Simard, Jacques

Abstract Background: Common cancers develop through a multistep process often including inherited susceptibility. Collaboration among multiple institutions, and funding from multiple sources, has allowed the development of an inexpensive genotyping microarray, the OncoArray. The array includes a genome-wide backbone, comprising 230,000 SNPs tagging most common genetic variants, together with dense mapping of known susceptibility regions, rare variants from sequencing experiments, pharmacogenetic markers, and cancer-related traits. Methods: The OncoArray can be genotyped using a novel technology developed by Illumina to facilitate efficient genotyping. The consortium developed standard approaches for selecting SNPs for study, for quality control of markers, and for ancestry analysis. The array was genotyped at selected sites and with prespecified replicate samples to permit evaluation of genotyping accuracy among centers and by ethnic background. Results: The OncoArray consortium genotyped 447,705 samples. A total of 494,763 SNPs passed quality control steps with a sample success rate of 97% of the samples. Participating sites performed ancestry analysis using a common set of markers and a scoring algorithm based on principal components analysis. Conclusions: Results from these analyses will enable researchers to identify new susceptibility loci, perform fine-mapping of new or known loci associated with either single or multiple cancers, assess the degree of overlap in cancer causation and pleiotropic effects of loci that have been identified for disease-specific risk, and jointly model genetic, environmental, and lifestyle-related exposures. Impact: Ongoing analyses will shed light on etiology and risk assessment for many types of cancer. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; 26(1); 126–35. ©2016 AACR.

Background The rarity of mutations in PALB2, CHEK2 and ATM make it difficult to estimate precisely associated cancer risks. Population-based family studies have provided evidence that at least some of these mutations are associated with breast cancer risk as high as those associated with rare BRCA2 mutations. We aimed to estimate the relative risks associated with specific rare variants in PALB2, CHEK2 and ATM via a multicentre case-control study. Methods We genotyped 10 rare mutations using the custom iCOGS array: PALB2 c.1592delT, c.2816T>G and c.3113G>A, CHEK2 c.349A>G, c.538C>T, c.715G>A, c.1036C>T, c.1312G>T, and c.1343T>G and ATM c.7271T>G. We assessed associations with breast cancer risk (42 671 cases and 42 164 controls), as well as prostate (22 301 cases and 22 320 controls) and ovarian (14 542 cases and 23 491 controls) cancer risk, for each variant. Results For European women, strong evidence of association with breast cancer risk was observed for PALB2 c.1592delT OR 3.44 (95% CI 1.39 to 8.52, p=7.1×10−5), PALB2 c.3113G>A OR 4.21 (95% CI 1.84 to 9.60, p=6.9×10−8) and ATM c.7271T>G OR 11.0 (95% CI 1.42 to 85.7, p=0.0012). We also found evidence of association with breast cancer risk for three variants in CHEK2, c.349A>G OR 2.26 (95% CI 1.29 to 3.95), c.1036C>T OR 5.06 (95% CI 1.09 to 23.5) and c.538C>T OR 1.33 (95% CI 1.05 to 1.67) (p≤0.017). Evidence for prostate cancer risk was observed for CHEK2 c.1343T>G OR 3.03 (95% CI 1.53 to 6.03, p=0.0006) for African men and CHEK2 c.1312G>T OR 2.21 (95% CI 1.06 to 4.63, p=0.030) for European men. No evidence of association with ovarian cancer was found for any of these variants. Conclusions This report adds to accumulating evidence that at least some variants in these genes are associated with an increased risk of breast cancer that is clinically important.

Abstract Women who carry a pathogenic mutation in the BRCA1 or BRCA2 gene are at high risk of breast (BC) and ovarian cancer (OC). Their clinical management usually includes invasive risk-reducing interventions with substantial side effects. Improved personalized cancer risk estimates may help to identify women at particularly high risk or with high risk of disease at early ages who may benefit from early intervention as well as women at lower risk who may opt to delay surgery or chemoprevention. Genome-wide association studies have identified >100 common genetic variants that are associated with BC or OC risks. Several of these variants are also individually associated with risk of BC or OC for BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers. However, no study has evaluated the combined effects of all the known common genetic variants on BC or OC risk for BRCA1/2 mutation carriers. We constructed polygenic risk scores (PRS) based on results of genetic association studies conducted in the general population. Each PRS was formed by the sum of the number of risk alleles across the variants weighted by their log-Odds Ratio estimate from population-based studies of BC or OC. We investigated 3 PRS for BC (overall, estrogen receptor (ER) positive, and ER-negative) and one PRS for OC. We used data for 15,252 BRCA1 and 8,211 BRCA2 female carriers. The association of each PRS with BC or OC risk was evaluated using a weighted cohort analysis with time to diagnosis as the outcome and estimated the Hazard Ratios (HR) per standard deviation increase in the PRS. All PRS were significantly associated with cancer risks for BRCA1/2 carriers. The PRS for ER-negative BC displayed the strongest association with BC risk in BRCA1 carriers (HR = 1.29 [1.25-1.33], p = 8×10−64). In BRCA2 carriers, the strongest association was seen for the overall BC PRS (HR = 1.26 [1.21-1.31], p = 3×10−27). The OC PRS was strongly associated with OC risk for both BRCA1 and BRCA2 carriers. These relative risks translate to large differences in absolute risks for carriers: e.g., the OC risk was 6% by age 80 for BRCA2 carriers at the 10th percentile of the OC PRS compared with 19% risk for those at the 90th percentile of PRS. Our findings demonstrate that BC and OC PRS derived from studies in the general population are predictive of cancer risks in BRCA1 and BRCA2 carriers. Incorporation of the PRS into risk prediction models would improve risk prediction and hence inform decisions on cancer risk management. Citation Format: Karoline Kuchenbaecker, Jacques Simard, Kenneth Offit, Fergus J. Couch, Douglas F. Easton, Georgia Chenevix-Trench, Antonis C. Antoniou, Consortium of Investigators of Modifiers of BRCA1/2. Predicting breast and ovarian cancer risks for BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers using polygenic risk scores. [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 107th Annual Meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research; 2016 Apr 16-20; New Orleans, LA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2016;76(14 Suppl):Abstract nr 2598.

