Loftus, Edward V.

Abstract Background Risankizumab (RZB), a high-affinity humanised IgG1 monoclonal antibody targeting interleukin-23 p19, has shown sustained efficacy and an acceptable safety profile for patients (pts) with ulcerative colitis (UC).1 This interim analysis reports efficacy data at week (wk) 0 and wk 96, as well as safety data of the COMMAND (NCT03398135) open-label extension (OLE). Methods The COMMAND OLE enrolled pts who completed 52-wks maintenance dosing in the COMMAND substudies or entered directly from the induction study.1 All pts received RZB180 subcutaneous (SC) starting at OLE wk 0, except pts who had prior rescue therapy (single RZB 1200 mg intravenous [IV] dose then RZB360 Q8w) who continued RZB360 in the OLE. The OLE was not designed to compare RZB180 and RZB360 groups. The data cut-off date for this interim analysis was as of June 30, 2024. Efficacy endpoints assessed were clinical remission (CR) per AMS, clinical response per AMS, endoscopic improvement, endoscopic remission, and corticosteroid-free CR per Partial AMS up to wk 96. Data are reported as observed prior to RZB rescue therapy during OLE. The safety analysis also includes pts who directly entered the OLE from induction; presented as events/100 pt years (E/100 PY). Results Of the pts who entered the OLE (RZB180, N = 701; RZB360, N = 302), approximately 40% of pts had the opportunity to reach OLE wk 96 as of the cut-off date. At OLE wk 0 and 96, a similar proportion of patients in the RZB180 group achieved clinical and endoscopic outcomes (Figure 1A). In the RZB360 group, the percent of pts achieving clinical and endoscopic endpoints increased from OLE wk 0 through OLE wk 96 (Figure 1B). Similar rates of serious AEs, severe AEs, and AEs leading to discontinuation of study drug were reported in the RZB180 group and the RZB360 group with no new safety risks identified (Table 1). Conclusion In this interim analysis of the OLE, a sustained benefit was observed with long-term RZB treatment up to 96 wks. The long-term safety profile for RZB remains consistent and supports the long-term use. References 1. Louis E et al. JAMA 2024;332(11):881-897

INTRODUCTION: Patients with ulcerative colitis (UC) and prior biologic failure may have reduced or delayed efficacy with subsequent advanced therapies. This analysis evaluated the efficacy and safety of ozanimod during the True North (TN) study and its open-label extension (OLE) in biologic-exposed patients with UC. METHODS: TN was a randomized, placebo-controlled 52-week trial (10-week induction, 42-week maintenance period). Eligible patients could enter the OLE. Clinical outcomes were assessed at TN week (W) 10 and W52 and OLE W46 and W94. Symptomatic efficacy was evaluated through induction and in the OLE until W94. Safety was assessed. RESULTS: This analysis included 376 biologic-exposed patients. In the placebo-controlled cohort, more ozanimod-treated patients achieved clinical response than placebo at W10 regardless of the number or type of prior biologics; patients who used 1 vs ≥2 prior biologics achieved higher efficacy rates. Efficacy rates were higher at W52 than W10 and were similar across subgroups regardless of the number or type of prior biologics. Significantly greater proportions of ozanimod vs placebo patients achieved symptomatic response by W5 ( P = 0.0173) and symptomatic remission by W10 ( P = 0.0207). Among biologic-exposed TN W10 ozanimod nonresponders who entered the OLE, 61% achieved symptomatic response with an extra 10 weeks of ozanimod treatment. Ozanimod efficacy was durable for ∼3 years of continuous treatment in biologic-exposed W52 clinical responders who entered the OLE. No new safety signals were observed. DISCUSSION: Ozanimod was effective and safe in biologic-exposed patients with UC, but these patients may require more time to respond to treatment. Clinical trial registry website and trial numbers: ClinicalTrials.gov, numbers NCT02435992 and NCT02531126.

Background: Etrasimod is an oral, once-daily (QD), selective sphingosine 1-phosphate (S1P)1,4,5 receptor modulator for the treatment of moderately to severely active ulcerative colitis (UC). It is known that non-serious treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) may not lead to UC drug discontinuation but can affect treatment tolerability. Objectives: This post hoc analysis evaluated the incidence of specific, common, non-serious TEAEs reported in the etrasimod UC clinical programme and the characteristics of affected patients. Design: Data included patients from the Placebo-controlled UC cohort (phase II OASIS, and phase III ELEVATE UC 52 and ELEVATE UC 12 trials) receiving QD etrasimod (2 or 1 mg) or placebo. Methods: Proportions and incidence rates (IRs; the number of patients with a TEAE divided by the total exposure in patient-years (PYs), per 100 PY) of Headache, Pyrexia, Nausea and Dizziness TEAEs were reported. Changes in heart rate among patients with Dizziness TEAEs were also evaluated. Results: Among 943 patients (etrasimod 2 mg, N = 577 (276.7 PY); etrasimod 1 mg, N = 52 (11.4 PY); placebo, N = 314 (115.1 PY)), 48, 34, 27 and 21 patients experienced events of Headache, Pyrexia, Nausea and Dizziness, respectively. All events were non-serious; one patient treated with etrasimod was discontinued due to a Pyrexia TEAE. Numerically, IRs of Headache and Dizziness TEAEs were higher, and Nausea slightly higher, with etrasimod versus placebo (13.45 vs 8.63 per 100 PY, 6.52 vs 1.69 and 7.18 vs 5.13 per 100 PY, respectively); IRs were similar for Pyrexia. The duration of most TEAEs was 1–10 days. Conclusion: In the etrasimod UC clinical programme, all Headache, Pyrexia, Nausea and Dizziness events were non-serious. Headache and Dizziness were more frequent, and Nausea slightly more frequent, among patients receiving etrasimod versus placebo. The post hoc nature of this analysis is a limitation. These results reiterate the favourable safety profile and tolerability of etrasimod. Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT02447302; NCT03945188; NCT03996369.

Abstract Background and Aims Patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) have a higher risk of developing colorectal dysplasia and colorectal cancer compared to the general population. Although the use of surveillance protocols has improved the ability to detect dysplasia, some lesions are still missed at colonoscopy. This study aims to determine the rate of dysplastic lesions that are undetected at colonoscopies in IBD patients undergoing colectomy and to identify factors associated with missed dysplasia. Methods Patients who had received a total or subtotal colectomy at Mayo Clinic (Rochester, Minnesota), between January 2003 and December 2022, and had a complete colonoscopy within 5 years before surgery were retrospectively enrolled. Data abstracted included demographic information, disease-related data, colonoscopy and pathology reports, and surgery pathology reports. Colonoscopy and surgery findings were compared, and patients were divided into 3 groups: no dysplasia at both, detected dysplasia, and undetected dysplasia. Results Among 1320 IBD patients undergoing colectomy, 5.4% had undetected dysplastic lesions identified only at surgery. Factors independently associated with dysplasia detection were endoscopic remission or mild endoscopic disease activity (odds ratio [OR], 2.326; P = .0081; 95% CI, 1.246-4.342), prior dysplasia detection (OR, 1.876; P = .0491; 95% CI, 1.002-3.511), colonoscopy performed for surveillance (OR, 2.380; P = .0048; 95% CI, 1.302-4.350), and longer disease duration at surgery (OR, 1.039; P = .0085; 95% CI, 1.010-1.070). Conclusions Clinicians should be aware of the risk of missing dysplastic lesions, especially when endoscopic disease activity is moderate/severe, and not only for longstanding disease. Efforts should be made to obtain endoscopic remission to make the “invisible” visible.