Citations

Introduction Geriatric distal femur fractures are associated with mortality rates exceeding 20%, comparable to hip fractures. Traditional single implant fixation often requires weight-bearing restrictions that delay recovery. This pilot study aims to assess the feasibility of conducting a multicentre randomised controlled trial comparing dual vs single implant fixation for geriatric distal femur fractures. Methods and analysis This multicentre, prospective, randomised controlled pilot trial will enrol 80 participants aged 60 years or older with displaced distal femur fractures at five US level 1 trauma centres. Patients will be randomly allocated 1:1 to receive either single implant (lateral plate or retrograde nail) or dual implant (nail-plate or dual plate) fixation. All patients will be permitted immediate weight-bearing. The primary outcome is feasibility assessed through enrolment rate (80 patients in 12 months), protocol adherence (≥90%) and follow-up retention (≥85% at 12 months). Secondary outcomes include post-surgical mobility (AM-PAC, TUG), patient-reported outcomes (PROMIS-PF, PROMIS-29), mortality (90-day and 1 year) and complication rates. Analyses will be on an intention-to-treat basis. Ethics and dissemination The protocol was approved by the University of Utah Institutional Review Board (IRB_00149119) and IRBs at all participating centres. Written informed consent will be obtained from participants or legally authorised representatives. Findings will be disseminated through peer-reviewed publications and conference presentations. Trial registration number NCT05292313 .

Abstract Background Although recent guidance recommends early surgical debridement for native joint septic arthritis (NJSA), supporting data, particularly on long-term outcomes, remains scarce. Methods We conducted a retrospective multicenter cohort study of adults (≥18 years) with NJSA who underwent surgery across Mayo Clinic campuses between 2012 and 2021. Clinical outcomes at 1 year were assessed using a 9-level Desirability of Outcome Ranking (DOOR) scale, incorporating survival, treatment failure (relapse, reinfection, readmission, or significant surgical events), and joint recovery. Time to surgery from hospital admission was analyzed both as a continuous variable and as categories: < 1, 1–2, or ≥3 days. Results Among 268 patients, 30% underwent surgery <1 day from admission, 47% in 1–2 days, and 24% in ≥3 days. At 1 year, 57% achieved full recovery without unfavorable events (DOOR score 1), while treatment failure occurred in 34%. In unadjusted analyses, longer surgical delay was significantly associated with higher (worse) DOOR scores (per IQR increase [from 0 to 2 days], OR: 1.5; 95% CI: 1.0–2.1; P = .026), increased 1-year mortality (HR: 1.7; 95% CI: 1.1–2.6; P = .019) and treatment failure (HR: 1.5; 95% CI: 1.1–2.0; P = .007). Even after adjusting for age and Charlson comorbidity index, the association between surgical delay and treatment failure remained significant (HR: 1.5; 95% CI, 1.1–2.0; P = .016). Conclusions The finding that delayed surgical intervention is associated with an increased risk of treatment failure reinforces current expert recommendations for timely surgical management in NJSA.

This case describes a 74-year-old woman who developed post-surgical acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) after Photodynamic Bone Stabilization System (PBSS) a balloon rupture with extravasation of approximately 20 mL of monomeric resin. The ARDS likely resulted from 2 possibilities: (1) displacement of fat or tumor embolism from PBSS insertion/inflation, displacement from bioinert monomers, or orthopedic screws; or (2) chemical inflammation/pneumonitis due to intravascular dissemination of bioinert monomeric resin. Though balloon rupture and/or fat embolism is a stated manufacturer risk, (IlluminOss. Accessed May 19, 2025. https://illuminoss.com/uploads/nuggets/60e47f517ee33862a5fcaab8/900356_T.pdf) this is the first published human case report of ARDS as a complication of PBSS balloon rupture.

