Thotamgari, Sahith Reddy

Introduction: Obesity is associated with a higher burden of atrial fibrillation (AF) and related complications. Hypothesis: Bariatric surgery in patients with AF is associated with a reduction in mortality and long-term complications at 1 year. Methods: Patients with AF who underwent bariatric surgery were identified by analyzing the nationwide readmission database and incorporating the validated ICD-10 CM codes from October 2015 to December 2019. We performed the propensity score matching to adjust the confounders and cox proportional hazard regression to generate hazard ratios. Moreover, we generated Kaplan Meier curves for time-to-event analysis. The primary endpoint was all-cause mortality at 1 year, whereas secondary endpoints were ischemic stroke, major bleeding, and AF readmission at 1 year. Results: Out of 892488 obese patients with AF, 18766 underwent bariatric surgery. After propensity score matching, 18764 patients were identified in each group. At 1-year, patients undergoing bariatric surgery had a significant reduction in mortality (2.18% vs. 2.73%, HR: 0.91, 95% CI: 0.85-0.96, p=0.001). Additionally, risk of ischemic stroke was also reduced (1.98% vs. 2.29%, HR: 0.91, 95% CI: 0.86-0.97, p=0.01), whereas no difference was noted in AF readmissions (4.02% vs. 3.34%, HR: 0.97, 95% CI: 0.92-1.04, p=0.49) and risk of major bleeding was increased (5.74% vs. 3.42%, HR: 1.17, 95% CI: 1.10-1.25, p<0.0001) at 1 year in AF patients with bariatric surgery. (Figure 1) Conclusions: Bariatric surgery in patients with AF was associated with a reduction in 1-year mortality and ischemic stroke. However, the risk of major bleeding was noted to be increased and no difference was noted in AF readmission at 1 year.

Introduction: There is a variation in cardiovascular outcomes between rural and urban hospitals such as higher mortality for AF. Whether such a relationship exists for safety and outcomes of left atrial appendage occlusion (LAAO) device implantation is unknown. Hypothesis: We hypothesized that LAAO procedure in rural hospitals is associated with worse in-hospital outcomes. Methods: A cross-sectional examination of patients who were hospitalized for LAAO procedure was performed in the National Inpatient Sample between 2016 and 2019 to compare in-hospital outcomes in patients admitted to urban vs rural hospitals. ICD 10 PCS code 02L73DK was used to identify hospitalizations with LAAO procedure. The cohort was further stratified into rural and urban hospitals. Chi-square test and multivariate logistic regression were used to analyze the association and statistical analyses were performed using weighted values. Results: A total of 61,390 hospitalizations for LAAO procedures were identified during the study period. From these, 1185 (1.93%) hospitalizations occurred in rural hospitals. Baseline characteristics and inpatient outcomes are shown in Table 1. LAAO in rural hospitalizations was associated with significantly higher in-hospital mortality [OR 2.94 (1.17-7.14), p<0.001*]. This associated persisted even after adjusting for significant baseline characteristics [aOR 3.55 (1.42-8.84), p=0.006*). Conclusions: In-hospital mortality was significantly higher in patients undergoing LAAO in rural hospital. Further studies are needed to validate these findings in a prospective manner.