Hruska, Carrie B

BACKGROUND: Technetium-based cardiac amyloid radionuclide imaging enables noninvasive diagnosis of transthyretin amyloid cardiomyopathy (ATTR-CM), but conventional planar and visual semiquantitative approaches have important limitations. We developed the quantitative 3-dimensional Mayo 3D Score, defined as the ratio of mean left ventricular myocardial radiotracer uptake to right atrial blood-pool uptake using computed tomography (CT)-fused single-photon emission CT (SPECT) volumes of interest, and sought to validate its diagnostic performance against myocardial pathology. METHODS: Consecutive patients who underwent 99m Tc-pyrophosphate SPECT/CT at Mayo Clinic for suspected ATTR-CM between June 2017 and January 2025 with archived myocardial tissue were included. Baseline characteristics, including demographics, echocardiogram, biomarkers, visual semiquantitative, and Mayo 3D Score metrics, were collected. Myocardial specimens underwent histopathologic confirmation of amyloid, with amyloid subtype determination and further semiquantitative grading of amyloid burden and deposition patterns. RESULTS: Among 230 patients (median age, 72 years; 78% male), 107 (47%) had ATTR-CM, of whom 9 had hereditary ATTR-CM. The Mayo 3D Score showed excellent discrimination against pathology (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve, 0.92 [0.88–0.96]), exceeding planar Perugini (0.87 [0.83–0.92]; P =0.006), and heart-to-contralateral lung ratio (0.86 [0.81–0.91]; P =0.004) and comparable to SPECT Perugini (0.90 [0.86–0.94]; P =0.12). A cutoff ≥1.0 yielded 86.0% sensitivity, 92.7% specificity, 91.1% positive predictive value, and 88.4% negative predictive value. Among ATTR-positive cases, the Mayo 3D Score correlated strongly with semiquantitative amyloid burden (Spearman ρ=0.69), was higher in pericellular than nodular deposition patterns ( P <0.001), and was not associated with vascular involvement ( P =0.42). CONCLUSIONS: In patients with suspected ATTR-CM undergoing 99m Tc-pyrophosphate SPECT/CT, the Mayo 3D Score demonstrated superior diagnostic performance compared with planar metrics and comparable to SPECT Perugini, while correlating with myocardial ATTR burden and deposition patterns on pathology. These findings support its integration as a quantitative adjunct within clinical diagnostic ATTR-CM workflows.

BACKGROUND: Guidelines recommend 3-hour cardiac amyloid radionuclide imaging (CARI) for transthyretin amyloid cardiomyopathy. Citing rapid blood clearance of 99m Tc-hydroxymethylene-diphosphonate (HMDP) and efficient laboratory throughput, 1-hour imaging is increasingly practiced despite limited supporting evidence. We sought to compare diagnostic performance and interpreter experience of 1-hour versus 3-hour HMDP-CARI. METHODS: Consecutive patients with suspected transthyretin amyloid cardiomyopathy (n=114) underwent both 1-hour and 3-hour HMDP single photon emission computed tomography (CT)/CT. Two cardiologist-radiologist reader teams, blinded to imaging timepoint (1 versus 3 hours), assessed overall interpretation, single photon emission CT–based Perugini grade, interpretation difficulty, interpreter confidence, and need for CT-fused images for anatomic localization. Discordant, equivocal, and difficult cases were arbitrated by a third tie-breaking team. The myocardial-to-blood-pool radiotracer uptake ratio (3-dimensional Score) was measured as a surrogate of contrast resolution. RESULTS: Interinterpreter agreement was high at both time points (κ≥0.81), with more cases requiring arbitration at 3 hours versus 1 hour (22% versus 13%; P =0.049). Overall interpretation and Perugini grades were concordant between time points in 111/114 (97%) and 106/114 (93%) patients, respectively. Three patients (3%) were negative at 1 hour but equivocal at 3 hours, all of which were clinically ruled out for transthyretin amyloid cardiomyopathy. Interpreter confidence was comparable at both timepoints (97% versus 95%; P =0.317). Compared with 3-hour imaging, contrast resolution was inferior (lower 3-dimensional score, P <0.001) and CT fusion was more frequently needed (57% versus 31%, P <0.001) at 1-hour imaging. CONCLUSIONS: In a prospective, blinded comparison of 1-hour versus 3-hour HMDP-CARI, diagnostic performance and interpreter experience were similar, with readers requesting CT fusion more frequently at 1 hour to optimize myocardial-to-blood pool discrimination.

