Badar, Talha

e18590 Background: TP53 mutations ( TP53 MUT ) are known to be associated with adverse prognosis in acute myeloid leukemia (AML) and multihit TP53 MUT in myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS). The prognostic relevance of multihit TP53 MUT in myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPN) was recently highlighted. The current study illustrates survival comparisons in multihit TP53- mutated MPN vs. AML and analysis of associated risk factors. Methods: A Mayo Clinic enterprise-wide database search identified 61 MPN and 81 AML cases with multihit TP53 MUT . Conventional statistical methods were used for analyses. Results: 142 patients with multihit TP53 MUT were included: i) chronic phase MPN (MPN-CP; N=19), ii) accelerated phase MPN (MPN-AP; N=14), iii) blast phase MPN (MPN-BP; N=28) and iv) AML, not including MPN-BP (N=81). Concomitant ASXL1 MUT , EZH2 MUT , IDH1 MUT and IDH2 MUT were more common in MPN-BP, compared to AML. At a median follow up of 0.6 years, 124 (87%) deaths and 19 (13%) allogeneic stem cell transplantations (ASCT) were documented. Overall survival (OS), calculated from time of TP53 MUT detection was similar between MPN-BP (median 4.6 months) and MPN-AP (5.6 months; p=0.5). OS in MPN-BP/AP (median 4.8 months) was inferior to that of AML (median 7.4 months; p=0.04) while that of MPN-CP (median 11.6 months) was similar to AML (0.07) but superior to that of MPN-BP/AP (p<0.01). Age-adjusted multivariable analysis (MVA) confirmed the independent prognostic significance of undergoing ASCT (HR 0.4, p=0.03), MPN-CP or achieving response to pre-transplant therapy (HR 0.2, p<0.01), and concurrent TET2 MUT or DNMT3A MUT (HR 2.7, p<0.01) on OS. Based on these risk factors, a 3-tiered risk model was constructed: low (no risk factors; N=18; median OS 23.8 months); intermediate (1 risk factor; N=44; median 11.1 months); and high (2 or more risk factors; N=80; median 4 months; p<0.01). Comparative analysis of risk factors among distinct diseases confirmed the prognostic significance of ASCT (HR 0.3, p=0.03), achieving response to pre-transplant therapy (0.4, p<0.01) and concurrent TET2 MUT or DNMT3A MUT (HR 5.0, p<0.01) in AML. In MPN AP/BP, OS was influenced by having received chemotherapy vs. supportive care (HR 0.1; p<0.01) and achieving response to pre-transplant therapy (0.2, p<0.01). No significant risk factors for OS were identified in MPN-CP. In MVA, ASCT did not appear to influence OS in MPN AP/BP (p=0.7) and MPN-CP (p=0.4) but the number of informative cases was too low to make definitive conclusions. Conclusions: The current study highlights the equally detrimental impact of multihit TP53 MUT in securing long-term survival in MPN and AML. Short-term survival was positively influenced by ASCT, at least in AML, and disease stage or remission status at time of mutation detection and ASCT, respectively.

SummaryFrom a historical perspective, the treatment landscape of myelodysplastic syndromes/neoplasms (MDS) has experienced a standstill in terms of new approvals by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration up until the recent 5 years. The widespread availability of comprehensive genome sequencing has shed insight into human MDS biology toward the goal of rational therapeutic design. This new knowledge has inspired the development of investigational therapies that extend beyond the scope of traditional erythropoiesis‐stimulating agents and hypomethylating agents. We describe how these contemporary treatment options are changing the management paradigms for lower‐risk and higher‐risk MDS, based on the landmark trial data. We discuss investigational therapies in the MDS pipeline, such as venetoclax, emavusertib, canakinumab and olutasidenib. We highlight challenges and solutions to the successful translation of emerging therapies based on our improved understanding of the biology of MDS, including the genomics of MDS with mutated TP53. We discuss how the identification of biomarkers of response to therapeutics may help guide clinical trial design for certain subsets of patients. Finally, we discuss how multicentre randomized trials can help facilitate the clinical rollout of emerging MDS therapeutics.

Abstract Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant (alloHCT) is considered for all patients with myeloid neoplasms (MNs) harboring TP53 mutations (TP53mut). The aim of this international study across 7 transplant centers in the United States and Australia was to identify factors associated with improved post-alloHCT survival. Of 134 TP53mut MN cases who underwent alloHCT, 80% harbored complex karyotype; 94% of TP53 variants were localized to the DNA-binding domain (DBD). Most common comutations were ASXL1 (7%), TET2 (7%), and DNMT3A (6%). Median post-HCT survival was 1.03 years, and overall survival (OS) at 1 year, 2 years, and 3 years was 51.4%, 35.1%, and 25.1%, respectively. A total of 103 cases (76.9%) met the International Consensus Classification (ICC) criteria for MN with mutated TP53 (referred to as ICC-defined TP53mut MN hereafter). The 3-year OS of ICC-defined TP53mut was significantly shorter compared with that of other TP53mut MNs (3-year OS, 16.9% vs 54.9%; P = .002). ICC-defined TP53mut MNs was independently associated with inferior OS (hazard ratio [HR], 2.62; P = .019). The presence of non-DBD TP53mut only (HR, 3.40; P = .005), DNMT3A comutation (HR, 2.64; P = .016), and pre-alloHCT bone marrow blasts ≥5% (HR, 2.76; P = .006) was independently associated with inferior relapse-free survival (RFS), whereas melphalan-based conditioning was associated with superior RFS (HR, 0.52; P = .005). Combining these variables, we constructed a hierarchical model that stratified patients into low-, intermediate-, and high-risk categories with 1-year RFS of 81.3%, 31.3%, and 6.7%, respectively (P &lt; .001). In conclusion, a subset of MN harboring TP53mut who have low blasts pre-alloHCT and received melphalan-based conditioning derived long-term benefit from alloHCT.

