Sharpe, Richard E.

A 64-year-old Asian woman diagnosed with synchronous breast ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) and stage IV EGFR-mutated non-small cell carcinoma of the lung (NSCLC). A decision was made to defer management of the DCIS and initiate Osimertinib for lung cancer treatment, since this was a life-limiting diagnosis. At 9 months, restaging FDG-PET CT showed an interval response in the NSCLC and complete loss of FDG avidity at the biopsy-proven DCIS site. Breast MRI confirmed complete imaging resolution of the DCIS. The clinical resolution of breast DCIS during third-generation EGFR inhibitor therapy has not been previously reported in humans and highlights a potential role for the EGFR/HER2 (ERBB) pathway in pre-invasive breast cancer.

Abstract Objective To compare the pathology outcomes of image-guided breast biopsies across a multistate health care enterprise by the method of detection (MOD), including the positive predictive value (PPV3) and histological types. Methods Biopsies from October 31, 2017, to July 6, 2023, across 18 imaging sites in 4 states were extracted. Radiologists prospectively assigned MODs, including symptomatic presentations (self-examination, clinical examination) and imaging modalities (mammogram, tomosynthesis, US, MRI, contrast-enhanced mammogram, molecular breast imaging, other imaging). For each MOD, the rates of malignancy and cancer subtypes were calculated. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were performed. Results In 26 932 biopsies on 22 582 patients (mean age 57.6 years ± 14.2 [SD]; 22 416 women), 6068 (81.1%) cancers were detected by screening, and 1144 (15.3%) were detected by symptoms. Symptomatic presentation MODs had a higher PPV3 (43.0% vs 25.6%; P < .001), larger cancer lesion sizes (x̄ = 27.5 mm vs x̄ = 17.8 mm; P < 001), and a higher association with invasive carcinoma (96.7% vs 76.8%; P <.001) compared with screening imaging-based MODs. Methods of detection with higher PPV3s also tended to have higher rates of invasive carcinoma (Spearman’s ρ = 0.83). Conclusion Compared with breast cancers detected after symptomatic presentations, those identified via image-based screening were smaller and less often invasive, confirming the value of screening in early detection. Positive predictive value and the rate of invasive carcinoma varied in parallel across MODs.

Pleomorphic adenoma of the breast is a rare tumor, with fewer than 100 patients described in the English literature, mainly as case reports and small case series. Histologically, breast pleomorphic adenoma resembles its more common salivary gland counterpart; however, it can present diagnostic challenges, particularly on core needle biopsy and fine-needle aspiration. The differential diagnosis includes benign and malignant tumors, which carry major treatment implications, from the extent of surgical intervention to the potential use of chemotherapy. Herein we describe a tumor that was initially diagnosed as a triple-negative matrix-producing metaplastic carcinoma, but a secondary review led to the diagnosis of pleomorphic adenoma of the breast. Prior to the secondary review, the patient underwent an excisional biopsy, sentinel lymph node biopsy, and one round of chemotherapy. This report adds to the limited literature surrounding this entity and discusses the differential diagnosis along with histopathologic and immunohistochemical findings that aid in the diagnosis and reviews the radiologic findings observed throughout the patient's clinical course. This patient underscores the difficulty of diagnosis and highlights the need for multidisciplinary consideration and communication to avoid overtreatment.

Abstract The initial method of detection (MOD) refers to the first imaging examination, physical symptom, or clinical sign that prompts further investigation and ultimately leads to a new breast cancer diagnosis. The MOD is assigned at the patient level and falls into 1 of 3 categories: screening in asymptomatic patients, detection by patients or health care providers, or neither of the above. The MOD should be assigned prospectively by the radiologist when interpreting an examination with a final BI-RADS category of 4 or 5, before image-guided biopsy and breast cancer diagnosis. The MOD is not assigned to examinations classified as BI-RADS category 0, 1, 2, 3, or 6, nor is it assigned in the setting of an active breast cancer diagnosis. This Clinical Practice article addresses frequently asked questions and challenging clinical scenarios compiled by the American College of Radiology’s Screening and Emerging Technology Committee to guide consistent MOD assignment. For example, if a patient presents with a lump but is ultimately found to have a suspicious finding requiring biopsy in the contralateral breast, the MOD should reflect the reason for presentation, the patient-detected symptom (Pat), even if the cancer itself is asymptomatic. By increasing awareness of MOD and standardizing MOD reporting practices, radiologists can contribute to improved data collection. While MOD is not currently tracked in U.S. cancer registries, its systematic collection may offer valuable insights into screening effectiveness, technology performance, and disparities in cancer detection. Standardized MOD reporting has the potential to strengthen early detection efforts and improve outcomes across diverse clinical settings.

