Polania-Sandoval, Camilo A

Background: Patients with abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAA) often have comorbidities that make them poor candidates for open surgical repair (OSR). Endovascular aortic aneurysm repair (EVAR) circumvents the morbidity associated with OSR of AAA. Candidacy for EVAR is impacted by multiple factors, including the quality and size of vascular access vessels and involvement of visceral arteries, as seen in paravisceral abdominal aortic aneurysms (PVAAA). Additional challenges, such as obesity, can complicate vascular access during EVAR. PVAAA may be better suited for fenestrated EVAR (FEVAR) using a physician-modified endograft (PMEG). Materials and Methods: In this report, we describe the case of a 64-year-old female patient with a complex PVAAA in the setting of significant aortoiliac occlusive disease (AIOD) with intermittent claudication. We describe a successful staged FEVAR technique in which vascular access challenges were first addressed by recanalization of the iliac system with femoral conduit (FC) creation, followed by successful FEVAR using bilateral FC for deployment of the PMEG. Conclusion: Patients with PAAA have unique and complex pathology that are clinically challenging to address. It is not uncommon that these patients also have co-morbid conditions that make them less-than ideal candidates for open repair. Patients may also have other conditions such as AIOD which make EVAR complex. Staged approach with iliac recanalization and femoral conduit creation followed by FEVAR with PMEG is an effective treatment option for high-risk complex patients and can help avoid common complications such as groin infection and delay in FEVAR which may result in a catastrophic event such as interval AAA rupture.

Objective To evaluate outcomes in patients with type 2 endoleak (T2E) and the impact of treatment outside the device instructions for use (IFU). Methods This retrospective single-center study included abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAA) patients who underwent EVAR (2011- 2024). Primary outcomes were 30-day and mid-term complications, reintervention, and mortality by T2E status. Propensity score matching was applied and secondary analysis stratified outcomes by IFU compliance, comparing within ( in IFU) or outside( out IFU) IFU in each T2E group. Results Among 154 EVAR patients (137 men (89.1%) and 17 women (11.0%); mean age 77.5 ± 7.6 years), 77 were T2E(−), and 77 were T2E(+). Baseline characteristics were similar. Thirty-day complications were comparable (T2E(−): 5, 6.4% vs T2E(+): 2, 2.56%, P = 0.72). The mean follow-up duration was 2.7 ± 2.4 years. Sac diameter change (Δ) decreased in the T2E(−) (7.7 ± 8.4 mm) and enlarged in the T2E(+) (1.79 ± 12.5 mm; P < 0.01). Mid-term graft-related complications (T2E(−): 3, 3.8% vs T2E(+): 49, 62.8%, P < 0.01) and reinterventions (T2E(−): 3, 3.8%, vs T2E(+): 20, 25.6% P < 0.01) were higher in the T2E(+) with no difference in mortality ( P = 1.00). These findings remained after excluding type 1 endoleaks. Among the T2E(+), those treated out IFU had longer hospital stays ( out IFU: 3.0 ± 2.8 days vs in IFU: 1.8 ± 2.0 days, P = 0.03), higher T1E ( out IFU: 3, 33.3% vs in IFU: 1, 4.34%, P < 0.01), higher rates of reintervention ( out IFU: 9, 100.0% vs in IFU:17; 24.6%, P < 0.01) and higher all-cause mortality than those within IFU criteria ( out IFU: 5, 55.0% vs in IFU: 13, 18.8%, P < 0.01). IFU status did not significantly affect outcomes in T2E(−) patients. Conclusions T2E is associated with sac growth and increased reinterventions, but not higher mortality. On subgroup analysis, those T2E(+) treated out IFU had longer hospitalizations, higher T1E rates, more reinterventions, and higher all-cause; but not aneurysmal-related mortality.

Background Secondary aortoenteric fistulas (SAEF) following endovascular aortic repair (EVAR) is an extremely rare event but life threatening. Our review offers comprehensive knowledge on pathophysiology, clinical presentation, diagnosis, and treatment options. Aim To summarize the current literature regarding pathophysiology, clinical, diagnostic and therapeutic approach of aortoenteric fistulas secondary to EVAR. Methods We performed a literature search in Pubmed/MEDLINE to identify the literature published about SAEF after EVAR. Cases were summarized in a table and prevalences. Other relevant literature was included in the results sections. Results A total of 35 reports (single cases and small series) with 45 patients were included. SAEF after EVAR can result from infection, inflammation, or mechanical factors. Clinical presentation is often non-specific, ranging from a gastrointestinal herald bleed to hemorrhagic shock, or malaise and general infection-related symptoms. Cross-sectional imaging plays a critical role in diagnosing SAEF. The treatment approach involves a multidisciplinary team approach and requires broad-spectrum intravenous antibiotics, endovascular intervention for urgent hemorrhage control, and open surgical intervention for definitive repair. Long-term antimicrobial therapy is essential to avoid reinfection. Conclusions SAEF following EVAR represents a complex, life-threatening condition with limited evidence-based management strategies. Given the growing prevalence of endovascular procedures, comprehensive knowledge of SAEF is crucial for all health care providers to improve early diagnosis and outcomes.