Abstract This retrospective analysis aimed to provide evidence-based risk stratification of TP53-mutated (TP53mut) myeloid neoplasms (MNs). Of 580 MNs harboring TP53mut with variant allele frequency (VAF) ≥2%, 219 (37.8%), 194 (33.4%), 92 (15.9%), and 75 (12.9%) were classified as acute myeloid leukemia (AML), myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) with low blasts (MDS-LB), MDS with excess blasts (MDS-EB)-2, and -EB1 according to the revised fourth edition of the World Health Organization (WHO) classification, respectively. Hierarchical analysis identified the following 4 risk groups with distinct survival: (1) MDS-LB, (2) MDS-EB1/EB2/AML VAF &lt;10%, (3) MDS-EB1/EB2 VAF ≥10%, and (4) AML VAF ≥10%. We next evaluated the impact of allelic status, VAF, and complex karyotype (CK). In our cohort, the significance of biallelic status was limited to MDS with &lt;5% blasts and not for blasts 5% to 9%, as proposed by the International Consensus Classification (ICC), or 5% to 19%, as proposed by the fifth edition of the WHO (WHO-5). MDS-EB1 and -EB2 with VAF ≥10% had comparable survival (9.6 vs 7.2 months; P = .12), regardless of allelic status. Contrary to the ICC proposal, MDS-EB1/EB2 with VAF &lt;10% and CK had poor survival compared with those without CK, comparable to MDS-EB1/EB2 with VAF ≥10% (5.6 vs 26.2 vs 6.3 months; P = .003). Survival of TP53mut AML was poor (median 3.9 months) regardless of allelic/CK status. Thus, using ICC or WHO-5 may underestimate prognosis of MDS with blasts 5% to 19% and 5% to 9%, respectively. Collectively, the hierarchical model acknowledges poor survival of 91.9% TP53mut MDS and AML compared with 36.5% and 80.7% by WHO-5 and ICC, respectively.

ABSTRACTA total of 142 patients with myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPNs) or acute myeloid leukemia (AML) associated with multihit TP53 mutations (mTP53 MUT) were accessed from the Mayo Clinic database and included (i) chronic phase MPN (MPN‐CP; N = 19), (ii) accelerated phase MPN (MPN‐AP; N = 14), (iii) blast phase MPN (MPN‐BP; N = 28), and (iv) AML (N = 81). Concurrent ASXL1 MUT, EZH2 MUT, IDH1,MUT and IDH2 MUT were more common in MPN‐MUTBP‐mTP53 compared to AML‐mTP53 MUT. At median of 11.6 months follow‐up, 124 (87%) deaths and 19 (13%) allogeneic stem cell transplantations (ASCT) were documented. Overall survival (OS), calculated from the time of mTP53 MUT detection, was similar between MPN‐BP‐mTP53 MUT (median 4.6 months) and MPN‐AP‐mTP53 MUT (5.6 months; p = 0.5) but both were inferior to MPN‐CP‐mTP53 MUT (11.6 months, p < 0.01). OS in MPN‐CP‐mTP53 MUT was similar to that of AML‐mTP53 MUT (median 7.4 months, p = 0.07). In multivariable analysis, OS was favorably affected by ASCT (HR 0.4, p = 0.03) and disease stage (i.e., chronic phase disease) or achieving response to pre‐transplant chemotherapy (HR 0.2, p < 0.01) and unfavorably by the presence of concurrent TET2 MUT or DNMT3A MUT (HR 2.7, p < 0.01). Based on these risk factors, a 3‐tiered risk model was constructed: low (no risk factors; N = 18; median OS 23.8 months); intermediate (one risk factor; N = 44; 11.1 months); and high (two or more risk factors; N = 80; 4 months; p < 0.01). The current study highlights the equally detrimental impact of mTP53 MUT on long‐term survival in MPN and AML and identifies predictors of short‐term survival.

