occurrence of vitreous hemorrhages (HR, 0.74; 95% CI, 0.68-0.80), neovascular glaucoma (HR, 0.78; 95% CI, 0.68-0.88), or blindness (HR, 0.77; 95% CI, 0.73-0.82). Conclusions and Relevance In this cohort study of individuals with T2D, GLP-1 RA use was associated with a modestly increased risk of incident DR; however, fewer patients experienced sight-threatening DR complications, including blindness, even among those with preexisting DR. These findings suggest that all patients with T2D treated with GLP-1 RAs, regardless of preexisting DR, should be regularly screened and monitored for potential complications of T2D.

Background Although micro‐ and nanoplastics are an emerging risk factor for the development of cardiovascular diseases, the association of marine microplastic levels (MMLs) with the burden of cardiometabolic diseases at a population level remains unexplored. We investigated the relationship between the mean microplastic concentration in ocean water within 200 nautical miles of the US coastline and the prevalence of type 2 diabetes, coronary artery disease, and stroke in nearby counties. Methods Microplastic concentration data within 200 nautical miles of the US coastline were geospatially analyzed to calculate mean MMLs. The coastal counties were stratified into 4 categories based on MMLs in the adjacent ocean water body: low, medium, high, or very high. The Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System 2019 to 2020 survey data were used to identify the prevalence of type 2 diabetes, coronary artery disease, and stroke in these counties. Univariate and population‐weighted multivariate quasi‐Poisson regression, adjusted for county‐level confounding variables, was used to evaluate the unadjusted and adjusted associations between disease prevalence and MMLs. Results The mean age of the population was 43±6 years. After adjusting for age, sex, physician access, and socioenvironmental vulnerabilities at the county level, counties with very high MMLs exhibited an 18%, 7%, and 9% higher adjusted prevalence of type 2 diabetes, coronary artery disease, and stroke, respectively, compared with those with low levels. Conclusion Marine microplastic levels were significantly associated with the prevalence of cardiometabolic diseases in coastal counties. Comprehensive studies at an individual level are needed to further investigate the health impacts of microplastic pollution.

ABSTRACTBackgroundMicroplastics are emerging as environmental pollutants with potential neurotoxic effects, yet their association with neurological disabilities remains largely unexplored.MethodsIn this cross‐sectional study comprising 218 coastal counties in the United States, we compared the self‐reported prevalence of cognitive disability, mobility disability, self‐care disability, and independent living disability in counties with very high and low marine microplastic levels (MMLs). Unadjusted and adjusted prevalence ratios (PRs) were computed using population‐weighted quasi‐Poisson regression across three different models to examine the relationship between disability prevalence and MMLs.ResultsCounties exposed to very high marine microplastic levels had a higher mean prevalence of self‐reported cognitive disability (15.2% vs. 13.9%), mobility disability (14.1% vs. 12.3%), self‐care disability (4.2% vs. 3.6%), and independent living disability (8.5% vs. 7.7%) compared to those exposed to low levels (p < 0.001). Regression analyses revealed significantly elevated adjusted prevalence ratios (PRs) for cognitive (PR: 1.09 [95% CI: 1.06–1.12], p < 0.001), mobility (PR: 1.06 [1.03–1.10], p < 0.001), self‐care (PR: 1.16 [1.11–1.20], p < 0.001), and independent living disability (PR: 1.08 [1.05–1.12], p < 0.001) in counties with very high microplastic exposure compared to those with low exposure.ConclusionsThis study highlights a significant association between marine microplastic pollution and the self‐reported prevalence of cognitive, mobility, self‐care, and independent living disabilities at the county level. While merely associative, these findings emphasize the urgent need for further investigation into the individual‐level health impacts of microplastic exposure and underscore the importance of environmental interventions to mitigate potential risks.

BACKGROUND: Global collaboration in cardio-oncology is needed to understand the prevalence of cancer therapy-related cardiovascular toxicity in different risk groups, practice settings, and geographic locations. There are limited data on the socioeconomic and racial/ethnic disparities that may impact access to care and outcomes. To address these gaps, we established the Global Cardio-Oncology Registry, a multinational, multicenter prospective registry. METHODS: We assembled cardiologists and oncologists from academic and community settings to collaborate in the first Global Cardio-Oncology Registry. Subsequently, a survey for site resources, demographics, and intention to participate was conducted. We designed an online data platform to facilitate this global initiative. RESULTS: A total of 119 sites responded to an online questionnaire on their practices and main goals of the registry: 49 US sites from 23 states and 70 international sites from 5 continents indicated a willingness to participate in the Global Cardio-Oncology Registry. Sites were more commonly led by cardiologists (85/119; 72%) and were more often university/teaching (81/119; 68%) than community based (38/119; 32%). The average number of cardio-oncology patients treated per month was 80 per site. The top 3 Global Cardio-Oncology Registry priorities in cardio-oncology care were breast cancer, hematologic malignancies, and patients treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors. Executive and scientific committees and specific committees were established. A pilot phase for breast cancer using Research Electronic Data Capture Cloud platform recently started patient enrollment. CONCLUSIONS: We present the structure for a global collaboration. Information derived from the Global Cardio-Oncology Registry will help understand the risk factors impacting cancer therapy-related cardiovascular toxicity in different geographic locations and therefore contribute to reduce access gaps in cardio-oncology care. Risk calculators will be prospectively derived and validated.