OBJECTIVES: To compare whether femoral version more closely mirrors the contralateral femur or a population norm estimate of 15 degrees of anteversion. METHODS: Design: Radiologic observational study. Setting: Level I Trauma Center. Patient Selection Criteria: Patients with no history of anatomy-altering femoral injury who underwent bilateral lower extremity computed tomography scans. Outcome Measures and Comparisons: Computed tomographies were analyzed to measure femoral version on each side. The asymmetry in femoral version between left and right in each patient (interfemoral rotational variance [IRV]) was recorded. The difference of each femur's version from a proposed population mean of 15 degrees of anteversion was also recorded. RESULTS: A total of 219 patients with a mean femoral version of 14.9 degrees ± 10.5 degrees of anteversion were included. Mean IRV was 5.3 degrees, compared with 8.2 degrees of mean variation from the population norm of 15 degrees of anteversion (P < 0.001). Five percent of patients had IRV >15 degrees compared with 15% that had femoral rotation >15 degrees from the population mean of 15 degrees (P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: In the setting of a comminuted diaphyseal femur fracture, knowledge of the appropriate target for restoration of rotational alignment is critical. This radiologic cohort study found that on average, femoral version more closely mirrors an individual patient's contralateral femur as opposed to a population norm of 15 degrees of anteversion.

Case: An 8-year-old boy underwent open reduction and internal fixation for pelvic and femoral fractures following a crush injury. At nine months postoperatively, computed tomography demonstrated a triradiate physeal bar contralateral to operated hemipelvis. A navigated physeal bar excision with O-arm navigation and low-dose radiation protocol was performed. Conclusion: Triradiate bar excision presents a technically challenging procedure that may be offset by O-arm navigation utilization, which provides accurate, real-time imaging that facilitates complete physeal bar excision while mitigating risk of damage to surrounding structures. Our low-dose protocol yielded a total exposure of 0.914 mSv, comparable with 1.5 pelvic radiographs.

Background: Periprosthetic tibial fractures around a total knee replacement (TKR) remain challenging to manage, with little published information for guidance. The purpose of this study was to review the types, management techniques, and outcomes of periprosthetic tibial fractures in the largest series to date. Methods: We identified 300 periprosthetic tibial fractures (285 patients) around a TKR (43% in primary TKRs and 57% in revision TKRs) sustained between 1996 and 2020. Fractures were classified according to Felix et al. as Type I (tibial plateau), Type II (adjacent to stem), Type III (distal to stem), or Type IV (tibial tubercle), with subtypes A (well-fixed component), B (loose component), and C (intraoperative fracture). Of the fractures in this study, 53% were Type I, 24% were Type II, 16% were Type III, and 8% were Type IV. A total of 46% of fractures occurred intraoperatively, and 54% of fractures occurred postoperatively (61% subtype A, 39% subtype B). The mean patient age at fracture was 67 years, and 64% of patients were female. The mean follow-up was 6 years. Results: The intraoperative fracture incidence was 1.40% in revision TKRs and 0.10% in primary TKRs. Among intraoperative fractures, the 2-year survivorship free from tibial component revision was highest in Type I (100%) and lowest in Type IV (67%) (p < 0.001). For postoperative fractures, the 2-year survivorship free from any reoperation was 29% and the 2-year survivorship free from tibial component revision was 51%. Type-I postoperative fractures had the lowest 2-year survivorship free from tibial component revision (10%), whereas Type-III fractures had the highest survivorship (88%) (p < 0.001). Conclusions: Intraoperative periprosthetic fracture of the tibia was fourteenfold more likely in revision TKRs compared with primary TKRs. Among all intraoperative fractures, Type-I fractures were well-tolerated, with 100% survivorship free from tibial component revision at 2 years. Conversely, Type-I postoperative fractures had only 10% survivorship at 2 years. Level of Evidence: Therapeutic Level III . See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to identify the rate at which the anterolateral (AL) tibial plafond is affected in comminuted suprasyndesmotic ankle fractures (OTA/AO 44C2) and to assess how its involvement affects clinical outcomes. METHODS: Design: Retrospective review. Setting: Level 1 Trauma Center. Patient Selection Criteria: Patients with a preoperative computed tomography treated surgically for OTA/AO 44C2 fractures from January 2005 to December 2021. Outcome Measures and Comparisons: The primary outcome measure was the prevalence of AL plafond impaction or a displaced Tillaux-Chaput fracture. Secondary outcome measures included reoperation rate (excluding hardware removal), rate of new-onset ankle osteoarthritis, rate of ankle osteoarthritis progression, Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation score, and the Olerud Molander Ankle Score. RESULTS: Fifty-three patients met inclusion criteria. The average age was 50 years (range 18–100), and 53% were female. The AL plafond was involved in 26 patients (49%), with AL plafond impaction in 11 patients (21%) and a displaced Tillaux-Chaput fragment in 15 patients (28%). Five patients (19%) received independent fixation of the AL plafond, and 3 of these patients had AL plafond impaction addressed. Thirty-eight patients (72%) had clinical follow-up of at least 6 months. Patients with AL plafond impaction had a higher rate of reoperation (excluding hardware removal) compared with those without any AL plafond involvement (hazard of reoperation = 8.3, 95% confidence interval, 1.4–15.3, P = 0.022) and a higher rate of new-onset ankle osteoarthritis (83% vs. 23%, P = 0.013). There was no difference in the rate of reoperation (11% vs. 9%, P = 0.748) or new-onset osteoarthritis (63% vs. 23%, P = 0.078) when comparing those with a displaced Tillaux-Chaput fracture to those without AL plafond involvement. There were no differences in Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation (75% vs. 78% vs. 85%, P = 0.661) or Olerud Molander Ankle Score (70 points vs. 69 points vs. 81 points, P = 0.517) scores when comparing those with AL plafond impaction, those with Tillaux-Chaput fragments, and those with no AL plafond involvement. CONCLUSIONS: Computed tomography evaluation is recommended in patients with comminuted suprasyndesmotic fibula fractures (OTA/AO 44C2) given their high association with AL plafond impaction and Tillaux-Chaput fracture. Patients with AL plafond impaction have a higher reoperation rate and new-onset ankle osteoarthritis compared with those without AL plafond involvement. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Prognostic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Case: A 67-year-old woman sustained a periprosthetic tibial tubercle avulsion fracture with extensor mechanism disruption. She underwent open reduction internal fixation (ORIF) with orthogonal mini-fragment plates applied in a tension band fashion with patellar tendon suture augmentation. Radiographs, range of motion, and patient-reported outcomes were completed over 1 year. Conclusion: Isolated periprosthetic tibial tubercle fractures with disruption of the extensor mechanism can be treated with ORIF using orthogonal tension band plating. At 1-year follow-up, the surgical technique described in this report yielded radiographic union, clinical restoration of preinjury motion, and excellent patient-reported outcomes.

