Ritchie, Charles

Introduction Endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair (EVAR) is the primary treatment for abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA). Despite favorable early outcomes, lifelong surveillance is essential as endoleaks remain a major cause of reintervention. Among these, type II endoleaks (T2E) remain controversial regarding optimal management. This study aimed to identify factors associated with intervention for T2E using time-to-event analysis and predefined anatomic thresholds. Secondary objectives included comparing outcomes between T2E patients with (intT2E) and without (nointT2E) intervention. Methods A retrospective review of EVAR procedures from 2011-2024 was performed. Patients with newly diagnosed or persistent T2E were identified on completion and follow-up CT angiography. Patients were categorized as intT2E or nointT2E. Multivariable Cox regression evaluated time to first intervention, and logistic regression served as sensitivity analysis. Kaplan-Meier curves assessed freedom from intervention by inferior mesenteric artery (IMA) size. Results Among 207 EVAR patients, 78 (37.6%) developed T2E over a mean 3.4 ± 2.4 years. Nineteen (24.3%) required intervention. IntT2E patients were younger (74.9 ± 6.8 vs 78.3 ± 7.9 years, P = 0.02), had more frequent anticoagulation use (47.4% vs 20.3%, P = 0.02), larger IMAs (4.2 ± 0.6 vs 3.3 ± 0.7 mm, P < 0.01), and more lumbar arteries (6.0 ± 1.2 vs 5.0 ± 1.3, P = 0.02). IMAs >4 mm occurred in 68.4% of intT2E vs 8.5% of nointT2E ( P < 0.01). Mean sac growth was greater in intT2E (9.7 ± 5.3 mm vs −1.9 ± 6.5 mm, P < 0.01). Thirty-day complications following the index EVAR procedure, mid-term reinterventions, and overall mortality were similar between groups. Post-embolization, T2E resolved in 36.9%, with sac regression in 63.1%. Among embolized patients, 26.3% required a second embolization and one patient required 3 attempts without achieving resolution. IMA >4 mm independently predicted intervention (HR 7.18, 95% CI 1.97-26.16, P < 0.01). Logistic regression confirmed IMA >4 mm (OR 23.4, 95% CI 6.17-88.6, P < 0.01), >6 lumbar arteries (OR 4.2, 95% CI 1.10-15.98, P = 0.02), and anticoagulation (OR 3.4, 95% CI 1.17-10.6, P = 0.02) as predictors. Conclusions Approximately one-quarter of T2E patients required embolization. IMA >4 mm was the strongest predictor of intervention, while anticoagulation and increased lumbar artery number also increased risk. Management should prioritize risk-stratified surveillance and selective intervention.

Objective To evaluate outcomes in patients with type 2 endoleak (T2E) and the impact of treatment outside the device instructions for use (IFU). Methods This retrospective single-center study included abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAA) patients who underwent EVAR (2011- 2024). Primary outcomes were 30-day and mid-term complications, reintervention, and mortality by T2E status. Propensity score matching was applied and secondary analysis stratified outcomes by IFU compliance, comparing within ( in IFU) or outside( out IFU) IFU in each T2E group. Results Among 154 EVAR patients (137 men (89.1%) and 17 women (11.0%); mean age 77.5 ± 7.6 years), 77 were T2E(−), and 77 were T2E(+). Baseline characteristics were similar. Thirty-day complications were comparable (T2E(−): 5, 6.4% vs T2E(+): 2, 2.56%, P = 0.72). The mean follow-up duration was 2.7 ± 2.4 years. Sac diameter change (Δ) decreased in the T2E(−) (7.7 ± 8.4 mm) and enlarged in the T2E(+) (1.79 ± 12.5 mm; P < 0.01). Mid-term graft-related complications (T2E(−): 3, 3.8% vs T2E(+): 49, 62.8%, P < 0.01) and reinterventions (T2E(−): 3, 3.8%, vs T2E(+): 20, 25.6% P < 0.01) were higher in the T2E(+) with no difference in mortality ( P = 1.00). These findings remained after excluding type 1 endoleaks. Among the T2E(+), those treated out IFU had longer hospital stays ( out IFU: 3.0 ± 2.8 days vs in IFU: 1.8 ± 2.0 days, P = 0.03), higher T1E ( out IFU: 3, 33.3% vs in IFU: 1, 4.34%, P < 0.01), higher rates of reintervention ( out IFU: 9, 100.0% vs in IFU:17; 24.6%, P < 0.01) and higher all-cause mortality than those within IFU criteria ( out IFU: 5, 55.0% vs in IFU: 13, 18.8%, P < 0.01). IFU status did not significantly affect outcomes in T2E(−) patients. Conclusions T2E is associated with sac growth and increased reinterventions, but not higher mortality. On subgroup analysis, those T2E(+) treated out IFU had longer hospitalizations, higher T1E rates, more reinterventions, and higher all-cause; but not aneurysmal-related mortality.

