Citations

Abstract Background Tau‐PET neuroimaging is increasingly applied to diagnose and stage, track progression, and assess response to putative disease‐modifying treatments in individuals with Alzheimer disease. However, it remains to be seen whether findings established in predominantly non‐Hispanic White (nHW) cohorts will generalize to Black and Latino participants who are underrepresented in dementia research. Method Community‐dwelling Black ( n = 83) and Latino participants ( n = 27) completed MRI (with quantification of white matter hyperintensity volumes), and amyloid‐ (PiB or florbetapir) and tau‐ (flortaucipir) PET brain imaging as part of a longitudinal study of memory and aging at Mayo Clinic in Florida. Global and regional tau‐PET standardized uptake value ratios (normalized to the cerebellar crus) were determined in Black and Latino participants and compared with findings from an independent cohort of nHW participants ( n = 110), 1:1‐matched for age, sex, education, and global Clinical Dementia Rating®. Conditional logistic modeling compared 47 regions of interest, adjusted for false discovery rate. Relevant associations between flortaucipir retention and clinical outcomes were assessed using Spearman rank correlations. Result Eighty‐three Black (mean 72±10.8‐years‐old, 63% female, 33% cognitively impaired) and 27 Latino participants (mean 65.8‐years‐old, 56% female, 11% cognitively impaired) completed neuroimaging. Data were compared with findings in 110 matched nHW individuals. Global tau‐PET burden was similar between matched cohorts (Black and nHW participants, mean SUVR: 1.34±0.39 vs 1.36±0.37, p = 0.71; Latino and nHW participants, mean SUVR: 1.17±0.09 vs 1.20±0.11, p = 0.66). Lower flortaucipir uptake was noted in the caudate ( p = 0.005) and putamen ( p = 0.022) of Black/Latino participants (vs nHW), although differences attenuated following adjustment for white matter hyperintensity volume. Global flortaucipir retention increased with age (Black: Rho=0.31; Latino: Rho=0.46; nHW: Rho=0.27; p <0.05), amyloid Centiloids (Black: Rho=0.65; Latino: Rho=0.41; nHW: Rho=0.58; p <0.05), and cognitive impairment (i.e., Clinical Dementia Rating® Sum‐of‐Box scores, Black/Latino: Rho=0.31, p = 0.07; nHW: 0.76, p <0.001). Conclusion Tau‐PET patterns were similar across ethnoracial groups after adjusting for white matter hyperintensity volumes—a biomarker of small vessel disease. Flortaucipir retention increased with age, amyloid accumulation, and cognitive impairment across all cohorts. These findings affirm the clinical and research applications of tau PET in diverse cohorts. Acknowledgements : Flortaucipir precursor and technology was supported by Avid Radiopharmaceuticals.

Abstract Background The IWG and AA diagnostic criteria are major references in the Alzheimer's domain. Although they share analogies, some key differences should be recognized. Method The original IWG 2024 JAMA Neurology and AA 2024 Alzheimers Dement papers will be used as the major data references. Result I will outline the similarities and differences between the IWG and the AA criteria for Alzheimer's disease from the point of view of the former. I will discuss similarities regarding: Aim of clinical research on AD and other cognitive disorders, Role of co‐pathology, Role of brain reserve, Biomarker use, Indication for anti‐β‐amyloid, Contra‐indication for anti‐β‐amyloid, and Health care delivery model. I will discuss differences regarding: Core question, Scientific discourse, Knowledge source, Definition of AD, Diagnosis of AD, and Interventions for AD. Conclusion The differences between the two sets of criteria are not “just semantics”. A unified definition of AD is essential to advance the field and improve patient care.

Study Design Narrative Review. Objectives To summarize the scientific contributions generated from the AO Spine Knowledge Forum Tumor (AOSKFT) databases, focusing on primary spine tumors, and highlight key findings, research trends, and future directions. Methods Data from the Primary Tumor Retrospective (PT-Retro) and Primary Tumor Research Outcome Network (PTRON) registries were analyzed. The nineteen studies included were peer-reviewed manuscripts focused on primary spine tumors, excluding abstracts, book chapters, systematic reviews, and metastatic studies. Results The PT-Retro registry compiled data from 1495 patients across 18 primary tumor histologies, offering insights into recurrence, survival, and treatment paradigms. Key findings emphasize the importance of Enneking-appropriate (EA) resection in improving survival and reducing recurrence in tumors such as chordoma, chondrosarcoma, and osteosarcoma. Genetic markers, including hTERT promoter mutations and rs2305089 SNP, were linked to prognosis in specific histologies. Benign tumors, such as giant cell tumors and aneurysmal bone cysts, demonstrated variable outcomes with different surgical approaches and selective arterial embolization. Conclusions The AOSKFT registries have significantly advanced knowledge in primary spine tumor management, emphasizing preoperative staging, surgical margins, and multidisciplinary approaches. International, multicentric registries are essential for studying rare diseases like primary spine tumors, enabling robust data collection, improved statistical power, and broader applicability of findings across diverse clinical settings. Ongoing prospective data collection through PTRON will further refine evidence-based care for these rare and challenging conditions.