In women with dense breasts, adding molecular breast imaging to digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT) increased both overall and invasive cancer detection rates, while modestly raising the recall rate compared with DBT alone.

PURPOSE Artificial intelligence (AI) algorithms improve breast cancer detection on mammography, but their contribution to long-term risk prediction for advanced and interval cancers is unknown. METHODS We identified 2,412 women with invasive breast cancer and 4,995 controls matched on age, race, and date of mammogram, from two US mammography cohorts, who had two-dimensional full-field digital mammograms performed 2-5.5 years before cancer diagnosis. We assessed Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System density, an AI malignancy score (1-10), and volumetric density measures. We used conditional logistic regression to estimate odds ratios (ORs), 95% CIs, adjusted for age and BMI, and C-statistics (AUC) to describe the association of AI score with invasive cancer and its contribution to models with breast density measures. Likelihood ratio tests (LRTs) and bootstrapping methods were used to compare model performance. RESULTS On mammograms between 2-5.5 years prior to cancer, a one unit increase in AI score was associated with 20% greater odds of invasive breast cancer (OR, 1.20; 95% CI, 1.17 to 1.22; AUC, 0.63; 95% CI, 0.62 to 0.64) and was similarly predictive of interval (OR, 1.20; 95% CI, 1.13 to 1.27; AUC, 0.63) and advanced cancers (OR, 1.23; 95% CI, 1.16 to 1.31; AUC, 0.64) and in dense (OR, 1.18; 95% CI, 1.15 to 1.22; AUC, 0.66) breasts. AI score improved prediction of all cancer types in models with density measures ( P LRT values < .001); discrimination improved for advanced cancer (ie, AUC for dense volume increased from 0.624 to 0.679, Δ AUC 0.065, P = .01) but did not reach statistical significance for interval cancer. CONCLUSION AI imaging algorithms coupled with breast density independently contribute to long-term risk prediction of invasive breast cancers, in particular, advanced cancer.

Abstract Background: Mammographic breast density declines during menopause. We assessed changes in volumetric breast density across the menopausal transition and factors that influence these changes. Methods: Women without a history of breast cancer, who had full field digital mammograms during both pre- and postmenopausal periods, at least 2 years apart, were sampled from four facilities within the San Francisco Mammography Registry from 2007 to 2013. Dense breast volume (DV) was assessed using Volpara on mammograms across the time period. Annualized change in DV from pre- to postmenopause was estimated using linear mixed models adjusted for covariates and per-woman random effects. Multiplicative interactions were evaluated between premenopausal risk factors and time to determine whether these covariates modified the annualized changes. Results: Among the 2,586 eligible women, 1,802 had one premenopausal and one postmenopausal mammogram, 628 had an additional perimenopausal mammogram, and 156 had two perimenopausal mammograms. Women experienced an annualized decrease in DV [−2.2 cm3 (95% confidence interval, −2.7 to −1.7)] over the menopausal transition. Declines were greater among women with a premenopausal DV above the median (54 cm3) versus below (DV, −3.5 cm3 vs. −1.0 cm3; P &lt; 0.0001). Other breast cancer risk factors, including race, body mass index, family history, alcohol, and postmenopausal hormone therapy, had no effect on change in DV over the menopausal transition. Conclusions: High premenopausal DV was a strong predictor of greater reductions in DV across the menopausal transition. Impact: We found that few factors other than premenopausal density influence changes in DV across the menopausal transition, limiting targeted prevention efforts.