Introduction: In the last two decades, risk factors, prevalence, and mortality due to coronary artery disease in young adults is on the rise. Hypothesis: Assess the prevalence, trends, and economic burden of ventricular tachycardia (VT) in young adults (18-44 years). Methods: The Nationwide Inpatient Sample was explored for hospitalizations with VT in patients (Age 19-44) between 2005-2018 and divided among 3 groups of the quadrennial period using validated ICD-9 and ICD-10 CM codes. The Pearson chi-square test and Student’s t-test were used for categorical and continuous variables, respectively. We assessed the temporal trends of mortality in VT as well as trends of VT stratified by age, sex, and race by the linear-by-linear association test (Figure 1). Results: Out of 5,156,326 patients were admitted with VT between 2005-2018, 309,636 were in young adults. Among them, 102,433 were admitted between 2005-2009 (mean age 36.1±6.99; 61% male, 58.5% white), 109,591 between 2010-2014 (mean age 35.5±7.16; 59% male, 54.2% white), and 97,495 between 2015-2018 (mean age 35.4±7.00; 60% male, 52.3% white) (p<0.0001). In the young adults with VT, all-cause mortality was 7.37% from 2005-2009, 7.85% from 2010-2014 (6.5% relative increase from 2005-2009), and 8.98% from 2015-2018 (relative increase of 14.4% from 2010-2014) (p<0.0001). Inflation adjusted cost increased over the years [$12,177 in 2005-2009; $13,249 in 2010-2014; $15,807 in 2015-2018; p<0.0001)]. Conclusions: The prevalence of VT in young individuals is rising. VT-related mortality and healthcare utilization costs are on the rise in the study period. VT burden and poor outcomes were notable for Black males. Further studies are required for targeted screening and preventative measures in young adults.

Abstract The discipline of Cardio-Oncology has seen tremendous growth over the past decade. It is devoted to the cardiovascular (CV) care of the cancer patient, especially to the mitigation and management of CV complications or toxicities of cancer therapies, which can have profound implications on prognosis. To that effect, many studies have assessed CV toxicities in patients undergoing various types of cancer therapies; however, direct comparisons have proven difficult due to lack of uniformity in CV toxicity endpoints. Similarly, in clinical practice, there can be substantial differences in the understanding of what constitutes CV toxicity, which can lead to significant variation in patient management and outcomes. This document addresses these issues and provides consensus definitions for the most commonly reported CV toxicities, including cardiomyopathy/heart failure and myocarditis, vascular toxicity, and hypertension, as well as arrhythmias and QTc prolongation. The current document reflects a harmonizing review of the current landscape in CV toxicities and the definitions used to define these. This consensus effort aims to provide a structure for definitions of CV toxicity in the clinic and for future research. It will be important to link the definitions outlined herein to outcomes in clinical practice and CV endpoints in clinical trials. It should facilitate communication across various disciplines to improve clinical outcomes for cancer patients with CV diseases.

Abstract The severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS–CoV‐2) has given rise to a pandemic of unprecedented proportions in the modern era because of its highly contagious nature and impact on human health and society: coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID‐19). Patients with cardiovascular (CV) risk factors and established CV disease (CVD) are among those initially identified at the highest risk for serious complications, including death. Subsequent studies have pointed out that patients with cancer are also at high risk for a critical disease course. Therefore, the most vulnerable patients are seemingly those with both cancer and CVD, and a careful, unified approach in the evaluation and management of this patient population is especially needed in times of the COVID‐19 pandemic. This review provides an overview of the unique implications of the viral outbreak for the field of cardio‐oncology and outlines key modifications in the approach to this ever‐increasing patient population. These modifications include a shift toward greater utilization of cardiac biomarkers and a more focused CV imaging approach in the broader context of modifications to typical practice pathways. The goal of this strategic adjustment is to minimize the risk of SARS–CoV‐2 infection (or other future viral outbreaks) while not becoming negligent of CVD and its important impact on the overall outcomes of patients who are being treated for cancer.