Hybrid Lower Extremity Revascularization Avoiding Groin Re-Exploration in a Morbidly Obese Patient With Acute Limb Ischemia After Failed Femoral-Popliteal PTFE Bypass: A Case Report and Literature Review
Introduction We present a case of acute limb ischemia (ALI) in a morbidly obese patient with prior femoro-popliteal artery PTFE bypass occlusion successfully treated with a hybrid femoral-to-posterior tibial artery bypass utilizing the previously occluded graft. Case Report A 69-year-old morbidly obese woman presented with acute left leg pain and numbness with preserved motor function. Computed tomography angiography (CTA) demonstrates chronic superficial femoral artery and femoro-popliteal PTFE bypass occlusion with a new native popliteal artery thrombosis and loss of tibial runoffs. After systemic heparinization, the leg was revascularized through a small medial thigh incision and a jump PTFE bypass to the posterior tibial artery. The previously occluded femoro-popliteal artery bypass was accessed to re-establish proximal flow through a retrograde endovascular construction using a 7 mm by 25 cm Viabahn (Gore, Flagstaff, AZ) stent. This stent was used as a bridge with distal deployment within a new 6 mm PTFE graft, which was then anastomosed in an end to side fashion to a Linton patch of the posterior tibial artery. There were no postoperative complications, and the ankle-brachial-index was measured to be 0.98 with a CTA with runoffs confirming bypass patency. Discussion ALI in the setting of a prior bypass occlusion in a morbidly obese patient reflects the typical contemporary patient and disease complexity, which demands corrective revascularization with appropriate mitigation/prevention of other postoperative complications. A limited thigh exposure to access a previously occluded bypass can successfully restore in-line flow in these high-risk patients. Conclusion Hybrid lower extremity revascularization is an alternative surgical modality to restore in-line flow to a lower extremity as a limb salvage option while avoiding groin re-exploration in a previously accessed groin for bypass construction in a morbidly obese patient.
Static Muscular Stretching Improves Microvascular Function in the Calf Muscles of Patients with Peripheral Artery Disease
Purpose: Supervised walking exercise is a critical component of rehabilitation for patients with peripheral artery disease (PAD); however, various barriers could limit participation in such programs, highlighting the need for accessible exercise strategies that may facilitate a gradual transition to more intensive physical activity while improving vascular function and walking performance in this population. We examined the hypothesis that static muscular stretching would improve microvascular function and walking ability in patients with PAD. Methods: Thirty-six PAD patients, classified as Fontaine Stage II or III, were randomized into stretching or non-stretching groups. The stretching group performed daily calf stretching using an ankle dorsiflexion splint for 30 minutes, 5 days a week, for 4 weeks. The six-minute walk test (6MWT) and a vascular occlusion test were used to assess changes in walking ability and calf microvascular function before and after the intervention. Results: Microvascular hyperemic reperfusion significantly increased in the treatment group (4958±1111 to 5749±1459 %*s, p=0.034), with no change observed in the control group (5502±1231 to 5022±1160 %*s, p=0.155). 6MWT total walking distance increased in all participants (260±88 to 285±85 m, p=0.004). A moderate but non-significant correlation was observed between the changes in 6MWT and total walking distance and reperfusion index in the treatment group (r=0.45, p=0.26). Conclusions: Static muscular stretching improves microvascular perfusion in the calf muscles, which may contribute to improvement in walking ability in patients with PAD. This low-cost and time-saving intervention may serve as a gradual transition to traditional supervised walking exercise rehabilitation, especially in patients with severely impaired walking ability.
Predictors for Type 2 Endoleak Requiring Embolization: Large Inferior Mesenteric Artery, Multiple Lumbar Arteries, and Anticoagulation
Introduction Endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair (EVAR) is the primary treatment for abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA). Despite favorable early outcomes, lifelong surveillance is essential as endoleaks remain a major cause of reintervention. Among these, type II endoleaks (T2E) remain controversial regarding optimal management. This study aimed to identify factors associated with intervention for T2E using time-to-event analysis and predefined anatomic thresholds. Secondary objectives included comparing outcomes between T2E patients with (intT2E) and without (nointT2E) intervention. Methods A retrospective review of EVAR procedures from 2011-2024 was performed. Patients with newly diagnosed or persistent T2E were identified on completion and follow-up CT angiography. Patients were categorized as intT2E or nointT2E. Multivariable Cox regression evaluated time to first intervention, and logistic regression served as sensitivity analysis. Kaplan-Meier curves assessed freedom from intervention by inferior mesenteric artery (IMA) size. Results Among 207 EVAR patients, 78 (37.6%) developed T2E over a mean 3.4 ± 2.4 years. Nineteen (24.3%) required intervention. IntT2E patients were younger (74.9 ± 6.8 vs 78.3 ± 7.9 years, P = 0.02), had more frequent anticoagulation use (47.4% vs 20.3%, P = 0.02), larger IMAs (4.2 ± 0.6 vs 3.3 ± 0.7 mm, P < 0.01), and more lumbar arteries (6.0 ± 1.2 vs 5.0 ± 1.3, P = 0.02). IMAs >4 mm occurred in 68.4% of intT2E vs 8.5% of nointT2E ( P < 0.01). Mean sac growth was greater in intT2E (9.7 ± 5.3 mm vs −1.9 ± 6.5 mm, P < 0.01). Thirty-day complications following the index EVAR procedure, mid-term reinterventions, and overall mortality were similar between groups. Post-embolization, T2E resolved in 36.9%, with sac regression in 63.1%. Among embolized patients, 26.3% required a second embolization and one patient required 3 attempts without achieving resolution. IMA >4 mm independently predicted intervention (HR 7.18, 95% CI 1.97-26.16, P < 0.01). Logistic regression confirmed IMA >4 mm (OR 23.4, 95% CI 6.17-88.6, P < 0.01), >6 lumbar arteries (OR 4.2, 95% CI 1.10-15.98, P = 0.02), and anticoagulation (OR 3.4, 95% CI 1.17-10.6, P = 0.02) as predictors. Conclusions Approximately one-quarter of T2E patients required embolization. IMA >4 mm was the strongest predictor of intervention, while anticoagulation and increased lumbar artery number also increased risk. Management should prioritize risk-stratified surveillance and selective intervention.