Chris-Olaiya, Abimbola

Background Safety-net hospitals (SNH) provide care to a significant proportion of low-income, uninsured, and underserved populations disproportionately affected by the COVID-19 pandemic. We evaluated the impact of safety-net burden on outcomes of COVID-19 hospitalizations. Methods We identified patients aged ≥ 18 years hospitalized with COVID-19 from the nationwide inpatient database using the International Classification of Diseases, Tenth Edition (ICD-10-CM) code U07.1. The primary study outcomes were inpatient mortality, respiratory failure requiring mechanical ventilation, and tracheostomy use. Secondary outcomes were total hospitalization costs (THC) and length of hospital stay (LOS). Multivariable logistic regression was used to compare the primary and secondary outcomes in HBH and medium safety-net burden (MBH) with lower-burden hospitals (LBH) (reference). Results An estimated 2,608,232 COVID-19 hospitalizations met the inclusion criteria, with 68.7% occurring in HBH, 22.8% in MBH, and 8.5% in LBH. On adjusted multivariable analysis, HBH was associated with increased odds of inpatient mortality (aOR 1.19, 95% CI 1.09-1.28) compared with LBH. Both HBH (aOR 1.30, 95% CI 1.21-1.40) and MBH (aOR 1.14, 95% CI 1.06-1.24) demonstrated increased odds of mechanical ventilation compared with LBH. THC was lower in HBH and MBH compared with LBH. The LOS was similar across safety net burden categories. Conclusion After adjusting for patient- and hospital-level factors, COVID-19 hospitalizations at HBH had inferior inpatient outcomes compared with LBH. Targeted policy reforms are needed to address the underlying causes of these disparities and increase our health systems’ readiness for future crises, particularly in underserved communities.

Background: Safety net hospitals treat a large burden of uninsured, or Medicaid insured patients, and have been linked to worse outcomes across several medical and surgical conditions. Currently, there is limited data on the effect of safety net burden on outcomes of inpatient cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) for patients that suffered in-hospital cardiac arrest (IHCA) in the US. Hypothesis: Patients that experience IHCA in high burden safety net hospitals (HBH) will have worse outcomes compared to low burden safety net hospitals (LBH). Methods: Using the National Inpatient Sample database, from 2008 – 2018, we identified patients aged ≥ 18 years who experienced IHCA, using International Classification of Diseases (ICD) codes. Hospitals’ safety net burden was calculated from the proportions of Medicaid and uninsured patients using previously published methodology and categorized into LBH and HBH. Multivariate regression models were used to estimate the odds of key clinical outcomes Result: From 2008 to 2018, an estimated 555,016 unweighted adult hospitalizations underwent CPR for IHCA, out of which 19.2 % occurred at LBH and 55.2 % occurred at HBH. Compared with LBH, patients at HBH on average were younger 62 years ± 20 vs 67 years ± 17), less likely to be of White race, and more likely to be in the lowest median household income. On multivariate regression analysis, HBH was associated with lower chances of survival to hospital discharge (aOR 0.88; 95% CI 0.85 – 0.96) and lower odds of routine discharge (aOR 0.6; 95% CI 0.47 – 0.75)), compared to LBH. Patients who suffered IHCA in safety net hospitals with medium and large hospital bed size (aOR 0.96; 95% CI 0.94 – 0.98) and those publicly owned (aOR 0.95; 95% CI 0.92 – 0.98) were less likely to survive to hospital discharge. Median household income of patients in the 26 th – 100 th quartile and hospital location in the Midwest and Southern region were associated with better odds of hospital survival. Conclusion: Our study suggests that patients who experience IHCA at HBH had lower rates and odds of in-hospital survival and also less likely to be routinely discharged home. Patients’ income level and hospital-level characteristics appear to contribute to survival.

Background: Overall inferior vena cava filter (IVCF) utilization has decreased in the United States since the 2010 US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) safety communication. The FDA renewed this safety warning in 2014 with additional mandates on reporting IVCF-related adverse events. We evaluated the impact of the FDA recommendations on IVCF placements for different indications from 2010 to 2019 and further assessed utilization trends by region and hospital teaching status. Methods: Inferior vena cava filter placements between 2010 and 2019 were identified in the Nationwide Inpatient Sample database using the associated International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, Clinical Modification, and Tenth Revision codes. Inferior vena cava filter placements were categorized by indication for venous thromboembolism (VTE) “treatment” in patients with VTE diagnosis and contraindication to anticoagulation and “prophylaxis” in patients without VTE. Generalized linear regression was used to analyze utilization trends. Results: A total of 823 717 IVCFs were placed over the study period, of which 644 663 (78.3%) were for VTE treatment and 179 054 (21.7%) were for prophylaxis indications. The median age for both categories of patients was 68 years. The total number of IVCFs placed for all indications decreased from 129 616 in 2010 to 58 465 in 2019, with an aggregate decline rate of −8.4%. The decline rate was higher between 2014 and 2019 than between 2010 and 2014 (−11.6% vs −7.2%). From 2010 to 2019, IVCF placement for VTE treatment and prophylaxis trended downward at rates of −7.9% and −10.2%, respectively. Urban nonteaching hospitals saw the highest decline for both VTE treatment (−17.2%) and prophylactic indications (−18.0%). Hospitals located in the Northeast region had the highest decline rates for VTE treatment (−10.3%) and prophylactic indications (−12.5%). Conclusion: The higher decline rate in IVCF placements between 2014 and 2019 compared with 2010 and 2014 suggests an additional impact of the renewed 2014 FDA safety indications on national IVCF utilization. Variations in IVCF use for VTE treatment and prophylactic indications existed across hospital teaching types, locations, and regions. Clinical Impact Inferior vena cava filters (IVCF) are associated with medical complications. The 2010 and 2014 FDA safety warnings appeared to have synergistically contributed to a significant decline in IVCF utilization rates from 2010 – 2019 in the US. IVC filter placements in patients without venous thromboembolism (VTE) declined at a higher rate than VTE. However, IVCF utilization varied across hospitals and geographical locations, likely due to the absence of universally accepted clinical guidelines on IVCF indications and use. Harmonization of IVCF placement guidelines is needed to standardize clinical practice, thereby reducing the observed regional and hospital variations and potential IVC filter overutilization.

