Nai, Nhi

Abstract Introduction: Despite advent of multiple tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) and newer treatment methods for AML and ALL, the outcomes of patients (pts) with chronic myeloid leukemia in blast phase (CML-BP) remain poor. Consensus guidelines on treatment of CML-BP are scarce. A recent study from the European leukemia network blast phase registry on 240 pts reported marked heterogeneity in treatment patterns and lack of an accepted standard. Hence, we undertook this study through the H Jean Khoury Cure CML Consortium (HJKC3) to describe the treatment patterns and outcomes of pts with CML-BP in the US. Methods: This is a multi-institution, retrospective study. IRB approval was obtained at each institution and data sharing agreements were executed. All pts diagnosed with CML-BP based on modified MD Anderson Criteria (≥30% blasts in the blood or bone marrow or extramedullary (EM) disease) from 2010 to 2025 were included. Categorical variables were compared using Chi-square test. Overall survival (OS) was calculated from time of diagnosis of CML BP to death from any cause. Event free survival (EFS) was calculated from date of best response to event (death or relapse). Results: Of the 283 pts with CML-BP, 96 (33.9%) were female and 187 (66.1%) were males. At the time of diagnosis, 183 (64.6%) had CML-CP, 21 (7.4%) pts had CML-AP and 79 (27.9%) pts had de-novo CML-BP. For the 204 pts that were initially diagnosed with CML-CP or CML-AP, the median time to progression to CML-BP was 22.5 months (1-207 months). Median age at diagnosis of CML-BP was 50 years (range 16-86 years). EM disease was present in 78 (27.6%) pts (38 myeloid sarcoma, 30 central nervous system and 10 skin). Blasts were of myeloid phenotype in 168 (59.4%), lymphoid in 103 (36.4%) and mixed in 9 (3.2%) pts. The bcr-abl protein was p210 in 229 (80.9%), p190 in 8 (2.8%) and p230 in 2 (0.7%) pts. ABL kinase domain mutation was seen in 42.1% (80/190) pts, with T315I being the most common (n=32), followed by E255K (n=16). Next generation sequencing was performed in 117 pts. The most common mutations were ASXL1 (n=27), RUNX1 (n=14), BCOR (n=4), DNMT3A (n=4) and BCORL1 (n=3). Of the 283 pts, 269 underwent CML-BP directed therapy. 63 (23.4%) pts were treated with TKI monotherapy, 184 (68.4%) pts were treated with a combination of chemotherapy (chemo) and TKI and 22 (8.2%) pts were treated with chemo alone. Response rate after CML-BP directed therapy was 75.3% (n=213). Best response was return to CML-CP in 49 pts, CHR with PCyR in 18 pts, CCyR in 31 pts, MMR in 31 pts, MR4 in 18 pts, MR4.5 in 19 pts and MR5 in 47 pts. Rate of response with 2G and ponatinib was significantly better than imatinib (85.3% and 77.3% vs 63.6%; p=0.04). 149 (55.4%) pts proceeded to alloSCT. Of the 213 pts that responded, 59 (27.7%) relapsed. At a median follow-up of 47 months, the median OS for all pts was 19.7 months (95% CI: 16.3-40.2 months), with 5-year OS rate of 38% (95% CI: 32-45%). Pts with myeloid phenotype had a significantly lower OS compared to lymphoid and mixed phenotype (Median OS 14.9 vs 45.9 and 31.1 months respectively; p=0.02). OS of pts that were treated with a combination of TKI and chemo was significantly longer compared to pts treated with TKI or chemo alone (52.9 vs 16.1 or 7.5 months; p<0.0001). Dasatinib (n=99; 34.9%) and ponatinib (n=97; 34.3%) were the most used TKIs followed by imatinib (n=23; 8.1%), nilotinib (n=21; 7.4%), bosutinib (n=8; 2.8%) and asciminib (n=3; 1.1%). Pts treated with ponatinib had a numerically longer OS compared to 2G-TKI and imatinib, however this was not statistically significant (40.1 vs 30.6 and 20.3 months; p=0.52). EFS for pts treated with ponatinib was significantly longer compared to 2G-TKI or imatinib (25.9 vs 17.6 and 15.9 months; p=0.03). In a landmark analysis, pts that underwent alloSCT within 6 months of diagnosis had a significantly longer OS compared to those who did not (69.3 vs 16.0 months; p=0.006). Conclusion: CML-BP continues to have poor prognosis. Treatment is heterogenous involving various combinations of TKI and chemo. In our analysis, treatment with 2G-TKI or ponatinib led to better responses. CML-BP with myeloid phenotype had worse OS. Treatment with ponatinib was associated with a numerically longer OS and significantly longer EFS compared to 2G-TKI and imatinib. In addition, treatment with chemo in combination with TKI and alloSCT led to improved OS.

