Schecter, Leah

Abstract INTRODUCTION Plasma p‐tau217 and p‐tau217/Aβ42 reliably identify non‐Hispanic White individuals with symptomatic and pre‐clinical AD. However, performance across ethnoracially diverse groups remains unknown. METHODS Cognitively normal Black, Hispanic, and non‐Hispanic White participants completed cognitive evaluations, brain magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), amyloid and tau positron emission tomography (PET), and measures of kidney function. Plasma p‐tau217 and Aβ42 were measured using Fujirebio Lumipulse assays. Pre‐clinical AD detection was evaluated using symptomatic and cohort‐derived optimized cutoffs. RESULTS Among 191 participants (57 Black, 46 Hispanic White, 88 non‐Hispanic White), age‐adjusted plasma p‐tau217 and p‐tau217/Aβ42 performed similarly in detecting amyloid‐positive individuals (≥ 25 Centiloids), regardless of race/ethnicity. Both measures independently correlated with amyloid deposition, whereas estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) correlated solely with p‐tau217. Pre‐clinical AD optimized cutoffs (p‐tau217 ≥ 0.132 pg/ml; p‐tau217/Aβ42 ≥ 0.0059) outperformed cutoffs established in symptomatic individuals (sensitivity: 83% vs. 57%; 77% vs. 63%; negative predictive value [NPV] > 93%). DISCUSSION Plasma biomarkers performed similarly across ethnoracially diverse cohorts. Optimized cutoffs may improve early detection and trial enrollment.

Abstract Background Tau‐PET neuroimaging is increasingly applied to diagnose and stage, track progression, and assess response to putative disease‐modifying treatments in individuals with Alzheimer disease. However, it remains to be seen whether findings established in predominantly non‐Hispanic White (nHW) cohorts will generalize to Black and Latino participants who are underrepresented in dementia research. Method Community‐dwelling Black ( n = 83) and Latino participants ( n = 27) completed MRI (with quantification of white matter hyperintensity volumes), and amyloid‐ (PiB or florbetapir) and tau‐ (flortaucipir) PET brain imaging as part of a longitudinal study of memory and aging at Mayo Clinic in Florida. Global and regional tau‐PET standardized uptake value ratios (normalized to the cerebellar crus) were determined in Black and Latino participants and compared with findings from an independent cohort of nHW participants ( n = 110), 1:1‐matched for age, sex, education, and global Clinical Dementia Rating®. Conditional logistic modeling compared 47 regions of interest, adjusted for false discovery rate. Relevant associations between flortaucipir retention and clinical outcomes were assessed using Spearman rank correlations. Result Eighty‐three Black (mean 72±10.8‐years‐old, 63% female, 33% cognitively impaired) and 27 Latino participants (mean 65.8‐years‐old, 56% female, 11% cognitively impaired) completed neuroimaging. Data were compared with findings in 110 matched nHW individuals. Global tau‐PET burden was similar between matched cohorts (Black and nHW participants, mean SUVR: 1.34±0.39 vs 1.36±0.37, p = 0.71; Latino and nHW participants, mean SUVR: 1.17±0.09 vs 1.20±0.11, p = 0.66). Lower flortaucipir uptake was noted in the caudate ( p = 0.005) and putamen ( p = 0.022) of Black/Latino participants (vs nHW), although differences attenuated following adjustment for white matter hyperintensity volume. Global flortaucipir retention increased with age (Black: Rho=0.31; Latino: Rho=0.46; nHW: Rho=0.27; p <0.05), amyloid Centiloids (Black: Rho=0.65; Latino: Rho=0.41; nHW: Rho=0.58; p <0.05), and cognitive impairment (i.e., Clinical Dementia Rating® Sum‐of‐Box scores, Black/Latino: Rho=0.31, p = 0.07; nHW: 0.76, p <0.001). Conclusion Tau‐PET patterns were similar across ethnoracial groups after adjusting for white matter hyperintensity volumes—a biomarker of small vessel disease. Flortaucipir retention increased with age, amyloid accumulation, and cognitive impairment across all cohorts. These findings affirm the clinical and research applications of tau PET in diverse cohorts. Acknowledgements : Flortaucipir precursor and technology was supported by Avid Radiopharmaceuticals.

