Citations

Introduction: Although the role of cardiometabolic risk factors (CMRF) has been characterized in steatotic liver disease, their role in the severity of alcohol-associated hepatitis (AH) remains unclear. We aimed to evaluate the impact of CMRF on mortality. Methods: Multinational prospective cohort study (2015–2024) including hospitalized patients with severe AH across 32 centers in 14 countries. Diagnosis of AH was made using the NIAAA criteria. Analyses included adjusted competing-risk models by age, sex, ethnicity, history of cirrhosis, CMRF, corticosteroid use, MELD, and ACLF grade, with liver transplantation as a competing risk. Results: 936 participants were included; mean age 48±11.2 years, and 88.9% were male. At least one CMRF was present in 46.6%; median body mass index (BMI) was 24.2 kg/m 2 [IQR: 22.8–28.2], prevalence of diabetes 17.6%, hypertension 16.5%, and dyslipidemia 5.8%. Median MELD was 24.4 [19.3–31.4], 86.7% had severe AH, and 180-day survival was 72.9%. Survival did not differ by CMRF status (log-rank p =0.453). In adjusted competing-risk models, higher age (sHR 1.02; 95%CI:1.01–1.04), greater alcohol intake (per g/day; sHR 1.001; 95%CI:1.000–1.002), MELD (sHR 1.04; 95%CI:1.01–1.06), and ACLF grade 2–3 (sHR 2.34 and 4.34) predicted mortality. However, no individual CMRF independently increased mortality. A prespecified non-linear BMI analysis showed modestly lower mortality between 25–40 kg/m², with a higher risk above 40 kg/m². Conclusion: Among patients with severe AH, metabolic dysfunction was not associated with increased mortality. Although a higher BMI was associated with slightly lower mortality in AH, this may reflect better nutritional status rather than a true protective effect.

INTRODUCTION: Nosocomial infections (NIs) in cirrhosis are associated with high mortality but could be preventable. Logistic regression (LR) models have failed to identify high-risk patients. We aimed to develop machine learning (ML) models to predict NI. METHODS: The CLEARED consortium consists of prospectively enrolled cirrhosis inpatients from >120 centers. Using day-of-admission clinical data, 3 ML approaches (random forest [RF], extreme gradient boosting, and neural networks [NNs]) were used to predict NI. Data were split 80:20 for training and testing stratified by the outcome. Models were compared using area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC). RESULTS: In total, 8,263 patients (55.90 ± 13.34 years; 64.1% men) from 127 centers in 37 countries were included. NI developed in 869 (10.5%), a median of 6 (4–11) days of postadmission. Major NIs were respiratory (29.6%) and urinary tract infection (15.7%), and spontaneous bacterial peritonitis (13.5%). NIs occurred more frequently in patients from low/low-middle income countries and those with severe liver disease, alcohol etiology, and admission infections. NIs were associated with inpatient mortality (31.9% vs 8.1%, P < 0.001) and liver transplantation (4.8% vs 1.9%, P < 0.001). Although the RF model (AUC 0.69) showed good calibration (Brier score 0.09), outperforming extreme gradient boosting, neural network, and LR models (AUC 0.66 for all; LR comparison P = 0.043), no model achieved AUC ≥0.80 for clinical utility. At 10% predicted probability threshold, the RF model demonstrated only 75.4% sensitivity, 52.9% specificity, and 15.9% positive predictive value (PPV). DISCUSSION: NIs cannot be accurately predicted from day-of-admission data using ML models, even in a large, prospective, global cirrhosis cohort. Every hospitalized patient with cirrhosis should receive protocolized infection control measures.