SummaryGermline variants in DDX41 (DDX41MT‐germline predisposition syndrome [GPS]) are associated with predisposition to haematological malignancies (HM), including lymphoid and myeloid neoplasms (MN). We retrospectively analysed the clinical and molecular features of 195 patients diagnosed and treated at Mayo Clinic with DDX41MT‐GPS. Patients with germline DDX41 pathogenic variants (42.3%) and variants of unknown significance (VUS, 57.6%) were included. The median age was 68.6 years (16.2–93.4). Ninety‐two per cent were Caucasian, 64.1% were male and 30.8% had a family history of HM. There were 92 distinct germline variants among our cohort, and the most common was p.Met1? (15.9%), followed by p.Asp140Glyfs*2 (9.2%). Clinical diagnoses included asymptomatic carriers (10.2%), clonal cytopenia of undetermined significance (CCUS, 6.1%), myeloproliferative neoplasms (6.7%), myelodysplastic syndrome (40.5%), acute myeloid leukaemia (20.5%), lymphoid neoplasms (9.2%), plasma cell dyscrasias (6.1%) and solid tumours (22.5%). Patients with MN were older (median age 70 vs. 63.5 years) and more likely to be male (M:F ratio 2.3 vs. 1.0) and most patients (78.8%) with MN had a normal karyotype. The most common somatic variants involved DDX41 (34.4%), followed by TET2 (11.2%), DNMT3A (9.6%) and ASXL1 (9.2%). In summary, we have comprehensively described the spectrum of clinical phenotypes within the Mayo Clinic DDX41MT‐GPS cohort.

Abstract Background: Age-related clonal hematopoiesis (ARCH) is a precursor state to blood cancers and is associated with epigenetic age acceleration (EpiAgeAccel). While ARCH is associated with increased all-cause mortality and cardiovascular disease, not much is known about these risks with therapy-related clonal hematopoiesis (t-CH) – CH occurring in the context of prior cytotoxic chemotherapy/radiation exposure. Methods: Patients were prospectively recruited for CH and EpiAge assessment from Mayo Clinic between 2022 and 2024. CH status was determined using error corrected sequencing on peripheral blood (PB) DNA (sensitivity 0.5% VAF). Patients with CH were classified as t-CH if they had received chemotherapy or radiation prior to CH detection. All other CH cases were classifed as ARCH. For EpiAge analysis, PB DNA was analyzed using the Illumina MethylationEPIC array. The resulting beta values were used to obtain epigentic age estimates using Horvath’s clock, Hannum’s Clock, PhenoAge, DunedinPACE, and estimated telomere lengths (DNAmTL). Results: 106 (62%) of 170 patients assessed were found to have CH. CH patients were classified into ARCH-63 (59%) and t-CH-43 (41%). While the median chronological age (69 vs 67 years) was similar between ARCH and t-CH, t-CH patients had lower Hgb [10.9g/dL vs. 13g/dL (p=0.0001)], lower platelet [146x109/L vs. 192x109/L (p=0.0132)] and lower WBC [4.4x109/L vs. 5.2x109/L (p=0.0345)]. The 3 most common ARCH mutations were TET2 (20%), DNMT3A (19%), and ASXL1 (14%), while PPM1D (27%), TET2 (18%), and DNMT3A (14%) were most frequent in t-CH. There was no significant difference in median EpiAge via Horvath (68 vs 67.5years p=0.2826), Hannum (65 vs 66 years p=0.9333), or PhenoAge (55 vs 56 years p=0.618) between ARCH and t-CH. However, DunedinPACE of aging was higher in t-CH (1.27 vs 1.18 bioyear/chronoyear p=0.0148) and median DNAmTL was shorter in t-CH (6.35 vs 6.49kb p=0.0247), compared to ARCH (Note patients with telomere biology disorders were excluded). Multivariable regression analysis adjusting for chronologic age, smoking status, and male sex showed that both ARCH and t-CH had EpiAgeAccel via Horvath(5.8years p=0.0001, 3.4 years p=0.051), Hannum(5years p=0.001, 4.5 years p=0.007), and PhenoAge (6.7years p=0.002, 7.6 years p=0.002) clocks. t-CH more than doubled DunedinPACE (0.2 bioyear/chronoyear, p&lt;0.001) of aging compared to ARCH (0.08 bioyear/chronoyear, p=0.026). t-CH also demonstrated a significant decrease in DNAmTL (0.34kb, p&lt;0.001) in comparison to ARCH (0.17kb, p=0.015). With a median follow-up of 20 months, t-CH was associated with worse overall survival in comparison to ARCH, and non-CH patients (p=0.013, 93% vs. 90% alive at 10 months, 87 vs. 72% alive at 20 months). Conclusion: Our prospective CH cohort study validates the association between CH and EpiAgeAccel using several different methylation clocks and for the first time highlights an increased pace of aging and shorter DNAmTL in the context of inferior survival outcomes in t-CH. Citation Format: Marissa Li, Jenna Fernandez, Kristina Kirschner, Tamir Chandra, Kristen McCullough, Sarah Aug, Terra Lasho, Christy Finke, James Foran, Cecilia Arana Yi, Yael Kusne, Talha Badar, Abhishek Mangaonkar, Naseema Gangat, Rachel Simon, Alejandro Ferrer, Mrinal Patnaik. A prospective cohort study of biological aging and epigenetic age acceleration in 106 patients with age and therapy-related clonal hematopoiesis [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the AACR Special Conference in Cancer Research: DNA Methylation, Clonal Hematopoiesis, and Cancer; 2025 Feb 1-4; San Diego, CA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2025;85(3 Suppl):Abstract nr A015.