Abstract Background Black and Latino Americans experience a disparate dementia burden yet remain underrepresented in dementia research, including clinical trials designed to slow or prevent symptomatic Alzheimer's disease (AD). Accessible and non‐invasive AD blood biomarkers may improve identification and recruitment of underrepresented participants into AD clinical trials. There is a clear need to assess the performance of emergent plasma AD biomarkers for the detection of AD neuropathology in cognitively normal Black and Latino Americans. Method Cognitively normal Black and Latino participants underwent cognitive evaluations and PET (amyloid‐PiB, tau‐flortaucipir) imaging at Mayo Clinic in Florida. Plasma p ‐tau217 was measured using Fujirebio Lumipulse assays. We evaluated the diagnostic performance of a p ‐tau217 threshold (≥0.186 pg/mL) known to identify non‐Hispanic White participants with cognitive impairment and “positive” amyloid PET scans (>25 Centiloids). Next, we derived an optimized threshold to identify participants with “positive” amyloid PET using Youden's method. Result The cohort included 58 Black (55%) and 47 Latino‐White (45%) well‐educated (mean 16.1±2.3 years) individuals, with mean age 64.7±8.8 years, and slight female bias (63%). Plasma p ‐tau217 concentrations increased with age (rho=0.269, p = 0.004) and declined with MoCA scores (rho=‐0.225, p = 0.027). Sixty‐nine participants completed amyloid‐ and tau‐PET imaging. Plasma p ‐tau217 concentrations increased with amyloid‐ (rho=0.254, p = 0.044) but not with tau‐PET standardized uptake value ratio (rho=0.127; p = 0.334). p ‐tau217 concentrations were ≥0.186 pg/mL in 10/69 participants (14%), including 3/3 amyloid‐ and tau‐PET positive (A+T+) participants, 3/8 A+T‐ participants (sensitivity: 55%), and 4/58 A‐T‐ participants (specificity 93%). An optimized p ‐tau217 threshold of ≥0.118 pg/mL identified 10/11 A+T± participants (sensitivity 91%), and 16/58 A‐T‐ participants (specificity 73%). In A‐T‐ participants, estimated glomerular filtration rate was lower in participants with ‘false positive’ elevations in plasma p ‐tau217 (mean difference: 67 vs 81 ml/min/1.73m 2 , p = 0.004), emphasizing the need for caution when interpreting plasma p ‐tau217 concentrations in patients with decreased kidney function. Conclusion Plasma p ‐tau217 thresholds validated in participants with symptomatic AD (≥0.186 pg/mL) failed to identify early AD neuropathology in 5/8 cognitively normal Black and Latino participants. Optimized thresholds are required to improve detection of preclinical AD in Black/Latino individuals.

