Erben, Young

Introduction We present a case of acute limb ischemia (ALI) in a morbidly obese patient with prior femoro-popliteal artery PTFE bypass occlusion successfully treated with a hybrid femoral-to-posterior tibial artery bypass utilizing the previously occluded graft. Case Report A 69-year-old morbidly obese woman presented with acute left leg pain and numbness with preserved motor function. Computed tomography angiography (CTA) demonstrates chronic superficial femoral artery and femoro-popliteal PTFE bypass occlusion with a new native popliteal artery thrombosis and loss of tibial runoffs. After systemic heparinization, the leg was revascularized through a small medial thigh incision and a jump PTFE bypass to the posterior tibial artery. The previously occluded femoro-popliteal artery bypass was accessed to re-establish proximal flow through a retrograde endovascular construction using a 7 mm by 25 cm Viabahn (Gore, Flagstaff, AZ) stent. This stent was used as a bridge with distal deployment within a new 6 mm PTFE graft, which was then anastomosed in an end to side fashion to a Linton patch of the posterior tibial artery. There were no postoperative complications, and the ankle-brachial-index was measured to be 0.98 with a CTA with runoffs confirming bypass patency. Discussion ALI in the setting of a prior bypass occlusion in a morbidly obese patient reflects the typical contemporary patient and disease complexity, which demands corrective revascularization with appropriate mitigation/prevention of other postoperative complications. A limited thigh exposure to access a previously occluded bypass can successfully restore in-line flow in these high-risk patients. Conclusion Hybrid lower extremity revascularization is an alternative surgical modality to restore in-line flow to a lower extremity as a limb salvage option while avoiding groin re-exploration in a previously accessed groin for bypass construction in a morbidly obese patient.

Introduction Endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair (EVAR) is the primary treatment for abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA). Despite favorable early outcomes, lifelong surveillance is essential as endoleaks remain a major cause of reintervention. Among these, type II endoleaks (T2E) remain controversial regarding optimal management. This study aimed to identify factors associated with intervention for T2E using time-to-event analysis and predefined anatomic thresholds. Secondary objectives included comparing outcomes between T2E patients with (intT2E) and without (nointT2E) intervention. Methods A retrospective review of EVAR procedures from 2011-2024 was performed. Patients with newly diagnosed or persistent T2E were identified on completion and follow-up CT angiography. Patients were categorized as intT2E or nointT2E. Multivariable Cox regression evaluated time to first intervention, and logistic regression served as sensitivity analysis. Kaplan-Meier curves assessed freedom from intervention by inferior mesenteric artery (IMA) size. Results Among 207 EVAR patients, 78 (37.6%) developed T2E over a mean 3.4 ± 2.4 years. Nineteen (24.3%) required intervention. IntT2E patients were younger (74.9 ± 6.8 vs 78.3 ± 7.9 years, P = 0.02), had more frequent anticoagulation use (47.4% vs 20.3%, P = 0.02), larger IMAs (4.2 ± 0.6 vs 3.3 ± 0.7 mm, P < 0.01), and more lumbar arteries (6.0 ± 1.2 vs 5.0 ± 1.3, P = 0.02). IMAs >4 mm occurred in 68.4% of intT2E vs 8.5% of nointT2E ( P < 0.01). Mean sac growth was greater in intT2E (9.7 ± 5.3 mm vs −1.9 ± 6.5 mm, P < 0.01). Thirty-day complications following the index EVAR procedure, mid-term reinterventions, and overall mortality were similar between groups. Post-embolization, T2E resolved in 36.9%, with sac regression in 63.1%. Among embolized patients, 26.3% required a second embolization and one patient required 3 attempts without achieving resolution. IMA >4 mm independently predicted intervention (HR 7.18, 95% CI 1.97-26.16, P < 0.01). Logistic regression confirmed IMA >4 mm (OR 23.4, 95% CI 6.17-88.6, P < 0.01), >6 lumbar arteries (OR 4.2, 95% CI 1.10-15.98, P = 0.02), and anticoagulation (OR 3.4, 95% CI 1.17-10.6, P = 0.02) as predictors. Conclusions Approximately one-quarter of T2E patients required embolization. IMA >4 mm was the strongest predictor of intervention, while anticoagulation and increased lumbar artery number also increased risk. Management should prioritize risk-stratified surveillance and selective intervention.