Citations

ABSTRACT Disease Overview POEMS syndrome is a life‐threatening syndrome due to an underlying plasma cell neoplasm. The major criteria for the syndrome are polyneuropathy, clonal plasma cell disorder (PCD), sclerotic bone lesions, elevated vascular endothelial growth factor, and the presence of Castleman disease. Minor features include organomegaly, endocrinopathy, characteristic skin changes, papilledema, extravascular volume overload, and thrombocytosis. Diagnosis The diagnosis of POEMS syndrome is made with three of the major criteria, two of which must include polyneuropathy and clonal plasma cell disorder, and at least one of the minor criteria. Risk Stratification Because the pathogenesis of the syndrome is not well understood, risk stratification is limited to clinical phenotype rather than specific molecular markers. Risk factors include low serum albumin, age, pleural effusion, pulmonary hypertension, and reduced eGFR. Risk‐Adapted Therapy For those patients with a dominant plasmacytoma, first line therapy is irradiation. Patients with diffuse sclerotic lesions or disseminated bone marrow involvement should receive systemic therapy. Corticosteroids are temporizing, but alkylators and lenalidomide are the mainstays of treatment, the former either in the form of low dose conventional therapy or as high‐dose conditioning for stem cell transplantation. Thalidomide and bortezomib also have activity, but their benefit needs to be weighed against their risk of exacerbating the peripheral neuropathy. Daratumumab combinations also appear promising based on case series. Prompt recognition and institution of both supportive care measures and therapy directed against the plasma cell result in the best outcomes.

Abstract Extramedullary disease (EMD) is increasingly recognized in relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (MM), with central nervous system involvement (CNS-MM) representing a rare but highly aggressive manifestation associated with dismal outcomes. Data on its incidence and optimal management, particularly in the era of cellular and bispecific therapies, remain limited. We conducted a retrospective analysis of patients with MM with pathology-confirmed EMD treated at our institution between January 2000 and December 2023. CNS-MM was defined by parenchymal or leptomeningeal involvement. Clinical features, cytogenetics, treatments, and outcomes were analyzed, with predictors of CNS involvement evaluated among patients with EMD. Among 304 patients with EMD, 20 (6.5%) had CNS-MM. CNS involvement occurred a median of 19.2 months after MM diagnosis, though 15% presented at diagnosis. CNS-MM was strongly associated with high-risk cytogenetics (odds ratio [OR], 3.7) and additional visceral EMD (OR, 4.6). Median overall survival (OS) from CNS-MM diagnosis was 4.2 months. Outcomes were significantly improved in patients receiving chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy or bispecific antibodies, with a median OS of 19.2 months vs 1.2 months in those who did not receive immune effector therapies. Intrathecal (IT) chemotherapy demonstrated limited and transient benefit. In conclusion, CNS-MM is an aggressive complication enriched in high-risk, multifocal EMD with extremely poor prognosis. Cellular and bispecific therapies show promising activity and may meaningfully improve survival, whereas IT therapy appears to have limited efficacy. Prospective studies are needed to define optimal treatment strategies for CNS-MM.

Abstract Therapeutic options for Waldenström macroglobulinemia (WM) have expanded but improvements in overall-survival (OS) are difficult to interpret due to competing non–WM mortality. We conducted a large single-center retrospective study of 1,020 patients with WM to evaluate survival trends. Patients were stratified by era of active WM diagnosis using a two-era model (1996–2005 and post-2005) and a four-era model (pre-2001, 2001–2007, 2008–2013, and post-2013). OS did not differ significantly across eras in the overall cohort (p = 0.64 and p = 0.86 for the two- and four-era models). However, among patients aged < 65 years at the time of active WM diagnosis in the 2-era model, OS improved in the post-2006 era (median 18.8 vs 14.1 years, p = 0.018). Cause-specific-survival (CSS) improved across all eras, increasing from 15.6 years in 1996–2005 to 18.9 years post-2006 (p < 0.0001), and from 13.7 years pre-2001 to not reached in later periods in the four-era model (p < 0.0001). Competing-risk-analysis (CRA) demonstrated a reduction in WM-related mortality over time (p < 0.001). However, excess mortality persisted, with a standardized mortality ratio (SMR) of 2.79 (p < 0.001) among patients < 65 years compared with a matched U.S. population. Our findings highlight improvements in WM-specific survival, while gains in OS are observed in younger patients.