We present a subset analysis on the adolescent cohort of the S1826 randomized phase three trial, comparing nivolumab, doxorubicin, vinblastine, dacarbazine (N-AVD) to brentuximab vedotin-AVD (BV-AVD) in newly diagnosed advanced-stage (AS, stages III and IV) classic Hodgkin lymphoma (cHL). Among 994 patients enrolled, 24% (n = 240) were age 12-17 years. The 3-year progression-free survival (PFS) was significantly higher in the N-AVD group (93% [95% CI, 87 to 96]) compared with the BV-AVD group (82% [95% CI, 73 to 88]; hazard ratio, 0.37 [95% CI, 0.17 to 0.80]). One N-AVD and two BV-AVD patients received protocol-specified residual site radiotherapy (RT). Rates of febrile neutropenia and sepsis were low in both groups. Severe immune-related adverse events were infrequent, although thyroid dysfunction was seen in 7% with N-AVD. Sensory neuropathy (grade ≥2) was more frequent with BV-AVD (14% v 7%) by clinician report. Although premature discontinuation of therapy was reported in 12 N-AVD patients and four BV-AVD patients, no PFS events were noted in the N-AVD group. Patient-reported outcomes indicated less toxicity with N-AVD. N-AVD demonstrated high 3-year PFS in adolescents with AS cHL, with minimal RT use. S1826 exemplifies the benefits of harmonized clinical trial protocols, resulting in timely access to novel agents for adolescents.

Abstract Homozygous deletions in the gene encoding methylthioadenosine phosphorylase (MTAP) occur in ∼10% of patients with cancer, including up to 45% in some tumor types, and may be associated with poor prognosis. MTAP deficiency causes accumulation of its catabolic target methylthioadenosine (MTA) that outcompetes S-adenosyl methionine (SAM) for binding to protein arginine methyltransferase 5 (PRMT5), partially inhibiting PRMT5 activity as a posttranslational regulator of a variety of critical cellular functions. Prior anticancer treatments developed to target PRMT5 exhibited high rates of dose-limiting hematologic toxicities because of a lack of selectivity for tumor cells. More recently, several agents have been developed that exploit the vulnerability of MTAP-deleted cancer cells to further inhibition of the PRMT5 pathway, selectively inducing synthetic lethality in those cancer cells. MTA-cooperative PRMT5 inhibitors such as BMS-986504/MRTX1719 and AMG 193 target the PRMT5–MTA complex, whereas inhibitors of the SAM synthetase methionine adenosyl transferase 2A, such as IDE397, deprive PRMT5 of its methyl donor SAM. In this review article, we summarize the mechanisms of action, preclinical data, and clinical data available thus far for these novel classes of oncology precision medicine and discuss potential future directions relevant to MTAP deletion as a promising synthetic lethal vulnerability for cancer therapy.

Abstract Hereditary hemorrhagic telangiectasia (HHT) causes severe recurrent epistaxis, chronic gastrointestinal bleeding, solid organ arteriovenous malformations, and significant anemia. Although it is the second most common inherited bleeding disorder worldwide, no approved therapies exist. The multicenter, US randomized, controlled PATH-HHT trial demonstrated efficacy of short-term pomalidomide treatment of epistaxis in HHT. However, questions regarding long-term safety, effectiveness, and utility for HHT-associated gastrointestinal bleeding remain. The PATH-HHT ATLAS (after trial longitudinal assessment study) was a multicenter US longitudinal observational study evaluating patients enrolled in PATH-HHT who continued pomalidomide after PATH-HHT through a poststudy drug access program, with ongoing close monitoring per PATH-HHT protocol and as mandated by the US Food and Drug Administration. Sixty-two patients treated with pomalidomide for HHT for up to 4.4 years were included. Significant, durable improvements in mean epistaxis severity score (5.55 points [baseline] to 2.80 points [month 12]; P&lt; .0001) and mean hematologic support score (9.11 red cell unit equivalents [RUEs] during 6 months pretreatment to 5.73 RUEs [months 7-12]; P = .0056) were observed. Pomalidomide was less effective for gastrointestinal bleeding than for epistaxis, particularly in patients with high red blood cell transfusion requirements. Thirty-one patients (50%) underwent dose reduction from 4 mg daily, primarily due to neutropenia, but most maintained effectiveness at 2 or 3 mg daily. Over 105.2 patient-years of pomalidomide treatment, 0 patients developed peripheral neuropathy, 1 developed venous thromboembolism, and 5 developed serious infections. In conclusion, pomalidomide was effective for HHT-associated epistaxis over extended durations, albeit with nontrivial potential toxicities, and may be considered for certain patients with HHT. This trial was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as NCT07018401.

