Khanna, Ankur

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to identify the rate at which the anterolateral (AL) tibial plafond is affected in comminuted suprasyndesmotic ankle fractures (OTA/AO 44C2) and to assess how its involvement affects clinical outcomes. METHODS: Design: Retrospective review. Setting: Level 1 Trauma Center. Patient Selection Criteria: Patients with a preoperative computed tomography treated surgically for OTA/AO 44C2 fractures from January 2005 to December 2021. Outcome Measures and Comparisons: The primary outcome measure was the prevalence of AL plafond impaction or a displaced Tillaux-Chaput fracture. Secondary outcome measures included reoperation rate (excluding hardware removal), rate of new-onset ankle osteoarthritis, rate of ankle osteoarthritis progression, Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation score, and the Olerud Molander Ankle Score. RESULTS: Fifty-three patients met inclusion criteria. The average age was 50 years (range 18–100), and 53% were female. The AL plafond was involved in 26 patients (49%), with AL plafond impaction in 11 patients (21%) and a displaced Tillaux-Chaput fragment in 15 patients (28%). Five patients (19%) received independent fixation of the AL plafond, and 3 of these patients had AL plafond impaction addressed. Thirty-eight patients (72%) had clinical follow-up of at least 6 months. Patients with AL plafond impaction had a higher rate of reoperation (excluding hardware removal) compared with those without any AL plafond involvement (hazard of reoperation = 8.3, 95% confidence interval, 1.4–15.3, P = 0.022) and a higher rate of new-onset ankle osteoarthritis (83% vs. 23%, P = 0.013). There was no difference in the rate of reoperation (11% vs. 9%, P = 0.748) or new-onset osteoarthritis (63% vs. 23%, P = 0.078) when comparing those with a displaced Tillaux-Chaput fracture to those without AL plafond involvement. There were no differences in Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation (75% vs. 78% vs. 85%, P = 0.661) or Olerud Molander Ankle Score (70 points vs. 69 points vs. 81 points, P = 0.517) scores when comparing those with AL plafond impaction, those with Tillaux-Chaput fragments, and those with no AL plafond involvement. CONCLUSIONS: Computed tomography evaluation is recommended in patients with comminuted suprasyndesmotic fibula fractures (OTA/AO 44C2) given their high association with AL plafond impaction and Tillaux-Chaput fracture. Patients with AL plafond impaction have a higher reoperation rate and new-onset ankle osteoarthritis compared with those without AL plafond involvement. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Prognostic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Fixation of olecranon fractures, especially those with minimal proximal bone and those that present with significant comminution, can be technically challenging. Current open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) methods, such as tension band wire (TBW) constructs, plate fixation (PF), and intramedullary screws (IMSF), have demonstrated high rates of reoperation and symptomatic implants. We present the omega plate technique, which utilizes a mini-fragment plate passed under the triceps tendon insertion, allowing maximal implant surface area contact with small, proximal olecranon fracture fragments. The mini-fragment plate is not placed on the dorsal subcutaneous border of the ulna, which allows it to capture medial and lateral fragments of cortical comminution and may contribute to less soft tissue irritation.

OBJECTIVES: To compare three fluoroscopic methods for determining femoral rotation. METHODS: Native femoral version was measured by computed tomography in 20 intact femurs from 10 cadaveric specimens. Two Steinmann pins were placed into each left femur above and below a planned transverse osteotomy which was completed through the diaphysis. Four surgeons utilized the true lateral (TL), neck-horizontal angle (NH), and lesser trochanter profile (LTP) techniques to correct the injured femur's rotation using the intact right femur as reference, yielding 120 measurements. Accuracy was assessed by comparing the angle subtended by the two Steinmann pins before and after manipulation and comparing against version measurements of the right femur. RESULTS: Absolute mean rotational error in the fractured femur compared to its uninjured state was 6.0° (95% CI, 4.6-7.5), 6.6° (95% CI, 5.0-8.2), and 8.5° (95% CI, 6.5-10.6) for the TL, NH, and LTP techniques, respectively, without significant difference between techniques (p = 0.100). Compared to the right femur, absolute mean rotational error was 6.6° (95% CI, 1.0-12.2), 6.4° (95% CI, 0.1-12.6), and 8.9° (95% CI, 0.8-17.0) for the TL, NH, and LTP techniques, respectively, without significant difference (p = 0.180). Significantly more femurs were malrotated by >15° using the LTP method compared to the TL and NH methods (20.0% vs 2.5% and 5.0%, p = 0.030). Absolute mean error in estimating femoral rotation of the intact femur using the TL and NH methods compared to CT was 6.6° (95% confidence interval [CI], 5.1-8.2) and 4.4° (95% CI, 3.4-5.4), respectively, with significant difference between the two methods (p = 0.020). CONCLUSIONS: The true lateral (TL), neck-horizontal angle (NH), and the lesser trochanter profile (LTP) techniques performed similarly in correcting rotation of the fractured femur, but significantly more femurs were malrotated by >15° using the LTP technique. This supports preferential use of the TL or NH methods for determining femoral version intraoperatively.