ABSTRACT High dose melphalan (HDM) with autologous stem cell transplant is an established treatment for systemic light chain amyloidosis, but its incremental benefit in the era of effective standard intensity therapy is unknown. We retrospectively analyzed 475 transplant‐eligible patients who completed standard intensity treatment with or without HDM within 12 months at six centers in Europe and the United States between 2010 and 2024 to evaluate outcomes by baseline risk factors, hematologic response, and receipt of HDM. Death was an equally competing risk after the 12‐month landmark chosen to address early non‐proportional hazards and to ensure completion of first‐line therapy. BMPC > 20% was associated with inferior outcomes (HR 1.7), and gain/amp 1q with shorter TTP (HR 2.15), whereas other high‐risk FISH abnormalities were not. In multivariable models, VGPR/CR after standard intensity therapy was associated with longer TTP (HR 0.49/0.29), while gain/amp 1q remained independently associated with shorter TTP (HR 2.18). Receipt of daratumumab and HDM were associated with longer TTP (HR 0.44/0.61). HDM benefited patients who had not achieved CR after standard intensity therapy (mTTP 21.0 vs. 5.7 months without HDM), whereas patients already in CR did not benefit. Higher BMPC at diagnosis was associated with earlier progression in patients not receiving HDM (HR 1.9 for 5%–20% and 4.09 for > 20%), a risk attenuated in the HDM cohort. Gain/amp 1q remained associated with shorter TTP regardless of HDM exposure. These findings support a selective role for HDM, primarily benefiting patients with residual disease after standard intensity therapy or higher BMPC burden at diagnosis.

ABSTRACT Primary plasma cell leukemia (pPCL) is a rare and aggressive plasma cell disorder with inferior outcomes compared with multiple myeloma (MM). However, studies describing outcomes after first progression and subsequent lines of therapy remain limited. We retrospectively analyzed 104 patients with pPCL who progressed after first‐line therapy treated at one comprehensive cancer center between 2006 and 2024. Clinical characteristics, treatments, time to next treatment (TTNT), and overall survival (OS) were assessed using Kaplan–Meier methods. All pPCL patients received novel agent–based induction. At the time of analysis, 63% had died; median OS was 39 months. High‐risk cytogenetics were present in 71%. The median TTNT after first‐line therapy was 10 months. Symptomatic progression occurred in 29% of patients and was associated with significantly inferior subsequent OS (13 vs. 34 months) compared with those experiencing asymptomatic biochemical progression. The TTNT progressively shortened with subsequent lines of therapy (3rd line: 6 months; 4th line: 4 months; 5th line: 3 months). Notable exceptions included pPCL patients with t (11;14) treated with anti‐BCL‐2‐based regimens, who achieved a median TTNT of 13 months. Additionally, 24 patients received anti‐BCMA CAR T‐cell therapy. With a median follow‐up of 21 months, their median TTNT was 32 months. pPCL is characterized by frequent disease progression and diminishing response duration with successive therapeutic lines. Symptomatic progression portends particularly poor outcomes. Anti‐BCL‐2‐based therapy in t (11;14) disease and anti‐BCMA CAR T‐cell therapy appear to provide more durable disease control and represent important advances for the management of progressed pPCL.