Abstract Disclosure: A.L. McKenna: None. Y. Huang: None. L. Yang: None. N. Loo: None. C. Ritchie: None. A. Metcalfe: None. R. Nakhleh: None. M. Krishna: None. S. Thota-Kammili: None. J. Eleazer: None. A.Y. Chang: None. Hepatocellular adenomas (HCA) are uncommon, benign epithelial tumors of the liver. Risk factors include exogenous estrogen or androgen use, and genetic and metabolic syndromes. Management of HCA is delineated by sex assigned at birth; Observation is recommended in an HCA less than 5 cm in an individual assigned female at birth, while resection of an HCA in an individual assigned male at birth is recommended no matter the size due to risk of malignant transformation. What is not known is whether risk is different for individuals with gender incongruence on gender affirming hormone therapy (GAHT). There is limited data on the risk of HCA in this population. One case report of a transgender man who continued GAHT after diagnosis of an HCA though no follow-up information was available. We present follow-up on a transgender man assigned female at birth with multiple hemorrhagic HCA that was re-initiated on GAHT after stabilization of adenomas off GAHT. Unlike prior cases, the molecular profile showed ß-catenin negative, estrogen and androgen receptors positive. This is the first case report to our knowledge reporting detailed follow-up after restarting masculinizing GAHT after diagnosis of HCA. A 24-year-old transgender man presented to the emergency department with right upper quadrant pain. Initial labs were notable for ALT of 239 units per liter (U/L) and AST 165 U/L. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the abdomen and liver elastogram revealed multiple bilobar hepatic masses, the largest measuring 9.9 cm concerning for hemorrhagic HCA which was subsequently confirmed on liver biopsy. Immunostains were positive for estrogen and androgen receptors. The patient had no history of alcohol or illicit drug use, tattoos, or family history of liver disease. The patient had been treated with 100 mg of intramuscular testosterone cypionate weekly for the past six years for gender incongruence locally. No testosterone concentrations were available from prior to or during acute presentation. Discontinuation of hormone therapy was recommended along with conservative management with frequent MRI. Over the next 19 months, monitoring revealed improvement/resolution of the auto infarcting adenomas with the last MRI noting two stable HCA measuring 2.1 cm and 0.8 cm without new or enlarging liver lesions. Due to gender dysphoria off GAHT, reinitiation of hormone therapy with low dose AndroGel 1.62% topically was prescribed at 18 months after presentation. The patient has been monitored with labs monthly and plans to obtain MRI abdomen every three months. To date, the patient has tolerated reinitiation of therapy. This case demonstrates that patients on masculinizing GAHT who develop HCA can be conservatively managed and monitored based on pathology and that testosterone does not necessarily explain sex differences in the presentation/malignant transformation of HCA cisgender men as opposed to cisgender women. Presentation: 6/3/2024

ABSTRACT The management of hepatic adenoma in transgender individuals undergoing gender-affirming hormone therapy remains unclear, especially whether treatment should be based on sex assigned at birth or therapy patient received. We presented a transgender man, female at birth, with hepatic adenomatosis with molecular profile differed from typical adenomas in cisgender males on testosterone. Discontinuing testosterone led to autoinfarction of the adenoma, allowing the avoidance of invasive treatments and resumption of gender-affirming hormone therapy. This case underscores the necessity for personalized care in the growing transgender population and challenges current consensus of treatment based on sex assigned at birth, emphasizing a tailored approach.