Introduction: Hypertension (HTN) is highly prevalent among patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) and end-stage kidney disease (ESKD), uncontrolled HTN as well as high blood pressure variability (BPV) can significantly impact cardiovascular health. This study aims to understand the impact of BPV in patients with ESKD following arteriovenous fistula (AVF) creation for hemodialysis, to better understand its association with age, sex, BMI, and cardiovascular risk. Methods: A retrospective analysis was conducted on 83 patients who underwent AVF creation between February 2019 and October 2020 at University of Miami Hospital. During 20 months, blood pressure measurements were collected from medical records at four different times during AVF access creation process, and BPV was quantified using machine learning clustering techniques. Results: The study identified three distinct clusters among the 83 patients with ESKD who underwent AVF creation. Cluster 1 ( n = 28) was characterized by high blood pressure variability, with a mean systolic blood pressure standard deviation of 16.2 mmHg. This cluster exhibited a significantly higher cardiovascular risk rate of 42.9% compared to Cluster 2 ( n = 30) and Cluster 3 ( n = 25), which had lower variability with mean systolic blood pressure standard deviations of 10.3 and 8.7 mmHg, respectively, and cardiovascular risk rates of 16.7% and 12.0%. Age, sex, and BMI did not differ significantly across the clusters. Conclusion: This study underscores the association between blood pressure variability and the increased risk of cardiovascular events, including myocardial infraction, stroke or heart failure in patients with ESKD undergoing AVF creation. Our findings highlight the critical need for vigilant monitoring of blood pressure fluctuations in this population and demonstrate how these variations are influenced by individual demographic factors. Further research is needed to develop targeted interventions to mitigate this risk.

Introduction: Extracranial carotid artery pathology accounts for 15-20% of ischemic strokes. Advancements in magnetic resonance angiography (MRA) with vessel wall imaging (VWI) have enabled the identification of vulnerable plaques, aiding in risk stratification for neurovascular events. This pilot study aimed to identify proteins in plaques with and without vulnerable features on MRA with VWI. Hypothesis: There is a differential proteomic profile of vulnerable and non-vulnerable, thus, these can serve as potential biomarkers for disease progression, stroke prevention, and therapeutic targets. Methods: Consecutive patients undergoing carotid endarterectomy (CEA) were included in the study cohort with pre-operative MRA with VWI. A retrospective chart review was conducted to extract pertinent clinical data including cardiovascular risk factors and medications. The proteomic analysis involved Tandem Mass Tag (TMTpro) labeling of peptides, basic pH HPLC fractionation, and NanoLC-tandem mass spectrometry. Results: A total of sixteen plaques were retrieved from fifteen patients. There were 73.3% male patients. The most common comorbidities were hyperlipidemia (93.3%) and hypertension (80%). 31.2% of patients had symptomatic disease. Eleven plaques were vulnerable in preoperative MRI with VWI. From those, intraplaque hemorrhage was the most common feature (81.1%) . Proteomic analysis revealed 23 relevant proteins significantly elevated in vulnerable plaques, including Proteinase 3 (PRTN3), Phospholipid Transfer Protein (PLTP), and S100 Calcium-Binding Protein A12 (S100A12), with increased abundance exceeding two-fold changes or above (P<0.001). Conversely, three proteins exhibited reduced abundance in vulnerable plaques including Dynamin-3 (DNM3), Transmembrane Protein 181 (TMEM181), and Adducin-3 (ADD3) (P<0.05). All results are summarized in Figure 1A-C and Table I and II. Conclusion: This study contributes to the understanding of protein biomarkers associated with carotid plaque vulnerability, offering insights into disease progression, stroke prevention, and identification of potential therapeutic targets (Figure 1D) . Furthermore, these patients could benefit from early surgical intervention if these biomarkers were to be detected. We present a comprehensive study of multiple proteins with significant bioavailability in explanted plaque specimens that can serve as a foundation for identifying blood biomarkers for future validation studies.

Loeys-Dietz syndrome (LDS) has been associated with multiple vascular abnormalities involving the entire arterial tree. However, limited reports regarding compromise in the aortoiliac and femoral bifurcation are available. Further, recommendations for optimal approach, thresholds for diameter at the time of surgery, and surveillance are also limited. We present a case of a 67-year-old male patient with LDS and aneurysmal aortoiliac and enlarging common femoral arteries aneurysms, who underwent open surgical repair. His past surgical history included multiple vascular interventions for lower extremity claudication and bilateral hip replacements. The right hip arthroplasty was previously removed due to infection. From the vascular standpoint, the patient underwent staged endovascular left hypogastric artery embolization and open aorto-bi-profunda bypass with a Rifampin-soaked Dacron graft. At 5-month follow-up, he remains asymptomatic with healed incisions and patent bypasses. This case highlights the challenges in managing peripheral aneurysms in LDS patients, emphasizing the need for tailored treatment strategies. While open repair is preferred, endovascular options may be considered in selected cases. Surveillance remains critical with annual cross-sectional imaging. Surgical planning is intricate due to comorbidities, anatomical complexities, and previous surgical infection. Surveillance of these patients must be strict as multiple vascular and non-vascular complications may arise. Therefore, collaborative decision-making is essential for optimal outcomes in this known high-risk population with connective tissue disorders.