PURPOSE In immunoglobulin light chain (AL) amyloidosis, amyloid fibrils cause organ dysfunction. Anselamimab, a monoclonal antibody, selectively binds to amyloid fibrils, accelerating their clearance. METHODS Newly diagnosed patients with European modification of Mayo 2004 stage IIIa or IIIb AL amyloidosis were randomly assigned to receive anselamimab or placebo with cyclophosphamide, bortezomib, and dexamethasone (with or without daratumumab). The primary end point was a hierarchical composite of time to all-cause mortality (ACM) and frequency of cardiovascular hospitalizations (CVHs), analyzed using the Finkelstein-Schoenfeld test and win ratio estimation. RESULTS Among 406 randomly assigned patients, the primary end point win ratio for anselamimab versus placebo was 1.11 (95% CI, 0.83, 1.50; P = .332) and the hazard ratio (HR) for ACM was 0.80 (95% CI, 0.57, 1.13; P = .290). CVH rates in the anselamimab and placebo groups were 0.59 (95% CI, 0.42, 0.83) and 0.89 (95% CI, 0.55, 1.43), respectively ( P = .145). Among patients with kappa isotype (n = 72), the win ratio was 2.06 (95% CI, 0.98, 4.31; P = .100) and anselamimab reduced ACM by 62% versus placebo (HR, 0.38; 95% CI, 0.17 to 0.86; nominal P = .012), and CVH by 71% (IRR, 0.29; 95% CI, 0.10 to 0.87; nominal P = .028) with improvements in Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire-Overall Score. There was no clinical benefit observed in the lambda population. Anselamimab was generally well-tolerated; safety data were comparable between treatment arms overall. CONCLUSION Treatment with anselamimab, an antifibril antibody used alongside antiplasma cell dyscrasia therapy, while not meeting the primary end point in the overall population, significantly improved ACM and CVH in patients with kappa AL, potentially offering a new therapeutic option for this isotype.

e19564 Background: Risk stratification in multiple myeloma (MM) relies on baseline staging systems and cytogenetic abnormalities, yet early relapse occurs in a subset of patients despite favorable risk features. Prior studies showed that clonal plasma cell S-phase assessed by flow cytometry using the plasma cell proliferation (PCPRO) assay at diagnosis and at autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) identifies biologically high-risk disease. The prognostic significance of clonal plasma cell S-phase following ASCT has not been well defined. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed MM patients who underwent ASCT within one year of diagnosis between January 1, 2013, and August 31, 2024. Patients without available post-ASCT clonal plasma cell S-phase assessment were excluded, yielding 150 evaluable patients. The proportion of clonal plasma cells in S-phase was determined by DNA content between G0/G1 and G2/M peaks and reported as a percentage. S-phase was assessed at the first post-ASCT marrow evaluation at day +60 (D45–75) and/or day +100 (D76–130), using the earlier assessment when both were available. Patients were classified as low (<2%) or high (≥2%) post-ASCT S-phase. Landmark progression-free survival (PFS) analyses were performed from the post-transplant assessment. Multivariable Cox models adjusted for cytogenetic risk, maintenance therapy, disease response at transplantation, International Staging System (ISS), and age. Results: Among 150 evaluable patients, 36 (24%) had high post-ASCT S-phase (≥2%) and 114 (76%) had low post-ASCT S-phase (<2%). Median age at ASCT was higher in the high S-phase group (64.5 vs 61.0 years; p=0.063), and advanced ISS stage (II/III) was more frequent (78% vs 57%; p=0.02). Cytogenetic risk, induction regimen, depth of response at transplantation, and maintenance therapy were similar between groups. Patients with high post-ASCT S-phase had significantly inferior PFS compared with those with low S-phase (median 17.0 vs 39.7 months; p=0.0003). On multivariable analysis, post-ASCT S-phase ≥2% remained independently associated with inferior PFS (HR 1.76, 95% CI 1.00–3.09; p=0.049). In an exploratory analysis among patients with paired S-phase assessments at the time of ASCT and post-ASCT, dynamic S-phase trajectories further stratified outcomes. Median PFS was longest in patients with persistently low S-phase (low→low; 39.7 months), intermediate in those converting from high to low S-phase (high→low; 27.2 months), and shortest in patients with newly emergent or persistently high post-ASCT S-phase (low→high: 15.0 months; high→high: 11.0 months) p=0.0019. Conclusions: Elevated proliferative activity of residual clonal plasma cells following ASCT identifies a biologically high-risk subset of MM patients with early relapse. Dynamic changes in post-ASCT S-phase further refine post-transplant risk stratification.

