Patel, Ameet C.

Objective: Evaluate prevalence and pattern of occipital pneumatization (OP). Patients: Individuals with imaging evidence of OP on computed tomography (CT). Intervention(s): High resolution CT scans of the temporal bone. Main Outcome Measure: The prevalence and pattern of OP on 1000 CT scans performed at a large academic healthcare system. Results: OP had a prevalence of 11.8% (n = 118) while occipital condyle pneumatization occurred in only 0.3%. Occipital air cells were right-sided in 27.1% (n = 32), left-sided in 51.7% (n = 61), and bilateral in 21.2% (n = 25), and OP was contiguous with the occipitomastoid suture. In cases of unilateral OP, the contralateral jugular foramen demonstrated relative enlargement ( p = 0.006), but a direct association could not be established. Conclusions: The occipital bone is an accessory site of skull base pneumatization in 11.8% of the population undergoing temporal bone CT, while air cell extension into the occipital condyle occurs more rarely. These occipital air cells have a left-sided predilection and are always in direct proximity to the occipitomastoid suture, suggesting developmental egress from the mastoid. OP is a normal variant and lacks features of craniocervical pneumatization, which is a rare disorder.

Pantopaque (iophendylate) is an oily contrast medium historically used during spine imaging. Due to its persistence in the subarachnoid space and the potential to lead to severe arachnoiditis, it is no longer used today. We present a 40‐year‐old male with new‐onset headaches, imbalance, and vertigo. Brain magnetic resonance imaging revealed a 2‐mm T1 ‐hyperintense intracanalicular lesion. Numerous hyperdense foci were scattered throughout the subarachnoid space on computed tomography. Further history revealed the patient received Pantopaque 30 years prior, after sustaining spinal trauma. Remnant Pantopaque contrast is an important differential when evaluating a patient with a suspected intracranial tumor in order to avoid unwarranted surgical intervention. Laryngoscope, 127:1916–1919, 2017

Background and Purpose— The American Stroke Association guidelines emphasized the need for further high-quality studies that assess agreement by radiologists and nonradiologists engaged in emergency telestroke assessments and decision-making. Therefore, the objective of this study was to determine the level of agreement of baseline brain CT scan interpretations of patients with acute stroke presenting to telestroke spoke hospitals between central reading committee neuroradiologists and each of 2 groups, spoke hospital radiologists and hub hospital vascular neurologists (telestrokologists). Methods— The Stroke Team Remote Evaluation Using a Digital Observation Camera Arizona trial was a prospective, urban single-hub, rural 2-spoke, randomized, blinded, controlled trial of a 2-way, site-independent, audiovisual telemedicine and teleradiology system designed for remote evaluation of adult patients with acute stroke versus telephone consultation to assess eligibility for treatment with intravenous thrombolysis. In the telemedicine arm, the subjects’ CT scans were interpreted by the hub telestrokologist and in the telephone arm by the spoke radiologist. All subjects’ CT scans were subsequently interpreted centrally, independently, and blindly by 2 hub neuroradiologists. The primary CT outcome was determination of a CT-based contraindication to thrombolytic treatment. Kappa statistics and exact agreement rates were used to analyze interobserver agreement. Results— Fifty-four subjects underwent random assignment. The overall agreement for the presence of radiological contraindications to thrombolysis was excellent (0.91) and did not differ substantially between the hub telestrokologist to neuroradiologist and spoke radiologist to neuroradiologist (0.92 and 0.89, respectively). Conclusions— In the context of a telestroke network designed to assess patients with acute stroke syndromes, agreement over the presence or absence of radiological contraindications to thrombolysis was excellent whether the comparisons were between a telestrokologist and neuroradiologist or between spoke radiologist and neuroradiologist. Clinical Trial Registration— URL: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov . Unique identifier: NCT00623350.