Yang, Suk‐Kyun

Background:Crohn’s disease (CD) exhibits variability in colorectal cancer (CRC) incidence and prognostic factors due to diverse clinical and behavioral characteristics, presenting inconsistencies between Western and Eastern patients.Objectives:This study compared clinical characteristics between CD patients with CRC from the US and Korean tertiary referral centers and defined the prognostic factors related to mortality.Design:Retrospective study.Methods:We reviewed the electronic medical records of 236 adult CD patients with colorectal adenocarcinoma evaluated at Mayo Clinic Rochester, Florida, or Arizona ( N = 200) and Asan Medical Center in Korea ( N = 36) between January 1989 and August 2022.Results:Asan patients had a younger age, shorter CD duration, more colonic involvement (L2 plus L3), penetrating behavior, perianal fistula, and shorter biological treatment duration before CRC diagnosis than Mayo patients. Furthermore, despite significant differences in body mass index, smoking status, primary sclerosing cholangitis, immunomodulators, CRC diagnosis period, clinical presentation, CRC location, surgery, and some histopathological details between the two groups, overall survival was not statistically different ( p value, 0.29, log-rank test). Advanced age (adjusted hazard ratio (aHR), 1.03 per year; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.01–1.04; p value, <0.01), unresectable CRC (aHR, 5.02; 95% CI, 2.49–10.12; p value, <0.01), and advanced CRC stage (aHR, 1.45 per stage; 95% CI, 1.07–1.97; p value, 0.02) were significantly associated with increased risk of death. CD remission at CRC diagnosis (aHR, 0.26; 95% CI, 0.08–0.91; p value, 0.04), CRC diagnosis period of 2011–2022 (aHR relative to 1989–2000, 0.46; 95% CI, 0.25–0.87; p value, 0.02), and CRC diagnosis by surveillance (aHR, 0.56; 95% CI, 0.32–0.98; p value, 0.04) were significantly associated with decreased risk of death.Conclusion:Notably, some clinical features of CD with CRC differed between Asan and Mayo patients; however, overall survival was not different. CD remission, CRC surveillance, and more recent diagnosis of CRC were associated with a reduced risk of death.

Abstract During the 20th century, inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) was considered a disease of early-industrialized regions in North America, Europe, and Oceania. At the turn of the 21st century, incidence of IBD increased in newly-industrialized and emerging regions in Africa, Asia, and Latin America, while prevalence in early-industrialized regions started to grow steadily. Changes in incidence and prevalence denote evolution of IBD across four epidemiologic stages: Stage 1 (Emergence), characterized by low incidence and prevalence; stage 2 (Acceleration in Incidence), characterized by rapidly rising incidence and low prevalence; and stage 3 (Compounding Prevalence), characterized by decelerating, plateauing, or declining incidence and steadily rising prevalence. A fourth stage (Prevalence Equilibrium) has been proposed where the slope of prevalence plateaus due to shifting demographics of an aging IBD population, but it has not yet been evidenced. To date, these stages have been theoretical without specific incidence/prevalence indicators defining transition points. Using real-world data from 490 population-based studies comprising 80 global regions and spanning over a century (1920–2023), we show spatiotemporal transitions across stages 1–3 and model transition towards stage 4. Understanding the evolution of IBD across epidemiologic stages allows healthcare systems to better prepare for the future worldwide burden of IBD.

Goals: The study aimed to compare the level and characteristics of disease-related knowledge of patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) between the West and the East using an international version of a questionnaire regarding knowledge of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD-KNOW). Background: The authors recently developed a new questionnaire regarding IBD-KNOW, which showed excellent test characteristics in Korea. Study: The IBD-KNOW questionnaire was administered to 100 patients with IBD from tertiary referral hospitals in the United States and Korea. Scores were calculated and compared between US and Korean patients, and factors associated with high scores were analyzed. Results: A total of 196 (100 US and 96 Korean) patients with IBD completed the questionnaires. Analysis of the baseline characteristics revealed that male sex, smoking status, disease duration, history of IBD-related operations, family history of IBD, and use of corticosteroids or biologics were significantly different between US and Korean patients. The mean IBD-KNOW score was higher in US patients than in Korean patients (14.8 vs. 11.3; P<0.001). Multivariate analyses showed that a high IBD-KNOW score (top 25%) was associated with a positive family history of IBD (odds ratio, 2.90; P=0.025) in US patients with IBD and with the use of biologics (odds ratio, 3.65; P=0.008) in Korean patients with IBD. Conclusions: The IBD-KNOW questionnaire, an updated assessment tool of IBD-related knowledge, is simple, reliable, and available in various patient populations. IBD-KNOW can be used to identify the factors affecting the level of IBD-related knowledge to improve the quality of care in patients with IBD through a personalized approach.