Geramita, Emily

Introduction: Acute myeloid leukemia (AML) has been considered by many to be an oncologic emergency often leading to hospital admission for expeditious evaluation and treatment. Previous studies reported that time from diagnosis to treatment (TDT) does not impact outcomes (Sekeres, Blood, 2009), (Bertoli, Blood, 2013), (Rollig, Blood, 2020), however these analyses were restricted to intensively treated and/or non-United States (US) patients (pts). We report on a multi-center, retrospective analysis of TDT in adults with newly diagnosed AML receiving Hypomethylating agent (HMA) + venetoclax (Ven) using real-world data from the COMMAND. Methods: Eight US academic medical centers with AML expertise performed a review of adult pts within their center treated with HMA+Ven for newly diagnosed AML. TDT was defined as days from diagnosis of AML to initiation of treatment with HMA+Ven. Cytoreduction with hydroxyurea or leukapheresis was included to control for the effects of severity of presentation on TDT. The primary outcome was impact of TDT on overall survival (OS) (defined as date of diagnosis to date of death). TDT was treated continuously for time-to-event analyses. Secondary outcomes included measurable residual disease (MRD) by flow cytometric analysis (sensitivity <0.1%), complete response (CR), complete response with incomplete count recovery (CRi), defined by European LeukemiaNet (ELN) 2022 Guidelines (Dohner, Blood,2022), and early mortality (death within 30 and 60 days of initiation of HMA+Ven). Pre-planned subgroup analyses included those based on disease biology (FLT3 ITD, IDH1/2, TP53 mutation, ELN 2022 risk), HMA used (azacitidine vs decitabine) and age (<75 vs ≥75 years). For those analyses where TDT was significant in univariable analysis (P=0.1), multivariable analysis was conducted controlling for the following: ECOG performance status (PS), age, receipt of cytoreduction, ELN 2022 risk, and presence of individual pathogenic variants detected on broad myeloid gene next generation sequencing panels used at each institution. All analyses were conducted by a central statistician using RStudio statistical package. Results: 488 pts were included in the analysis. Median age was 76 (interquartile range: 70-80) and the majority of pts had an ECOG PS of 0 or 1 (56%). Most pts (67.6%) had adverse risk with 9.4% and 18.6% of pts having favorable and intermediate risk disease by ELN 2022, respectfully. The most common mutations identified were TP53 (27.5%), IDH1/2 (19.3%), NPM1 (16.4%), DNMT3A (16.8%), ASXL1 (15.4%), and FLT3-ITD (13.7%). Twenty-eight percent of pts received cytoreduction prior to initiation of HMA+Ven. Azacitidine+Ven was the most common regimen utilized (53.9%). Median number of cycles of HMA+Ven was 3 (IQR: 1-6). MRD (-) CR, MRD (+) CR, and CRi was achieved in 21.5%, 10.5%, and 16.4% of pts after one cycle of HMA+Ven. Median OS for the cohort was 10.4 months (95% CI: 9.4-12.6). Median TDT for the cohort was 9 days (IQR: 5-17). In univariate Cox model, longer TDT was associated with improved OS (HR: 0.989, 95% CI: 0.981 to 0.998; p = 0.013). In multivariable analysis, longer TDT was still associated with improved OS (HR: 0.987; 95% CI: 0.973-0.999; p=0.049). TDT and presence of bZIP in-frame CEBPA mutations were the only factors associated with improved OS, while ECOG PS of 2 or 3-4, when compared to ECOG PS=0 (p=0.035 and 0.0002, respectively) and therapy-related AML (p=0.002), were associated with worse OS. Notably, ELN 2022 risk and IDH1/2 or NPM1 mutation status did not impact OS. Discussion: In this real-world, multi-center, US-based analysis of pts with newly diagnosed AML treated with HMA+Ven we show that longer TDT is associated with improved OS even when controlling for severity of presentation, ELN 2022 risk score, ECOG PS, and age. This finding is consistent with data in pts treated with 7+3. Similar to results published in an electronic medical record-based analysis out of Germany (Baden, Haemotologica, 2024) in pts treated with lower-intensity Ven regimens, our results show that pts with newly diagnosed AML eventually treated with HMA+Ven are best served with a complete appraisal of disease biology and treatment planning before initiation of induction therapy. Given the consistent negative impact of ECOG PS and the findings of our study, future consideration for potential patient optimization strategies to improve ECOG PS prior to therapy initiation are warranted.

