Montoya, Christopher

Background Secondary aortoenteric fistulas (SAEF) following endovascular aortic repair (EVAR) is an extremely rare event but life threatening. Our review offers comprehensive knowledge on pathophysiology, clinical presentation, diagnosis, and treatment options. Aim To summarize the current literature regarding pathophysiology, clinical, diagnostic and therapeutic approach of aortoenteric fistulas secondary to EVAR. Methods We performed a literature search in Pubmed/MEDLINE to identify the literature published about SAEF after EVAR. Cases were summarized in a table and prevalences. Other relevant literature was included in the results sections. Results A total of 35 reports (single cases and small series) with 45 patients were included. SAEF after EVAR can result from infection, inflammation, or mechanical factors. Clinical presentation is often non-specific, ranging from a gastrointestinal herald bleed to hemorrhagic shock, or malaise and general infection-related symptoms. Cross-sectional imaging plays a critical role in diagnosing SAEF. The treatment approach involves a multidisciplinary team approach and requires broad-spectrum intravenous antibiotics, endovascular intervention for urgent hemorrhage control, and open surgical intervention for definitive repair. Long-term antimicrobial therapy is essential to avoid reinfection. Conclusions SAEF following EVAR represents a complex, life-threatening condition with limited evidence-based management strategies. Given the growing prevalence of endovascular procedures, comprehensive knowledge of SAEF is crucial for all health care providers to improve early diagnosis and outcomes.

Introduction: Hypertension (HTN) is highly prevalent among patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) and end-stage kidney disease (ESKD), uncontrolled HTN as well as high blood pressure variability (BPV) can significantly impact cardiovascular health. This study aims to understand the impact of BPV in patients with ESKD following arteriovenous fistula (AVF) creation for hemodialysis, to better understand its association with age, sex, BMI, and cardiovascular risk. Methods: A retrospective analysis was conducted on 83 patients who underwent AVF creation between February 2019 and October 2020 at University of Miami Hospital. During 20 months, blood pressure measurements were collected from medical records at four different times during AVF access creation process, and BPV was quantified using machine learning clustering techniques. Results: The study identified three distinct clusters among the 83 patients with ESKD who underwent AVF creation. Cluster 1 ( n = 28) was characterized by high blood pressure variability, with a mean systolic blood pressure standard deviation of 16.2 mmHg. This cluster exhibited a significantly higher cardiovascular risk rate of 42.9% compared to Cluster 2 ( n = 30) and Cluster 3 ( n = 25), which had lower variability with mean systolic blood pressure standard deviations of 10.3 and 8.7 mmHg, respectively, and cardiovascular risk rates of 16.7% and 12.0%. Age, sex, and BMI did not differ significantly across the clusters. Conclusion: This study underscores the association between blood pressure variability and the increased risk of cardiovascular events, including myocardial infraction, stroke or heart failure in patients with ESKD undergoing AVF creation. Our findings highlight the critical need for vigilant monitoring of blood pressure fluctuations in this population and demonstrate how these variations are influenced by individual demographic factors. Further research is needed to develop targeted interventions to mitigate this risk.