Konda, Sanjit R.

Introduction Geriatric distal femur fractures are associated with mortality rates exceeding 20%, comparable to hip fractures. Traditional single implant fixation often requires weight-bearing restrictions that delay recovery. This pilot study aims to assess the feasibility of conducting a multicentre randomised controlled trial comparing dual vs single implant fixation for geriatric distal femur fractures. Methods and analysis This multicentre, prospective, randomised controlled pilot trial will enrol 80 participants aged 60 years or older with displaced distal femur fractures at five US level 1 trauma centres. Patients will be randomly allocated 1:1 to receive either single implant (lateral plate or retrograde nail) or dual implant (nail-plate or dual plate) fixation. All patients will be permitted immediate weight-bearing. The primary outcome is feasibility assessed through enrolment rate (80 patients in 12 months), protocol adherence (≥90%) and follow-up retention (≥85% at 12 months). Secondary outcomes include post-surgical mobility (AM-PAC, TUG), patient-reported outcomes (PROMIS-PF, PROMIS-29), mortality (90-day and 1 year) and complication rates. Analyses will be on an intention-to-treat basis. Ethics and dissemination The protocol was approved by the University of Utah Institutional Review Board (IRB_00149119) and IRBs at all participating centres. Written informed consent will be obtained from participants or legally authorised representatives. Findings will be disseminated through peer-reviewed publications and conference presentations. Trial registration number NCT05292313 .

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effect of joint preparation and patient factors on outcomes and complications in patients treated acutely with hindfoot fusion nails for ankle and pilon fractures. METHODS: Design: Retrospective chart review. Setting: Thirteen US trauma centers and 2 UK trauma centers. Patient Selection Criteria: Ankle and pilon fractures (AO-OTA types A-C) from 2010 to 2020 acutely treated definitively with hindfoot fusion nail were reviewed. Patients at least 18 years old and with minimum 6 months follow-up or earlier diagnosis of complication were included. Exclusion criteria included nonambulatory at baseline, prior internal fixation that failed and underwent revision, and prior tibiotalar or subtalar arthrodesis. Outcome Measurements and Comparisons: The primary outcome was final postoperative ambulatory status. Secondary outcomes were infectious and fracture-related complications. RESULTS: One hundred forty-nine patients (75 men; 74 women; age 20–99; median 63 years) were treated for ankle (104) or pilon (45; 8A, 13B, 24C) fractures. Eighty-five patients (44%) had open fractures and 55 (37%) had diabetes. Thirty-six patients (24%) had joint preparation at the time of surgery. Forty-five (30%) were made weight bearing as tolerated postoperatively; the median time to mobilize was 1.5 days (0–210) and to full weight bearing was 35 days (0–1462). Fifty-seven patients (85%) returned to their preinjury ambulatory status, which was not affected by joint preparation (50% vs. 59%, P = 0.327). Joint preparation led to higher articular fusion rates (94% vs. 24%; P = 0.001) and fewer hardware removals (19% vs. 42%, P = 0.013), but trended toward a higher fracture nonunion rate (19% vs. 8%, P = 0.053). Forty-five patients (30%) had infectious complications, 60 (40%) had a fracture-related complication, and 67 (45%) had additional procedures. Open fractures did not lead to any differences in superficial or deep infection. Insulin-dependent diabetes was associated with higher rates of infectious complications (31% vs. 15%, P = 0.028) and amputation (17% vs. 4%, P = 0.029). CONCLUSIONS: Hindfoot fusion nails for acute ankle and pilon injuries had high complication rates. More complications occurred in patients with insulin-dependent diabetes. While 95% regained ambulation, only 57% returned to preoperative status. Joint preparation led to higher rates of articular fusion (94% vs. 24%, P < 0.001) but not fracture union (81% vs. 66%, P = 0.106). LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Prognostic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Objectives: To evaluate monetary trends in government (Medicare) reimbursement rates for 20 commonly used orthopedic trauma surgical procedures over a 20-year period. Methods: The Physician Fee Schedule Look-Up Tool from the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services was queried for the 20 common Current Procedural Terminology (CPT) codes in orthopaedic trauma, and reimbursement data were extracted. All monetary data were adjusted for inflation to 2020 US dollars (USD) using changes to the US Consumer Price Index. Both the average annual and the total percentage change in reimbursement and in Relative Value Units were calculated for all included procedures. Results: After adjusting for inflation, the average reimbursement for all procedures decreased by 30.0% from 2000 to 2020. Total Relative Value Units during this time increased by 4.4% on average. Procedures about the foot and ankle demonstrated the greatest decrease in the mean adjusted reimbursement at −42.6%, whereas procedures about the shoulder and upper extremity demonstrated the smallest mean decrease at 23.7% during the study period. From 2000 to 2020, the adjusted reimbursement rate for all included procedures decreased by an average of 1.5% each year. Conclusion: To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study to comprehensively evaluate trends in procedural Medicare reimbursement for orthopaedic trauma. When adjusted for inflation, Medicare reimbursement for included procedures has steadily decreased from 2000 to 2020. Increased awareness and consideration of these trends will be important for policy makers, hospitals, and surgeons to assure continued access to meaningful surgical orthopaedic trauma care in the United States.

Case: An 65-year-old immunocompetent female developed a Leclercia adecarboxylata infection following the repair of closed olecranon fracture. L. adecarboxylata is associated with polymicrobial infections, infections in immunocompromised patients and penetrating or open wounds. Following speciation, intravenous ceftriaxone was started. Two weeks later, the patient presented with leukopenia and neutropenia. Per infectious disease recommendations, the patient was switched to intravenous ertapenem with resolution of both infection and neutropenia. The olecranon fracture went on to heal fully. Conclusions: This case describes a rare postoperative monomicrobial infection with L. adecarboxylata in an immunocompetent host following musculoskeletal trauma and identifies L. adecarboxylata as a potential emerging hospital-acquired pathogen following orthopedic surgery.