IMPORTANCE: High safety-net burden hospitals (HBHs) treating large numbers of uninsured or Medicaid-insured patients have generally been linked to worse clinical outcomes. However, limited data exist on the impact of the hospitals’ safety-net burden on in-hospital cardiac arrest (IHCA) outcomes in the United States. OBJECTIVES: To compare the differences in survival to discharge, routine discharge home, and healthcare resource utilization between patients at HBH with those treated at low safety-net burden hospital (LBH). DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Retrospective cohort study across hospitals in the United States: Hospitalized patients greater than or equal to 18 years that underwent cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) between 2008 and 2018 identified from the Nationwide Inpatient Database. Data analysis was conducted in January 2022. EXPOSURE: IHCA. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: The primary outcome is survival to hospital discharge. Other outcomes are routine discharge home among survivors, length of hospital stay, and total hospitalization cost RESULTS: From 2008 to 2018, an estimated 555,016 patients were hospitalized with IHCA, of which 19.2% occurred at LBH and 55.2% at HBH. Compared with LBH, patients at HBH were younger (62 ± 20 yr vs 67 ± 17 yr) and predominantly in the lowest median household income (< 25th percentile). In multivariate analysis, HBH was associated with lower chances of survival to hospital discharge (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 0.88; 95% CI, 0.85–0.96) and lower odds of routine discharge (aOR, 0.6; 95% CI, 0.47–0.75), compared with LBH. In addition, IHCA patients at publicly owned hospitals and those with medium and large hospital bed size were less likely to survive to hospital discharge, while patients with median household income greater than 25th percentile had better odds of hospital survival. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Our study suggests that patients who experience IHCA at HBH may have lower rates and odds of in-hospital survival and are less likely to be routinely discharged home after CPR. Median household income and hospital-level characteristics appear to contribute to survival.

Abstract Introduction. Commonly prescribed medications are associated with various gastrointestinal (GI) side effects but few data are available on prescription medication use and polypharmacy in a gastroenterology outpatient practice. We aimed to examine the prevalence of polypharmacy, defined as the simultaneous use of 5 or more medications. Methods. A descriptive correlational study of consecutive outpatient consultations in 988 patients referred to a tertiary gastroenterology practice. Main outcome measurements were frequency of prescription medication use and polypharmacy. Results. The most common GI symptoms were abdominal pain (72%), nausea (57%), and constipation (53%). The frequency of polypharmacy was 10%. Eighty percent of patients took at least one medication and 60% took two or more. The most frequently used medication classes were proton pump inhibitors (43%), followed by benzodiazepines (30%), selective serotonin-reuptake or norepinephrine-reuptake inhibitors (28%), non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (27%), and opioids (21%). Conclusion. There was a higher use of prescription medicine including antidepressants, and a lower frequency of polypharmacy in our study cohort compared to the general population. The use of medications may have contributed to the symptoms leading to our study’s population GI consultation.

INTRODUCTION: High nursing turnover has long been recognized as a fiscally and emotionally costly phenomenon in gastrointestinal (GI) endoscopy units. Previous studies suggest high turnover may be partly attributed to job-related stress in GI endoscopy units and lack of educational opportunities. A retrospective review of nursing turnover rate in 2016 at Mayo Clinic Florida GI endoscopy unit found the turnover rate to be 25%, which is twice the average of other departments at the clinical site. We aimed to reduce endoscopy staff turnover rate to less than 25% and improve job satisfaction by improving knowledge of GI diseases through structured didactic sessions. METHODS: A descriptive correlational study of the impact of a six-month long optional educational curriculum on professional quality of life and employee turnover was performed. All endoscopy nurses and technicians employed at Mayo Clinic in Florida were recruited, but both study enrollment and participation were blinded and voluntary. Data on clinical gastroenterological knowledge and surveys on professional satisfaction and team cohesion were collected at the initiation of the curriculum and at one month after completion. Pre and post intervention knowledge scores were compared using the Wilcoxon signed rank test. The annual percentage of turnover was estimated by the Wilson score confidence interval. RESULTS: All available GI nurses and endoscopy technicians (n = 71) were invited to participate. 40 (56.3%) participants completed only the initial survey, 30 (42.3%) only the second survey, and 16 (22.9%) both surveys. Of those who completed both surveys, median quiz scores improved by 2 questions for those that attended 6 or more lectures ( P = 0.017). There was a trend towards increased professional satisfaction on the modified perceived cohesion scale in participants who attended 6 or more lectures ( P = 0.095). For participants who have worked in the unit for less than 1 year, the estimated turnover is 14% (6 – 38%, P > 0.05) and 24% (11 – 45%, P >0.05) for those who have worked longer than 1 year. CONCLUSION: Though limited by sample size, there is a trend towards improved job satisfaction for participants that completed all surveys and a reduction in turnover rate for staff who have worked in the unit for less than one year. This study suggests potential benefit in knowledge, professional satisfaction, and turnover for those offered voluntary education.