Abstract Breast, ovarian, and prostate cancers are hormone-related and may have a shared genetic basis, but this has not been investigated systematically by genome-wide association (GWA) studies. Meta-analyses combining the largest GWA meta-analysis data sets for these cancers totaling 112,349 cases and 116,421 controls of European ancestry, all together and in pairs, identified at P < 10−8 seven new cross-cancer loci: three associated with susceptibility to all three cancers (rs17041869/2q13/BCL2L11; rs7937840/11q12/INCENP; rs1469713/19p13/GATAD2A), two breast and ovarian cancer risk loci (rs200182588/9q31/SMC2; rs8037137/15q26/RCCD1), and two breast and prostate cancer risk loci (rs5013329/1p34/NSUN4; rs9375701/6q23/L3MBTL3). Index variants in five additional regions previously associated with only one cancer also showed clear association with a second cancer type. Cell-type–specific expression quantitative trait locus and enhancer–gene interaction annotations suggested target genes with potential cross-cancer roles at the new loci. Pathway analysis revealed significant enrichment of death receptor signaling genes near loci with P < 10−5 in the three-cancer meta-analysis. Significance: We demonstrate that combining large-scale GWA meta-analysis findings across cancer types can identify completely new risk loci common to breast, ovarian, and prostate cancers. We show that the identification of such cross-cancer risk loci has the potential to shed new light on the shared biology underlying these hormone-related cancers. Cancer Discov; 6(9); 1052–67. ©2016 AACR. This article is highlighted in the In This Issue feature, p. 932

Previous genome‐wide association studies among women of European ancestry identified two independent breast cancer susceptibility loci represented by single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) rs13281615 and rs11780156 at 8q24. A fine‐mapping study across 2.06 Mb (chr8:127,561,724–129,624,067, hg19) in 55,540 breast cancer cases and 51,168 controls within the Breast Cancer Association Consortium was conducted. Three additional independent association signals in women of European ancestry, represented by rs35961416 (OR = 0.95, 95% CI = 0.93–0.97, conditional p = 5.8 × 10−6), rs7815245 (OR = 0.94, 95% CI = 0.91–0.96, conditional p = 1.1 × 10−6) and rs2033101 (OR = 1.05, 95% CI = 1.02–1.07, conditional p = 1.1 × 10−4) were found. Integrative analysis using functional genomic data from the Roadmap Epigenomics, the Encyclopedia of DNA Elements project, the Cancer Genome Atlas and other public resources implied that SNPs rs7815245 in Signal 3, and rs1121948 in Signal 5 (in linkage disequilibrium with rs11780156, r2 = 0.77), were putatively functional variants for two of the five independent association signals. The results highlighted multiple 8q24 variants associated with breast cancer susceptibility in women of European ancestry.

Abstract Background: A recent association study identified a common variant (rs9790517) at 4q24 to be associated with breast cancer risk. Independent association signals and potential functional variants in this locus have not been explored. Methods: We conducted a fine-mapping analysis in 55,540 breast cancer cases and 51,168 controls from the Breast Cancer Association Consortium. Results: Conditional analyses identified two independent association signals among women of European ancestry, represented by rs9790517 [conditional P = 2.51 × 10−4; OR, 1.04; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.02–1.07] and rs77928427 (P = 1.86 × 10−4; OR, 1.04; 95% CI, 1.02–1.07). Functional annotation using data from the Encyclopedia of DNA Elements (ENCODE) project revealed two putative functional variants, rs62331150 and rs73838678 in linkage disequilibrium (LD) with rs9790517 (r2 ≥ 0.90) residing in the active promoter or enhancer, respectively, of the nearest gene, TET2. Both variants are located in DNase I hypersensitivity and transcription factor–binding sites. Using data from both The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) and Molecular Taxonomy of Breast Cancer International Consortium (METABRIC), we showed that rs62331150 was associated with level of expression of TET2 in breast normal and tumor tissue. Conclusion: Our study identified two independent association signals at 4q24 in relation to breast cancer risk and suggested that observed association in this locus may be mediated through the regulation of TET2. Impact: Fine-mapping study with large sample size warranted for identification of independent loci for breast cancer risk. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; 24(11); 1680–91. ©2015 AACR.