Abstract Background PET visual reads for multi‐center studies are conducted centrally by one or a few experts. In CLARiTI, a broader network of raters will perform the reads, necessitating methods to ensure their accuracy and reliability. Method All ADRC sites ( N = 37) will prospectively acquire amyloid PET scans for 800 cognitively unimpaired and 1200 cognitively impaired participants. Each site can use one of four amyloid PET tracers ([ 18 F]florbetaben, [ 18 F]florbetapir, [ 11 C]PIB, [ 18 F]NAV4694). PET scans will be visually interpreted by ten PET neuroimaging experts located across eight ADRCs, using their preferred hardware, software, and file format (DICOM, NIFTI). Calibration requires readers to perform blinded, independent visual interpretation of 180 amyloid PET scans (30 unique and 15 duplicate scans per tracer), previously read and selected by an expert (Table 1). An even mix of visually non‐elevated and elevated scans were selected, with quantitation spanning ‐26‐123 Centiloids (Figure 1), and 15% were visually borderline (similar proportion to ADNI4), with quantitation spanning 4‐48 Centiloids (mean 21). Kruskal‐Wallis H test showed no significant difference in the distribution of Centiloid values for scans in each tracer group, Χ 2 (3)=2.133, p = 0.545. Result Calibration scans were read by a second expert not serving in CLARiTI. There was 97% concordance and almost perfect agreement between readers (κ=0.932, p <0.001; Figure 2). Discordantly read scans were visually borderline elevated ( N = 2), borderline non‐elevated ( N = 1), and negative ( N = 1), with quantitation of 8‐21 Centiloids (mean 14). Intra‐rater reads were 98% concordant and had almost perfect agreement (κ=0.966, p <0.001). These findings hold promise for scaling‐up visual reads in CLARiTI, and we expect ≥80% concordance and substantial to almost perfect agreement (κ≥0.7) for inter/intra‐rater reliability. Conclusion Calibration is essential for accurate/reliable amyloid PET visual reads in large multi‐center studies with multiple raters. Through the calibration process, we will develop methods to improve the adjudication of borderline/challenging scans and formalize methods for visual reads of amyloid PET tracers that are investigational (i.e., [ 11 C]PIB, [ 18 F]NAV4694). Involving multiple raters across different sites, who use diverse hardware/software/file format combinations, will mirror the natural heterogeneity present in real‐world clinical practice. This calibration set can also serve as a standardized training tool for other studies incorporating amyloid PET visual reads.

Abstract Background In vivo Braak staging stratifies patients across the AD spectrum and has the potential to harmonize tau PET tracer staging. This study aims to compare and test harmonization procedures for Braak staging individuals using MK6240 and Flortaucipir tau PET tracers. Methods We assessed 437 participants across the AD spectrum (245 cognitively unimpaired (CU) and 192 cognitively impaired; mean age 68.5 ± 8.6) using head‐to‐head MK6240 and Flortaucipir scans. We computed SUVRs in Braak regions of interest (ROIs) and assessed four cut‐off methods for Braak positivity: (a) mean + 2.5 SD of young controls (age <28 years), (b) mean + 2.5 SD of elderly CU Aβ−, (c) Gaussian mixture modeling (GMM), and (d) the Youden index. Braak stages were assigned using seven (0 to VI) or four (0, I–II, III–IV, V–VI) categories. We evaluated inter‐ and intra‐tracer concordance (intra‐tracer, i.e., whether it follows the sequential Braak pattern). Results The intra‐tracer seven‐class Braak staging concordance ranged from 63% to 94%. With the highest intra‐tracer Braak concordance being achieved when using GMM cutoffs: 94% (MK6240) and 89% (Flortaucipir; Figure 1). Inter‐tracer agreement concordance ranged from 56% to 76%. The highest concordance emerged from the CU Elderly Aβ– cutoff optimizing the Braak II region for spill‐off (Figure 2). Using the Braak staging simplified version improved intra‐tracer concordance in both tracers (MK6240as well as inter‐tracer agreement (86.5%). Most inter‐tracer discrepancies were observed at Braak stages II–IV. Despite showing staging discordances, the distribution of cognitive status across the Braak stages is similar for both tracers (Figure 3). Conclusion These preliminary findings reveal some discrepancies in Braak staging when comparing MK6240 and Flortaucipir. Our results also suggest that adjustments in cutoffs and regions of interest can partially mitigate both inter‐ and intra‐tracer divergences. Finally, our analysis suggests robust concordance after adjustment and using 4 classes (0, I‐II, III‐IV, V‐VI).