7501 Background: AL amyloidosis is a plasma cell dyscrasia (PCD) characterized by κ or λ Ig light chain amyloid fibrils that deposit in vital organs. Anselamimab is an investigational mAb designed to complement anti-PCD therapy through accelerated removal of amyloid fibrils. Cardiac Amyloid Reaching for Extended Survival (CARES) studies (NCT04512235 and NCT04504825) investigated the efficacy and safety of anselamimab compared with placebo, in addition to anti-PCD therapy. Methods: Alongside anti-PCD therapy with CyBorD (daratumumab was permitted) newly diagnosed patients with European modification of Mayo stage IIIa or IIIb AL amyloidosis were randomized 2:1 to receive anselamimab (1000 mg/m 2 ) or placebo (normal saline) IV every 7 days for 4 weeks followed by every 14 days for the remainder of the blinded study (18 months after the last participant enrolled). The primary endpoint was a hierarchical combination of time to all-cause mortality (ACM) and frequency of adjudicated cardiovascular hospitalizations (CVH) using the Finkelstein-Schoenfeld test and win-ratio in the combined study population. Subgroup analysis by involved κ or λ free light chain (iFLC) was prespecified. Results: 271 patients were randomized to receive anselamimab and 135 placebo. Baseline characteristics were similar between treatment arms. The median duration of treatment was 21.4 months and 21.1 in the anselamimab and placebo arms, respectively. Daratumumab was used in 79.3% and 83.7% of the anselamimab and placebo arms, respectively. Results of the primary efficacy analyses are shown in the table. Anselamimab-treated patients with κ iFLC had a 62% reduction in ACM (HR = 0.38; 95% CI, 0.17, 0.86; nominal P = 0.012) and a 71% reduction in risk for CVH (estimated CVH rate ratio = 0.29; 95% CI, 0.10, 0.87; nominal P = 0.028). Patients with λ iFLC had a 10% reduction in risk for CVH; none in ACM. Safety data were comparable between both treatment arms. In anselamimab-treated patients, safety findings were similar between κ subgroup and full population. Conclusions: Anselamimab, a κ light chain–directed anti-fibril monoclonal antibody used alongside standard of care chemotherapy, offers a first-in-class, new therapeutic option for patients with newly diagnosed κ AL amyloidosis. Clinical trial information: NCT04512235 and NCT04504825 . Summary of primary efficacy endpoints. Endpoint Overall κ Isotype λ Isotype Anselamimab (N=271) Placebo (N=135) P -value Anselamimab (N=48) Placebo (N=24) P -value Anselamimab (N=219) Placebo (N=109) P -value ACM and CVH win ratio (95% CI) 1.1 (0.8, 1.5) 0.332 2.06 (0.98, 4.31) 0.100 0.9 (0.6, 1.3) 0.848 ACM n (%) 90 (33.2) 52 (38.5) 15 (31.3) 14 (58.3) 73 (33.3) 37 (33.9) HR (95% CI) 0.8 (0.6, 1.1) 0.290 0.38 (0.2, 0.9) 0.012 1.0 (0.7, 1.5) 0.647 CVH Frequency/year (95% CI) 0.6 (0.4, 0.8) 0.9 (0.6, 1.4) 0.145 0.41 (0.2, 0.8) 1.4 (0.6, 3.4) 0.028 0.7 (0.4, 1.0) 0.8 (0.4, 1.3) 0.664 Incidence risk ratio (95% CI) 0.7 (0.4, 1.2) 0.29 (0.1, 0.9) 0.9 (0.5, 1.7)