Background: Overall inferior vena cava filter (IVCF) utilization has decreased in the United States since the 2010 US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) safety communication. The FDA renewed this safety warning in 2014 with additional mandates on reporting IVCF-related adverse events. We evaluated the impact of the FDA recommendations on IVCF placements for different indications from 2010 to 2019 and further assessed utilization trends by region and hospital teaching status. Methods: Inferior vena cava filter placements between 2010 and 2019 were identified in the Nationwide Inpatient Sample database using the associated International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, Clinical Modification, and Tenth Revision codes. Inferior vena cava filter placements were categorized by indication for venous thromboembolism (VTE) “treatment” in patients with VTE diagnosis and contraindication to anticoagulation and “prophylaxis” in patients without VTE. Generalized linear regression was used to analyze utilization trends. Results: A total of 823 717 IVCFs were placed over the study period, of which 644 663 (78.3%) were for VTE treatment and 179 054 (21.7%) were for prophylaxis indications. The median age for both categories of patients was 68 years. The total number of IVCFs placed for all indications decreased from 129 616 in 2010 to 58 465 in 2019, with an aggregate decline rate of −8.4%. The decline rate was higher between 2014 and 2019 than between 2010 and 2014 (−11.6% vs −7.2%). From 2010 to 2019, IVCF placement for VTE treatment and prophylaxis trended downward at rates of −7.9% and −10.2%, respectively. Urban nonteaching hospitals saw the highest decline for both VTE treatment (−17.2%) and prophylactic indications (−18.0%). Hospitals located in the Northeast region had the highest decline rates for VTE treatment (−10.3%) and prophylactic indications (−12.5%). Conclusion: The higher decline rate in IVCF placements between 2014 and 2019 compared with 2010 and 2014 suggests an additional impact of the renewed 2014 FDA safety indications on national IVCF utilization. Variations in IVCF use for VTE treatment and prophylactic indications existed across hospital teaching types, locations, and regions. Clinical Impact Inferior vena cava filters (IVCF) are associated with medical complications. The 2010 and 2014 FDA safety warnings appeared to have synergistically contributed to a significant decline in IVCF utilization rates from 2010 – 2019 in the US. IVC filter placements in patients without venous thromboembolism (VTE) declined at a higher rate than VTE. However, IVCF utilization varied across hospitals and geographical locations, likely due to the absence of universally accepted clinical guidelines on IVCF indications and use. Harmonization of IVCF placement guidelines is needed to standardize clinical practice, thereby reducing the observed regional and hospital variations and potential IVC filter overutilization.

Retrieval of tip-embedded inferior vena cava filters using endobronchial forceps is a well-described technique. The tip of dorsally tilted filters may be in proximity to the right renal artery, increasing the risk of arterial injury during retrieval. We present one case that illustrates renal artery injury requiring emergent stent graft repair. The three subsequent cases illustrate techniques that avoid renal artery injury using a femoral and jugular approach with the assistance of an arterial fiducial wire. Renal artery injury is a potential complication during retrieval of filters using endobronchial forceps that can be prevented with careful planning.

AbstractRadiofrequency ablation (RFA) is one of the first developed minimally invasive definitive cancer therapies. The safety and efficacy of RFA is well documented and has led to its incorporation into multiple international societal guidelines. By expanding on the body of knowledge acquired during the clinical use of RFA, alternative ablative technologies have emerged and are successfully competing for locoregional therapy market share. The adaption of newer ablative technologies is leading to a rapid decline in the utilization of RFA by interventional radiologists despite the lack of proven superiority. In their 2010 article, Hong and Georgiades stated “… RFA is likely to remain the mainstay of ablations for small tumors until sufficient experience emerges for the widespread acceptance for alternative ablative modalities.” Within a decade of this publication, has this time arrived?