Abstract We examined the effect of preoperative antibiotic exposure and duration on synovial fluid samples from patients with native joint septic arthritis of the hip/knee. While exposure before diagnostic arthrocentesis did not affect fluid parameters, increased duration was associated with a decreased total nucleated cell count, underscoring the complex antibiotic effects on synovial fluid parameters.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate tranexamic acid (TXA) when administered immediately on hospital presentation in patients with extracapsular peritrochanteric hip fractures to determine its effect on (1) transfusion rates, (2) estimated blood loss, and (3) complications. METHODS: Design: Prospective, double-blinded, randomized clinical trial. Setting: Single-center, Level 1 trauma center. Patient Selection Criteria: All patients with isolated OTA/AO 31-A fracture patterns from 2018 to 2022 were eligible for inclusion. Study drug was administered in the emergency department at the time of presentation—1-g bolus over 10 minutes followed by a 1-g infusion over 8 hours. Outcome Measures and Comparisons: The primary outcome was the rate of red blood cell transfusion hospital days 1–4. Secondary outcomes included estimated blood loss and complications including venous thromboembolic events, stroke, myocardial infarction, all-cause 90-day readmissions, and all-cause mortality. RESULTS: One hundred twenty-eight patients were included—64 patients were randomized to intravenous TXA and 64 patients to intravenous normal saline (ie, placebo). There was no difference in the rate of red blood cell transfusion between treatment arms between hospital days 1–4 (27% in the TXA arm vs. 31% in the placebo arm, P = 0.65). Patients randomized to placebo who required transfusion received a mean of 2.30 units compared with 1.94 units in the TXA cohort (P = 0.55). There was no difference in the estimated blood loss between hospital days 1–4. There was no difference in the incidence of postoperative complications including venous thromboembolic events, stroke, myocardial infarction, 90-day readmission, or death. CONCLUSIONS: The results of this study do not support the use of preoperative TXA for reducing blood loss for geriatric patients with extracapsular hip fractures. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic Level I. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.