Abstract Objective To assess the performance and cost implications of contrast-enhanced mammography-guided biopsy (CEM Bx). Methods This is a prospective study from May 5, 2021, to April 18, 2022, across 2 U.S. academic centers, evaluating technical success, patient/radiologist feedback, and operational factors of CEM Bx. Inclusion criteria included that patients be 40 years or older and recommended for biopsy with suspicious findings on contrast-enhanced mammography (CEM). Descriptive statistics are reported for clinical outcomes, length of procedure, and user and participant feedback. An estimate of cost was made by comparing general Medicare costs that are being billed for CEM Bx and post-clip mammogram ($475.48) to the Medicare costs of MRI-guided biopsy (MRI Bx) and post-clip placement mammogram ($845.94). Results Eighty-two participants enrolled. Twenty-two were excluded at the time of CEM Bx (22/82, 27%). Sixty participants were included (mean age 57 years, range 33 to 81 years) with 63 suspicious CEM lesions. The malignancy rate was 22% (14/63). A technical success rate of 100% was achieved. Average CEM Bx time was 29% to 33% the average reported MRI-guided breast biopsy times (CEM Bx = 11 minutes; MRI Bx = 33 to 38 minutes), indicating operational efficiencies. A positive opinion of CEM Bx was reported by 78% of radiologists, 93% of technologists, and 98% of patients. The estimated cost for each CEM Bx was ~ 45% lower than MRI Bx. Conclusion CEM Bx demonstrates high success rates and satisfaction scores. CEM Bx resulted in shorter procedure times, enhanced operational efficiency, and ~45% reduction in costs compared with MRI Bx. As advancements continue, we anticipate CEM Bx will offer a cost-efficient and timely option for breast biopsy.

PURPOSE Contrast-enhanced mammography (CEM) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) have shown similar diagnostic performance in detection of breast cancer. Limited CEM data are available for high-risk breast cancer screening. The purpose of the study was to prospectively investigate the efficacy of supplemental screening CEM in elevated risk patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS A prospective, single-institution, institutional review board–approved observational study was conducted in asymptomatic elevated risk women age 35 years or older who had a negative conventional two-dimensional digital breast tomosynthesis screening mammography (MG) and no additional supplemental screening within the prior 12 months. RESULTS Four hundred sixty women were enrolled from February 2019 to April 2021. The median age was 56.8 (range, 35.0-79.2) years; 408 of 460 (88.7%) were mammographically dense. Biopsy revealed benign changes in 22 women (22/37, 59%), high-risk lesions in four women (4/37, 11%), and breast cancer in 11 women (11/37, 30%). Fourteen cancers (10 invasive, tumor size range 4-15 mm, median 9 mm) were diagnosed in 11 women. The overall supplemental cancer detection rate was 23.9 per 1,000 patients, 95% CI (12.0 to 42.4). All cancers were grade 1 or 2, ER+ ERBB2–, and node negative. CEM imaging screening offered high specificity (0.875 [95% CI, 0.844 to 0.906]), high NPV (0.998 [95% CI, 0.993 to 1.000), moderate PPV1 (0.164 [95% CI, 0.076 to 0.253), moderate PPV3 (0.275 [95% CI, 0.137 to 0.413]), and high sensitivity (0.917 [95% CI, 0.760 to 1.000]). At least 1 year of imaging follow-up was available on all patients, and one interval cancer was detected on breast MRI 4 months after negative screening CEM. CONCLUSION A pilot trial demonstrates a supplemental cancer detection rate of 23.9 per 1,000 in women at an elevated risk for breast cancer. Larger, multi-institutional, multiyear CEM trials in patients at elevated risk are needed for validation.