Back to Authors

Berger, Stuart

Mayo Clinic

Northwestern University

Citations 3

Health Care Policy and Congenital Heart Disease: 2020 Focus on Our 2030 Future
Chowdhury, Devyani , Johnson, Jonathan N. , Baker‐Smith, Carissa M. , Jaquiss, Robert, Mahendran, Arjun , Curren, Valerie , Bhat, Aarti , Marshall, Audrey C. , Fuller, Stephanie , Marino, Bradley S. , Fink, Christina M. , Ather, Mishaal, Torentinos, Natalie, Kranz, Olivia, Thorne, Vivian, Berger, Stuart, Shaffer, Kenneth M. , Mahendran, Arjun K , Fink, Christina M , Lopez, Keila N , Baker-Smith, Carissa M , Jaquiss, Robert D.B. , Patel, Angira , Lopez, Keila N. , Frank, Lowell H. , Davies, Ryan R. , Snyder, Christopher, Saidi, Arwa S.

Journal of the American Heart Association | October 8, 2021 | Volume: 10 | Issue: 20 | Pages: No page available

10.1161/jaha.120.020605 Get It

Abstract The congenital heart care community faces a myriad of public health issues that act as barriers toward optimum patient outcomes. In this article, we attempt to define advocacy and policy initiatives meant to spotlight and potentially address these challenges. Issues are organized into the following 3 key facets of our community: patient population, health care delivery, and workforce. We discuss the social determinants of health and health care disparities that affect patients in the community that require the attention of policy makers. Furthermore, we highlight the many needs of the growing adults with congenital heart disease and those with comorbidities, highlighting concerns regarding the inequities in access to cardiac care and the need for multidisciplinary care. We also recognize the problems of transparency in outcomes reporting and the promising application of telehealth. Finally, we highlight the training of providers, measures of productivity, diversity in the workforce, and the importance of patient–family centered organizations in advocating for patients. Although all of these issues remain relevant to many subspecialties in medicine, this article attempts to illustrate the unique needs of this population and highlight ways in which to work together to address important opportunities for change in the cardiac care community and beyond. This article provides a framework for policy and advocacy efforts for the next decade.
Sudden Death in the Young: Information for the Primary Care Provider
Erickson, Christopher C. , Salerno, Jack C., Berger, Stuart, Campbell, Robert M. , Cannon, Bryan C. , Christiansen, James L., Pflaumer, Andreas , Snyder, Christopher S. , Srinivasan, Chandra , Valdés, Santiago O. , Vetter, Victoria L. , Zimmerman, Frank, Cannon, Bryan, Christiansen, James, Moffatt, Kody A.

Pediatrics | June 21, 2021 | Volume: 148 | Issue: 1 | Pages: No page available

10.1542/peds.2021-052044 Get It

There are multiple conditions that can make children prone to having a sudden cardiac arrest (SCA) or sudden cardiac death (SCD). Efforts have been made by multiple organizations to screen children for cardiac conditions, but the emphasis has been on screening before athletic competition. This article is an update of the previous American Academy of Pediatrics policy statement of 2012 that addresses prevention of SCA and SCD. This update includes a comprehensive review of conditions that should prompt more attention and cardiology evaluation. The role of the primary care provider is of paramount importance in the evaluation of children, particularly as they enter middle school or junior high. There is discussion about whether screening should find any cardiac condition or just those that are associated with SCA and SCD. This update reviews the 4 main screening questions that are recommended, not just for athletes, but for all children. There is also discussion about how to handle post-SCA and SCD situations as well as discussion about genetic testing. It is the goal of this policy statement update to provide the primary care provider more assistance in how to screen for life-threatening conditions, regardless of athletic status.
Safety of Sports for Young Patients With Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillators
Saarel, Elizabeth V. , Law, Ian H. , Berul, Charles I. , Ackerman, Michael J. , Kanter, Ronald J. , Sanatani, Shubhayan , Berger, Stuart, Fischbach, Peter , Dziura, James , Simone, Laura, Olshansky, Brian , Cannom, David S. , Lampert, Rachel , Sanatani, Shubhayan , Olshansky, Brian , Law, Ian H , Burton, David A., Brandt, Cynthia , Li, Fangyong

Circulation: Arrhythmia and Electrophysiology | January 7, 2019 | Volume: 11 | Issue: 11 | Pages: No page available

10.1161/circep.118.006305 Get It

Background: Despite safety concerns, many young patients with implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (ICDs) participate in sports. We undertook a prospective, multinational registry to determine the incidence of serious adverse events because of sports participation. The primary end points were death or resuscitated arrest during sports or injury during sports because of arrhythmia or shock. Secondary end points included system malfunction and incidence of ventricular arrhythmias requiring multiple shocks for termination. Methods: Athletes with ICDs aged ≤21 years were included in this post hoc subanalysis of the ICD Sports Registry. Data on sports and clinical outcomes were obtained by phone interview and medical records review. ICD shocks and clinical details of lead malfunction were classified by 2 electrophysiologists. Results: A total of 129 young athletes participating in competitive (n=117) or dangerous (n=12) sports were enrolled. The mean age was 16 years (range, 10–21; 40% female; 92% white). The most common diagnoses were long QT syndrome (n=49), hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (n=30), and congenital heart disease (n=16). The most common sports were basketball and soccer, including 79 varsity/junior varsity high school and college athletes. During a median follow-up of 42 months, 35 athletes (27%) received 38 shocks. There were no occurrences of death, arrest, or injury related to arrhythmia, during sports. There was 1 ventricular tachycardia/ventricular fibrillation storm during competition. Freedom from lead malfunction was 92.3% at 5 years and 79.6% at 10 years. Conclusions: Although shocks related to competition/practice are not uncommon, there were no serious adverse sequelae. Lead malfunction rates were similar to previously reported in unselected pediatric ICD populations. Clinical Trial Registration: URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov . Unique identifier: NCT00637754.