Abstract Genome-wide association studies (GWAS) have identified several susceptibility regions that confer risk of two or more cancers. A region at 19p13 is associated with both breast and ovarian cancer risk in the general population as well as in BRCA1/BRCA2 mutation carriers. Using the iCOGs custom genotyping array, we analyzed 438 SNPs in this region in 7,435 ER-negative breast cancer cases and 42,599 controls from BCAC, and 15,347 ovarian cancer cases and 30,845 controls from OCAC and 15,252 BRCA1 mutation carriers. We identified two significant peaks of association. Peak 1, consisting of 13 highly correlated SNPs (r2>0.95), spans a 19.4kb region harboring the BABAM1, ANKLE1 and ABHD8 genes. Peak 1 SNPs are associated with serous ovarian cancer (top hit rs4808075, P = 9.2×10-20), ER-negative breast cancer (rs61494113, P = 1.1×10-13) and breast cancer in BRCA1 mutation carriers (rs61494113, P = 7.7×10-16). Peak 2 spans over 100kb and contains 7 SNPs associated with breast cancer in BRCA1 mutation carriers only (rs4464206, P = 8.9×10-8). Multiple assays were used to establish the putative functional roles of risk SNPs and candidate susceptibility genes in this region. Expression quantitative trait locus (eQTL) analyses identified significant genotype-gene expression correlations between genotype at the Peak 1 SNP rs480816 and ABHD8 expression in ovarian tumors (P = 3.0×10-5) and normal breast tissues (P = 2.8×10-3). The Peak 2 SNP, rs7246243, was significantly associated with BABAM1 expression (P = 5×10-3) in normal breast tissue only. Overexpression of BABAM1 in normal ovarian and breast cells did not modulate neoplastic phenotypes, whereas overexpression of ABHD8 induced a significant reduction in migration in both cell types in vitro. Differentially expressed genes in ABHD8 models, identified by RNAseq, were associated with cellular movement (P<1.82×10-44). Chromosome conformation capture (3C) identified an interaction between the ABHD8 promoter and a region containing 4 risk SNPs (rs4808075, rs10419397, rs56069439 and rs4808076) in breast and ovarian normal and cancer cells but only rs56069439 coincides with epigenetic enhancer marks in breast and ovarian cells. CRISPR/Cas9 genome editing was used to delete a 57bp region containing rs56069439 and expression of BABAM1, ANKLE1 and ABHD8 were measured. Taken together, these data suggest a common functional mechanism underlying risk of breast and ovarian cancer at this locus, mediated by rs56069439 variants differentially regulating expression of ABHD8, a gene involved in cell motility. Citation Format: Kate Lawrenson, Siddhartha Kar, Karoline Kuckenbaeker, Stacey Edwards, Qiyuan Li, Jonathan Tyrer, Jonathan Beesley, Kyriaki Michailidou, Susan Ramus, Alison Dunning, Fergus Couch, Alvaro Monteiro, Jacques Simard, Matthew Freedman, Douglas Easton, Georgia Chenevix-Trench, Paul Pharoah, Antonis Antoniou, Simon Gayther, OCAC, BCAC and CIMBA. Common functional mechanisms underlying pleiotropy at the 19p13.1 breast and ovarian cancer cusceptibility locus. [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 106th Annual Meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research; 2015 Apr 18-22; Philadelphia, PA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2015;75(15 Suppl):Abstract nr 2783. doi:10.1158/1538-7445.AM2015-2783

Abstract Mammographic density measures adjusted for age and body mass index (BMI) are heritable predictors of breast cancer risk, but few mammographic density-associated genetic variants have been identified. Using data for 10,727 women from two international consortia, we estimated associations between 77 common breast cancer susceptibility variants and absolute dense area, percent dense area and absolute nondense area adjusted for study, age, and BMI using mixed linear modeling. We found strong support for established associations between rs10995190 (in the region of ZNF365), rs2046210 (ESR1), and rs3817198 (LSP1) and adjusted absolute and percent dense areas (all P < 10−5). Of 41 recently discovered breast cancer susceptibility variants, associations were found between rs1432679 (EBF1), rs17817449 (MIR1972-2: FTO), rs12710696 (2p24.1), and rs3757318 (ESR1) and adjusted absolute and percent dense areas, respectively. There were associations between rs6001930 (MKL1) and both adjusted absolute dense and nondense areas, and between rs17356907 (NTN4) and adjusted absolute nondense area. Trends in all but two associations were consistent with those for breast cancer risk. Results suggested that 18% of breast cancer susceptibility variants were associated with at least one mammographic density measure. Genetic variants at multiple loci were associated with both breast cancer risk and the mammographic density measures. Further understanding of the underlying mechanisms at these loci could help identify etiologic pathways implicated in how mammographic density predicts breast cancer risk. Cancer Res; 75(12); 2457–67. ©2015 AACR.