Introduction Blood-based biomarkers offer a promising, minimally invasive approach to Alzheimer’s disease (AD) diagnosis, yet validation in admixed populations remains limited. We investigated whether plasma biomarkers predict CSF-defined AD pathology in a Brazilian cohort. Methods Seventy-eight older adults [including individuals with mild cognitive impairment (MCI), subjective cognitive decline (SCD), and cognitively unimpaired controls] underwent cognitive testing, neuroimaging, and plasma biomarker assessment. CSF data were available for symptomatic participants (MCI and SCD; n = 61), and regression and ROC analyses were performed in the subset with both CSF and APOE genotyping data ( n = 53). Plasma Aβ42, p-Tau181, p-Tau217, t-Tau, and derived ratios were quantified. Multivariable logistic regression and ROC analyses evaluated prediction of abnormal CSF p-Tau181/Aβ42 and t-Tau/Aβ42, adjusting for age, sex, and APOE ε4 status. Results Approximately 25% of individuals with MCI exhibited abnormal CSF p-Tau181/Aβ42 and t-Tau/Aβ42 ratios. Moderate correlations were observed between plasma and CSF biomarkers (r &gt; 0.4), particularly for Aβ42/p-Tau217 and p-Tau217. In adjusted models, plasma p-Tau217 and the Aβ42/p-Tau217 ratio independently predicted abnormal CSF pathology. Each one standard deviation increase in p-Tau217 was associated with 3.53–4.83-fold higher odds of abnormal CSF ( p ≤ 0.003). In contrast, higher Aβ42/p-Tau217 ratios were associated with substantially lower odds of pathology, with each one standard deviation increase corresponding to a 91%–93% reduction in risk ( p ≤ 0.002). The ratio showed stronger associations than p-Tau217 alone. ROC analyses demonstrated good discrimination. For CSF p-Tau181/Aβ42, Aβ42/p-Tau217 achieved an AUC of 0.88 (83% sensitivity, 85% specificity), compared with 0.83 for p-Tau217. For CSF t-Tau/Aβ42, both biomarkers yielded AUCs of 0.89. Discussion Plasma Aβ42/p-Tau217 and p-Tau217 effectively identify CSF-defined AD pathology in an admixed cohort. While higher p-Tau217 levels were associated with increased odds of pathology, higher Aβ42/p-Tau217 ratios were associated with lower pathological burden and demonstrated stronger effect sizes, supporting the added value of combining amyloid and tau biomarkers. These findings provide initial evidence for local validation of blood-based AD biomarkers in Brazil.

ABSTRACT Patients with chronic thromboembolic pulmonary disease (CTEPD) without resting pulmonary hypertension (PH) frequently experience dyspnea which is not explained by stationary assessment and therefore requires cardiopulmonary exercise testing for further diagnostic insight. Ventilatory inefficiency in CTEPD is commonly identified; however, consensus definitions are lacking. Upright iCPET and careful definition of ventilatory inefficiency (i.e., lack of reduction in VD/VT with exercise) may allow optimal characterization of patients with chronic thromboembolic disease and specifically helps correctly identify patients with preload insufficiency who may otherwise be misclassified or undiagnosed.

Abstract Purpose Consensus recommendations and guidelines for reporting quantitative research in health professions education (HPE) research are lacking. This study synthesizes available quantitative reporting recommendations and guidelines to present a harmonized framework and derive quantitative standards for reporting HPE research. Method The authors identified existing standards, recommendations, and guidelines from peer-reviewed scientific journals in medicine, education, and social sciences by searching PubMed, Web of Science, and Google from August 2006 through April 2025. The authors also requested input from experts in HPE (scholars and journal editors) via electronic communication over 6 months (November 2024 to April 2025). The articles identified were then used to synthesize and generate an initial list of standards for reporting quantitative research in HPE. Two authors reviewed each article to rate its alignment with HPE research. All authors independently evaluated the full list of standards and discussed them as a group for their relevance and alignment for reporting in HPE; all authors also made recommendations for each standard (to report as is, report but modify, or drop). The group subsequently reviewed and collectively reached consensus on the final set of quantitative reporting standards. Results The authors reviewed a total of 34 articles, with 19 identified as having alignment with HPE quantitative research standards. Mean interrater agreement among author pairs was 98% (kappa = .96). Authors initially generated 40 reporting standards, of which 18 (45%) were modified and 1 (3%) was identified to be dropped. The final set of quantitative guidelines consisted of 39 standards, with each standard nested in one of 28 topic areas. Conclusions The quantitative reporting standards identified in this study provide guidance to ensure rigor in reporting expectations for HPE research. These standards may also facilitate critical appraisal of articles and enhance the quality and impact of quantitative HPE research.