Abstract Background Bedside cognitive screening tools intend to reliably and efficiently detect cognitive impairment in research, clinical, and community settings. Black American (BA) and Hispanic/Latino (H/L) adults obtain lower performance on widely used screeners, largely driven by demographics and structural and social determinants of health (SSDoH). This study characterized the performance of the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) performance in a cohort of cognitively normal ethnoracially diverse adults while considering cohort‐specific factors that contributed to misclassification of impairment. Method Cognitively normal BA and H/L participants completed a comprehensive neurological assessment, neuropsychological testing, and MRI and amyloid‐ and tau‐PET imaging as part of a longitudinal study of memory and aging at Mayo Clinic in Florida. Demographically adjusted MoCA cutoffs were applied to BA (MoCA ≤ 22) and WH/L (MoCA ≤ 24) subgroups. Hierarchical binary logistic regression assessed whether amyloid burden (Centiloid value) improved prediction of scoring below demographically adjusted MoCA cutoffs beyond demographic/SSDoH factors, including age, education, and Area Deprivation Index (ADI). Result Participants included 105 (47 WH/L, 58 BA/AA) cognitively normal adults (mean age = 64.71 years, SD = 8.91; 62.9% female) with average of 16.07 years of education (SD=2.35) and mild‐to‐moderate neighborhood disadvantage (mean ADI=47.60, SD=23.77). 40% of H/L participants (MoCA (≤ 24) and 17% of BA participants (MoCa ≤22) scored below demographically adjusted MoCA cut‐offs. For the H/L subgroup, the best fitting model included age, education, ADI, and amyloid burden ( R 2 = 0 .43, χ 2 = 10.98, p = 0.03). Age (OR=1.21, 95% CI: 0.986 – 1.487) and amyloid burden (OR = 0.83, 95% CI: 0.67 – 1.03) approached statistical significance as individual predictors ( p = 0.06, p = 0.09). In the BA/AA subgroup, the best fitting model included age, education and ADI only ( R 2 = 0.47, χ 2 = 9.06, p = 0.02), with education approaching significance as an individual predictor (OR=0.46, 95% CI: 0.21 – 1.01, p = 0.05). Conclusion Sociodemographic factors continued to drive low MoCA performance in cognitively normal individuals despite applying demographically adjusted cut‐off scores by subgroup. These factors differentially impacted performance among BA/AA and WH/L participants. Careful consideration of these factors is warranted to mitigate risk of overdiagnosing impairment based on cognitive screening across clinical and research settings.

Abstract Background Disparities in structural and social determinants of health in Latino and Black communities may increase the burden of Alzheimer disease and related dementias (ADRD). Identifying dementia risk factors, which may account for up to 45% of ADRD risk, is crucial to implement effective risk‐reduction strategies. This study aimed to assess ADRD risk factors in community‐dwelling, cognitively normal, Latino and Black Americans by measuring the frequency of modifiable dementia risk factors through subjective and objective measures. Method Community‐dwelling, cognitively normal, Latino and Black adults (≥45‐years‐old) were enrolled in a longitudinal study of memory and aging at Mayo Clinic in Jacksonville, Florida. Baseline assessments conducted between Mach 2022 and November 2024 included demographics, self‐reported race/ethnicity, and history of dementia risk factors. Socioeconomic deprivation [Area Deprivation Index (ADI) State scores] and modifiable dementia risk factors were reported by participants and directly measured, including hypertension (BP >130/80 mmHg), obesity (BMI≥30), hyperlipidemia (LDL>100 mg/dL), hyperglycemia (HbA1C >5.6%), low vitamin B12 (B12<350 pg/mL), hearing loss (bedside assessment), vision loss (bedside assessment), and depression (Geriatric Depression Scale ≥5). Result 105 participants (47 Latino, 55 Black), 64.7 (±8.8) years‐old, female 66 (63%), with 16 (±2.3) years of education were assessed. Black participants experienced higher socioeconomic deprivation than Latino participants (median ADI 7 vs 3; p <0.001). Dementia risk factors were common in Latino and Black participants. These included, hypertension (55.3%, 70.3%; p = 0.291), hyperlipidemia (58.7%, 55.8%; p = 0.908), obesity (29.8%, 45.5%; p = 0.263), hyperglycemia (51.1%, 49.1%; p = 0.834), low vitamin B12 (23.9%, 28.0%; p = 0.270), hearing loss (19.1%, 7.3%; p = 0.111), vision loss (85.1%, 85.2%; p = 0.771), and depression (6.4%, 5.5%; p = 0.168). Objective measures revealed a higher frequency of risk factors compared with participant‐provided history, highlighting a substantial proportion of unrecognized or inadequately treated risk factors: hypertension (62.3%, 45.1%; p = 0.067), hyperlipidemia (57.6%, 47.5%; p = 0.004), hyperglycemia (49%, 20%; p = <0.001), vitamin B12 deficiency (27.8%, 9.3%; p = 0.170), and depression (6.9%, 11.9%; p = 0.009). Conclusion Modifiable dementia risk factors were detected in most cognitively normal Latino and Black adults engaged in a longitudinal study of memory and aging. Objective measures highlighted unrecognized and undertreated risk factors. Active surveillance programs are needed to detect and treat modifiable ADRD risk factors in underrepresented populations.