Background: Acute promyelocytic leukemia (APL) is one of the most treatable leukemias in the current era, with cure rates upwards of 90%. Early mortality due to coagulopathies often seen at diagnosis is a major driver of adverse outcomes. Prompt initiation of all-trans retinoic acid (ATRA) is crucial for suspected APL, as it is known to reverse these coagulopathies. Chemotherapy-free protocols consisting of arsenic trioxide (ATO) and ATRA have become the standard of care for low-risk APL with high cure rates and reduced hematologic toxicities. For high-risk disease, there are multiple treatment options that have not been compared. Since APL is rare, there is a lack of real-world data for this disease. This retrospective review aimed to assess the outcomes of APL patients (pts) across multiple institutions and to examine the most common induction regimens, characteristics linked to early (30-day) mortality, and supportive care strategies. Methods: This retrospective study involved 9 institutions in the US and was conducted through the Consortium on Myeloid Malignancies and Neoplastic Diseases (COMMAND). Data included pts admitted from 8/5/2006 through 2/3/2024 with a confirmed diagnosis of APL. Each institution received a data-collection form and contributed data on APL pts from presentation to last follow-up. Key data categories included patient demographics, presenting laboratory and molecular data, treatment regimen, supportive care, and patient outcomes. Results: Data for 412 pts were identified with a median age of 51 (range 17-90) and 49% were female. Cardiovascular comorbidities were present in 44% of pts and 16% had a known pulmonary comorbidity. At presentation 109 (27%) had high risk-disease, defined as a white blood cell count (WBC) greater than 10 x 109/L. A FLT3 mutation was seen in 50% of tested pts, WT1 (22%), KRAS (3.6%), and NRAS (6.5%). The median WBC at presentation was 2 x 109/L (range: 0-166 x 109/L) and the median platelet count was 27 x 109/L (range: 2.0-315 109/L). Twenty-six percent presented with grade 2+ thrombosis, bleeding, or both. A higher percentage of pts with high-risk vs. low-risk disease presented with grade 2+ thrombosis, bleeding, or both (43% vs. 20%), DIC (60% vs. 36%), and mutated FLT3 (81% vs. 37%). The majority of pts received a chemotherapy-free induction regimen consisting of ATRA plus ATO. It was determined that 36 (8.7%) pts received induction with intermittent ATO plus ATRA (Burnett AK, Lancet Oncol 2015), 276 (67%) received daily ATO plus ATRA (Ravandi F, J Clin Oncol 2009 and Lo Coco, NEJM 2013), and 70 (17%) received a regimen inclusive of an anthracycline plus ATRA. Eleven pts did not start an induction regimen other than single-agent ATRA due to early death, while 19 had their regimen classified as “other” because they did not follow a conventional induction path. In total, 295/358 (82%) received ATRA within 24 hours of admission. At least 1 dose of gemtuzumab ozogamicin was given to 58 (14%) pts, of which 35 (60%) were considered high risk. The incidence of differentiation syndrome (DS) was 37% (n=154). Among the 243 pts who received steroid prophylaxis, 30% developed DS, compared to 52% of those who did not receive prophylaxis. Among the 360 pts with at least 1 available PCR result after starting induction, 94% achieved PCR-negativity. The 30-day mortality rate was 6.6%. On univariate analysis, presenting variables associated with a higher 30-day mortality include older age, diabetes, cardiovascular comorbidities, thrombosis or bleeding, DIC, eGFR < 60, elevated total bilirubin and D-dimer levels, and high-risk disease. The median overall survival (OS) of the cohort was not reached, and the 5- and 10-year OS was 88% (95% CI: 84-91%) and 79% (95% CI: 72-87%) respectively. The cumulative incidence of relapse at 3 years was 2.7% (95% CI: 1.4 - 5.1%), with no additional relapses observed. The incidence of CNS relapse at 3 years was 0.9% (95% CI: 0.3% - 2.8%), with 2 of the 4 pts classified as high-risk. Conclusion: This is the largest real-world evidence data collection in the US evaluating the outcome of pts with APL in the current era, inclusive of ATO as front-line induction. Outcomes for this disease remain extremely positive, with low 30-day mortality rates noted in this study along with durable OS rates and low incidence of relapse. Additional information on outcomes, safety, and supportive care will be presented at the meeting.

AbstractCore‐binding factor acute myeloid leukemia (CBF‐AML) is characterized by the presence of inv(16)/t(16;16) or t(8;21) and is classified as a favorable risk by the 2022 European LeukemiaNet (ELN) guidelines. The CD33‐targeting antibody‐drug conjugate, gemtuzumab ozogamicin (GO), is commonly added to intensive chemotherapy (IC) in CBF‐AML. We sought to compare outcomes in patients treated with IC with or without GO in CBF‐AML. We included 200 patients with CBF‐AML treated with IC across seven academic centers. Induction treatment regimens were categorized as IC alone, IC with GO, or IC with KIT inhibitor (dasatinib or midostaurin). Median follow‐up for the whole cohort was 2.5 years. Three‐year overall survival (OS) was 70% and 3‐year event‐free survival (EFS) was 51%. Patients treated with IC with GO experienced a 3‐year EFS of 50% compared to those treated with IC alone who experienced a 3‐year EFS of 47%, with no statistically significant difference (p = 0.62). Similarly, those treated with IC with GO did not experience an improved OS compared to those treated with IC alone (p = 0.67). Patients treated with IC with KIT inhibitor experienced a significantly improved 3‐year EFS of 85% compared to those with IC with or without GO (p = 0.04). We find in our study that there is no survival benefit in patients treated with IC with the addition of GO; improved EFS was seen in patients with CBF‐AML treated with IC plus KIT inhibitors, consistent with outcomes noted in prospective studies utilizing this approach.