Hypertension is the main risk factor for cardiovascular disease (CVD), affecting 20–40% of Latin American (LATAM) adults, and responsible for more than two million deaths annually due to CVD. The different ethnic, economic, geographic, and cultural characteristics of the LATAM population influence the high prevalence of all cardiovascular risk factors (CVRF), particularly metabolic disturbances such as type 2 diabetes (DM2), obesity and the metabolic syndrome. Their main determinants in LATAM includes environment, food quality, social inequity, low education, political aspects, contextual behaviour, and genetics. The prevalence of overweight and obesity in LATAM increased during the last four decades reaching figures of 10–20% in childhood, 30–40% in adolescence, and 60–70% in adults. Many studies in the region have reported the extremely low rates of awareness, treatment, and control of CVRF in the general population of LATAM, particularly in patients with metabolic disorders, and the consequent high cardiovascular morbidity and mortality. This 2026 LATAM consensus is developed by a large group of experts from different LATAM countries, the USA and Europe, representing areas of internal medicine, cardiology, nephrology, endocrinology, geriatrics, paediatrics, pharmacology, and epidemiology. A careful search for novel studies in LATAM, together with new evidence that has emerged since the 2019 LATAM consensus, support the statements and recommendations in the current report. This update aims to provide clear and useful recommendations for health professionals to improve awareness, treatment, and control of hypertension and associated CVRF in the region.

OBJECTIVE: A definition of refractory septic shock is necessary to guide diagnosis, management, prognostication, research, and future guidelines for this most severe form of the disease. We sought to achieve consensus on clinical criteria that would be used to define refractory septic shock. DESIGN: Review of literature, expert panel position statements, and Delphi rounds with an international expert group. SETTING: Consensus was defined as having at least 75% of panellists in agreement or disagreement on the three highest or lowest levels of a 7-point Likert scale or based on responses to single- or multiple-choice questions, respectively. SUBJECTS: A panel of multinational, multiprofessional and multidisciplinary critical care experts assembled by the Society of Critical Care Medicine and the European Society of Intensive Care Medicine (57 invitations and 56 participants). MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: A five-round Delphi process was conducted for consensus and stability. The steering committee proposed 34 statements, and five of them were rejected by panel experts after round 2. Among 29 statements selected from eight domains, consensus was reached for 13. The panel agreed on the need for a comprehensive consensus set of clinical criteria for refractory septic shock. Markers of organ dysfunction (75%, 2 rounds), tissue perfusion (91.1%, 2 rounds) including lactate (94.6%, 2 rounds) and capillary refill time (76.8%, 2 rounds), assessment of fluid-responsiveness after initial resuscitation (92.9%, 5 rounds), and use of vasoactive drugs at norepinephrine equivalents greater than 0.5 µg/kg/min (75.0%, 3 rounds), were selected as clinical criteria of refractory septic shock. The use of critical care ultrasound (CCUS) (92.9%, 3 rounds) was the single diagnostic modality that reached a consensus-based agreement. CONCLUSIONS: A consensus for 13 criteria to frame the definition of refractory septic shock was reached. Refractory septic shock is characterised by persistently elevated lactate concentrations and or prolonged capillary refill time in patients with septic shock who are fluid unresponsive, require a norepinephrine base equivalent dose greater than 0.5 micrograms per kilogram per minute, and undergo CCUS assessment when mixed shock is suspected.

Introduction: The biomechanical role of the dorsal scaphotriquetral ligament (DSTL) ligament in scapholunate (SL) stability remains debated. We assessed DSTL contribution using a cadaveric sectioning model. Methods: Twenty-four wrists underwent sequential sectioning: none (phase 0), palmar/proximal scapholunate interosseous ligament (SLIOL) (phase 1), dorsal SLIOL (phase 2), superficial dorsal intercarpal ligament (DICL) (phase 3) and DSTL (phase 4). Under axial loading (60 N; cyclic 60–200 N) and wrist motion, the SL gap and carpal angles, and a CT-derived dorsal instability scaphoid angle (DISA) were measured. Results: Phase 1 produced no significant instability. Dorsal SLIOL sectioning (phase 2) initiated dynamic instability, with increased SL gap and angles under load and dorsal scaphoid translation, but no resting dorsal intercalated segment instability (DISI). Sectioning the superficial DICL fascicle (phase 3) did not add instability. DSTL sectioning (phase 4) produced the largest changes, with marked SL diastasis, increased angles and DISA, and DISI at rest and under load. Conclusion: Dorsal SLIOL sectioning produced load-dependent (dynamic) SL instability, whereas subsequent DSTL sectioning was associated with progression to static instability, supporting the DSTL as an important dorsal restraint. The DISA may provide an additional CT-based measure of dorsal scaphoid subluxation; however, clinical validation is required.