AbstractVenetoclax (VEN) combined with hypomethylating agents (HMAs) is the standard of care for the treatment of patients with newly diagnosed acute myeloid leukemia (AML) unfit for intensive chemotherapy. To date, real‐world data published on HMAs plus VEN have been either single‐center studies or using community‐based electronic databases with limited details on mutational landscape, tolerability, and treatment patterns in elderly patients. Therefore, we conducted a multicenter retrospective study to assess the real‐world experience of 204 elderly patients (≥75 years) with newly diagnosed AML treated with HMAs plus VEN from eight academic centers in the United States. Overall, 64 patients achieved complete remission (CR; 38%) and 43 CR with incomplete count recovery (CRi; 26%) for a CR/CRi rate of 64%, with a median duration of response of 14.2 months (95% CI: 9.43, 22.1). Among responders, 63 patients relapsed (59%) with median overall survival (OS) after relapse of 3.4 months (95% CI, 2.4, 6.7). Median OS for the entire population was 9.5 months (95% CI, 7.85–13.5), with OS significantly worse among patients with TP53‐mutated AML (2.5 months) and improved in patients harboring NPM1, IDH1, and IDH2 mutations (13.5, 18.3, and 21.1 months, respectively). The 30‐day and 60‐day mortality rates were 9% and 19%, respectively. In conclusion, HMAs plus VEN yielded high response rates in elderly patients with newly diagnosed AML. The median OS was inferior to that reported in the VIALE‐A trial. Outcomes are dismal after failure of HMAs plus VEN, representing an area of urgent unmet clinical need.

Background: Hypomethylating agent (HMA) and venetoclax (Ven) frontline therapy for acute myeloid leukemia (AML) is astandard of care for patients (pts) deemed to be poor candidates for intensive induction due to age or fitness. However, given its attractive risk-benefit ratio, there is an increasing interest to extend the preference for HMA + Ven to other pts, including those who are fit for intensive therapy but with adverse risk disease. Unfortunately, most pts treated in this fashion will require future therapies for relapsed/refractory (R/R) disease and intensive therapy is given consideration mostly for pts with a path to allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (alloHCT). Little is known about the outcomes of pts who receive intensive induction therapy after use of a frontline less-intensive regimen in the modern era. In this multi-center study, we seek to describe the experience with such a patient population and identify predictors of differential clinical outcomes. Methods: We conducted a multi-center, retrospective study of pts with AML treated with frontline less-intensive chemotherapy, followed by intensive induction chemotherapy for R/R disease. We first described the baseline characteristics of this cohort. Nominal variables were summarized with frequency and percentage while continuous variables were summarized with median and interquartile range (IQR). Overall response rate (ORR) was defined as complete remission (CR), complete remission with incomplete count recovery, or morphologic leukemia free state. Differences in ORR were analyzed with Fisher's exact test for nominal variables and Wilcoxon rank-sum test was used for continuous variables. Kaplan-Meier analysis was used to determine median overall survival (OS) after induction chemotherapy. Log-rank testing and Cox proportional hazard models were used to determine survival differences for nominal and continuous variables, respectively. Statistical significance was determined as p-value <0.05. Results: A total of 23 pts were included in this study. Median age at diagnosis was 64 years (IQR: 62-71). The majority of pts were male (n=12, 52%), white (n=20, 87%), and had an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status (ECOG PS) of 0 or 1 (n=18, 82%). The majority of pts (61%) at time of frontline therapy had AML arising out of MDS. As expected, the majority of pts had adverse risk ELN cytogenetics (n=16, 70%) with an enrichment for disease harboring TP53 mutation (n=6, 27%) and complex karyotype (n=9, 39%). Fifteen pts (65%) had frontline therapy with azacitidine backbone, 6 pts (26%) with decitabine; some pts received both before intensive therapy. The median number of cycles of frontline therapy was 2 (IQR: 2-5). Median WBC at time of R/R therapy was 1.9 x 10 9/L (IQR: 0.8-6.45), while hemoglobin was 8.4 g/dL (IQR: 7.5-9.45), platelets were 41 x 10 9/L (IQR: 19.5-116.5), and marrow blasts were 25% (IQR: 16.5-30%). The plurality of pts received CPX-351 as intensive R/R therapy (n=9, 39%). Other regimens included 7+3 (n=2, 9%), FLAG-Ida + Ven (n=2, 9%), HiDAC + Mitoxantrone +/- Ven (n=4, 17%) ( Table 1). ORR after intensive R/R therapy was 27% (n=6), with 23% achieving CR. CPX-351 after HMA + Ven was specifically associated with an ORR of 33% (CR rate 22%). Median OS after initiation was 5.8 months. Thirty- and 60-day mortality was 17% and 26%, respectively. Five patients (23%) proceeded to alloHCT ( Table 1). Univariate differences in response rate and median survival were analyzed for each of the aforementioned variables as illustrated in Table 1. While none of the covariates reached statistical significance for impacting ORR or OS, ECOG PS trended towards significantly impacting OS ( p=0.074) and the median OS among patients proceeding to alloHCT was numerically doubled (8.0 vs. 4.0 months, p=0.11) ( Figure 1). Conclusions: Intensive therapy for R/R AML after prior frontline less-intensive therapy was associated with an ORR rate of 27% and median OS of 5.8 months in our cohort. This approach may be an appropriate strategy for a subset of pts, particularly those eligible for alloHCT. The relatively small and heterogeneous nature of this cohort limits strong conclusions regarding efficacy. As the use of frontline HMA + Ven continues to expand, further studies with larger sample size are needed to determine which pts would and would not benefit from intensive induction therapy in the R/R setting.